18th-century Britain, 1714–1815 - United Kingdom - Britannica

Ask the Chatbot Games & Quizzes History & Society Science & Tech Biographies Animals & Nature Geography & Travel Arts & Culture ProCon Money Videos United Kingdom

• Introduction & Quick Facts
• Land
  • Relief
    • The highland zone
    • The lowland zone
  • Drainage
  • Soils
  • Climate
  • Plant and animal life
• People
  • Ethnic groups
  • Languages
  • Religion
  • Settlement patterns
    • Rural settlement
    • Urban settlement
  • Demographic trends
    • Population growth
    • Migration patterns
• Economy
  • Agriculture, forestry, and fishing
    • Agriculture
    • Forestry
    • Fishing
  • Resources and power
    • Minerals
    • Energy
  • Manufacturing
  • Finance
  • Trade
  • Services
  • Labour and taxation
  • Transportation and telecommunications
• Government and society
  • Constitutional framework
  • Regional government
  • Local government
  • Justice
  • Political process
  • Security
  • Health and welfare
    • The National Health Service
    • Cash benefits
  • Housing
  • Education
    • Primary and secondary education
    • Private schools
    • Higher education
• Cultural life
  • Daily life and social customs
  • The arts
  • Cultural institutions
  • Sports and recreation
  • Media and publishing
    • Newspapers
    • Broadcasting
• History
  • Ancient Britain
    • Pre-Roman Britain
      • Neolithic Period
      • Bronze Age
      • Iron Age
    • Roman Britain
      • The conquest
      • Condition of the province
        • Army and frontier
        • Administration
      • Roman society
        • Economy
        • Towns
        • Villas
        • Religion and culture
      • The decline of Roman rule
  • Anglo-Saxon England
    • The invaders and their early settlements
      • The social system
      • The conversion to Christianity
      • The golden age of Bede
    • The heptarchy
      • The supremacy of Northumbria and the rise of Mercia
      • The great age of Mercia
      • The church and scholarship in Offa’s time
      • The decline of Mercia and the rise of Wessex
    • The period of the Scandinavian invasions
      • Viking invasions and settlements
      • Alfred’s government and his revival of learning
    • The achievement of political unity
      • The reconquest of the Danelaw
      • The kingdom of England
      • The church and the monastic revival
    • The Anglo-Danish state
      • The Danish conquest and the reigns of the Danish kings
      • The reign of Edward the Confessor and the Norman Conquest
  • The Normans (1066–1154)
    • William I (1066–87)
      • Resistance and rebellion
      • The introduction of feudalism
      • Government and justice
      • Church–state relations
      • William’s accomplishments
    • The sons of William I
      • William II Rufus (1087–1100)
      • Henry I (1100–35)
    • The period of anarchy (1135–54)
      • Matilda and Stephen
      • Civil war
    • England in the Norman period
  • The early Plantagenets
    • Henry II (1154–89)
      • Government of England
      • Struggle with Thomas Becket
      • Rebellion of Henry’s sons and Eleanor of Aquitaine
    • Richard I (1189–99)
    • John (1199–1216)
      • Loss of French possessions
      • Struggle with the papacy
      • Revolt of the barons and Magna Carta
      • Economy and society
  • The 13th century
    • Henry III (1216–72)
      • Minority
      • Early reign
      • The county communities
      • Simon de Montfort and the Barons’ War
      • Later reign
    • Edward I (1272–1307)
      • Law and government
      • Finance
      • The growth of Parliament
      • Edward’s wars
      • Domestic difficulties
    • Social, economic, and cultural change
  • The 14th century
    • Edward II (1307–27)
    • Edward III (1327–77)
      • The Hundred Years’ War to 1360
      • Domestic achievements
      • Law and order
      • The crises of Edward’s later years
    • Richard II (1377–99)
      • The Peasants’ Revolt (1381)
      • John Wycliffe
      • Political struggles and Richard’s deposition
    • Economic crisis and cultural change
  • Lancaster and York
