Clint Eastwood Height - How Tall

Clint Eastwood's Height

5ft 11 (180.3 cm)

Peak height was 6ft 3 ½ (191.8 cm)

American actor and Director best known for films such as The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, Dirty Harry films, Unforgiven, Every Which Way But Loose, The Outlaw Josey Wales, Million Dollar Baby, Escape from Alcatraz, Space Cowboys and Gran Torino. In a racquetball website he stated he was "6ft 4" and in a 1988 article it mentioned his weight: "At 6- 3 and 216 pounds". 60's Publicity Photo, via Wikimedia Commons

When you're a new kid in town, you always have to punch it out with the other kids the first day or so. Kids always seem to pick on tall kids too, and I was six feet tall at the age of 13.

At school, I was never the one in my class to make things go. In the first place, I was about a foot taller than the rest of the kids. There were even occasions when I'd have lopped myself off at the knees if that had been possible. [on basketball team] There was one guy taller than me at six-five.

DirectorsClassic Hollywood Actors6ft 3 ½ Males

You May Be Interested

John Wayne6ft 3 ¾ (192 cm) Gene Hackman6ft 1 ¾ (187 cm) Lee Van Cleef6ft 2 (188 cm) Scott Eastwood5ft 10 ¾ (180 cm)

Add a Comment5790 comments

• Your Guess (Optional) 5ft 95ft 9 ¼5ft 9 ½5ft 9 ¾5ft 105ft 10 ¼5ft 10 ½5ft 10 ¾5ft 115ft 11 ¼5ft 11 ½5ft 11 ¾6ft 06ft ¼6ft ½6ft ¾6ft 1 Peak Height 6ft 1 ½6ft 1 ¾6ft 26ft 2 ¼6ft 2 ½6ft 2 ¾6ft 36ft 3 ¼6ft 3 ½6ft 3 ¾6ft 46ft 4 ¼6ft 4 ½6ft 4 ¾6ft 56ft 5 ¼6ft 5 ½

Average Guess (494 Votes)Peak: 6ft 3.36in (191.4cm) Current: 5ft 11.73in (182.2cm)

• 1
• 2
• 3
• ...
• 24

Hong said on 4/Feb/26Click Here Here's Clint in his 80s with a couple of medium sized guys,hard to believe in his Youth he was 6ft3.5, or even close. James B 172cm said on 19/Jan/26Rob was he 6ft3 190.5cm by Deadpool?Editor RobHe still seemed around that mark during that period. Arch Stanton said on 2/Jan/26Eastwood edged out Sutherland in Kelly Heroes I thought. Certainly looks taller here in the still. Click Here Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 31/Dec/25Arch, I would give the edge to Sutherland…..slightly better chance of hitting 6ft4 in his prime MaskDeMasque 5'9.5 said on 30/Dec/25Could be better 6'3.25 by evening time Rob? I think a guy like Peter serafinowicz who's a legit 6'3.5 would edge out Clint. Arch Stanton said on 20/Dec/25No way was Clint shorter than Donald Sutherland! Arch Stanton said on 20/Dec/25Easily 6'3.5" with people like David Soul and Tim Matheson, Charlton Heston Jeff Bridges and George Kennedy in the early 70s. Grayloth said on 19/Dec/25@HongYeah, 191 cm is probably bang on target. I think Clint himself have said "about 6'3". He only looks 192 cm in his cowboy boots as "The man with no name" but probably with help from his boots. Robhuesos said on 18/Dec/25@Gemetr11 - I agree with you Hong said on 18/Dec/25"I definitely think Clint was more a solid 6ft3 guy at peak, more than 6ft3.5", at most 6ft3.25. Arch Stanton said on 17/Dec/25"If Reynolds is in normal footwear and not massive heels". That's a tall order for Burt! Rory said on 17/Dec/25I don't personally see any more than 3.5 inches between Burt and Clint there. Hong said on 15/Dec/25Click Here Here's Clint with 5ft11 listed Burt Reynolds,if Reynolds is in normal footwear and not massive heels and Clint is in normal footwear too,Clint is looking a strong 6ft3 in comparison. JPTheGamer said on 22/Nov/25Found a picture of him with his son on Instagram. How tall does he look here, Rob?Click HereEditor RobFrom that photo it's taken quite close and Scott a bit closer, so it's making Clint probably look 1-2 inches shorter than he'd normally be at that point. Gemetr11 said on 19/Nov/256’2.5 max for his peak. was shorter than Brolin and Sutherland Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Nov/25Com, you mean Larry Hankin…..He’s listed 6ft4 in places. I think in his prime 6ft3½ is probable like Eastwood. Still looked around 6ft3 on Breaking Bad next Cranston Grayloth said on 17/Nov/25I could actually buy 192 cm for Eastwood. Proportionwise he looks it. He has very long legs but what could make people believe he is shorter is because he had very bad posture and seemed to have some kind of