Austin, Texas, Proposition B, Prohibition On Sitting, Lying, And ...
Maybe your like
Sign up to receive Ballotpedia's daily newsletter
Email *
First Name
Please complete the Captcha above
×Ballotpedia on Facebook
Share this page
Follow Ballotpedia
×Ballotpedia on Twitter
Share this page
Follow Ballotpedia
Subscribe Donate| Austin Proposition B | |
|---|---|
| Election dateMay 1, 2021 | |
| TopicLocal law enforcement | |
| Status | |
| TypeInitiative | OriginCitizens |
Austin Proposition B, a prohibition on sitting, lying, and camping and limiting solicitation in public areas measure, is on the ballot as an initiative in Austin on May 1, 2021.
A "yes" vote supported making it a criminal offense (Class C misdemeanor punishable by a fine) for anyone to sit, lie down, or camp in public areas and prohibiting solicitation of money or other things of value at specific hours and locations. |
A "no" vote opposed making it a criminal offense for anyone to sit, lie down, or camp in public areas and prohibiting solicitation of money or other things of value at specific hours and locations. |
A simple majority was required for the approval of Proposition B.
Contents
- 1 Election results
- 2 Text of measure
- 2.1 Ballot question
- 2.2 Full text
- 3 Support
- 3.1 Supporters
- 3.2 Arguments
- 4 Opposition
- 4.1 Opponents
- 4.2 Arguments
- 5 Background
- 5.1 2019 repeal of sitting, lying, and panhandling prohibition
- 5.2 Unauthorized camping ordinances across the U.S.
- 5.3 Other sit-lie measures on local ballots
- 6 Path to the ballot
- 6.1 Texas Supreme Court ruling on ballot language
- 7 See also
- 8 External links
- 8.1 Support
- 8.2 Opposition
- 9 Footnotes
Election results
| Austin Proposition B | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| | 90,498 | 57.69% | ||
| No | 66,360 | 42.31% | ||
Text of measure
Ballot question
The ballot question was as follows:[1]
| “ | Shall an ordinance be adopted that would create a criminal offense and a penalty for sitting or lying down on a public sidewalk or sleeping outdoors in and near the downtown area around the University of Texas campus; create a criminal offense and penalty for solicitation, defined as requesting money or another thing of value, at specific hours and locations or for solicitation in a public area that is deemed aggressive in manner; create a criminal offense and penalty for camping in any public area not designated by the Parks and Recreation Department?[2] | ” |
The Texas Supreme Court directed the Austin City Council to change the ballot language following a lawsuit filed by signers of the initiative petition. You can read more about the lawsuit here.
Full text
The full text can be read here.
Support
Save Austin Now led the campaign in support of Proposition B.[3]
Supporters
- Cleo Petricek, co-founder of Save Austin Now[3]
- Matt Mackowiak, chairman of the Travis County GOP and co-founder of Save Austin Now[3]
- Ken Casaday, president of the Austin Police Association[3]
- Joell McNew, president of SafeHorns[3]
- Austin Chamber of Commerce[4]
Arguments
- Save Austin Now campaign said, "Incompetent policy has encouraged aggressive public camping and panhandling that creates unsafe living conditions on the streets and unsafe streets for everyone else."[3]
Opposition
Homes not Handcuffs led the No on Prop B campaign in opposition to Proposition B.[5]
Opponents
- Mike Siegel, former candidate for the U.S. House (D)[6]
- Austin City Council Member Greg Casar[6]
- Julie Oliver, former candidate for the U.S. House (D)[6]
- Working Families[6]
- Grassroots Law Project[6]
- Texas Appleseed[6]
- Sunrise ATX[6]
- University Democrats[6]
- Austin chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America[6]
- UT Austin chapter of the Youth Democratic Socialists of America[6]
- Bend the Arc: Austin[6]
- Indivisible Austin[6]
- Travis County Democratic Party[6]
- Circle C Democrats[6]
Arguments
- Homes Not Handcuffs campaign website said, "These laws also make the underlying problems that cause homelessness worse. People wrack up fines and fees that they cannot pay. They are saddled with criminal records, making it more difficult to get housing and employment. When individuals are jailed, they often lose access to public benefits and shelter space. For those with medical or treatment needs, continuity of care is disrupted. Any possessions these individuals have managed to obtain are lost forever. All of these effects perpetuate the cycle of homelessness."[7]
Background
2019 repeal of sitting, lying, and panhandling prohibition
On June 20, 2019, the Austin City Council voted unanimously to repeal an ordinance that prohibited sitting, lying, or panhandling in the downtown area. In a 9-2 vote, with Council Members Alison Alter and Kathie Tovo opposing, the council also voted to prohibit camping in public areas only if "the person is: (1) materially endangering the health or safety of another person or of themselves; or (2) intentionally or knowingly impeding the use of public property making usage of such property unreasonably inconvenient."[8]
A 2014 report released by nonprofit organization the National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty included the following findings based on a survey of municipal codes in 187 U.S. cities:[9]
- The report stated that 34 percent of U.S. cities imposed citywide bans on camping in public.