    • Henry IV (1399–1413)
      • The rebellions
      • Henry and Parliament
    • Henry V (1413–22)
      • The French war
      • Domestic affairs
    • Henry VI (1422–61 and 1470–71)
      • Domestic rivalries and the loss of France
      • Cade’s rebellion
      • The beginning of the Wars of the Roses
    • Edward IV (1461–70 and 1471–83)
    • Richard III (1483–85)
    • England in the 15th century
  • England under the Tudors
    • Henry VII (1485–1509)
      • Economy and society
      • Dynastic threats
      • Financial policy
      • The administration of justice
    • Henry VIII (1509–47)
      • Cardinal Wolsey
      • The king’s “Great Matter”
      • The Reformation background
      • The break with Rome
      • The consolidation of the Reformation
      • The expansion of the English state
      • Henry’s last years
    • Edward VI (1547–53)
    • Mary I (1553–58)
    • Elizabeth I (1558–1603)
      • The Tudor ideal of government
      • Elizabethan society
      • Mary, Queen of Scots
      • The clash with Spain
      • Internal discontent
  • The early Stuarts and the Commonwealth
    • England in 1603
      • Economy and society
      • Government and society
    • James I (1603–25)
      • Triple monarchy
      • Religious policy
      • Finance and politics
      • Factions and favourites
    • Charles I (1625–49)
      • The politics of war
      • Peace and reform
      • Religious reform
      • The Long Parliament
      • Civil war and revolution
      • Commonwealth and Protectorate
  • The later Stuarts
    • Charles II (1660–85)
      • The Restoration
      • War and government
      • The Popish Plot
      • The exclusion crisis and the Tory reaction
    • James II (1685–88)
      • Church and king
      • The Revolution of 1688
    • William III (1689–1702) and Mary II (1689–94)
      • The revolution settlement
      • A new society
      • The sinews of war
    • Anne (1702–14)
      • Whigs and Tories
      • Tories and Jacobites
  • 18th-century Britain, 1714–1815
    • The state of Britain in 1714
    • Britain from 1715 to 1742
      • The supremacy of the Whigs
      • Robert Walpole
        • George II and Walpole
        • Foreign policy
        • Religious policy
        • Economic policies
      • The electoral system
      • Walpole’s loss of power
    • Britain from 1742 to 1754
      • The Jacobite rebellion
      • The rule of the Pelhams
      • Domestic reforms
    • British society by the mid-18th century
      • Joseph Massie’s categories
      • Urban development
      • Change and continuity
      • The revolution in communications
    • Britain from 1754 to 1783
      • Conflict abroad
      • Political instability in Britain
      • The American Revolution
      • Domestic responses to the American Revolution
    • Britain from 1783 to 1815
      • William Pitt the Younger
      • Economic growth and prosperity
      • The Industrial Revolution
      • Britain during the French Revolution
      • The Napoleonic Wars
      • Imperial expansion
  • Great Britain, 1815–1914
    • Britain after the Napoleonic Wars
      • State and society
      • The political situation
    • Early and mid-Victorian Britain
      • State and society
      • The political situation
        • Whig reforms
        • Chartism and the Anti-Corn Law League
        • Peel and the Peelite heritage
        • Palmerston
        • Gladstone and Disraeli
      • Economy and society
      • Cultural change
        • The development of private life
        • Religion
        • Leisure
    • Late Victorian Britain
      • State and society
      • The political situation
        • Gladstone and Chamberlain
        • The Irish question
        • Split of the Liberal Party
        • Imperialism and British politics
        • The return of the Liberals
        • The international crisis
      • Economy and society
      • Family and gender
      • Mass culture
  • Britain from 1914 to the present
    • The political situation
      • World War I
        • The Asquith coalition
        • Lloyd George
      • Between the wars
        • The election of 1918