back problems already at a young age. 191 cm is ofc possible also. Com said on 13/Nov/25Rob, how tall do you think Larry Hanson was at peak? He co starred with Clint in Escape From Alcatraz. He also appeared in Friends and Breaking Bad.With Bryan Cranston in Breaking BadClick HereEditor RobFrom what I remember, he seemed quite close to Clint, at least 6ft 3 range, maybe they were within a fraction of each other. Reptilian said on 8/Nov/25I feel like 6'3.25 peak is a lot more reasonable.. Joe Ponce said on 6/Nov/25Would a 5ft 10¾in be possible today, Rob?Editor RobDifficult to pinpoint exactly, but it's clear he is sub 6ft now. 001 said on 1/Nov/25Rob, is sub 5ft 11 a better listing today?Editor RobHard to tell exactly what figure he would measure, but he probably could look 5ft 10 at times to people who meet him. It's when you ask him to stand up tall for a measurement, how high can he still manage? Grayloth said on 9/Oct/25Then 191 cm (6’3.25”) might be a good shout? Cold Water said on 8/Oct/25Peak: 191.3 cm Current: 180.3 cm Hong said on 5/Oct/25Click Here I taught I'd repost this video of Clint and Newman again,they would be both at their peak heights here,I don't know weather I see a full 6 inches height difference, what do you think Rob. Rory said on 2/Oct/25I'd say maybe a little more than 6ft3 there Hong. As you say ground and footwear is unknown and certainly a factor, but at face value I'd say 6ft2 and 6ft3.25 there. Hong said on 2/Oct/25Click Here Hong said on 29/Sep/25Click Here Here's Clint looking about a inch taller than 6ft2 Dennis Weaver,the ground level isn't visible though.He looks around 6ft3. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Sep/25I see 2-3in between Eastwood and Larch..... James B 172cm said on 26/Sep/25Click Here Parker said on 25/Sep/25There’s an episode of the fugitive on Utube with John Larch and Joseph Campanella (listed 6’1) starring alongside David Janssen.All 3 men look very similar in height, you would need a stadiometer to split them. 6-6’1 Hong said on 25/Sep/25Click Here Here's Clint with Larch again,considering Clints posture it looks like 3inches too me. Rory said on 23/Sep/25Yh Larch looks around 3 inches shorter than Clint. So something like 6ft0.25 or 6ft0.5 at best is likely. Beau Dare said on 23/Sep/25Clint Eastwood is simply the best there is. At just under 6 feet, he stands taller than most men. I work in the film industry, and believe me, Hollywood needs him more than ever. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Sep/256ft flat is definitely too low for Larch. That 6ft0½ listing is the minimum I’d argue for him based on how he looks with Eastwood. I would list him at 6ft0¾ or even the full 6ft1. Grayloth said on 23/Sep/25191-192 cm I think is the best range for Clint. Hong said on 22/Sep/25Click Here Here's John Larch with Clint,IMDb have him listed 1m84 or 6ft.05 inches,but in general his height is given as 6ft flat. Hong said on 21/Sep/25Click Here Here's Clint in 2008 aged 88,with 6ft3 listed Toby Keith,it's a good indicator of how a young Clint 'who would have been a similar height to Keith", would looked next to his older self. WILL THOPSON said on 18/Sep/25EASTWOOD WAS ALWAYS TALL BUT NOW HE'S IN HIS MID NINETIES, HE WAS ALMOST ALWAYS TALLER THAN EVERYONE ELSE ON SCREEN AND IN REAL LIFE UP TILL RECENTLY(PAST 20 YEARS) Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Sep/25Prime Eastwood I would place in the same territory as Paul Bettany and Josh Duhamel. A very strong 6ft3 guy who will always look standout tall and will get away with claiming 6ft4. Jake: 1.84 m- 1.85 m said on 15/Sep/25Could 6ft 0.5- 6ft 0.75 have been close for Larch, RobEditor RobI would need to watch more of him. James B 172cm said on 14/Sep/25MaskDeMasque 5'9.5 said on 13/Sep/25 Could he have been 6'3.25 peak, Rob. I reckon a legit 6'3.5 like Peter Serafinowicz would edge him out. Editor Rob At the moment 3.5 looks the highest I feel I can argue with 3.25 the lowest I would try to argue. So 6ft3 3/8ths?