Brad Pitt Height - How Tall

Brad Pitt's Height

5ft 11 (180.3 cm)

American actor best known for movies such as Se7en, Fight Club, Snatch, Oceans Films, Troy, Inglorious Bastards, Interview With The Vampire and World War Z. A newspaper article on heights (washington post) quoted as saying people had seen Pitt put down 5ft 10 on an audition form for his height. Well, before he was A-list, aged 24 he wrote his own height as 5ft 11 in a teen magazine profile. At times he can appear taller, but with impeccable posture and at times, in the last few years, cuban type heels, that is a given. Even his good friend George Clooney was wise to his footwear, saying once in USA Today that "He's tall. He's like 6-1. It's irritating." Brad & Angelina Jolie, Jonah Hill, Claudia Schiffer / Photo by PRPhotos Brad Heights5ft 11 Males

You May Be Interested

Leonardo DiCaprio5ft 11 ¼ (181 cm) George Clooney5ft 10 ¼ (178 cm) Jennifer Aniston5ft 4 ¾ (164 cm) Angelina Jolie5ft 6 ½ (169 cm)

Add a Comment6942 comments

• Your Guess (Optional) 5ft 95ft 9 ¼5ft 9 ½5ft 9 ¾5ft 105ft 10 ¼5ft 10 ½5ft 10 ¾5ft 115ft 11 ¼5ft 11 ½5ft 11 ¾6ft 06ft ¼6ft ½6ft ¾6ft 1

Average Guess (1469 Votes)5ft 10.62in (179.4cm)

• 1
• 2
• 3
• ...
• 28

B true said on 10/Dec/25Uses lifts so it’s hard to gauge. Definitely not 6-0. Divaddavid said on 5/Dec/25He looks 6ft next to Clooney. Maybe Clooney is a little shorter than listed though. I say he’s a solid 5’10 1/2 min. Putrescent said on 29/Nov/25Rob, do you think it possible that Brad was a well-postured 5ft 10.5 in his prime if he has not actually lost any height (since he has always been in shape and isn't too old)?Editor Rob5ft 10.75 maybe. I feel 10.5 might be too low as a peak for him. Seungbeen Jeon said on 25/Nov/25Rob, another question, when you list heights, do you take users' opinions and their average guesses below into account? because I sometimes see your listing on the top and average guesses vary quite a lot(like 1~1.5cm).Editor RobIt's a combination of what I see with my own eyes and also sometimes people bring up more information that adds to an opinion. Sometimes I think guesses are on the fence and can be sitting there for years before I end up deciding to add (or subtract) a fraction, because I now have more than a 50/50 confidence in the new figure. There will be many average guesses that vary from my own, though there are many that end up within a 1/4 inch or very close. Donald40 said on 25/Nov/25180cm peak 178cm today reachjtm said on 22/Nov/25he doesn't need a peak and current listing. he just needs a significant downgrade because is obvious he is and has never been anywhere near 5'11. Nebi180 said on 20/Nov/25Legit 180 cm guy, just like me. Gemetr11 said on 19/Nov/25Need peak and current listing abs0l1 said on 21/Oct/25dont think hes full 5 11 anymore. 180 cm at his peak , nowadays im 100 percent sure hes 178cm or 179cm range depending on time of day MaskDeMasque 5'9.5 said on 21/Oct/25He can pull off 5'11 in films but he's well proportioned and often wears big boots or shoes in his film. Average guess is prob spot on for his peak, 5'10.5-5'10.75 range. He's shrunk now though, he's probably somewhere between 5'10.25-510.5 nowadays Grayloth said on 9/Oct/25Maybe peak 180 cm? Lubin said on 8/Oct/25I think is a 5'10" min, and 5'10.75 max Is a very good 5'10.5 fkace63 said on 30/Sep/25He looks like a 5'11 dude here with footwear advantage. This woman is 6'2. Elizabeth Debicki. Maybe he just has I don't care posture and appears 5'10.75 as illusion. Near fallon he looked 5'10.75. Here he seems 5'11. Click Here Click Here fkace63 said on 28/Sep/25@Dmeyer Rob made it clear he only does a peak height if it is a 1/2 inch height loss not 0.25 inches. Dmeyer said on 27/Sep/255-11 IS 180-180,3cm 5-10.75 IS 179,5-179,8cm It will relieve people if peak 5-11 now 5-10,75 You did it for Travolta you had a 6ft o.25 peak 6 FT curent at some point Alex 6'0 said on 23/Sep/25He should have a peak and current height listing by now? Hes 61. I'm sure lost at least 1/2 inch. Id say 5'11 peak. Now 5'10.5 Canson said on 20/Sep/25@Dmeyer: that’s a good estimate. Worst case he was a weak 5’11” peak (a guy who was no worse than 5’10.5 at his low) or was 5’10.5-.75 at his afternoon height fkace63 said on 19/Sep/25He definiely wore lifts 1.25 inchers at least. But now he kind of doesn't care anymore. Click Here CDS said on 18/Sep/25The pic with Gareth Bale (6'0.5") posted below just confirms Brad is the height I've been saying he is all long, going back to his early "pre-lift", pre-stardom days of the very early 90s -- 5'9.75" barefoot, end of day, around 5'11" in a pair of shoes. Dmeyer said on 17/Sep/25Brad Never wore lifts , just AT Times wore 1,2in-1,7in with excellent posture so gave ans impression of 6'0-6-0,5in ans somtimes 0.6in shoes with loose posture ans Bad angle and looked 5-10 , so a wide range looking 5-10- almost 6-1 , Brad has looked many Times thé full 5-11 wearing normal 1in shoes liké 6-o shoes on , and has looked over 5-10 even with low heels so arguable Peak 5-10.75-11 now 5-10.5-10.75 Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Sep/25Full 5ft11 is still reasonable, not more than a fraction under. Notorious lift-wearer whose height is generally impossible to pin down. He’s really looked over a wide range. 5'11james said on 8/Sep/25Especially with that recent photo of him with Gareth Bale, I think he’s definitely at most 5’10.5 range nowadays. 5'11james said on 8/Sep/25I have a feeling that Brad might not have ever been the full 5’11, from seeing more photos of him recently…. I think he was a solid 5’10.75 in his prime, and has lost a small fraction now and is in the 5’10.5 range. Emil said on 7/Sep/25I don't think he's lost any significant amount of height, he just doesn't use lifts anymore Com said on 5/Sep/25Rob, would you give Brad 5ft 10.5 today under the stadiometer?Editor Rob10.75 is likely, but 10.5 I'm not as sure on yet... it's a bald life said on 30/Aug/25Brad Pitt ain't five eleven I bet pretty close though,This heavenly is so true enough said. fkace63 said on 29/Aug/25The Bale pic has angles and an illusion where 1.75 inches looks like 2.75. He stands next to Damson Idris and who is a full 6'1 range and looks 5'10.75 But in totality next to Javier Bardem, Clooney, Dicaprio, Jimmy Fallon it's clear he's close to 5'11. But 5'10.5 is close to 5'11 too. He also has worn a lot less cuban heels and lifts. reachjtm said on 28/Aug/25That is correct pov. His real height has been exposed with Bale. It has nothing to do with height loss and age. all you have to do is look at his older movies in the 90s and the older comments here and is obvious that 5'11 is a far cry from the truth. Matt99 said on 27/Aug/25There’s a quite a bit of evidence to suggest he’s lost a fraction, like that Gareth bale photo. Maybe a peak and current height now Rob?Editor RobIf I was sure it was half inch I'd consider it, maybe in next couple of years. fkace63 said on 26/Aug/25on video Pitt looks closer to 5'10.5 or so. Click Here pov said on 25/Aug/25@Rob you need to see this!! Click Here This is a pic of Brad Pitt and Gareth Bale who is 6”0.5 LEGIT. They are both similar stance and standing evenly from the camera. Brad looks no more than 5”9.5 max. Maybe he’s not wearing his heels? Or maybe he’s lost height (which I don’t think he has yet). I never believed Brad was 5”11. He originally listed himself as 5”10. I always saw him as. 5”9.5 guy without his hollywood lift shoes. What do you think? There is no denying he’s clearly not 5”11 here.Editor RobHe can look 179 at best there. Has he lost a cm or could he have been weak 5ft 11 and only lost a small fraction like 0.25... fkace63 said on 24/Aug/25rob why did you call pitt almost 5'11 in this video? Freudian slip or just small verbal typo? Click HereEditor RobMaybe an indication that he's lost a small fraction over the last few years. bababooey said on 24/Aug/25179-180 Height accuracy said on 19/Aug/25@Rob Is pitt heading towards 5'10.5 soon?Editor RobHe might be 10.75 now. I know he looks good for his age, but sometimes small fractional losses happen by early 60's and most wouldn't recognise it. Adel177 said on 19/Aug/25he wears shoes lifts fkace63 said on 18/Aug/25Caught: Click Here fkace63 said on 18/Aug/25Rob what height is he here? Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click HereEditor RobIt's trickier on the grass to say whether it's flat or not. Original said on 18/Aug/25His prime (low height) around 5'10.5" or 179.4cm as the average guess, these days probably around 5'10.25" as he is 60, the debate remains open bc he often uses some help inside his boots, so looking solid 5'11 range is still possible for him, but no 6' range anymore or he will look more unconfortable as this image: Click Here Click Here So visible he was on lifts this day and to be that visible that would close to 3 inches boots, at least. Still mid point between 188.5cm Bana and 179cm Bloom = 183.5cm to 184cm looking if he was using normal shoes, 187cm-187.5cm with them. Retire his boots and his real height will probably be on Bloom's territory, perhaps a fraction taller only. But he almost never sees him without his boots, anyway. Peak Pitt = 179.4cm These days = 178.5cm Red Carpet Pitt = can look somewhere between 5'10.25 to 6'0.5", but often around 5'11-5'11.5" imho. Amrithh said on 16/Aug/25Rob,Can you comment on how tall he looked with these men from these pics? With 6ft 1 Damson Idris(same racing footwear) Click Here Click Here With 5ft 11 Bardem(poor posture) Click Here With Hamilton Click Here With 6f1 Tobias Menzies Click Here Click Here Particularly the pics with Damson Idris?Editor RobOverall I'd say 5ft 10.75 from those photos...which is possible today *if* he's lost a small fraction. 5'7 and a fraction said on 29/Jul/25This guy can look 5'10 a lot these days. Biteme said on 22/Jul/25Every height on here is wrong. They all do so much to hide their heights, or lack of. Pitt is not over 5'9. Might be 5'8. Every height on here is wrong. They are much shorterEditor RobPitt may have lost a small fraction in his early 60's, but you only have to go back a few years to see him with guys I've met like Steven Yeun who in person ain't much shorter than myself. viper said on 22/Jul/25He's looked too short consistently to be 5-11 reachjtm said on 22/Jul/25it has been mentioned that he was shorter than aidan quinn in legend of the fall. quinn is listed 5'11.5 here but he certainly didn't look over 5'10 with liam neeson and also shorter than henry thomas who is listed 5'10.75 here and used to be listed 5'10.5. 5'11james said on 20/Jul/25He definitely was around flat 5’11 in his peak, but nothing more than that mark. He easily looked around that height in the films he appeared in, in the 90s. Nowadays, Brad is probably a weak 5’11 or 5’10.5 range at the very lowest. viper said on 16/Jul/25Looking at all the evidence he's never been 5-11 Vadela3 said on 11/Jul/25He’s probably heading towards that 5’10.5 range now, considering he’s turning 62 this year he probably measures around 5’10.75 or maybe just shy of it later on in the day and in the next few years will probably be down to 5’10.5 or so. I’d still give him a good 5’11 at his peak though, chance of slightly over or under but no more than 1/8th inch less or more than 5’11 at his peak, might’ve measured bang on 180cm in the afternoon or something. 5’11 peak, 5’10 3/4-5/8 nowadays. MaskDeMasque 5'9.5 said on 7/Jul/25He looks 3 inches max taller than 5'7.5 Lewis Hamilton in recent photos with him. 5'10.5. Spencer said on 7/Jul/25Weak 5'11" viper said on 6/Jul/25Too much evidence shows hes 5-10.5 max and he wrote down 5-10 Jesse jess said on 5/Jul/25Tall guy Jessonei said on 3/Jul/25I love Brad Pitt but these photos with Bale just make a full legit 180 nowadays impossible. berta said on 2/Jul/25pitt always looked like a legit 180 guy to me. Only time he could look 179 is with duchovny if we go by 183 but i feel he was closer ( maybe still is when standing tall) to 184 cm. and that makes Pitt 180. viper said on 1/Jul/25He doesn't look like he has shrunk any reachjtm said on 1/Jul/25looks 5'9.5 with bale and it has nothing to do with his age. his height has been exposed so many times. all you have to do is look at the older comments. Johno said on 30/Jun/25Comparing him to Lewis Hamilton gives you interesting clues .... Amrithhh said on 30/Jun/25At the same event with 6'1 Damson idris(little less footwear) Click Here miko said on 29/Jun/25Brad is at the age where he's probably down half an inch now. Philip Z said on 29/Jun/25Even when accounting for slight posture or footwear differences, that's a minimum of two inches between Pitt and Gareth Bale. We know that Bale definitely isn't 6ft 1, hence Pitt cannot be 5ft 11 at this present day. At the same time, Pitt still has close to three inches on Cruise, so something in the 5ft 10.25-10.5 zone probably makes the most sense for Pitt right now. Could also be a case of Pitt not caring about height and leaving the big boots at home, which seems to become more common lately. Rory said on 29/Jun/25Good chance Pitt is 5ft10.75 today and Bale is 6ft0.25-0.5 range..if Bale had a bit thicker shoe and slightly better posture too then you've got easily a good 2 inch difference in a photo. pov said on 28/Jun/25@Rob look at this pic of him and Gareth Bale, Bale is clearly 2.5 to 3 inches taller. Brad looks 5”10 flat here. I never saw him as 5”11. And even in his early career he listed himself as 5”10. Brad gets a 5”10 flat for me. What do you think? Click HereEditor RobYeah, someone else mentioned it. Bale does have a bit thicker heel and maybe position makes it seem more than it is? Dmeyer said on 28/Jun/25Bale is listed 184cm pitt looks 178-178.5cm 5-10-10.25 viper said on 28/Jun/25Brad has never been taller than 5-10.5 Anp said on 27/Jun/25Rob, look at Brad here with Gareth Bale (6ft 0.25) Click Here Nearly 3 inches on BradEditor RobLooks like a 6ft 1 vs 5ft 10.5-75 guy there!! Jensen said on 26/Jun/25He still looks relatively large in his recent photos with Cruise. Actually looks larger nowadays than early in his career like Legends of the Fall. If he was not a full 5'11", then he was so close to it that is there is no point discussing this tiny fraction. Com said on 23/Jun/25Rob, can you give an estimate as to how many inches are between Pitt and Cruise today, meeting at the F1 premiere? Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Im sensing 2.5-3 inchesEditor RobIn the clip someone posted, when they first greet each other, I thought it was a good 3 inches. fkace63 said on 18/Jun/25Amrithhh i agree with you mostly. But in the pic of clooney and pitt pitt is in 0.5 inch lifts. Clooney even joked about it. Click Here Amrithhh said on 16/Jun/25I feel at times angle favoured Dicaprio and showed the difference a lot more than it really is. Below photos are literally the same footwear attire photos but at different instances . In the below 2 photos ,pitt and dicaprio look closer or even pitt edges him .But that's because pitt is slightly near the camera.In the 3rd photo,pitt is slouching and dicaprio is standing tall as well as near the camera.So he looks taller than he really is ,with Pitt. Click Here Click Here Click Here Comparison with Clooney Clooney(footwear advantage,3cm shoes) with pitt (a sneaker type shoes(1.5cm).Still Pitt looks a hair taller. Click Here Now when both are in similar type shoes, Pitt looks like an inch taller. Still in old-age I think pitt is near 5ft 11 rather than 179.Ofcourse ,weak 5ft 11 is also possible today Click Here I agree with Rob's listing. Garrett Thompson said on 14/Jun/25It's time for a downgrade. Leo has close to over a half-inch on him. He's 5'10.5 and since Leo slouches a bit, he's around 5'11 now a days. It's fine to keep Leo at 181 until he reaches Bradd's age, but if Clooney is listed 178, Brad is 179 Care to prove me wrong? Shoot me an email: [email protected] reachjtm said on 14/Jun/25this has been mentioned a million times but he was well under 5'11 with david duchovny Aznn said on 12/Jun/25Pitt is definitely not near 5'10 even at older age, I think he still holds the 5'11 even if just shy of it viper said on 12/Jun/255-10.5 max He wrote 5-10 supposedly reachjtm said on 12/Jun/25look at the older comments. there is so much evidence that he was never anywhere near 5'11. 