A Comparison Of State-of-the-Art Classification ... - Neil Lawrence

edit

MENU

Back to publications

A Comparison of State-of-the-Art Classification Techniques with Application to Cytogenetics Boaz Lerner, Neil D. Lawrence Neural Computing and Applications, 10(1):39-47, 2001.

Abstract

Several state-of-the-art techniques: a neural network, Bayesian neural network, support vector machine and naive Bayesian classifier are experimentally evaluated in discriminating fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) signals. Highly accurate classification of signals from real data and artefacts of two cytogenetic probes (colours) is required for detecting abnormalities in the data. More than 3,100 FISH signals are classified by the techniques into colour and as real or artefact with accuracies of around 98% and 88%, respectively. The results of the comparison also show a trade-off between simplicity represented by the naive Bayesian classifier and high classification performance represented by the other techniques.

Links

Download PDF Edit this information on GitHub

Cite this Paper

BibTeX @Article{Lerner-comparison01, title = {A Comparison of State-of-the-Art Classification Techniques with Application to Cytogenetics}, author = {Lerner, Boaz and Lawrence, Neil D.}, journal = {Neural Computing and Applications}, pages = {39--47}, year = {2001}, volume = {10}, number = {1}, pdf = {https://lawrennd.github.io/publications/files/comparison.pdf}, url = {/publications/lerner-comparison01.html}, abstract = {Several state-of-the-art techniques: a neural network, Bayesian neural network, support vector machine and naive Bayesian classifier are experimentally evaluated in discriminating fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) signals. Highly accurate classification of signals from real data and artefacts of two cytogenetic probes (colours) is required for detecting abnormalities in the data. More than 3,100 FISH signals are classified by the techniques into colour and as real or artefact with accuracies of around 98% and 88%, respectively. The results of the comparison also show a trade-off between simplicity represented by the naive Bayesian classifier and high classification performance represented by the other techniques.} } Copy to Clipboard Download Endnote %0 Journal Article %T A Comparison of State-of-the-Art Classification Techniques with Application to Cytogenetics %A Boaz Lerner %A Neil D. Lawrence %J Neural Computing and Applications %D 2001 %F Lerner-comparison01 %P 39--47 %U /publications/lerner-comparison01.html %V 10 %N 1 %X Several state-of-the-art techniques: a neural network, Bayesian neural network, support vector machine and naive Bayesian classifier are experimentally evaluated in discriminating fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) signals. Highly accurate classification of signals from real data and artefacts of two cytogenetic probes (colours) is required for detecting abnormalities in the data. More than 3,100 FISH signals are classified by the techniques into colour and as real or artefact with accuracies of around 98% and 88%, respectively. The results of the comparison also show a trade-off between simplicity represented by the naive Bayesian classifier and high classification performance represented by the other techniques. Copy to Clipboard Download RIS TY - JOUR TI - A Comparison of State-of-the-Art Classification Techniques with Application to Cytogenetics AU - Boaz Lerner AU - Neil D. Lawrence DA - 2001/04/01 ID - Lerner-comparison01 VL - 10 IS - 1 SP - 39 EP - 47 L1 - https://lawrennd.github.io/publications/files/comparison.pdf UR - /publications/lerner-comparison01.html AB - Several state-of-the-art techniques: a neural network, Bayesian neural network, support vector machine and naive Bayesian classifier are experimentally evaluated in discriminating fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) signals. Highly accurate classification of signals from real data and artefacts of two cytogenetic probes (colours) is required for detecting abnormalities in the data. More than 3,100 FISH signals are classified by the techniques into colour and as real or artefact with accuracies of around 98% and 88%, respectively. The results of the comparison also show a trade-off between simplicity represented by the naive Bayesian classifier and high classification performance represented by the other techniques. ER - Copy to Clipboard Download APA Lerner, B. & Lawrence, N.D.. (2001). A Comparison of State-of-the-Art Classification Techniques with Application to Cytogenetics. Neural Computing and Applications 10(1):39-47 Available from /publications/lerner-comparison01.html. Copy to Clipboard Download This site last compiled Fri, 06 Dec 2024 20:39:33 +0000

Github Account

Copyright © Neil D. Lawrence 2024. All rights reserved.