😂Editor RobWe're trying to get rid of the 1/8ths :) Jake: 1.84 m- 1.85 m said on 13/Sep/25Rob, John Larch would be a really good add. Maybe 6ft+ ? He was in Play Misty for Me, Amityville Horror etc etc. Cheers!Editor RobHe did seem over 6ft. MaskDeMasque 5'9.5 said on 13/Sep/25Could he have been 6'3.25 peak, Rob. I reckon a legit 6'3.5 like Peter Serafinowicz would edge him out.Editor RobAt the moment 3.5 looks the highest I feel I can argue with 3.25 the lowest I would try to argue. Rory said on 11/Sep/25I feel peak Clint was something like 6ft4.25 out of bed and 6ft3.25 at night,I doubt prime Clint ever saw 6ft3 flat standing tall. James B 172cm said on 11/Sep/25Rob after a long day on set on his feet all day would have a peak clint dropped to 6ft3 flat before bed?Editor RobCertainly would fall under 6ft 3.5 at night, but whether a flat 6ft 3 is another matter. Hong said on 1/Sep/25@Rory,agreed somewhere around 6ft3 and 6ft3.5 range for Clints peak height,6ft4 morning measurement,weak 6ft4. Rory said on 30/Aug/25He looks 1.25 inches taller than Ali there but I suspect unusually for Clint because of his swinging pose he's got better posture than Ali there. I'd guess peak Clint would be 1 inch taller than peak Ali. Ali 6ft2.25-2.5 Clint 3.25-3.5. Hong said on 29/Aug/25Click Here Just found a rare picture, "never seen by me anyway",of Clint and 6ft2.5 listed Ali,Clint looking over 6ft3 in comparison,looks like it's from early 1980s I'd say. Hong said on 29/Aug/25@Parker,There's a good chance of that,would have been closer to 6ft3 by evening. Parker said on 28/Aug/25Hong said on 26/Aug/25 Click Here In this interview he's asked if he's 6ft4,and he replies yes. I'm sure he's had a 6'4 measurement Hong. As Rory said in an earlier post it may have been a morning measurement and may not have been aware or cared about height loss during the day. Hong said on 26/Aug/25Click Here In this interview he's asked if he's 6ft4,and he replies yes. Height comparation said on 21/Aug/25In prime 60-70s He have 190-191cm And in this have 182,5cm? Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Aug/25Great find Rory…..yeah his dad looks 6ft2 and his mum around 5ft8. Clint clearly got a great dose of the height gene from both sides. That’s solid tall even today never mind back then. I wonder if he has any brothers…..It’d be interesting to see how tall they are, particularly if they’re taller than him? Like Tom Selleck’s family. His dad was his height, his mum I think 5ft8 as well and he has two brothers that are over 6ft6….. B true said on 4/Aug/25Peak weak 6-4. Plenty of shots of him in normal footwear in Dirty Harry and still looks tall range of 6-4. Now sub 6-0 Rory said on 3/Aug/25Rob, how tall would you say Clints parents were assuming footwear was equal ? My guess Dad 6ft2,Mum 5ft8 ? Which considering their generation was very tall. Click HereEditor RobYeah his Father might be near that, mother I'm not sure, but 5ft 7-8 is likely. Rory said on 1/Aug/25Hong tbh I couldn't go less than 6ft3.25...6ft3 flat ? The last thing I watched with peak Clint was Where Eagles Dare and Clint had at least 5.5 inches on Richard Burton,at times nearly 6. 3.25 or 3.5 is the question. I'm happy enough with 3.25 but 6ft3 flat is too low imo. Hong said on 1/Aug/25@Rory Walking scenes are not always the best for comparisons,but I do see the argument for 6ft3.25,but I'd just think a fraction of a centimeter is not really noticeable so 6ft3 seems a very good estimate too me,although I'm wondering if Rob is considering a slight downgrade for Clint? Rory said on 31/Jul/25Hong, there's a better scene in Eiger sanction later in the film where Walcott and Clint walk side by side for a minute or so and Walcott clearly edges Clint, but by a full inch ? I didn't think so, I'd have thought 6ft4 and 6ft3.25 looked right. Rory said on 31/Jul/25Yh it's much easier to see how tall Clint was looking in his later career because he was much more famous, photographed a lot more,in more films and in more high profile films amd wearing more regular clothes/footwear whilst doing it. I think he lost close to an inch during the 90s, started them at 6ft2.75 and finished them at 6ft2 tops. Hong said on 31/Jul/25Click Here In this scene with 6ft4 Walcott,you can see he's not as tall looks too me it could be a full inch difference?although the angle is not great,but it looks like Clint is looking up at him. Hong said on 30/Jul/25Click Here Here's Clint with 6ft1.25 listed Dennis