- It also stated that 57 percent of cities prohibited camping in particular public places.
- Eighteen percent of cities were found to impose citywide bans specifically on sleeping in public.
- Twenty-seven percent of cities were found to prohibit sleeping in particular public places, such as in public parks.
Other sit-lie measures on local ballots
Ballotpedia has tracked the following local ballot measures related to sit-lie ordinance since 2010 in the top 100 cities:
Denver, Colorado, Initiated Ordinance 300, "Right to Survive" Initiative (May 2019)
Berkeley Sit-Lie Ordinance, Measure S (November 2012)
San Francisco Sit-Lie Ordinance, Proposition L (November 2010)
Path to the ballot
See also: Laws governing local ballot measures in TexasThis measure was put on the ballot through a successful indirect initiative petition drive. In Austin, to place an initiated ordinance on the ballot petitioners must collect 5% of qualified voters of the city or 20,000, whichever number is the smaller. In January 2021, the number of qualified voters in Travis County was 553,166, and 5% of the qualified voters was 27,658.[10]
Save Austin Now, the sponsor behind the initiative, filed over 24,000 signatures with the city clerk. On February 4, the city clerk certified the petition as sufficient. On February 9, 2021, the Austin City Council voted to certify the initiative to the ballot.[11][12]
Texas Supreme Court ruling on ballot language
| Lawsuit overview | |
| Issue: Whether the ballot language complies with the city's charter | |
| Court: Third Court of Appeals;Texas Supreme Court | |
| Ruling: Ruled in favor of plaintiffs; Austin City Council ordered to change the ballot language | |
| Plaintiff(s): Linda Durin, Eric Krohn, and Michael Lovins | Defendant(s): Austin City Council; City of Austin |
| Plaintiff argument:The ballot language as written by the city council does not comply with the city's charter and is biased against the proposition. | Defendant argument: The ballot language does comply with the city's charter |
Source: Austin Bulldog
On February 16, 2021, Linda Durin, Eric Krohn, and Michael Lovins, who all signed the initiative petition to place the proposition on the ballot, filed a lawsuit against the Austin City Council arguing that the ballot language written by the council did not comply with the city's charter and the use of "anyone" was biased against the proposition. The lawsuit was filed simultaneously with the Third Court of Appeals and the Texas Supreme Court. The court of appeals denied relief without opinion.
On March 2, the Texas Supreme Court granted mandamus relief and directed the Austin City Council to delete the word "anyone" from the ballot language.[13]
See also
Local measures
| Texas
| News and analysis
|
External links
| | Suggest a link |
- Search Google News for this topic
- Initiative full text
Support
| Opposition
|
Footnotes
- ↑ Austin City Council, "Notice of City Council action on Court’s Order, Case No. 21-0170," accessed April 5, 2021
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 Save Austin Now, "Home," accessed March 11, 2021
- ↑ Austin Chamber of Commerce, "May 2021 City of Austin propositions voter guide," accessed April 5, 2021
- ↑ No on Prop B, "Home, " accessed March 11, 2021
- ↑ 6.00 6.01 6.02 6.03 6.04 6.05 6.06 6.07 6.08 6.09 6.10 6.11 6.12 6.13 No on Prop B, "About," accessed March 11, 2021
- ↑ No on Prop 21, "Learn More," accessed March 11, 2021
- ↑ Austin City Council, "June 20, 2019 Council Meeting Agenda," accessed March 11, 2021
- ↑ National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty, "No Safe Place," accessed April 10, 2019
- ↑ Austintexas.gov, "General Information: Initiative, Referendum, and Recall," accessed March 8, 2021
- ↑ KVUE, "Austin City Council votes to let voters decide on 'strong mayor' government proposal on May ballot," February 9, 2021
- ↑ Facebook, "Save Austin Now post on February 4, 2021
