Alcatel 1S (2020) Review - An Entry-level Smartphone With Strong ...
Maybe your like

Comparison devices
| Bewertung | Rating Version | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74.6 %v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 06 / 2020 | Alcatel 1S (2020)Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320 | 165 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.22" | 1520x720 | |
| 75.3 %v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 01 / 2020 | Huawei Y6sHelio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300 | 150 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.09" | 1560x720 | |
| 68.3 %v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2020 | Nokia 1.3SD 215, Adreno 308 | 155 g | 16 GB eMMC Flash | 5.71" | 1520x720 | |
| 74.8 %v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2020 | Motorola Moto E6sHelio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320 | 160 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.10" | 1560x720 |
Case, features and operation - Alcatel 1S with good voice quality
The Alcatel 1S (2020) isn't quite light in the comparison field with 165 grams, but this is due to the larger battery. The housing is completely made of plastic and has a clean finish. The camera is just 0.3 millimetres higher than the rest of the back and the smartphone leaves a stable impression.
The Micro USB 2.0 port is used to transfer data and charge the Alcatel 1S. The hybrid card slot can accept either two nano-SIM cards or instead of the second SIM a microSD card, which even supports the exFAT file system. The dedicated Google Assistant key cannot be assigned to any other key. There is no notification LED.
As operating system Android 10 is used with a slightly adapted UI, which also includes the so-called Smart Manager, in order to be able to better manage the system resources. TCL also preinstalls some third-party apps, which can be uninstalled.
In the mobile network, the Alcatel smartphone covers all important frequencies for Europe, only 5G has to be dispensed with and LTE is not particularly fast with Cat. 4. Only the 2.4 GHz network can be used in WLAN networks. However, in combination with our reference router Netgear Nighthawk AX12, the 1S is comparatively fast and runs at stable data rates.
In terms of telephony features, the Alcatel 1S convinces with good voice quality when held to the ear. The handsfree speaker picks up voices very clearly, unfortunately, a quite strong hall is also created. The suppression of noise is quite successful in everyday life. The smartphone supports VoLTE, but WLAN calling was not available to us.
The input elements of the 1S are convincing. The touch screen reacts reliably and has good sliding properties. Although the physical keys have a short stroke, the soft pressure point is still clearly defined. For biometric security, a fingerprint scanner and a 2D face recognition system are available, both of which perform their services as reliably as possible.



Size comparison
Alcatel 1S (2020) Huawei Y6s Motorola Moto E6s Nokia 1.3 DIN A6 ❌158.7 mm / 6.25 in 74.6 mm / 2.94 in 8.45 mm / 0.3327 in 165 g0.3638 lbs156.3 mm / 6.15 in 73.5 mm / 2.89 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 150 g0.3307 lbs155.6 mm / 6.13 in 73 mm / 2.87 in 8.5 mm / 0.3346 in 160 g0.3527 lbs147.3 mm / 5.8 in 71.2 mm / 2.8 in 9.35 mm / 0.3681 in 155 g0.3417 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Alcatel 1S (2020)802.11 b/g/n | 62.8 (58min - 66max) MBit/s |
| Huawei Y6s802.11 b/g/n | 55.8 (53min - 65max) MBit/s -11% |
| Nokia 1.3802.11 b/g/n | 52.2 (27min - 61max) MBit/s -17% |
| Motorola Moto E6s802.11 b/g/n | 35.4 (5min - 57max) MBit/s -44% |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Alcatel 1S (2020)802.11 b/g/n | 65.7 (60min - 70max) MBit/s |
| Huawei Y6s802.11 b/g/n | 58.3 (55min - 61max) MBit/s -11% |
| Nokia 1.3802.11 b/g/n | 50.8 (44min - 55max) MBit/s -23% |
| Motorola Moto E6s802.11 b/g/n | 43 (26min - 61max) MBit/s -35% |
Cameras - Triple camera with ultra wide angle and macro