Leary, he's looking slightly taller maybe 6ft2?,aged 69.Editor RobClose to 6ft 2 then. Hong said on 30/Jul/25Click Here @Rory, Here's Clint from the lat 90s with 5,ft11 James Woods,I think he's looking max 6ft2 here not any more though. Rory said on 30/Jul/25I'd say barefoot Clint would have nearly 4 inches on Hall if he stood well there(already looks 3-3.5 with him slouching)her in heels too means likely 6+ inch difference both barefoot Hong so 5ft9 and 6ft3.5 isn't unreasonable in that instance. The thing is though Hong there actually isn't many cast iron examples of Clint looking much less than 6ft3.5 in 60s/70s. The Ebsen/Parker one for sure is a valid one, but other than that there's not many bankers I don't think. The Ali/Presnell video is another one though I think...stood with Presnell in that video he does look more than 1 inch shorter than Harve imo. Clint is always difficult to guess though peak I think because A his posture wasn't good so you always wondered even if he looked 190 could he maybe stretch to 191 or even 192 ? Unknowable B, a lot of his early career was westerns based which also aren't good films to gauge height and C when he eventually did start acting with more familiar actors in normal City settings/footwear he was a bit older and you felt hed already lost some height. For me I think it comes down to either 6ft3.25 or 6ft3.5, I think you can argue either of those figures peak..I'm not convinced though that a 30 Yr old Clint standing at his best was just 6ft3 flat nor do I think he was ever close to 6ft4. Personally if it was up to me I'd remove his current height(I think it's pointless and too difficult to say today)and just give him his peak at 6ft3.25 I think. Hong said on 29/Jul/25Click Here Here's Clarke with 6ft1 listed Henry Fonda, there's not much difference between Fonda and Clint, considering Clint is listed 2.5 inches taller than Fonda. Hong said on 29/Jul/25Click Here Here's Clint with 5ft9 listed Susan Clarke,in this scene Clint removed his boots but Clarke still had her shoes on,from memory I recall Clark's shoes were not too high maximum 3 inches or a bit less definitely not more than 3, making her max 6ft or a bit less Too me Clint is struggling to look 6ft3.5 here. Hong said on 29/Jul/25A proper 6ft3.5 man in cowboys boots should be nudging 6ft5 inches tall,but Clint never looked that tall even in Rawhide,you just have to take a look at him next to Buddy Ebsen and Fess Parker in the video I posted,even with footwear advantage he's looking inches shorter than 6ft5.5 Parker and similar to 6ft3ish Ebsen, he's looking like. 190cm guy in cowboy boots, to be honest.I think he was know more than 6ft3 at peak there is just too many examples of him falling short of his 6ft3.5 peak height listing. Rory said on 29/Jul/25That picture with Michael Douglas is from 1998 so Clint was late sixties at the time,I think hes losing 1-2 inches there with his leg position,looks like he's widened it to reduce his height next to the other two. Clint in his films from around that time looked 6ft2 range. I think he'd lost at least an inch by late 90s. Hong said on 28/Jul/25Click Here This picture with 5,ft9.5 listed Michael Douglas is a bit odd as Clint is looking know more than 6ft in comparison?Clint looks like he's in his early 60s so not peak but he's not looking over 6ft though. Hong said on 28/Jul/25@Rory,to be fair the scene with Bellamy was filmed in the jail on I assume flat even floor boards,Clint's posture is pretty slouchy,but if Bellamy was 6ft.05 as Rob has him listed and presuming both guy's are in similar height cowboy boots,then Clint is looking more 6ft2 range there.Rob I would be Interested to know what your opinion is on this,do you think Clint looks a 6ft3.5 guy in comparison to a 6ft.05 guy?Editor RobIn the jail scene, I found it tricky to say exactly - Clint didn't seem over 6ft 3 from what I could tell, though he wasn't standing great for most of it. Rory said on 27/Jul/25@Hong no tbh he didn't look anywhere near 6ft3.5 with Bellamy,in fact objectively speaking he looked only 1 inch taller than Bellamy..but how tall really was Bellamy ? He's listed 6ft0.5,he's claimed 6ft1.5..I've not seen enough of him to say..either way Clint was caught looking shorter