- ↑ The Austin Bulldog, "Court orders Prop B language change," March 2, 2021
| v • eLocal ballot measures in Texas (by county) | |
|---|---|
| A-B | Anderson • Andrews • Angelina • Aransas • Archer • Armstrong • Atascosa • Austin • Bailey • Bandera • Bastrop • Baylor • Bee • Bell • Bexar • Blanco • Borden • Bosque • Bowie • Brazoria • Brazos • Brewster • Briscoe • Brooks • Brown • Burleson • Burnet |
| C-E | Caldwell • Calhoun • Callahan • Cameron • Camp • Carson • Cass • Castro • Chambers • Cherokee • Childress • Clay • Cochran• Coke • Coleman • Collin • Collingsworth• Colorado • Comal • Comanche • Concho • Cooke • Coryell • Cottle • Crane • Crockett • Crosby • Culberson • Dallam • Dallas • Dawson • Deaf Smith • Delta • Denton • DeWitt • Dickens • Dimmit • Donley • Duval • Eastland • Ector • Edwards • El Paso • Ellis • Erath |
| F-I | Falls • Fannin • Fayette • Fisher • Floyd • Foard • Fort Bend • Franklin • Freestone • Frio • Gaines • Galveston • Garza • Gillespie • Glasscock • Goliad • Gonzales • Gray • Grayson • Gregg • Grimes • Guadalupe • Hale • Hall • Hamilton • Hansford • Hardeman • Hardin • Harris • Harrison • Hartley • Haskell • Hays • Hemphill • Henderson • Hidalgo • Hill • Hockley • Hood • Hopkins • Houston • Howard • Hudspeth • Hunt • Hutchinson • Irion |
| J-L | Jack • Jackson • Jasper • Jeff Davis • Jefferson • Jim Hogg • Jim Wells • Johnson • Jones • Karnes • Kaufman • Kendall • Kenedy • Kent • Kerr • Kimble • King • Kinney • Kleberg • Knox • La Salle • Lamar • Lamb • Lampasas • Lavaca • Lee • Leon • Liberty • Limestone • Lipscomb • Live Oak • Llano • Loving • Lubbock • Lynn |
| M-O | McCulloch • McLennan • McMullen • Madison • Marion • Martin • Mason • Matagorda • Maverick • Medina • Menard • Midland • Milam • Mills • Mitchell • Montague • Montgomery • Moore • Morris • Motley • Nacogdoches • Navarro • Newton • Nolan • Nueces • Ochiltree • Oldham • Orange |
| P-S | Palo Pinto • Panola • Parker • Parmer • Pecos • Polk • Potter • Presidio • Rains • Randall • Reagan • Real • Red River • Reeves • Refugio • Roberts • Robertson • Rockwall • Runnels • Rusk • Sabine • San Augustine • San Jacinto • San Patricio • San Saba • Schleicher • Scurry • Shackelford • Shelby • Sherman • Smith • Somervell • Starr • Stephens • Sterling • Stonewall • Sutton • Swisher |
| T-Z | Tarrant • Taylor • Terrell • Terry • Throckmorton • Titus • Tom Green • Travis • Trinity • Tyler • Upshur • Upton • Uvalde • Val Verde • Van Zandt • Victoria • Walker • Waller • Ward • Washington • Webb • Wharton • Wheeler • Wichita • Wilbarger • Willacy • Williamson • Wilson • Winkler • Wise • Wood • Yoakum • Young • Zapata • Zavala |
| Election Dates | Local ballot measure elections covered by Ballotpedia in Texas |
| v • eState of TexasAustin (capital) | |
|---|---|
| Elections | What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2026 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government | Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |
- Pages using DynamicPageList3 dplreplace parser function
- Local ballots, 2021
- Texas 2021 local ballot measures
- Local law enforcement, Texas, 2021
- Local measure in Austin, Texas
- Local measure in county of Travis, Texas
- Local measure, May 1, 2021
- Approved local measure, 2021
- Certified past date local ballot measures
- Current measure lawsuit
- Ballot measure with lawsuit, 2021
- Ballot measure lawsuit about Ballot language
- Ballot measure with lawsuit, Texas
- Ballot measure with lawsuit, Texas, 2021
- Local law enforcement
Ballotpedia features 655,913 encyclopedic articles written and curated by our professional staff of editors, writers, and researchers. Click here to contact our editorial staff or report an error. For media inquiries, contact us here. Please donate here to support our continued expansion.
Information about voting
- Your 2025 Election Toolkit
- What's on my ballot?
- Where do I vote?
- How do I register to vote?
- How do I request a ballot?
- When do I vote?