The front camera illuminates the subject well if there is enough light, but weakens the details and focus. For video telephony, however, the optics are more than adequate.
The main camera offers an additional ultra wide angle and a macro lens. All three cameras certainly don't meet the demands of ambitious amateur photographers, but for an occasional snapshot in everyday life the offered performance is sufficient. Somewhat disturbing is the weak performance in very bright ambient light.
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
NahaufnahmePanoramaLow-LightZoom
click to load images
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Canon EOS 70D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
click to load images
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Canon EOS 70D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
click to load images
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Canon EOS 70D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
click to load images
Alcatel 1S (2020)
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Canon EOS 70D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
14.6 ∆E5.6 ∆E14.7 ∆E21.9 ∆E11.1 ∆E2.6 ∆E7.3 ∆E15.4 ∆E3.3 ∆E8.4 ∆E5.3 ∆E13.2 ∆E11 ∆E12 ∆E6.6 ∆E10.2 ∆E4.6 ∆E13.4 ∆E6.2 ∆E4 ∆E5.5 ∆E8 ∆E4.6 ∆E3.5 ∆E
29.6 ∆E54.6 ∆E39.8 ∆E34.8 ∆E45.6 ∆E61.9 ∆E53.3 ∆E36.1 ∆E43.2 ∆E29 ∆E64.2 ∆E63.3 ∆E31.5 ∆E47.7 ∆E37.3 ∆E75.3 ∆E44.6 ∆E42 ∆E89.7 ∆E70.2 ∆E52 ∆E36.9 ∆E23.8 ∆E13.3 ∆E



Display - Alcatel 1S without brightness sensor

The 6.22 inch IPS panel of the Alcatel 1S (2020) is on a quite class-typical level and delivers a sufficiently high image sharpness with its small HD resolution. On closer inspection, however, pixel formation may be visible.
The brightness is on a decent level, unfortunately, the Alcatel cell phone doesn't have an ambient light sensor. The measurement with an even distribution of light and dark areas (APL50) also turns out worse and the 1S only achieves a luminance of 351 cd/m² in the center of the image and also the black level (0.41 cd/m²) is lower, so that the contrast ratio is reduced to 856:1.
The color display we analyzed with CalMAN is too cool and shows visible deviations for the trained eye with some blue tones. However, these are not serious or disturbing in everyday life.
|
| Alcatel 1S (2020)IPS, 1520x720, 6.2" | Huawei Y6sIPS, 1560x720, 6.1" | Nokia 1.3IPS, 1520x720, 5.7" | Motorola Moto E6sIPS, 1560x720, 6.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -27% | -15% | -19% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 48 ?(21.2, 26.8) | 54 ?(25, 29) -13% | 55 ?(28, 27) -15% | 64 ?(31, 33) -33% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 22.8 ?(9.2, 13.6) | 32 ?(15, 17) -40% | 26 ?(11, 15) -14% | 24 ?(3, 21) -5% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 100 ?(10) | |||
| Screen | -7% | 6% | 22% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 470 | 424 -10% | 456 -3% | 488 4% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 456 | 397 -13% | 406 -11% | 481 5% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 87 | 85 -2% | 83 -5% | 95 9% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.33 | 0.35 -6% | 0.33 -0% | 0.25 24% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1424 | 1211 -15% | 1382 -3% | 1952 37% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.7 | 6.45 4% | 5.22 22% | 5.02 25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.1 | 12.76 -5% | 8.38 31% | 8.99 26% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.6 | 8.5 -12% | 6.4 16% | 4.4 42% |
| Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.231 99% | 2.186 101% | 2.252 98% |
| CCT | 8732 74% | 9108 71% | 8108 80% | 7841 83% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -17% / -11% | -5% / 2% | 2% / 13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise | ![]() |
| ↘ 13.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise | ![]() |
| ↘ 26.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ![]() | |
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8077 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||