there. That said I'm not always the biggest fan of height comparisons based on Rawhide just because I think A,a lot of it was filmed outdoors on uneven ground or what looked like dodgy set designs..B,a lot of the time the actors are wearing hats which distorts height slightly and C, we don't know who was or wasn't in cowboy boots or how big those boots heels were. Combine hats,cowboy boots and uneven ground together and comparing height becomes impossible. I've got now peak Clint something like 6ft4 out of bed and 6ft3 at night so strong 6ft3 guy. Hong said on 26/Jul/25@Rory "What about how he's looking with 6ft.05 listed 60 year old Ralph Bellamy"?Do you think he's looking 3 inches taller?,considering Bellamy may have shrunk a bit and maybe a flat 6ft at the time?I personally think Clint was Solid 6ft3 guy at his prime, scraping 6ft4 in the morning. Rory said on 25/Jul/[email protected] think although they are pretty close there, I think Clint clearly edged him..I'd expect Clint to be 1-2cm taller and probably a full inch taller if his posture was better. That said Davis was 56 at the time and potentially lost a fraction. I'd say at the time Davis 6ft2.25 and Clint 6ft3.25(but looking 6ft2.75-3 with the slouch). Hong said on 25/Jul/25Although Eastwood's posture is pretty bad in comparison to Davis,but they still seem very close in height. Hong said on 24/Jul/25Check out this video from this search, the pursuit rawhide Click Here Hong said on 24/Jul/25Ralph Bellamy is listed as 6ft.5 tall peak. Hong said on 24/Jul/25Check out this video from this search, the pursuit rawhide Click Here Here's Clint with 6ft2.5 listed Jim Davis,from 30 minutes on you can see there's not much in it height wise,also Ralph Belamy is also in this episode too. B true said on 22/Jul/25Peak weak 6-4. Plenty of shots of him in normal footwear in Dirty Harry and still looks tall range of 6-4. Now sub 6-0 Big Bill said on 27/Jun/25Having been very tall in his youth. If he ends up making it closer to 100 is there a chance that he ends up well under 5'10?.Editor RobThe question will be whether he can walk around at that age. Com said on 25/Jun/25Didn’t mean to put down 70 in my comment was just only asking his current height when he turned 80Editor RobThere's so many adjustments and celebrities over the year, that I wouldn't be able to remember that. Parker said on 20/Jun/25Rory said on 21/May/25 Parker, a guy though who was say 6ft3.25 isn't really lying in all probability if they claim 6ft4. If they measure once say 6ft3 5/8ths at 10am and claim 6ft4 thereafter, that's not really an unreasonable or dishonest claim. They may not know at all that they fall another half inch by nighttime. That's a very fair point Rory. There was a story in UK newspapers many years ago about a guy that didn't make the (then) 5'8 requirement to join the police force at 5'71/2. A few months later he got his friends to take him back for his medical on a stretcher. He made the cut. I'm convinced Clint once got a 6'4 (or close ) measurement because he has quoted it on a number of occasions. Hong said on 18/Jun/25@Terry 2.5 inch cowboy boots? that's just ridiculous,Clint wore the same boots he wore in Rawhide in all his westerns,heel height in similar boots ranging from 1.25 inches to 1.75 inches.Also when not staring in Westerns he wore standard heel shoes and very flat footwear.Also remember all his costars in westerns were also wearing cowboy boots too so that balances out the heights. Rory said on 18/Jun/[email protected] you believe in the moon landings out of interest? Terry said on 17/Jun/25Clint Eastwood peak height without cowboy boots on was 6'2. Cowboy boots have at least a 2.5 inch heel. Clint Eastwood has always been really slim which gives the deception of looking much taller. I don't know how tall he is nowadays, perhaps slightly under 6ft without cowboy boots on? Gerald S said on 15/Jun/25Rob, is American actor Jack Cassidy eligible for a page on Celebheights? 