        • Harsh peace and hard times
        • Ireland and the return of the Conservatives
        • The Baldwin era
        • Baldwin and the abdication crisis
        • Foreign policy and appeasement
      • World War II
        • The phases of war
        • Political developments
      • Britain since 1945
        • Labour and the welfare state (1945–51)
        • Economic crisis and relief (1947)
        • Withdrawal from the empire
        • Conservative government (1951–64)
        • Labour interlude (1964–70)
        • The return of the Conservatives (1970–74)
        • Labour back in power (1974–79)
        • The Margaret Thatcher government (1979–90)
          • The Falkland Islands War, the 1983 election, and privatization
          • Racial discrimination and the 1981 England riots
          • The 2001 England riots
          • The “Troubles” in Northern Ireland
          • “Thatcherism”
        • The government of John Major (1990–97)
          • “Black Wednesday,” epidemic scandals, and Major’s “Citizens Charter”
          • “Mad cow disease”
        • The Tony Blair government (1997–2007)
          • The struggle for control of Labour
          • New Labour, the repeal of Clause IV, and the “third way”
          • Navigating the European monetary system and the EU Social Chapter
          • The Good Friday Agreement
          • London’s local government, House of Lords reform, and devolution for Scotland and Wales
          • The royal family’s “annus horribilis,” the death of Princess Diana, and the Millennium Dome
          • The battle for the soul of the Conservative Party
          • Response to the September 11 attacks
          • Weapons of mass destruction and the Iraq War
        • The Gordon Brown government (2007–10)
        • Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition rule (2010–15)
          • The U.K. general election of 2010
          • First-past-the-post referendum
          • Intervention in Libya
          • News of the World hacking scandal
          • The 2011 riots, the European sovereign debt crisis, and Cameron’s veto of changes to the Lisbon Treaty
          • The 2012 London Olympics, Julian Assange’s embassy refuge, and the emergence of UKIP
          • The birth of George, rejection of intervention in Syria, and regulation of GCHQ
          • Euroskepticism
          • Scottish independence referendum
          • Economic recovery
        • David Cameron on his own (2015–16)
          • The U.K. general election of 2015
          • The “Brexit” referendum
        • The premiership of Theresa May (2016–19)
          • The resignation of Cameron, the rise of May, and a challenge to Corbyn’s leadership of Labour
          • Triggering Article 50
          • The Manchester arena bombing and London bridge attacks
          • The snap election campaign
          • The 2017 U.K. general election
          • The Grenfell Tower fire, a novichok attack in Salisbury, and air strikes on Syria
          • The wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, the Chequers plan, and Boris Johnson’s resignation
          • EU agreement and Parliamentary opposition to May’s Brexit plan
          • Objections to the Irish backstop and a challenge to May’s leadership
          • Parliamentary rejection of May’s plan, May’s survival of a confidence vote, and the Independent Group of breakaway MPs
          • Parliament rejects May’s plan again
          • “Indicative votes,” May’s pledge to resign, a third defeat for her plan, and a new deadline
        • The Boris Johnson government
          • Boris Johnson’s ascent, the December 2019 snap election, and Brexit
          • The coronavirus pandemic
          • “Partygate”
          • Further scandal and Johnson’s resignation
        • The premiership of Liz Truss
          • Ascent to office
          • The death of Elizabeth II
          • Abrupt resignation
        • The premiership of Rishi Sunak
    • Society, state, and economy
      • State and society
      • Economy and society
      • Family and gender
      • Mass culture
• Sovereigns of Britain
• Prime ministers of Great Britain and the United Kingdom