Performance, emissions and battery life
The Alcatel 1S (2020) is driven by a Helio P22 from MediaTek, whose GPU has been throttled by 50 MHz in direct comparison to the standard version, which doesn't always lead to a worse result in the benchmarks, though. The system as such runs quite smoothly, but with short waiting times when starting apps or small jerking must be arranged.
The surface temperatures stay pleasantly low in idle and even under load the rates only climb over the 30 degree mark in places.
The mono speaker on the bottom edge delivers a high-frequency sound and the maximum volume is not too high, but both are perfectly sufficient for everyday tasks. The jack connector provides a usable sound output, but its signal-to-noise ratio is not particularly high at 30 dBFS.
The Alcatel 1S (2020) sets a powerful exclamation mark in the battery life, because the smartphone proves to be very efficient with over 20 hours in our WLAN test.
Geekbench 5.5 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench| Geekbench 5.5 | |
| Single-Core (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 1S (2020)Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072 | 136 Points |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (134 - 155, n=9) | 142.1 Points +4% |
| Average of class Smartphone (145 - 2635, n=120, last 2 years) | 1252 Points +821% |
| Multi-Core (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 1S (2020)Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072 | 794 Points |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (475 - 883, n=9) | 761 Points -4% |
| Average of class Smartphone (550 - 9512, n=120, last 2 years) | 4305 Points +442% |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Y6sMediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072 | 4658 Points |
| Nokia 1.3Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024 | 4339 Points |
| Motorola Moto E6sMediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048 | 6873 Points |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (4404 - 7465, n=18) | 5847 Points |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 1S (2020)Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072 | 4817 Points |
| Huawei Y6sMediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072 | 3936 Points -18% |
| Nokia 1.3Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024 | 3476 Points -28% |
| Motorola Moto E6sMediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048 | 5197 Points +8% |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3805 - 5380, n=21) | 4696 Points -3% |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 1S (2020)Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072 | 12598 Points |
| Nokia 1.3Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024 | 5289 Points -58% |
| Motorola Moto E6sMediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048 | 11836 Points -6% |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (9835 - 13960, n=20) | 11460 Points -9% |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 1S (2020)Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072 | 12309 Points |
| Nokia 1.3Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024 | 4622 Points -62% |
| Motorola Moto E6sMediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048 | 11220 Points -9% |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (9536 - 13491, n=20) | 11373 Points -8% |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 1S (2020)Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072 | 13728 Points |
| Nokia 1.3Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024 | 10678 Points -22% |
| Motorola Moto E6sMediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048 | 14651 Points +7% |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (9080 - 15891, n=20) | 12110 Points -12% |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 1S (2020)Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072 | 732 Points |
| Huawei Y6sMediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072 | 465 Points -36% |
| Nokia 1.3Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024 | 291 Points -60% |
| Motorola Moto E6sMediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048 | 722 Points -1% |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (428 - 830, n=23) | 633 Points -14% |
| Average of class Smartphone (847 - 6787, n=5, last 2 years) | 4275 Points +484% |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 1S (2020)Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072 | 678 Points |
| Huawei Y6sMediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072 | 403 Points -41% |
| Nokia 1.3Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024 | 245 Points -64% |
| Motorola Moto E6sMediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048 | 655 Points -3% |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (370 - 750, n=23) | 572 Points -16% |
| Average of class Smartphone (781 - 8784, n=5, last 2 years) | 4900 Points +623% |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 1S (2020)Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072 | 1014 Points |
| Huawei Y6sMediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072 | 1017 Points 0% |
| Nokia 1.3Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024 | 844 Points -17% |
| Motorola Moto E6sMediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048 | 1124 Points +11% |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (854 - 1185, n=23) | 1026 Points +1% |
| Average of class Smartphone (1203 - 3990, n=5, last 2 years) | 3193 Points +215% |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 1S (2020)Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072 | 813 Points |
| Huawei Y6sMediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072 | 763 Points -6% |
| Nokia 1.3Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024 | 287 Points -65% |
| Motorola Moto E6sMediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048 | 810 Points 0% |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (513 - 873, n=23) | 770 Points -5% |
| Average of class Smartphone (953 - 22613, n=16, last 2 years) | 12634 Points +1454% |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 1S (2020)Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072 | 763 Points |
| Huawei Y6sMediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072 | 712 Points -7% |
| Nokia 1.3Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024 | 242 Points -68% |
| Motorola Moto E6sMediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048 | 742 Points -3% |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (452 - 823, n=23) | 719 Points -6% |
| Average of class Smartphone (879 - 45492, n=16, last 2 years) | 22925 Points +2905% |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 1S (2020)Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072 | 1053 Points |
| Huawei Y6sMediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072 | 1015 Points -4% |
| Nokia 1.3Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024 | 819 Points -22% |