5’10”? Around 11:00 & 17:30 below, I’d argue 5’10” flat. Click Here Such a unique and valuable entertainer to the acting profession. Gave fine performances in THE EIGER SANCTION, W.C. FIELDS AND ME, THE PRIVATE FILES OF J. EDGAR HOOVER, LOOK IN ANY WINDOW, BUNNY O’HARE & FBI CODE 98.Editor RobI'm not sure exactly what his autopsy listed him (69?) but he could seem over that. Hong said on 14/Jun/[email protected],"What are you basing your opinion Van Cleef was taller than Clint on"?Have you got some some unseen rare images or clips of them together that demonstrate this point? Warren said on 13/Jun/25Is that possible to people get shrink by such nearly 5 inches Rob??Editor RobYeah, it happens with those in 90's and who were quite tall it can be a greater than average amount. A.Lawrence said on 13/Jun/25He was never taller than Lee Van Cleef. Easily under 6'2. Hong said on 12/Jun/25@avi,you seem to be forgetting,when Clint was Hogan's age he was still looking around 6ft1.5 range so he would be about 2 inches of his listed height here,wait and see if Hogan reaches 95, what height he is. avi said on 5/Jun/25@Duhon said on 3/Jun/25 Yes agrees more likely to lose more if bigger But to me 4+ seems excessive unless there's a big issue going on E.g Hulk Hogan lost 2.5 inches over 6'5 now I think 6'3 if lucky Id expect a 6'4 man to end at 6'2 maybe 6'1.5 My dad in 70s is 5'8.3 or so now May even be 5'8 flat if doesn't squeeze out a straight measurement used to be solid 5'9 maybe 5'9.25 when younger Crazy how age affects so much @Hong Lee sloich a bit but looks not much taller than Burton May be 6'1.5-6'1.75 if squeezed up for measuring He was 6'4.5 when young So yeah "lost" about 3 inches Still not 4 or so like Eastwood Mike190 said on 4/Jun/25@Avi My father was a legit 196cm and hes down to solid 192cm in his 60s. He has poor posture from sleeping on couches for a good part of his life. I am doing everything in my power to slow height loss and maintain good posture though unfortunately my profession requires a great deal of bending and hunching. Duhon said on 3/Jun/25@Avi the taller you are the more height you have to lose later in life. A man 6'3"+ will certainly drop more inches than a man who started off 5'8". Hong said on 2/Jun/25@avi, Here's Christopher Lee,listed height 6ft4.5 some even say 6ft5! he's with 5ft11 Tim Burton, aged 90 Lee is looking around 6ft1 range with Burton that's 3.5 or 4 inches down on peak. Click Here Zuber said on 2/Jun/25@avi ,mine was a legit 6'4'' until his 60s and 6'2'' when he passed away at 87. avi said on 1/Jun/25I agree he's 5'11 range nowadays Probably strong 6'3 going So confused how he shrunk down 4 inches or so That's not normal even at 90+ My grandfather is high 80s and 5'6.5 possibly weak 5'7 standing straight peak weak 5'8 Must be some spinal /disc issue Gerald S said on 1/Jun/25Rob, is Roberts Blossom eligible for a page on Celebheights? 6’0” peak? He looked tall in HOME ALONE but did not surpass six feet with Clint around 37:30: Click HereEditor RobNot sure on him. He may have shrunk a bit by that stage. Arch Stanton said on 1/Jun/25Let's hope he makes it to 96 unlike Gene Hackman! Com said on 31/May/25I’m thinking he’s struggling to look over 5ft 11 today, maybe 5ft 10 at lowest, but 5ft 10.5 today is fine Com said on 31/May/25Happy 95th birthday to the Hollywood legend!😃🎂 reachjtm said on 31/May/25he is apparently planning on doing another movie soon. Gerald S said on 31/May/25Rob, is John Larch eligible for a page here? Around 35:30, see with Clint: Click Here Around 1:05:30, see with Clint: Click Here Clint’s DIRTY HARRY & PLAY MISTY FOR ME co-star would have been a good 6’0.5” peak I feel, and would be another fine, vintage addition to Celebheights. Hong said on 31/May/25Happy 95th birthday Mr Eastwood🥳6ft3.25 peak 5ft10.5 now. Hong said on 28/May/25I think he's finally retired now, haven't seen anything of him since his last movie "juror number 2",he seemed in pretty bad physical condition in the most recent pics,also he'll be 95 on Sunday.He lost his long time partner to a Heart attack,she was only 60 years old, apparently he's not dealing with it very well, according to an interview I read on line with his son Scott. James B 172cm said on 27/May/25Rob if he loses another inch will clint need a wheelchair?Editor RobIt can get to a stage the legs give up and you need one. Grayloth said on 26/May/25He can be 192 cm if he stretch out to the fullest. He had terrible posture already in his 20s. I agree that he looks at most 191 cm but if you account for his bad posture maybe 192 cm is possible. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/May/25Full 6ft4 and flat 6ft3 are off the table other than first thing and extreme low…… 000614080093 said on 26/May/25Clint's peak was 193 cm, current 181 cm Hong said on 25/May/25@ Rory, good video still think Bridges was more 6ft1 flat.I think I could go with 6ft3.25 peak for Clint,I think that's fair. Rory said on 25/May/25Hong, if you want to see the real difference between Bridges and Garcia check out from 1hr 19 mins onwards... Click Here Clearly Bridges has him by at the very least 4 inches,and likely more. I'd never go anything below 186 for a prime Bridges. Of course all heights are debatable until you actually measure someone, but I think if you find yourself adjusting and changing multiple other listings just to suit one narrative about Clint really being 6ft3 max then that's not prudent. I'm willing to meet you at 6ft3.25 for peak Clint though. Strong 6ft3 peak and then weak 6ft3 by late 80s with Clive Mantle/Neason looks reasonable. Arch Stanton said on 25/May/25Agreed Rory. Though I think full 6 ft 4 Walcott did edge out Clint walking across the yard in Joe Kidd. He just looked too lanky to me to be under 6'3.5". Of course you're going to get occasions when he seemed a bit shorter, but you can also find occasions of him looking taller than 6'3.5". Hong said on 25/May/25Click Here 6 ft1.5 listed Jeff Bridges with 5ft9 Andy Garcia,I don't really see a 4.5 inch difference there? Bridges always looked a weak 6ft1 guy too me. Grayloth said on 24/May/25I have not seen thousands of pics but in his younger years he looks imposing and you do not look imposing generally below 6’3, but 6’2.75 kinda does too. From what I have seen and judging from his proportions, he looks 6’3-something. 6’3.5 might be too tall but 6’3.25 seems possible. I have to agree with Hong though that he already in his 40s seems to have lost a little since he barely looks 6’3. That could be from bad posture. His back is killing him and somebody should have told Clint to do some RDLs. Hong said on 24/May/25@Rory,It was just a worse case scenario with Clint at 6ft2.75 that I was suggesting.My honest opinion is he was probably close to 6ft4 morning height but by evening closer to 6ft3.I would personally just say 6ft3 flat at peak but would agree 6ft3.25 is possible too.By the way I found a military record of Lee Marvin's height and posted it on Marvin's page which has him as 74 inches tall so maybe he was 6ft2 after all. Hong said on 24/May/25Click Here All heights are debatable here including Kennedys, here he is with 6ft5.5 Fess Parker,I think he's looking similar to how tall Clint looked next to Parker. Rory said on 24/May/25I can't take someone seriously who thinks a 30 Yr old Clint was just 6ft2.75. Theres no credibility in that argument at all. That would leave people like Bruce Dern,Lee Marvin and Jeff Bridges at about 6ft0.5..it would leave Don Stroud at just 6ft1,Matheson/Ulrich/Van Cleef 6ft1...Ali 6ft1.75,George Kennedy/Greg Walcott/John Gavin 6ft3.25-3.5...presumably would make Liam Neason 6ft3.5 peak. Certainly puts Sutherland under 6ft3.5 too,Its a silly argument. 6ft3-3.5 prime is where the argument lies for Clint. 6ft3 bare minimum,6ft3.5 at most. Parker said on 24/May/25Hong said on 23/May/25 Click Here Clint with another 6ft5.5 actor,this time Clive Mantle,as you can see he's looking a good 3 inches shorter. Fair enough Hong. lets agree to disagree. Eyes to mouth is approximatey 3 inches. In that particular pick with Clive Mantle that looks more a 2 inch difference to me, not 3. Hong said on 23/May/25Click Here Parker, here's Clint and Freeman from the same photoshoot,there are plenty of pics of Clint and Freeman online to chose from.Freeman in most edged Clint.My argument is in the video I posted, full length shots of Clint with a 6ft5.5 guy, "at peak" and in cowboy boots! was struggling to look 6ft4 even in his boots! next to Parker.So that's what I think after seeing thousands of pics of Clint and all his movies I have come to the conclusion that he was not a genuine 6ft4 guy as he said he was on many occasions, in fact he was more 6ft3 flat, "or dare I say it 