- When are polls open?
- Who Represents Me?
2026 Elections
- Congress
- State executives
- State legislatures
- State judges
- State ballot measures
- Municipal officials
- School boards
- Other local officials
- Local ballot measures
2025 Elections
- 2025 Election results
- State government trifectas
- State government triplexes
- Governors
- State executives
- State supreme courts
- State legislatures
- State ballot measures
- Municipal officials
Election analysis
- 2025 elections analysis hub
- State executive competitiveness
- State legislative competitiveness
- Ballot measure trends
- Pivot Counties in the 2024 presidential election
- General election voter turnout in 2024
Trending
- Elections calendar
- Redistricting ahead of the 2026 elections
- Donald Trump's Cabinet
- Education policy on Ballotpedia
- Ballotpedia News
Public Policy
- Policy in the states
- Administrative state
- Criminal justice policy
- Education policy
- Environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG)
- Federalism
- Unemployment insurance
- Work requirements
Information for candidates
- Ballotpedia's Candidate Survey
- How do I run for office?
- How do I update a page?
- Election results
- Send us candidate contact info
Get Engaged
- Donate to Ballotpedia
- Contact us
- Report an error
- Events
- Newsletters
- Ballotpedia Podcast
- Careers
- Volunteer
- Ad Policy
- Ballotpedia Boutique
Services
- Media inquiries
- Data sales
Additional analysis
- Election legislation tracking
- Redistricting
- Pivot Counties
- State Supreme Court Partisanship
- Polling indexes
SITE NAVIGATION
- Read today's Daily Brew
- 2026 Elections
- 2026 Congressional elections
- 2026 State executive elections
- 2026 State legislative elections
- 2026 State judge elections
- 2026 State ballot measures
- 2026 Municipal elections
- 2026 School board elections
- 2026 Other local elections
- 2026 Local ballot measures
- Primary election types by state
- Redistricting
- 2025 Elections
- 2025 Election results
- 2025 State government trifectas
- 2025 State government triplexes
- 2025 Governors
- 2025 State executives
- 2025 State supreme courts
- 2025 State legislatures
- 2025 Municipal officials
- 2025 Ballot measures
- Ballotpedia's in-depth analysis
- Ballotpedia's Election Analysis Hub, 2025
- Ballotpedia's analysis of laws governing ballot measures, 2025
- Ballotpedia's Deepfake Legislation Annual Report, 2025
- Ballotpedia's mid-year recall report
- Factors affecting the speed of ballot counting and delivery of unofficial election results
- Mixed-party election outcomes in presidential election years, 1916-2024
- History of school choice ballot measures
- The Trump administration
- Donald Trump's Cabinet
- Judicial nominations
- Executive orders and actions
- Key legislation
- Vetoes
- Government
- U.S. President
- U.S. Congress
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Federal courts
- State government
- Ballot measures
- Municipal government
- School boards
- Recalls
- Education policy on Ballotpedia
- Public policy
- Administrative state
- Criminal justice policy
- Education policy
- Environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG)
- Federalism
- Unemployment insurance
- Work requirements
- Policy in the states
- Add as a preferred source on Google
- More...
- Ballotpedia's Sample Ballot
- Ballotpedia’s Voter Toolkit
- Ballotpedia's Candidate Survey
- Redistricting
- Trifectas
- Election policy
- Running for office
- Election legislation tracking
- Ballotpedia's weekly podcast
- About us
- About Ballotpedia
- Donate
- Buy Political Data
- Editorial independence
- Index
- Job opportunities
- News and events
- Staff
- Volunteer
Tag » What Is Prop B Austin
-
Proposition B Fact Sheet
-
Proposition B And Homeless In Austin
-
Prop B Would Allow The City Of Austin To 'swap' One Piece Of Land For ...
-
What Austin Voters May Not Know About Proposition B This Special ...
-
Austin Prop B Passes, Trades Downtown Parkland For More Elsewhere
-
Prop B: City To Vote On East Austin Parkland Swap
-
Austin's Prop B: Voters Easily Approve City's Land Swap Plan
-
Prop B Archives - Austin ECHO
-
Austin's Prop B Passes In November 2021 Election - KVUE
-
Proposition B Passes In Austin, Authorizing Initiation Of City Parkland ...
-
Prop B Passed. Now What? - Austin Monthly Magazine
-
What Is Proposition B On Austin's May Ballot?
-
Details About Park Area At The Focus Of Proposition B - CBS Austin
-
Austin Vote Yes On Prop B May 1