| Motorola Moto E6sMediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048 | 1189 Points +13% |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (900 - 1195, n=23) | 1032 Points -2% |
| Average of class Smartphone (1352 - 8203, n=16, last 2 years) | 5498 Points +422% |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 1S (2020)Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072 | 396 Points |
| Huawei Y6sMediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072 | 304 Points -23% |
| Motorola Moto E6sMediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048 | 464 Points +17% |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (269 - 470, n=22) | 383 Points -3% |
| Average of class Smartphone (444 - 5880, n=20, last 2 years) | 2657 Points +571% |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 1S (2020)Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072 | 337 Points |
| Huawei Y6sMediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072 | 508 Points +51% |
| Motorola Moto E6sMediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048 | 397 Points +18% |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (222 - 405, n=22) | 326 Points -3% |
| Average of class Smartphone (384 - 6979, n=20, last 2 years) | 2625 Points +679% |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 1S (2020)Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072 | 1011 Points |
| Huawei Y6sMediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072 | 435 Points -57% |
| Motorola Moto E6sMediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048 | 1131 Points +12% |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (860 - 1175, n=22) | 1022 Points +1% |
| Average of class Smartphone (982 - 4534, n=20, last 2 years) | 3155 Points +212% |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 1S (2020)Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072 | 458 Points |
| Huawei Y6sMediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072 | 509 Points +11% |
| Motorola Moto E6sMediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048 | 523 Points +14% |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (426 - 536, n=22) | 482 Points +5% |
| Average of class Smartphone (508 - 23762, n=106, last 2 years) | 9345 Points +1940% |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 1S (2020)Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072 | 394 Points |
| Huawei Y6sMediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072 | 443 Points +12% |
| Motorola Moto E6sMediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048 | 451 Points +14% |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (368 - 467, n=22) | 418 Points +6% |
| Average of class Smartphone (453 - 40163, n=106, last 2 years) | 14369 Points +3547% |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 1S (2020)Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072 | 1055 Points |
| Huawei Y6sMediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072 | 1061 Points +1% |
| Motorola Moto E6sMediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048 | 1187 Points +13% |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (912 - 1188, n=22) | 1036 Points -2% |
| Average of class Smartphone (877 - 10632, n=106, last 2 years) | 5209 Points +394% |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 1S (2020)Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072 | 7.1 fps |
| Huawei Y6sMediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072 | 6.9 fps -3% |
| Motorola Moto E6sMediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048 | 6.7 fps -6% |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (6.4 - 7.6, n=21) | 6.9 fps -3% |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 166, n=212, last 2 years) | 60.5 fps +752% |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 1S (2020)Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072 | 3.7 fps |
| Huawei Y6sMediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072 | 3.8 fps +3% |
| Motorola Moto E6sMediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048 | 3.8 fps +3% |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3.5 - 4.7, n=21) | 3.81 fps +3% |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.4 - 367, n=212, last 2 years) | 120.9 fps +3168% |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 1S (2020)Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072 | 4.4 fps |
| Huawei Y6sMediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072 | 4.2 fps -5% |
| Motorola Moto E6sMediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048 | 4.2 fps -5% |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (4.1 - 4.8, n=21) | 4.35 fps -1% |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=213, last 2 years) | 48.7 fps +1007% |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 1S (2020)Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072 | 1.3 fps |
| Huawei Y6sMediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072 | 1.4 fps +8% |
| Motorola Moto E6sMediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048 | 1.4 fps +8% |
| Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (1.3 - 1.6, n=21) | 1.39 fps +7% |
| Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 146, n=212, last 2 years) | 46.5 fps +3477% |
| Alcatel 1S (2020) | Huawei Y6s | Nokia 1.3 | Motorola Moto E6s | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 7% | 16% | 20% | 1% | 1134% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 273.3 | 263.2 -4% | 284.8 4% | 275 1% | 242 ?(25.8 - 452, n=248) -11% | 2242 ?(270 - 4370, n=199, last 2 years) 720% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 146 | 118 -19% | 48.5 -67% | 103.5 -29% | 100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=248) -31% | 1881 ?(103.2 - 4051, n=199, last 2 years) 1188% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 26.57 | 46.7 76% | 48.7 83% | 69.4 161% | 43.1 ?(3.59 - 117.2, n=248) 62% | 299 ?(47.6 - 576, n=199, last 2 years) 1025% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 20.27 | 18.6 -8% | 38.6 90% | 17.7 -13% | 22.3 ?(0.75 - 91, n=248) 10% | 345 ?(9.4 - 987, n=199, last 2 years) 1602% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (MB/s) | 82 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 80.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1% | 76.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -7% | 82.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0% | 71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, n=178) -12% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (MB/s) | 62.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 60.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -3% | 59 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5% | 63.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2% | 52.9 ?(3.4 - 87.1, n=178) -15% |
Temperature
Max. LoadIdle
| |||||||||
| Maximum: 31.4 °C = 89 FAverage: 29.4 °C = 85 F |
| |||||||||
| Maximum: 29.3 °C = 85 FAverage: 28.1 °C = 83 F |
| |||||||||
| Maximum: 26.6 °C = 80 FAverage: 25.4 °C = 78 F |
| |||||||||
| Maximum: 27.2 °C = 81 FAverage: 25.4 °C = 78 F |