5'10 is generous enough but that would be a good listing. fkace63 said on 9/Jun/25Rob - What exactly would you have to see to change him to 5'10.75 - since you downgraded Clooney? And Clooney called him out for lifts. Would 10-30 pics count as proof (dicaprio, etc..). If you take Clooney next to Biden and transpose Pitt. You have 5'10.75 (95%) maybe 5'11. Does this count as one of those 30? Click HereEditor RobToday there is a chance he is that mark. Early 60's can throw up a first instance of height loss in many individuals, but usually I am looking for 1/2 inch before I will give peak/current. David Garcia said on 7/Jun/25Max 5’11 1/4. hr6054 said on 6/Jun/25Peak- 5ft 11 1/8 Current-5ft 10 7/8 or 3/4 Do you think this is likely,Rob? David Garcia said on 5/Jun/25Rob, do you think Brad is still likely to clear 5'11? Anp said on 4/Jun/25Rob, can you give us a rundown of his approximate height from morning, afternoon to evening in the 90s?Editor RobI think he had to have been 5ft 11.75 to maybe a touch over 5ft 11 afternoon and by evening not really much below 5ft 11. reachjtm said on 22/May/25seems like many posters here don't want to know the truth these days lol. hr6054 said on 19/May/25Rob. Is 181 possible in the morning time at 8 am 9amEditor RobYes, that is quite likely for him. fkace63 said on 18/May/25yeah he was definitely 5'11 peak. Did he shrink to 5'10.75? I think maybe but everyone is going to be caught 1/2 inch shorter due to illusions in some pics. Basically there are probably 30-50 images of him looking 5'10.75 today with Dicaprio vs. 20 years ago he was easily 5'11 - near 5'10.5 Topher Grace. So is it 30 illusions? Click Here Click Here Amrithh said on 14/May/25Yea with Aaron taylor johnson at 5'10.5,he can comfortably look 5'11 in similar footwear. Click Here Click Here He's either 5'11 or atleast close.In photos ,can look under and over at times fkace63 said on 13/May/25yeah he is either 5'10.75 or 5'11. Very close and hard to tell apart. Seems same height as Fassbender near Bardem. The guy wears boots near bardem sometimes to look 5'11.75. Click Here Click Here Amrithh said on 26/Apr/25Even with dicaprio ,he doesn't look much short as people think.The angles favoured dicaprio and pitt was bad loose in stance Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Amrithh said on 26/Apr/25Still This mark is beleive for him .Click Here Click Here Click Here even with bad posture and less footwear comparatively he is still not far off from 5 11 with Javier bardem and damson idris fkace63 said on 6/Dec/24Click Here Click Here Yeah if I had to pick heights it would be. Clooney - 5'10.25 (after injury) Pitt - 5'10.75 (Shrank from 5'11) Aaron Taylor Johnson - 5'10.5 Leo - 5'11.25 Javier Bardem - 5'11.25 Pitt near Aaron Taylor Johnson usually appears either a lick taller of shorter because of shoes. He is clearly shorter than Javier Bardem. Rob - what is stopping you from downgrading Pitt based on above? My guess is Clooney has to be downgraded too. Rising174cm said on 4/Dec/24@fkace63: I remember the video with Obama and as I recall, Rob agreed that Obama made DiCaprio look 5'11" at most and Joe Biden similarly made Leo look no more than 5'11" in 2016, particularly since it is likely Biden was already more like the 5'11 5/8" he supposedly measured in 2019 at 77 years old than the 6'0" he likely was as a senator in the 1970s. It is even more likely he is not taller than 5'11" when you see him with Tom Hanks for the Catch Me If You Can photocall and consider the likelihood that the 5'11" and 175 pounds in the 2000 Time Magazine profile were figures that came from Leo himself. Pitt did look shorter at that Berlin premiere for Once Upon A Time In Hollywood and you can see in this full picture he had a fraction more footwear wearing those 1.2"-1.3" range heels he's often worn at red carpet events: Click Here Pitt was also shorter in Berlin at the photocall with a bit of a footwear advantage again since you see DiCaprio wearing just 0.7" range sneakers: Click Here Video from that event also shows Leo taller: Click Here I would have generally thought Pitt was about 2 cm shorter from almost all of the promotional appearances for the film. The one exception was the Cannes red carpet when Pitt did seem at least as tall, albeit with thicker heels. But at the Cannes photocall Pitt again seems clearly shorter: Click Here That's the one event when Pitt didn't seem to have any footwear advantage but he looks shorter even including his hat. I think Pitt must be at least somewhat under 5'11" with DiCaprio but I think he was always at least a bit taller than Clooney. The one exception was the photocall for Burn After Reading at the 2008 Venice film festival: Click Here Pitt is wearing loafers with a small heel while Clooney's motorcycle boots must add at least a cm or a half inch more but the height difference oddly doesn't look less than that. Clooney sometimes only looked like a solid 5'10"-5'10.25" guy to me even at his peak, but he was taller than Michael Parkinson in 2003 so I suppose I can buy that he was as tall as 5'10.5" but no taller. Oddly, the 3rd picture Putrescent posted on 26/Sep/24 is the photocall for Wolfs from the 2024 Venice Film Festival and that is a rare event in which Clooney can appear as tall as Pitt or at worst 1 cm shorter. I don't know if that is just Pitt wearing a style of sneaker that adds less height or if Clooney was wearing an elevator shoe. Clooney apparently wore lifts and bought elevator shoes around 2012 while dating Stacy Keibler and likely on some occasions after because his wife Amal will also be quite tall in heels and he may be compensating for some height loss. If you see him with Sandra Bullock in the picture at the top of Clooney's page, he definitely looks closer to 5'10" than 5'11" then in his early 50s and by age 55, his posture could make him look as short as 5'9" at times so it's surprising to see him looking as tall again as he did at the recent photocall in Venice. Whether that is Clooney wearing an elevator shoe would probably at least require at least a good shot of the shoe from the side. uddipta saikia said on 24/Nov/24He Has Lose His Height Even At The Age Of 61. fkace63 said on 22/Nov/245'10.75 near dicaprio. Rob hinted at that in a video or two. Dicaprio is not much over 5'11.25 compared to Obama as an example. Click Here Clooney must be 5'10 or 5'10.25 after his injury. During ocean's eleven they were the same height. Scotto said on 21/Nov/245-11 absolute peak. Now sub 5-11. fkace63 said on 1/Oct/24clooney is being explicit because they are buddies. Pitt is 0.5 inches taller than Clooney but that goes up to 1.25 with lifts. Click Here Nobleyute said on 1/Oct/24Can’t see him being as tall as me, legit 5’11.5 out of bed, 5’11 flat mid day and around 5’10.5 at the end of the day. Pitt is probably closer to 5’10.5-5’10.75 mid day. It looks like he’s wearing lifts, as most 5’10-5’11 barefoot guys do. fkace63 said on 29/Sep/24They are joking about the lifts "6 foot barrier". Clooney knows. Click Here Putrescent said on 26/Sep/24Rob, How tall