References & Edit History Facts & Stats Images, Videos & Interactives At a Glance United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland summary Quizzes The Country Quiz Which Country Is Larger By Area? Quiz Which Country Is Larger By Population? Quiz Fit for a King (or Queen): the British Royalty Quiz A Royal Vocabulary Quiz Related Questions

• What is Charles Darwin famous for?
• What is evolution, as Charles Darwin understood it?
• What was Charles Darwin’s educational background?
• What was Charles Darwin’s family life like?
• What were the social impacts of Charles Darwin’s work?

Contents Geography & Travel Countries of the World print Print Please select which sections you would like to print:

• Table Of Contents

CITE verifiedCite While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions. Select Citation Style MLA APA Chicago Manual of Style Copy Citation Share Share Share to social media Facebook X URL https://www.britannica.com/place/United-Kingdom Feedback External Websites Feedback Corrections? Updates? Omissions? Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login). Feedback Type Select a type (Required) Factual Correction Spelling/Grammar Correction Link Correction Additional Information Other Your Feedback Submit Feedback Thank you for your feedback

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

External Websites

• CRW Flags - Flag of United Kingdom
• Central Intelligence Agency - The World Factbook - United Kingdom

Britannica Websites Articles from Britannica Encyclopedias for elementary and high school students.

• United Kingdom - Children's Encyclopedia (Ages 8-11)
• United Kingdom - Student Encyclopedia (Ages 11 and up)

18th-century Britain, 1714–1815

in United Kingdom in History Ask Anything Homework Help Also known as: Britain, Great Britain, U.K., United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland(Show More) Written by Ralph Charles Atkins Staff reporter, Financial Times, London. Ralph Charles AtkinsAll Fact-checked by Britannica Editors Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree.... Britannica Editors Last updated Mar. 9, 2026 •History Britannica AI Ask Anything Table of Contents Table of Contents Ask Anything

The state of Britain in 1714

When Georg Ludwig, elector of Hanover, became king of Great Britain on August 1, 1714, the country was in some respects bitterly divided. Fundamentally, however, it was prosperous, cohesive, and already a leading European and imperial power. Abroad, Britain’s involvement in the War of the Spanish Succession had been brought to a satisfactory conclusion by the Treaty of Utrecht (1713). It had acquired new colonies in Gibraltar, Minorca, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland, and Hudson’s Bay, as well as trading concessions in the Spanish New World. By contrast, Britain’s rivals, France, Spain, and the Dutch Republic, were left weakened or war-weary by the conflict. It took France a decade to recover, and Spain and Holland were unable to reverse their military and economic decline. As a result Britain was able to remain aloof from war on the Continent for a quarter of a century after the Hanoverian succession, and this protracted peace was to be crucial to the new dynasty’s survival and success.

News •

Glasgow building fire closes Scotland's busiest train station and disrupts rail services • Mar. 9, 2026, 10:31 AM ET (AP) ...(Show more) Finnish pair wins a barrel of ale in annual 'wife-carrying' contest in England • Mar. 9, 2026, 9:13 AM ET (AP) Schwarber homers and Henderson gets 4 hits to lead United States over Britain 9-1 at WBC • Mar. 7, 2026, 11:46 PM ET (AP) German media group Axel Springer will buy the publisher of UK's Daily Telegraph for $766 million • Mar. 6, 2026, 11:37 AM ET (AP) Hong Kong ex-media mogul Jimmy Lai will not appeal national security conviction, legal team says • Mar. 6, 2026, 8:55 AM ET (AP) Show less

War had also strengthened the British state at home. The need to raise men and money had increased the size and scope of the executive as well as the power and prestige of the House of Commons. Taxation had accounted for 70 percent of Britain’s wartime expenditure (£93,644,560 between 1702 and 1713), so the Commons’ control over taxation became a powerful guarantee of its continuing importance.

Britain’s ability to pay for war on this scale demonstrated the extent of its wealth. Agriculture was still the bedrock of the economy, but trade was increasing, and more men and women were employed in industry in Britain than in any other European nation. Wealth, however, was unequally distributed, with almost a third of the national income belonging to only 5 percent of the population. But British society was not polarized simply between the rich and the poor; according to writer Daniel Defoe there were seven different and more subtle categories:

1. The great, who live profusely.

2. The rich, who live plentifully.

3. The middle sort, who live well.

4. The working trades, who labour hard, but feel no want.

5. The country people, farmers etc., who fare indifferently.

6. The poor, who fare hard.

7. The miserable, that really pinch and suffer want.

From 1700 to the 1740s Britain’s population remained stable at about seven million, and agricultural production increased. So, although men and women from Defoe’s 6th and 7th categories could still die of hunger and hunger-related diseases, in most regions of Britain there was usually enough basic food to go around. This was crucial to social stability and to popular acquiescence in the new Hanoverian regime.