Speakers and jack connector


Alcatel 1S (2020) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 41% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.4% lower than median(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.1% difference to median)Compared to same class» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 17% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto E6s audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 66.5% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(-) | nearly no mids - on average 66.5% lower than median(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(-) | nearly no highs - on average 66.5% lower than median(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(-) | overall sound is not linear (121.9% difference to median)Compared to same class» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 2% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 1% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Battery life
| Alcatel 1S (2020)4000 mAh | Huawei Y6s3020 mAh | Nokia 1.33000 mAh | Motorola Moto E6s3000 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi Websurfing (h) | 20.4 | 12.4 -39% | 15.1 -26% | 13.4 -34% | 19.4 ?(12.1 - 54.1, n=211, last 2 years) -5% |
| WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 83) | 20h 26min |
Pros
+ long battery life + good voice quality + neat display + microSD with exFAT supportCons
- no ambient light sensor - mediocre main cameraConclusion - Good beginner with a small shortcoming

With the Alcatel 1S (2020) TCL offers a successful entry-level smartphone, which is particularly convincing in the core competencies telephony and battery life. The system performance and memory equipment are quite good for this price range. There is also a dedicated button for the Google Assistant and a radio receiver.
With the Alcatel 1S (2020), TCL has succeeded in creating a successful overall package in the entry-level class.
Some compromises have to be made, especially during camera setup. The additional ultra wide angle and macro lenses are useful additions, but the quality of the main camera is a little lacking.
We see the missing ambient light sensor as an equipment gap, but those who prefer to regulate their display manually anyway won't mind.
Alcatel 1S (2020) - 06/17/2020 v7 (old) Daniel Schmidt
Chassis75% Keyboard65 / 75 → 87% Pointing Device84% Connectivity38 / 70 → 54% Weight91% Battery93% Display81% Games Performance7 / 64 → 10% Application Performance51 / 86 → 59% Temperature95% Noise100% Audio70 / 90 → 78% Camera47% Average69% 75% Smartphone - Weighted AverageMore articles related to this device
Alcatel 1S (2020) (1 Series)Review•Alcatel 1S (2021) review - Che... |Review•Alcatel 1T 10 Tablet ReviewPrice comparison
Read all 1 comments / answer static version load dynamicLoading Comments Comment on this article Please share our article, every link counts!
Editor of the original article: Daniel Schmidt - Managing Editor Mobile - 817 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013As a child I was fascinated by my Commodore 16, and this sparked my enthusiasm for computers. Using my first modem, I surfed the BTX videotext system and later the World Wide Web. I have always been captivated by the latest technologies, and this is especially true for mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets. I’ve been part of the Notebookcheck team since 2013 and have also on occasion written for Notebookinfo.de, and I’m looking forward to testing new innovations for our readers. I like to spend my spare time indulging in photography and barbecues and being with my family.contact me via: @Tellheim, Facebook, tellheim1763, LinkedIn, Xing
Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 694771 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008My main responsibility as an editorial assistant is maintaining the Library section, which aggregates reviews from other publications and channels. In addition, my daily breakfast is Notebookcheck's long list of new content, which I comb through to select the most interesting topics for translation from English to French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, and Dutch."contact me via: Facebook > Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Alcatel 1S (2020) Review - An Entry-level Smartphone with Strong Core Competencies Daniel Schmidt, 2020-06-17 (Update: 2020-06-17) 10 ← exclude selected types Tag » Alcatel S1 2020 Review
-
Alcatel 1S 2020 Review - Good Housekeeping
-
Alcatel 1S (2020) - User Opinions And Reviews
-
Alcatel 1S (2020) Review: How Good Is A $100 Smartphone? - NextPit
-
Alcatel 1S (2020) - Full Specification, Price, Review, Comparison
-
Alcatel 1S (2020) Review | 247 Facts And Highlights - Versus
-
Alcatel 1S (2020) | Specifications And User Reviews - Tech In Deep
-
Alcatel 1S 2020 Review: Pros And Cons [2022]
-
Alcatel 1S Smartphone Review - YouTube
-
Review Alcatel 1S - YouTube
-
Alcatel 1S (2020) Review - Mobile Phones - Which? Magazine
-
Review Of Alcatel 1S 2020 Mobile Smart Phone | Toddle About
-
Alcatel 1S (2020) - Affordable Price/Full Specs & Price - YouTube
-
Alcatel 1S 2020 Vs Alcatel 1S (2021): Compare Specifications, Price
-
Alcatel 1s 2021 Review, Pros And Cons - OiSpice