do you think him and Clooney look together now? 1) Click Here 2) Click Here 3) Click Here 4) on video: Click Here Editor RobDoes look taller than Clooney, but the video he was closer at times to the camera (when not leaning on railing). mrtguy said on 24/Apr/24Brad Pitt is right around 5'10.5" Bob.C.Q said on 22/Apr/245-10.5 Jenji said on 30/Nov/23hi rob I turned 16 today and I grew exactly 2.5 cm from 15 yrs old to 16 yrs old, I'm actually 172.5 cm is there a chance that I could grow at least 1 cm from now until the end of my growth ? I wanna be at least 173.5 cm, I did my growth spurt at exactly 12.9 yrs old Editor RobOn average you might still expect another few cm of growth. Mickie said on 29/Nov/23I'm kinda with Viper on this. I'm going 5'10.25" - 5'10.5" range on Brad. Leret said on 29/Nov/23Is it possible for Brand Pitt to be 1.82 when he wakes up? Editor RobVery good chance he's that range Abdul-5'10 said on 28/Nov/23177-179 viper said on 28/Nov/23He wasn't any more than 5-10.5 at the very, very most 5'11james said on 28/Nov/23Rob, do you think Brad was bang on 5'11 5/8 or extremely close to it out of bed in his peak? Editor RobDoubt any less than that berta said on 25/Nov/23Not under 180 cm peak. 5'11james said on 24/Nov/23180-180.5cm peak afternoon height 179.5cm nowadays Slim1.75m said on 23/Nov/231.8 babu said on 27/Sep/23177.7 cm Abdu-5'10" said on 24/Sep/23178-179 Emil said on 20/Sep/23@Rob I think he still clears 179 cm but maybe it's time for a slight downgrade? I don't see Brad clearing 5'11 except for 1-2 hours out of bed maybe Editor RobUsually if I think half an inch has been lost I might consider it, but I don't think he's quite at that stage. The Bald Bros Mann said on 20/Sep/23Brad Pitt I just know has never been five eleven in his life.More closer to five ten and a half.On the film Thelma and Louise, Brad looked shorter than six footer Geena Favis. He wore Cuban boots Brad in that film.Looked even on film two inches shorter.Another thing I think Brad was an inch shorter than the great David Bowie who stood five nine.For Brad I'll go five ten and a tad over. Abdul 5'10 said on 17/Sep/23177.7 Slamm said on 14/Sep/235-10.5. hhhhhh said on 11/Sep/23compared to many people, he is definitely 179cm. Philip Z said on 11/Sep/23Stallone is wearing some properly thick boots in that picture, as seen here: Click Here It's the reverse of the usual situation of Pitt enjoying a footwear and/or posture advantage. aroodium said on 10/Sep/23i saw him in a picture next to Sylvester Stallone who is 5'8 1/2 I believe, and Brad looked almost the same height as him. im guessing he has to be around 5'9 or 5'10 max Click Here Height Analyzer 2 said on 31/Aug/23@7272 I think he looks closer to 5'11 than 5'11.25 today, but that's because he's gotten a good bit fatter and looks bloated in most pics. Though the difference between the two is negligible, I'd say keep the listing as is until Brad gets a downgrade. Then Leo should also get a downgrade as he's approaching 50 years 181cmguy said on 29/Aug/23@Putifer, tbh I used to think Pitt was a strong 5'11, even perhaps closer to 6ft. However looking at him in more detail I doubt he was ever my height in the afternoon or even later in the morning. I have him at 179.7(5'10 and 3/4) and Clooney at 178.4(5'10 and 1/4). I disagree on Paltrow though, she's definitely closer to 5'9 than 8, lowest I'd give her is 174.6(5'8 and 3/4). Putifer said on 29/Aug/23I don’t think he lost any height. He did not get fat and keeps stretching as one of his physical daily routines. He was barely taller than Gwyneth Paltrow both barefoot. She’s not even a full 5ft9 and I would say she’s closer to 5ft8. Brad was never 5ft11 imho I have a friend that met him in the 90s and described him as shorter than himself and he’s 181cm. 7272 said on 28/Aug/23@ Height Analyzer DiCaprio still looks 5'11 ¼ But Brad definitely lost height. Height Analyzer 2 said on 26/Aug/23Pitt needs to be downgraded to 5'10.75 and DiCaprio to 5'11 Jason Martensen said on 11/Jun/23I also believe its time for a peak height. With cuban heels he looks pretty equal to Leo but overal still seems to fall 1-2 cm short. Sometimes he strikes back and looks actually taller than Leo, but his Troy posture 6 feet days are gone. Considering the 1 cm shoe advantage he falls a full inch short of Leo now and somehow not that many people think Leo is really much above 180 himself. But its impossible to not have lost something at age 60, which he is this year. No man however fit keeps his peak height during his lifetime. As for the peak height 5'11", even generally looked 6" in his prime days. Sandy Cowell said on 10/Jun/23There was a guy laughing in my road today and he sounded EXACTLY like Brad Pitt’s laughter in Fight Club. A couple of hours later, I heard him again. I didn’t half laugh! 😂👌🏼 188 CM Legend said on 10/Jun/23I think it is time for a slight downgrade for Brad. He doesn't hold up to true 5'11 guys like Leo Dicaprio anymore. I would say 5'10.75 is a better listing for him, as he probably falls to 5'10.5 by the end of the day. Leo always has a half-inch on him, so if Leo falls to 5'11 by the end of the day, Brad should get a slight downgrade. The average guess is close to Brad's early evening height Sandy Cowell said on 9/Jun/23When Brad is confronted in Fight Club by those two overweight men who are grimble-grumbling about the members using their room to practice their ‘art’, Brad’s Tyler Durdon is so used to fighting that he’s immune to Lou’s punches! “Sorry Lou - I didn’t quite catch that!” 😂😂🤣 Sandy Cowell said on 8/Jun/23‘Project Mayhem’ indeed! 🤣🤣🤣 I laughed at the water-squirting scenes, and everything else as well. Now I think I’ll turn it back…… 📺 5ft11. He’s virtually the same height as Edward Norton. He is 6ft. Jack Daniels said on 7/Jun/23Hi Rob! I agree with Pauly e. Why Mr Pitt wrote 5'11' if it wasn't his peak height? Also I think he lost a fraction now at nearly 60 years old. He probably wake up at 5'10,5" now. It explains the 1 inch difference between him and Mr DiCaprio. Personally I wake up at 5'10,6" (179.3 cm) and generally 5'9,9" (177.5 cm) is my evening height. I wrote 5'10.5" on my identity Card, Rob do you think I'm wrong? The Schizo Vision said on 6/Jun/23He needs a downgrade to 179 (5'10.5) asap. Leo barely looks 5'11 these days & Brad is always shorter 7272 said on 5/Jun/23Always look almost an inch shorter than Di Caprio. 5'10.75 peak, 5'10.5 now viper said on 5/Jun/23He hasn't lost any height He's always been 5-10-5-10.5 range He even put down 5-10 on a form supposedly LuisTenma said on 31/May/23Got my attention how similar in height he was to 5'8'' Christian Slater in True Romance. Go to 2:00 in the video: Click Here EM25 said on 30/May/23This listing needs to be updated, for sure. The fact he’s pushing 60, plus him looking slightly shorter than a 5’11 Leo, pretty much solidifies he’s lost some height. By how much I can’t really say, but it doesn’t look he’s a solid 5’11 at this point. Weak5'11james said on 29/May/235'10.75 peak (at the max) flat 5'10 now Leah Kims 02 said on 25/May/23Don't think he reached 180. 178 to 179 seems about right. 5'10.25" said on 24/May/23Never saw him outside 179-180 cm tbh. viper said on 20/May/23I can't buy as high as 5-10.75 Maybe, maybe 5-10.5 Jtm said on 20/May/23pauly e said on 18/May/23 Since he wrote his height as 5'11 do we really think that a flat 5'11 was his low (night height)? He would surely then measure 5'11.5 in the morning at a Dr and would almost certainly claim 6'0 right? he also claimed he was born in 1965. doesn't make any sense he would shave 2 years off his real age and was telling the truth about his height. makes me doubt he is even a legit 5'10 and again struggle to look 5'10 with geena davis, tarantino, paltow, tatum, duchovny etc. we should be discussing if he's 5'10 not 5'11. I am Negan said on 19/May/23My dream height..my average height of my mom and dad plus 6 is 180 and i am not 180 at my 20th at the moment.. would i be Rob? pauly e said on 18/May/23Since he wrote his height as 5'11 do we really think that a flat 5'11 was his low (night height)? He would surely then measure 5'11.5 in the morning at a Dr and would almost certainly claim 6'0 right? Johan 185 cm said on 16/May/235'10.75" at most in his prime. Not sure if he has lost anything, just doesnt wear thick footwear as much anymore. 