But early 18th-century Britain also had its weaknesses. Its Celtic fringe—Wales, Ireland, and Scotland—had been barely assimilated. The vast majority of Welsh men and women could neither speak nor understand the English language. Most Irish men and women spoke Gaelic and belonged to the Roman Catholic church, in contrast with the population of the British mainland, which was staunchly Protestant. Scotland, which had only been united to England and Wales in 1707, still retained its traditional educational, religious, legal, and cultural practices. These internal divisions were made more dangerous by the existence of rival claimants to the British throne. James II, who had been expelled in the Glorious Revolution of 1688, died 13 years later, but his son, James Francis Edward Stuart, the Old Pretender, pressed his family’s claims from his exile in France. His Catholicism and Scottish ancestry ensured him wide support in Ireland and the Scottish Highlands; his cause also commanded sympathy among sections of the Welsh and English gentry and, arguably, among the masses.

Controversy over the succession sharpened partisan infighting between the Whig and Tory parties. About 50 Tory MPs (less than a seventh of the total number) may have been covert Jacobites in 1714. More generally, Tories differed from Whigs over religious issues and foreign policy. They were more anxious to preserve the privileges of the Anglican church and more hostile to military involvement in continental Europe than Whig politicians were inclined to be. These attitudes made the Tories vulnerable in 1714. The new king was a Lutheran by upbringing and wanted to establish wider religious toleration in his new kingdom. As a German he was deeply interested in European affairs. Consequently he regarded the Tory party as insular in its outlook as well as suspect in its allegiance.

Britain from 1715 to 1742

The supremacy of the Whigs

Even before he arrived in Britain, George I had decided to exclude the two leading Tory ministers, Robert Harley, earl of Oxford, and Henry St. John, Viscount Bolingbroke. In their place he appointed two Whig politicians, Charles, Viscount Townshend, and James, Viscount Stanhope, as secretaries of state. Townshend’s brother-in-law, Robert Walpole, became paymaster general. Walpole, who came from a minor Norfolk gentry family, was an extremely able politician, shrewd, greedy, and undeviatingly Whig. He encouraged the new king’s partisan bias, turning it unremittingly to his advantage. A general election was held in February 1715, and, due in part to royal influence, the Whigs won 341 seats to the Tories’ 217. In December the Old Pretender landed in Scotland, provoking an armed rebellion that was quickly suppressed. The proved involvement of a small number of Tory landowners led to Tories being purged not only from state office but also from the higher ranks of the army and navy, the diplomatic service, and the judicial system. To make their capture of the state even more secure, the Whigs passed the Septennial Act in 1716. It allowed general elections to occur at seven-year intervals instead of every three years, as mandated by the Triennial Act of 1694. The intention was to tame the electorate, which during Anne’s reign had shown itself to be volatile and far more inclined to vote Tory than Whig.

Having defeated their Tory opponents, the Whig leaders began to quarrel among themselves. In 1717 Walpole and Townshend left office and went into open opposition. Stanhope stayed on, with Charles Spencer, earl of Sunderland, now serving as secretary of state. At the same time the heir apparent to the throne, George, prince of Wales, quarreled with his father and began to flirt with Opposition groups in Parliament. These events set the pattern for future political conflicts. From then on until the 1750s the Opposition in Parliament would be a hybrid group of Whig and Tory sympathizers. And from then on until the early 19th century Oppositions in Parliament would enjoy sporadic support from successive princes of Wales. In 1717 the rebel Whigs were a serious threat in large part because Walpole was such a skillful House-of-Commons politician. As peers, Sunderland and Stanhope were confined to the House of Lords and lacked spokesmen in the Commons who could match Walpole’s ruthlessness and talent. He showed his power by mobilizing a majority of MPs against the Peerage Bill in 1719. Had this legislation passed, it would have limited the king’s prerogative to create new peers, thereby cementing the Whig administration’s majority in the House of Lords. To prevent further blows of this kind, the Whig elite ended its schism in April 1720. The royal family temporarily buried its differences at the same time.