5'10 Abdul said on 11/May/23It’s time for a downgrade. 179 peak Today 178 Original said on 9/May/23I used to think he was like 5'10 or a weak 178cm, but he was taller than that, but I was never convinced he was 5'11 and he used big shoes at some point - not a lift wearer like Vin Diesel. Overall, I think solid 179cm was Pitt's peak height at a low. Nowadays probably he is near 178 flat. Clooney solid 178cm in his peak (177cm flat these days) and DiCaprio around 180.5cm. Dmeyer said on 6/May/23Pitt still manages to look 1cm taller than Clooney in similar shoes , even when Pitt has vans 1.6-1.8cm type and clooney 2.5-2,6cm shoes white sneakers even if Clooney IS 5-10,25-10,5 today Pitt has to bé near 5-10,75 it means Léo IS non less than 180,5-181 5-11-11,25 Malcolm Oliver said on 29/Apr/23Peak: 5’10.75 Now: 5’10.5 TurtleZach4 said on 27/Apr/23@Rob I think Brad's lost a few mm in height by now Peak: 5'11 flat (180-180.3 cm) Now: 5'10 3/4 (179.5-179.7 cm) Editor Robhe's now at an age where even fit men can still lose a small fraction. Slamo said on 23/Apr/23Stood with Slash he was 2” taller. Make what you wish with that. Has to be around 5-11. Dmeyer said on 22/Apr/235mm loss by now 180-180,3 Peak now 179.5-179.8cm no less than 180 Peak still over 179 today Terry 6 feet said on 20/Apr/23Typical 179cm guy recent years. GERAD HOKJH said on 13/Apr/23Maybe a little over 180 peak, shrunk slightly maybe 179-179.5? Going with 5’10 ¾ nowadays Terry 6 feet said on 7/Apr/23I used to think pitt is a 177cm guy, but through these years I saw he wearing the flat shoes and he still look taller than average male actor in his 59 years old, it made me change the mind of it. I will guess he was a 180cm guy when he was young and now maybe drop to 179cm. That’s still a decent height for an American. 6,1ftguy said on 7/Apr/23179.5 no more no less viper said on 5/Apr/23Pitt has never been more than 179cm imo He supposedly wrote down 5-10 Emil said on 31/Mar/23If Pitt ever drops close to 179 cm flat it's an extreme low. He's 5'11 or a smidgen under Malcolm Oliver said on 31/Mar/23I’d argue he does, even that one site @Heightist referenced mentions it He definitely measures around that currently, at peak he’d measure that at his lowest Look at him next to Geena Davis, even Clooney (when they’re in flats) and you’ll see why 5’11 is questionable Gian 181cm said on 30/Mar/23@Malcolm I don't think he drops to 179cm Dmeyer said on 29/Mar/23Pitt Can look 3.5-4in over 5-7-7,5 waltz Can look easy as tall as 5-11 Eli Roth Slightly taller than Clooney all this with low cut normal looking shoes , easy as tall as 5-11 Malkovich 15 years back As tall as 6ft Norton because of posture A good 3cm over if not 4 cm than 176.5 Damon, can look 1cm taller than 180 Dujardin and about as tall as DiCaprio so 5-11 isnt a shock Heightist9999 said on 29/Mar/23Strangely, he is listed 179 cm on this foreign website: Click Here Malcolm Oliver said on 27/Mar/23@Gian More like 181 - morning 179.7 - afternoon 179 - night pauly e said on 27/Mar/23I see alot of estimates on here with a height loss of 2+ centimeters. Do people really lose that much height in a day? I've measured myself numerous times and never seem to drop more than 1.5 cms or roughly 1/2 inch in a day. As it pertains to Pitt I'd guess him to be 5'10.75 in the morning and 5'10.25 at evening. Gian 181cm said on 26/Mar/23181.9cm - Morning 180.6cm - Noon 180.3cm - Afternoon 180.0cm - 179.7cm - Evening Jtm said on 25/Mar/23Original said on 4/Dec/20 Around 5'10 at his low (5'9.75 to 5'10.25" or 177-178.5cm) in his peak. ironic coming from a poster that now laughing at other posters for basically having the same opinion he did in 2020. Original said on 21/Mar/23Is CDS the new Pierre then? I don't even think someone can drop that much from mid day to the end of the day, I for example drop around 1cm in the first hour and a half and then just 0.5cm until the end of the day (with GYM and etc), I think relatively slim/athletic people, with no fat and single digit BF like Pitt, drop more like 1.5cm on average rather than 2cm or more too. ... and Pitt is nonwhere as low as nearly 176.5cm (5'9.5") hahah, perhaps with 70years old or something, maybe he reaches that. haha Overall, I think Pitt can be the full 5'11 in the morning, but drop to 5'10.25-5'10.5 at the end of the day with his excellent posture, zero chances from Pitt being less than 5'10 at any momment, even if 5'10.75" seems too high too. Maybe now he is borderline deserving a downgrade, but in his peak, less than 5'10 is a totally red zone as it is higher than 5'10.75". I give him 180.3cm out of the bed peak and 179cm before bed. CDS said on 12/Mar/23@jtm: I would break down Brad's height as (all barefoot): Out of bed: 5'10.5"-5'10.75" (pretty close to this site's listing) Mid day: 5'10"-5.10.25" End of day (heavy activity): 5'9.5"-5'9.75" Which all this indicates his mid - end of day height around 5'11" in a pair of sneakers. With modest lift-based footwear, easily over 6'. And I think most on here agree, a LOT of the footwear he's been seen wearing over the years is anything but modest. 🤔😅 Geena Davis, on the other hand, right around an inch taller. This makes perfect sense all around: why she appears taller than Brad in "Thelma and louise ", why she appears shorter than alec Baldwin in "beetlejuice ", how she (in flats) looked the same height as Michael Keaton (in cowboy boots) in "speechless "; would also explain her 6' listings, as well as her earlier 5'10" listings... mikus said on 11/Mar/23who cares about night height? or morning height for that matter. our concern should be the noon/afternoon height. that's our average height. Jtm said on 11/Mar/23CDS- i made that clear in the past and maybe it was also the camera angles making baldwin look taller but we agree on pitt's height. Jtm said on 23/Jan/19 no way 5'11 even on his best day. i watched thelma and louise again a couple days ago and despite the solid footwear advantage he was still noticeably shorter than geena davis. go compare alec baldwin with davis in beetlejuice. baldwin had shoes on and i think davis was barefoot but he was taller. that tells you 5'11 is far from the truth. sreesmith said on 10/Mar/23Rob, Is there a chance of 6ft first thing in the morning and 5ft 11 flat at night. He can look that range with bradley cooper, orlando bloom and sometimes edge Decaprio Editor RobIn the past I might have thought it was easily possible, but you know recent years I'm thinking almost 6ft out of bed. Sean Forrest said on 10/Mar/23I hope he holds 5'11 until maybe his mid 60s CDS said on 7/Mar/23@jtm: geena Davis was never 6'. See the film, "Beetlejuice", as many on here have pointed out, 5'11.5" (listed here), Alec Baldwin was about an inch taller. Although, I'm guessing he is closer to 5'11",and over on his thread, rising makes a very valid argument for that... Jtm said on 7/Mar/235'9.5 looks right if geena davis was 6'0 peak (not sure about her height now). if she's between 5'10-5'11 then that's a really scary situation for pitt. Vibram said on 6/Mar/23Peak: 5'10½ (noon) morning: 5'10.8 Today: 5'10 (noon) morning: 5'10.5 Wears 1 to 2 inch lifts depending on his mood and event importance. There's photos where he looks taller than Jon Bernthal and photos where he looks equal or shorter to him. Odd. Looking shorter than Bernthal: Click Here Looking taller than Bernthal: Click Here CDS said on 5/Mar/23Referring to the pic posted below with Brad and geena Davis, presumably at the 1991 premiere of "Thelma and louise ", we get a good idea of his pre-lifts era. I think it's safe to assume, based on her clothing, geena is not wearing heels, while at the same time, Brad is not wearing cowboy boots, as he was known to back in those days. Geena, who is somewhere between 5'10"-5'11", edges out Brad by about an inch. People forget, at one time, she was listed publicly at 5'10" until she started doing action films, then she started claiming 6'. I don't think she's as low as 5'10", but I think that was a barefoot rounded-down height, back when she was making mostly romantic comedies (see the 1994 film "speechless ", and she looks about dead-even with 5'9" actor , Michael Keaton). Well anyway, that puts Brad somewhere between 5'9" and 5'10" barefoot (end of day). I honestly don't think 59-year old Brad has lost any height at his age. I think posters on this site seem to forget those earlier years of his career, and underestimate his use of lifts during a big portion of his career (I estimate from around the mid-late 90s mid 2010's), and, in recent years, I think he's still wearing them, just not the massive lifts he had been wearing in years past. I can recall, at an event in the mid 2000's, Brad towering over 6' Edward Norton (nah, he doesn't wear lifts at all does he?? 🤔😂). 5'10-Abdul. said on 4/Mar/23177-179. Malcolm Oliver said on 2/Mar/23Actually if I were to be more precise, at most 6’1.5 in his special shoes. Never reaches 6’2 in anything I looked over pictures between him and Bana and the latter at most is 6’3.5 in shoes. If you disregard the camera tricks and angles, he clearly has Pitt by 2 inches still. Take away the footwear and he loses even more In regular shoes he’s near 6ft, if not at it; in standard lifts and special shoes, he’s well into 6ft-6ft1 range. As others have said, he can pull this off because of his build and look (head size, shoulders, posture, proportions, etc). But even at peak he never reached this. Good looking guy though regardless Joy Krish said on 2/Mar/23With perfect posture, he might clear 180 (highest I'd go is 180.3) so 5'11 at peak. By now though, he's closer to 5'10.75, might even be under that. IAmTheWalrus said on 1/Mar/23I think peak he was 5’10.5-5’10.75 but now he looks around 5’10.25 Malcolm Oliver said on 28/Feb/23More like 181 in the morning. But a weak 5’11, even in his prime. 6’-6’2 depending on footwear (shoes, lifts, special shoes, etc) berta said on 25/Feb/23i think most poeple underestimate brads height. He pull of atleast 5´11 most times. Myabe now have lost a couple mm but i dont think he have. Have he used lifts? maybe in that case he could be at best 5´11. If he havent i think legit 5´11. If i remember right he was at 6 foot in the beginning then listed at 182,181 and now 180 for many years. I can understand why he was listed at little over 5´11 before. 181 on a good day at peak is not impossible. James Matthews said on 23/Feb/23Weak 5’11 Heightist9999 said on 21/Feb/23179,4 cm walking on a street today 180,0 cm walking on a street in his prime He is under 5ft 11 nowadays, no doubt. Jawilder said on 20/Feb/23Click Here= Terry 6 feet said on 19/Feb/23Brad is a 5’10 1/4 guy, there is no question. He was 5’10 1/2 in 90s, that’s it. viper said on 18/Feb/23He's definitely below 5-11 Leesheff1985 said on 14/Feb/23Five eleven looks fine. Not below. Jawilder said on 14/Feb/23Weak 5’11 def would never measure 5’11 flat at a low. But he’s also closer to it than 5’10 imo. viper said on 13/Feb/23Don't think he's more than 5-10-5-10.25 Njp said on 13/Feb/23Seems to wear less extreme lifts these days and, at a glance, his foot doesn’t look too steep but then you zoom in and you can actually see the soft leather fold over the internal lift in his shoe. He’s still doubt a solid 5’10.5”. Lift looks around an inch, maybe 7/8”s. Click Here Sandy Cowell said on 26/Jan/23Brad swings Helena Bonham Carter round like a rag doll in Fight Club, but she doesn’t seem to mind. Speaking purely from a female point of view, neither would I! 😎 QM6'1.5"QM said on 26/Jan/23I can't take him as "not young". He's this type of always and forever young, lol. Anyway, 5'10.5"! he's no taller than Jon Benthral (5'10.75-5'11"). Slim1.75m said on 25/Jan/23Rod do you think Brad Wears lifts or not I'd like to hear your thoughts. Editor RobHe's no Stallone, but at times has had bigger than average heels. Rockaway said on 23/Jan/23I don’t see the full 5’11, at least as a lunch time height. At this age especially, I think he deserves a quarter inch downgrade. Qiyu said on 23/Jan/23You can get an idea of his height when he was younger by looking at a lot of pictures of his ex-girlfriend Paltrow, there are a lot of pictures on the Internet. His recent height can be defined by pictures of him with the other two leading men at the Bullet Train event, and you can easily find a lot of pictures on the Internet, where he's wearing the green suit, and he's wearing yellow shoes and obviously Brad begin to prefer ‘normal’ shoes as he gets into his old age, I mean, you can clearly tell he's the shortest of the three leading men, but I would say that 5 '9 3/4-5' 10 is never short for a white male actor, and with Brad's elegant looks and his charming temperament, it's enough to ignore an average height. I would go so far as to say that he still looks more attractive than most young male actors. Anyway, when he was young, it's probably 5 '10 1/4- 5' 10 1/2. Malcolm Oliver said on 23/Jan/23The most classic case is him with 6ft Norton. He’s getting away with that range too, making me think that was around the time he became height conscious (during Fight Club) Original said on 22/Jan/23If he was shorter than 5'10.5 in his peak, he was 5'10.25. Bradley said on 22/Jan/23Notorious custom lift guy.....even in boots. Packed in them he's as Clooney says: 6-1. Philip Z said on 21/Jan/23Barefoot height, Pitt generally falls into the 5ft 10.25-10.75 range. I don't think he is the full 5ft 11, but I also don't think he is an even 5ft 10 or below it, even at a low. w/ 6 ft Geena Davis in the early 90s: Click Here We can't see footwear, but if we assume it's roughly equal, Pitt looks around 5ft 10.5 here. Pitt wasn't as fond of big heels and lifts back then, so it's safe to say he didn't get much if any help on that front. w/ 5ft 9 Gwyneth Paltrow in the late 90s: Click Here The perspective is a bit deceiving, but even with bigger footwear, Pitt doesn't have 2 full inches on Paltrow here. Other pictures of them likewise suggest a difference of around 1.5 inches between them sans footwear. w/ George Clooney in 2008: Click Here One of the rare cases of Pitt not having much if any footwear advantage over Clooney. McDormand is listed at 5ft 5, but seems to have bigger footwear, which has her look less than four inches shorter than Pitt. Hence, we can assume Pitt receives minimal footwear help here. Swinton in huge heels has him by several inches. In fact, in this picture with Stallone we can see what happens when the footwear and posture advantage Pitt usually enjoys is reversed: Click Here The reason why Pitt can get away with big shoes and some lifts and believably pull off 6ft-6ft 1 are his above average head size and broad shoulders. In terms of build and overall look, he can pass for a six footer, despite falling roughly 1.5 inches short of it. In any case, it is obvious that he is quite aware of his own height, and I wouldn't be surprised if he goes to great lengths (no pun intended) to look as tall as possible when needed, even getting up late for a premiere event to enjoy a morning height