The restoration of unity was just as well, as 1720 saw the bursting of what became known as the South Sea Bubble. The South Sea Company had been founded in 1711 as a trading and finance company. In 1719 its directors offered to take over a large portion of the national debt previously managed by the Bank of England. The Whig administration supported this takeover, and in return the company made gifts (in effect, bribes) of its new stock to influential Whig politicians, including Stanhope and Sunderland, and to the king’s mistress, the Duchess of Kendal. In 1720 investing in the South Sea Company became a mania among those who could afford it and some who could not; South Sea stock was at 120 in January and rose to 1,000 by August. But in September the inevitable crash came. Many landed and mercantile families were ruined, and there was a nationwide shortage of specie. Parliament demanded an inquiry, thus raising the possibility that members of the government and the royal family would be openly implicated in financial scandal. This disaster proved to be Walpole’s opportunity, and he did not waste it. He used his influence in the Commons to blunt the parliamentary inquiry and managed gradually to restore financial confidence. The strain of the investigation killed Stanhope, and Sunderland too died in 1722. Walpole duly became first lord of the treasury and chancellor of exchequer, while Townshend returned to his post as secretary of state.

Walpole’s position as the king’s favourite minister was finally assured when he exposed the Atterbury plot. Francis Atterbury was bishop of Rochester. Always a Tory and High Churchman, he drifted after the Hanoverian succession into Jacobite intrigue. In 1721–22 he and a small group of conspirators plotted an armed invasion of Britain on behalf of the Old Pretender. The plot was uncovered by the secret service, which was more efficient in this period than it was until World War II. Atterbury was tried for treason by Parliament and sent into exile. This coup, one politician aptly wrote at the time, was the “most fortunate and greatest circumstance of Mr Walpole’s life. It fixed him with the King, and united for a time the whole body of Whigs to him, and gave him the universal credit of an able and vigilant Minister.”

Robert Walpole

Walpole has often been referred to as Britain’s first prime minister, but historically this is incorrect. The title had in fact been applied to certain ministers in Anne’s reign and was commonly used as a slur or simply as a synonym for first minister. During Walpole’s period of dominance it was certainly used more frequently, but it did not become an official title until the early 20th century. Some historians have also claimed that Walpole was the architect of political stability in Britain, but this interpretation needs to be qualified. There is no doubt that from 1722 to his resignation in 1742 Walpole stabilized political power in himself and a section of the Whig party. Nor can there be any doubt that his foreign and economic policies helped the Hanoverian dynasty to become securely entrenched in Britain. But it should not be forgotten that Walpole inherited a nation that was already wealthy and at peace. He built on foundations that were already very strong. And, although he was to dominate political life for 20 years, he never succeeded in stamping out political, religious, and cultural opposition entirely, nor did he expect to do so.

Opposition to Walpole in Parliament began to develop as early as 1725. When William Pulteney, an ambitious and talented politician, was dismissed from state office, he and 17 other Whig MPs aligned themselves with the 150 Tory MPs remaining in the House of Commons. These dissidents (who called themselves Patriot Whigs) grew in number until, by the mid-1730s, more than 100 Whig MPs were collaborating with the Tories against Walpole’s nominally Whig administration. Some were motivated primarily by disappointed ambition. But many Whigs and Tories genuinely believed that Walpole had arrogated too much power to himself and that he was corrupt and an enemy to liberty. These accusations were expressed not just among politicians in London but also in the growing number of newspapers and periodicals in Britain at large. In 1726 Pulteney and the one-time Tory minister Lord Bolingbroke founded their own journal, The Craftsman (the implication of the title being that Walpole governed by craft alone). It was widely read among the political classes, not least because many of the most gifted writers working in London had been drawn into the Opposition camp. Jonathan Swift, Alexander Pope, and, for a time, Henry Fielding all wrote against Walpole. So did John Gay, whose triumphantly successful The Beggar’s Opera (1728) was a satire on ministerial corruption.

But, despite its flamboyance and innovative tactics, the Opposition for a long time lacked high-level support. Frequent disagreements occurred between its Patriot Whig and Tory sectors. These weaknesses helped Walpole to keep the Opposition at bay until 1742. But there were other reasons for his prolonged stay in power: he retained the support of the crown, resisted military involvement in Europe, pursued a moderate religious policy, and adopted a skillful economic policy. Moreover, in the general elections of 1727 and 1734 he was able to manipulate the electoral system to maintain himself in power.

George II and Walpole

George I died in June 1727 and was buried in Hanover. He was succeeded by his eldest son, who became George II. Initially the new king planned to dismiss Walpole and appoint his personal favourite, Spencer Compton, in his place. Closer familiarity with Walpole’s gifts, however, dissuaded him from taking this step, as did his formidable wife, Queen Caroline, who remained an important ally of the minister until her death in 1737. Walpole cemented his advantage by securing the king a Civil List (money allowance) from Parliament of £800,000, a considerably larger sum than previous monarchs had been able to enjoy. Royal favour, in turn, shored up Walpole’s parliamentary majority. Because the monarch appointed and promoted peers, he had massive influence in the House of Lords. In addition, he appointed the 26 bishops of the Church of England, who also possessed seats in the House of Lords. He alone could promote men to high office in the army, navy, diplomatic service, and bureaucracy. Consequently, MPs who held such offices (the so-called placemen), and those who wanted to hold them in the future, were likely to support Walpole as the king’s minister out of self-interest, if for no other reason. Walpole, however, could never take royal support for granted. George II was an irritable but by no means an insignificant figure who retained great influence in terms of patronage, military affairs, and foreign policy. He demanded respect from his minister and had to be carefully managed.

Foreign policy

Once the Hanoverian succession had taken place, Whig ministers became as eager to remain at peace with France as the Tories had been. Walpole certainly adhered to this view, and for good reasons. Although Britain now possessed the world’s most powerful navy, it could not match France in land forces. War with France, moreover, was likely to lead to an invasion of Hanover, which was naturally unwelcome to George I and his successor. It would also give the Old Pretender the prospect of French military aid to launch an invasion against Britain itself. In 1717 Stanhope negotiated a Triple Alliance with the French and the Dutch. This treaty was maintained by Walpole and Townshend throughout the 1720s. By 1730, however, it was attracting considerable criticism from the Opposition, and in the Second Treaty of Vienna, signed in March 1731, Walpole jettisoned the Anglo-French alliance in favour of an alliance with Austria. But whether forming an alliance with the French or the Austrians, Walpole always considered it his primary aim to keep Britain out of war in continental Europe. In 1733 Austria, Saxony, and Russia went to war against France, Spain, and Sardinia in the War of the Polish Succession (1733–38). The Austrians asked for British aid under the terms of the Treaty of Vienna, but Walpole refused to give it. By keeping out of European entanglements for so long, Walpole appeased some of the traditionally insular Tory MPs. He also kept direct taxation low, which pleased many landed families. The land tax was cut to two shillings in the pound (10 percent) in 1730 and to one shilling in the pound two years later.

Religious policy

Walpole’s religious policy was also designed to foster social and political quiescence. Traditionally the Whig party had supported wider concessions to the Protestant dissenters (Protestants who believed in the doctrine of the Trinity but who refused to join in the worship of the state church, the Church of England). They had been given freedom of worship under the Toleration Act of 1689 but were barred from full civil rights and access to university education in England. In 1719 the Whigs had repealed two pieces of Tory legislation aimed against dissent, the Schism and the Occasional Conformity acts. These concessions ensured that Protestant dissenters would be able to establish their own educational academies and hold public office in the localities, if not in the state.

There was always a danger, however, that too many concessions to Protestant dissent would alienate the Church of England, which enjoyed wide support in England and Wales. There were 5,000 parishes in these two countries, each containing at least one church served by a vicar (minister) or a curate (his deputy). For much of the 18th century these Anglican churches provided the only large, covered meeting places available outside of towns. They served as sources of spiritual comfort and also as centres for village social life. At religious services vicars would not only preach the word of God but also explain to congregations important national developments: wars, victories, and royal deaths and births. Thus churches often supplied the poor, the illiterate, and particularly women with the only political information available to them. Weakening the Church of England therefore struck Walpole as unwise, for at least two reasons. Its ministers provided a vital service to the state by communicating political instruction to the people. The church, moreover, commanded massive popular loyalty, and assaults on its position would arouse nationwide discontent. Walpole therefore determined to reach an accommodation with the church, and in 1723 he came to an agreement with Edmund Gibson, Bishop of London. Gibson was to ensure that only clergymen sympathetic to the Whig administration were appointed to influential positions in the Church of England. In return, Walpole undertook that no further extensive concessions would be made to Protestant dissenters. This arrangement continued until 1736.