advantage over his co-stars. Jtm said on 21/Jan/23Malcolm Oliver should consider looking at the pictures with Tarantino back in 2009 A D H Jade said on 20/Jan/23Here's the real deal I know and Brad knows he's all his twenties, to this present day standing as always five ten and a half I really, seriously believe in that. On Thelma and Louise the 1990 fabulous film Brad Pitt looked a couple of inches shorter than main woman Geena Davis. He was wearing cowboy boots Brad in that movie but noticeably Geena got the prize for being taller. Maybe Brad could really even be five ten only just. like David Beckham who's really five ten and a half, people instantly think five eleven God well, it's only half an inch less! Malcolm Oliver said on 19/Jan/23with strong 6 footers (Gosling, Cooper, Hamm): Click Here Click Here Click Here with 6’1 Tarantino: Click Here Obviously he is the master at posing in front of the camera to his advantage (posture and angle) and is notorious for lifts. But to his credit, much of it IS his height. Him with strong 6’2 Bana: Click Here Click Here As I’ve said, no 5’9 guy is going to pull off this feat even with lifts. So that discredits any 5’9 guesses. In fact, a similar case can be seen here between 5’10 Chalamet and weak 6’2 Hiddleston: Click Here where there is a clear 3-4 inch difference, but somehow they look close On the other end, he is no 6ft. We know he has special shoes, but it’s a matter of HOW MUCH height they’re giving him. I’d say with some 6ft+ guys, he’s got standard lifts (2 inches), in rare instances here and there, he’ll gain more from some shoes (e.g, Golden Globes as seen w/ Cooper and Hamm, Troy premiere w/ Bana, etc) TLDR; If you want to highball it, he’s 181. But 179-180 is more fit. Njp said on 11/Jan/23Pre-lift era Pitt circa Interview With The Vampire/Kalifornia he looked at best around the 5’10” mark. Not sure why his earlier work and appearances are discounted here in preference of his work from 2000 onwards. Robs either taking a back hander or is in denial of the lifts ;) James G said on 11/Jan/23I rly don't think he falls above the 178 mark these days. Maybe 179.5 cm peak. Since there's no peak and current, I'd go with 178.75 overall. There are some recent pics of him with his girlfriend that show him in slides. Looks on the shorter side in those. Malcolm Oliver said on 6/Jan/23I still don’t see reason to keep him at this listing as the majority of comments seem to see him a fraction or so under. Rob, thoughts on a downgrade? Qiyu said on 5/Jan/23The average guess was close to his peak height, he is 5’9 3/4 barefoot nowadays. Jtm said on 3/Jan/23Qiyu said on 22/Dec/22 180.0 cm is a dream for him. finally someone gets it. Jtm said on 3/Jan/23QM6'1.5"QM said on 10/Dec/22 5'9.5" is just too low. 5'10.25- 5'10.5" is the most accurate guess, that's how he looked in "Thelma&Louise" (1991). noticeably shorter than geena davis despite the footwear advantage and wsa noticeably shorter than channing tatum in that recent movie they did together and yet again with the footwear advantage. 5'9.5 seems about right for me without footwear. Henrik said on 25/Dec/22IMO, I don't have a study or statistics to back it up, but most guys who are considered to have the most handsome faces are usually 5ft 11 to 6ft, let's say 5ft 9 to 6ft 1 broadly speaking. Maybe that's why the height of Hollywood leading actors changed and decreased over time with rugged masculinity being replaced in favour of handsome. Resurrection of Edwards said on 23/Dec/22i personally think brad pitt is one of the most goodlooking guys along with david beckham.same body proportion and same faceshape and ofcource same height.i personally think both pitt and becks were flat 5’11 at peak and 5’10.5 or 5’10.75 currently.these guys prove that 5’11 is a good height or most attractive height proportion wise. Qiyu said on 22/Dec/22180.0 cm is a dream for him. Sandy Cowell said on 18/Dec/22🎂🎉🎁 Happy Birthday Brad! 🎁🎉🎂 A very Happy 59th Birthday to the ever adorable, hilarious actor that is Brad Pitt! 5ft11. XXXXX QM6'1.5"QM said on 10/Dec/225'9.5" is just too low. 5'10.25- 5'10.5" is the most accurate guess, that's how he looked in "Thelma&Louise" (1991). He's def solid 5'10er range, no saying about 5'11". A little bit shorter than Jon Benthral and probably will the same height as Aaron Taylor (barefoot). Ema said on 9/Dec/225'10 barefoot could be 5'9.5 at night Abdul-DK said on 4/Dec/22178.5 Qiyu said on 1/Dec/22179 when he was young, 178 now, maybe 177 at late night. Always a decent 5’11 with shoes. Original said on 25/Nov/225'10.5 In good shoes (typical for him) = 6'0.5 In his special boots = 6'1.5 Thats why in that Troy event in Cannes 2004 he only looked around two inches shorter than someone like Bana, a typical 6'2 guy (6'2.25" for me) and also two inches taller than Bloom (5'10.25 for me), or around four to four and a half inches taller than a legit 5'5 Diane Kruger (5'5.5 for me) in big heels. In his 6'1.5 megaboots heights, he looked a typical 6'0.25" guy there (easily taller than someone like Bloom or Sean Bean). Is Pitt actually 6'0.25" IRL? haha! All peak range for him, now he is at least 0.25 inches shorter. Thats why recently he looked a bit shorter than Di Caprio while in his 'normal boots' (where he looked around 181cm in the past, he looks 180cm nowadays, truly height about solid 178cm these days, rather than 179cm or nearly it). He uses lifts, thats why you can see pictures of him with Clooney (around 5'10.25 for me) where he barely looks taller than George, while you also can find some other pics where the difference seems to be about a good two inches. Sh0ckeh said on 18/Nov/22Yep 5'10.75 (179.5cm) is good for brad pitt. Abdul-DK said on 9/Nov/225’10.6 Orginal said on 12/Oct/22Beckham = 180cm. Brad Pitt = 178.5cm-179cm So yeah Beckham would edge him. (Billythetreesurgeon) said on 11/Oct/22Beckham would probably edge him Malcolm Oliver said on 9/Oct/22@jacken Lifts for sure. He does have great posture and his slim build does help in the illusion of “looking tall.” Proportions go a long way when it comes to height. Sean Forrest said on 9/Oct/22@jacken I'd say it's definitely more to do with posture. I don't think he necessarily wears lifts but a few times has worn Cubans so maybe 1.75-2" of footwear on occasion. Leighton Tang said on 9/Oct/22@jacken Brad Pitt does wear lifts which make him look much taller than his 5'10.5 barefoot height. Leighton Tang said on 9/Oct/22@jacken Brad Pitt does wear lifts which make him look over his 5'10.5 barefoot height. Orginal said on 30/Sep/22His height is something between 5'10 and 5'10.75", I personally ruled out 5'9.75 and 5'11, even though in pics with bad angles he can look 5'9.75 and very often looks in the 5'11 range or even 6' in pics, but with his special shoes on and people know that. 5'10.25 and 5'10.5 are the most reasonable guesses imo. Not bad height at all (in fact an adequate height) but people expect more from a Hollywood superstar. Pierre said on 29/Sep/22Leighton Tang said on 26/Sep/22 @Pierre Leonardo Dicaprio looks at least 5'11 next to 5'9.5 Liv Tyler in heels, so 5'10 is nonsense for Dicaprio. Click Here Leonardo /Arnold absolute max 5'10.5" this days = Click Here Leonardo /Prince Albert = Click Here Robert Knepper 5'8.5"/5'8.75" ( Click Here )/Prince Albert = Click Here 5'10" nonsense ?! Orginal said on 29/Sep/225'10.5" Abdul.dk11 said on 28/Sep/22178.6 Sandy Cowell said on 27/Sep/22@ Pierre - He was wearing trainers in his boxing match in ‘Snatch’, the second half of which I saw yesterday - and very funny it was too! Yes, I think Brad’s peak was 5ft11, certainly in the morning. The film was from 2000/2001, and Brad appeared at his own request, having enjoyed Guy Ritchie’s first movie. Sandy Cowell said on 26/Sep/22@ Pierre - That’s funny! In order to know the answer for sure, I’d need to see him running around barefooted! Leighton Tang said on 26/Sep/22@Pierre Leonardo Dicaprio looks at least 5'11 next to 5'9.5 Liv Tyler in heels, so 5'10 is nonsense for Dicaprio. Click Here viper said on 24/Sep/225-10.25 to maybe 5-10.5 is correct Pierre said on 24/Sep/22Sandy Cowell said on 21/Sep/22 Do you believe he could win an award for best discreet lift shoe wearer ? Sandy Cowell said on 23/Sep/22@ Mickie: I think Brad’s excellent physique helps us to think that he’s a convincing 5ft11. His height was described as such in his film ‘Kalifornia’. Have you seen it yet, Mickie? I showed it to my Dad and he thought it was great! It was on the TV shortly afterwards and my Dad watched it again…. 