Economic policies

Finally, Walpole’s long tenure of power was assisted by national prosperity. The gross national product rose from £57.5 million in 1720 to £64.1 million in 1740, an increase of 11.5 percent. Walpole encouraged trade by abolishing some customs duties, but his main economic concerns were to reduce interest payments on the national debt and to foster agriculture by switching taxation from land to consumption. He succeeded in reducing interest payments on the debt by 26 percent during his time in office, but his efforts to reduce the land tax in favour of more excises almost led to political disaster. In 1732 he revived a duty on salt, which enabled him to cut the land tax to one shilling in the pound. In 1733 he proposed to levy excise taxes on the sale of wine and tobacco, but the Opposition in Parliament launched a ferocious and successful campaign against these proposals. It claimed that excises weighed unfairly on the poor, whereas the land tax was mainly paid by the prosperous. It claimed, too, that excise collectors, and there were more than 6,000 of them employed by the state by this time, intruded into citizens’ private affairs and were a danger to British liberties. This crisis led to nationwide riots and demonstrations, and Walpole’s House-of-Commons majority seemed in jeopardy. In April 1733 he decided to retreat. He continued, however, until 1740 to keep the land tax at a low rate, thereby winning important support from the nation’s dominant landed class.

The electoral system

The fiasco over the excise might have toppled Walpole, since a general election was scheduled for 1734. In fact, however, his administration retained a comfortable majority in the House of Commons. One reason for this was that Britain’s electoral system at this time did not adequately reflect the state of public opinion. Until the Reform Act of 1832 England returned 489 MPs. Eighty of these were elected by the 40 county constituencies; 196 smaller constituencies called boroughs returned two MPs each, and two other boroughs, including London, the capital city, returned four MPs each. Oxford and Cambridge universities were also allowed four representatives in Parliament. Wales returned only 24 members of Parliament and Scotland 45. Their limited representation indicated the extent to which these countries were subordinated to England in the British political system at this time.

The system was not even remotely democratic. Power in this society was intimately and inextricably connected with the possession of property, particularly landed property. To be eligible for election as an MP, a man had to possess land worth £600 per annum if he was representing a county constituency and worth £300 per annum in the case of a borough constituency. To vote, adult males had to possess some kind of residential property or, in certain borough constituencies, be registered as freemen. Women were not given the vote until 1918.

In all, some 350,000 Britons may have been able to vote in the 1720s, which was roughly one in four of the adult male population. There was no secret ballot, and voting took place in public. Consequently, many voters were liable to be influenced or coerced by their landlords or employers or bribed by the candidates themselves. Bribery was particularly widespread and effective in the smaller boroughs where there were often fewer than 100 voters and sometimes fewer than 50. These constituencies were called rotten or pocket boroughs. In the borough of Malmesbury, for example, in the English county of Wiltshire, there were only 13 voters, few of whom voted strictly in accordance with their own conscience or opinions: “It was no odds to them who they voted for,” one inhabitant declared, “it was as master pleased.” Large electorates could be found, however, in some areas. The northern English county constituency of Yorkshire had 15,000 voters in 1741. In Bristol, a major port on the western coast of England, 5,000 men had the vote—approximately one-third of the city’s adult male population. In these larger constituencies public opinion could make itself felt at election time. The problem for the Opposition in 1734 was that there were few such populous, open constituencies but very many rotten borough seats such as Malmesbury. Since government candidates usually had more to bribe voters with in the way of money and favours, Walpole was able to win the majority of these boroughs and therefore retain his majority in the House of Commons despite his unpopularity after the excise crisis.