😊 I also sent my Dad a copy of ‘Fight Club’. Well, there you go! I don’t think I’ve EVER seen Brad in a lousy picture, and that includes his little appearances, for example, in ‘True Romance’. Cheers to you, Mickie! 😄 Pierre said on 23/Sep/22Brad supposed full 5'10" = A young Magic Johnson / Kareem weak 6'2" = Click Here Récent Lebron James( wearing advantageous cap) / Magic Johnson = Click Here Other = Click Here Bad Bunny / Lebron = Click Here Brad / Bad Bunny = Click Here Where is the full 5'10" please Mickie said on 22/Sep/22Not as low as 5'9", but I also don't believe he's ever been a legit 5'11". I think 5'10.25" - 5'10.5" range, somewhere right in there. He can look a bit taller at times because he wears enhancing footwear and has very good posture. Sandy Cowell said on 21/Sep/22I really enjoyed Brad’s performance in ‘Once Upon A Time In Hollywood’, which I saw last night. He had a lovely liver-coloured dog, who proved to be a hero, as did Brad, who was in fine form, as usual. He played Leonardo Di Caprio’s stunt double. Not surprisingly, he won an award for Best Supporting Actor. 5ft11. Leighton Tang said on 21/Sep/22If Orlando is as short as you say then why does he look much taller next to Viggo Mortensen, Ian McKellen, Sean Bean, Johnny Depp and Keira Knightley? Either they're all over listed or there's some error I'm unaware of in your photo. sam cohen said on 20/Sep/22looks close to 6 feet tall Leighton Tang said on 20/Sep/22@Pierre Look at Logan Lerman next to 5’10 Dylan O’Brien who Rob has met. It’s hard to argue Lerman only being 5’6 in these pictures. Click Here Click Here CDS said on 19/Sep/22Jon bernthal and his 5'10" "walking dead" costar, Andrew Lincoln, were about dead even height wise... Pierre said on 18/Sep/22Leighton Tang said on 17/Sep/22 @Parker Knowing Pierre, he will probably say something along the lines of Pitt standing on higher sand, which is just as wild as his thicker grass argument on Tyson Fury's page Lol, by watching their respective feet this is just an evidence the floor advantage them! (Brad and Tyson!) Pierre said on 18/Sep/22Parker said on 15/Sep/22 Brad's sneakers are looking regular but not impossible to insert little lifts.The floor isn't regular here and Brad imo stands on a hill here compared to other feet... About Logan Lerman's height supposed 5'7.5" = Logan /James Corden = Click Here Click Here Mathew horne listed 5'6" /James Corden = Click Here Click Here 4ndrews said on 17/Sep/22Parker said on 15/Sep/22 Brad Pitt has lifts and looks max 5'11 next to him here: Click Here Brad Pitt is a classic 5'10 guy 4ndrews said on 17/Sep/22Parker said on 15/Sep/22 Brad Pitt looking a solid 5'10 guy maybe around Bernthal height but I think both guys are solid 5'10 guys. I know Rob met Jon Bernthal but he looks 5'10.5 to my eyes. 5'11 is too tall. CDS said on 17/Sep/22@Parker: they do actually make tennis shoes with lifts built into them, and I believe, in that pic you just posted, Pitt is wearing them. You can tell my the extended toe, especially for someone like Brad, who is reported as wearing a size 9, and in most pics, the shoes he has on are clearly a larger size than that. For those who know anything about wearing lifts (or shoes with lifts built in), you have wear about a size larger footwear than your regular size... Leighton Tang said on 17/Sep/22@Parker Knowing Pierre, he will probably say something along the lines of Pitt standing on higher sand, which is just as wild as his thicker grass argument on Tyson Fury's page Parker said on 15/Sep/22Pierre said on 12/Sep/22 Nah, you would have to question every pic you ever posted if you think they are elevators, although to be fair I did not expect any other response from you. Not a good pic for height comparison,but you can see Pitt & Bernthal are similar range from this pic, Click Here, especially with Logan Lerman listed at 5'7.5. Please don't tell me you think Pitt has lifts in his tennis shoes or Logan Lerman is really 5'6. Pierre said on 12/Sep/22Parker said on 10/Sep/22 Brad's shoes have a hard angle of laces imo ,this shoes are not looking classic shoes to my eyes . Parker said on 10/Sep/22viper said on 8/Sep/22 I think Brad is 5-10.25 Fair enough Viper, that's your opinion. There is no doubt that Pitt at times uses enhanced footwear to appear over 6 foot, but please explain this pic. An elevator/enhanced footwear will invariably have a thicker sole,heel. The angle of the foot may be different, or bulging at the lace area. Click Here Here's Rob with Jon Bernthal for reference. Click Here viper said on 8/Sep/22I think Brad is 5-10.25 Pierre said on 8/Sep/22Parker said on 7/Sep/22 = @Parker also explain me Brad like Tom Cruise never wears lifts (lol) .... Leighton Tang said on 8/Sep/22@Parker I know Pitt is not 5'9.5. I'm just trying to prove Pierre wrong by giving evidence as to why he's not that short. After all, how can a 5'9.5 guy look as tall as he does next to 6'0 + celebrities like Bradley Cooper and Ryan Gosling even with the help of elevator shoes? Parker said on 7/Sep/22Leighton Tang said on 3/Sep/22 @Pierre If Pitt is only 5'9.5 peak, then explain this photo next to 179.1cm Orlando Bloom. Click Here Pitt is not below 5'10.5. 5'9.5 peak (an average height man) is laughing gas and not even worth debating. There's plenty of pics at The Fury premiers with Jon Bernthal who Rob has at 5'11 - Looks very close to Pitt in height. Any poster can check them out on google images. Pierre said on 4/Sep/22Leighton Tang said on 3/Sep/22 @Pierre If Pitt is only 5'9.5 peak, then explain this photo next to 179.1cm Orlando Bloom. Click Here First Brad stands closer to the camera here and Orlando stands in poorer posture. Second = we can't really see Brad's shoes hidden by his pants ... Three= Here probably both guys wearing similar helps this time,Orlando tilting a lot his head and Brad standing a bit closer to the camera = Click Here Four = Here is how much tall looks Orlando supposed 5'10.5" next Madds Mikelsen max 5'11.5" /Christoph Waltz 5'7.25" = Orlando closer to the camera and probably a centimeter less shoe than others= Click Here Click Here Leighton Tang said on 3/Sep/22@Pierre If Pitt is only 5'9.5 peak, then explain this photo next to 179.1cm Orlando Bloom. Click Here

• 1
• 2
• 3
• ...
• 28

Celebrity Heights A-Z A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Random Celebrity Latest Star Heights Jimmy Tatro Duane Martin Olivia Mai Barrett Dean McDermott Hannibal Buress Tulsi Gabbard Michelle Morgan John Starks View More Latest Height Video Jeremy Davies Popular Pages

• Celebs My Height
• Top 50 Celebs
• Guess Heights
• Justin Bieber
• Tom Cruise
• Brad Pitt
• Arnold Schwarzenegger
• Sylvester Stallone
• Sneaker Heights
• Elevator Shoes
• Height Articles
• Categories

Random Video CelebHeights.com © Rob Paul 2004-2025. By visiting Celeb Heights you agree to its Terms and Privacy & Cookie Policies.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films. Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media. Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.