6ft2.75". Hong said on 23/May/25Rob,I would be interested to know how tall you think Clint is looking in comparison to 5ft10 Alan Young,do you think he's looking 5.5 inches taller?Editor RobI felt he could clear 6ft 3 with Alan, how much though... Hong said on 23/May/25Click Here Clint with another 6ft5.5 actor,this time Clive Mantle,as you can see he's looking a good 3 inches shorter,given he's now sixty we will allow a bit of shrinkage so 6ft2.5 by 60 for Clint.Rory the reason I reposted that video is because it is a very good reference for Clint's peak height in comparison to 6ft5.5 Parker 6ft3 Ebsen and 5ft11 Danny Kaye, given Clint has cowboy boots on with heels of between 1.25 and 1.5 inches would make Clint around 6ft5 inches tall when he's nearly looking 6ft4 in comparison to Kaye,he also looks similar to Ebsen even with footwear advantage. Beau Dare said on 23/May/25Clint Eastwood is truly one of a kind. He marches to the beat of his own drum. At 6'3" or slightly under six feet, he still stands taller than most men. I work in the film industry as an actor/ screenwriter, and believe me, Hollywood could take a lesson. We need him more than ever. Gerald S said on 22/May/25Yeah Rob, that video means we should downgrade Clint’s peak and consider upgrading Buddy’s. Buddy could look taller than Clint in cowboy boots! Parker said on 22/May/25Clint with Morgan Freeman 2010 Click Here James B 172cm said on 22/May/256'3.25 would be a fair compromise Parker said on 22/May/25Hong said on 21/May/25 I think a downgrade to 6ft3 flat is more suitable,and just leave the original 6ft4 listing as a bit of Hollywood height inflation. Hong-You only see an inch between 6'2 listed Tim Matheson/Robert Urich and Clint? Click Here Rory said on 21/May/25Parker, a guy though who was say 6ft3.25 isn't really lying in all probability if they claim 6ft4. If they measure once say 6ft3 5/8ths at 10am and claim 6ft4 thereafter, that's not really an unreasonable or dishonest claim. They may not know at all that they fall another half inch by nighttime. Hong,that video you've posted several times now..its not new. As I always point out don't underestimate the footwear Fess has on in that clip either...they're rather chunky looking boots, I'd be surprised if they didn't give at least 1.25inch but yes Clint likely had half inch footwear advantage over Fess there. I see a 2-2.5 inch difference between the men so yh that does leave Clint looking 6ft2.75 there imo...but it's not a slamdunk is it because there's other cases out there of Clint looking 6ft3.5..in the video you posted with Alan Young I thought he looked 5-5.5 inches taller. I wouldn't be against a 6ft3.25 peak Clint though,its perfectly reasonable Hong said on 21/May/25I think a downgrade to 6ft3 flat is more suitable,and just leave the original 6ft4 listing as a bit of Hollywood height inflation. Hong said on 21/May/25Rob,as you saw in the video Clint has cowboy boots on too.He was only young there,still peak, I think 6ft3 flat is more than generous in that video.Editor RobYeah he was certainly struggling to seem 6ft 3.5 there! Hong said on 20/May/25Click Here Editor RobLooks nearer 6ft 3 flat there. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/May/25Rory, those eighth listings are exhausting to navigate. I did think they were a cool concept but I get why Rob has pulled them back. The only time they are warranted is if there is an actual measurement documented like in NFL where they are more common (For example Marcus Allen 6ft1⅞ and Brett Favre 6ft2⅛) or a direct quote. I think 6ft3½ is reasonable for Eastwood at peak. The flat 6ft3 is a disservice to him when you see him beside proper 6ft2 guys like Lee Van Cleef and Ben Johnson. Parker said on 19/May/25He has always claimed 6’4. He said he was self conscious of his height at school. He also said he’d missed parts because of it. Why would he claim a taller height than he is? Hong said on 18/May/25Click Here A young Clint with 5ft10 Alan Young. Rory said on 16/May/25For me it comes down to either 6ft3.25 or 6ft3.5 for a prime Clint, that's where I see the argument. The average guess actually of 191.4 feels very plausible,could definitely see a thirty something Clint measuring that at lunchtime. 6ft3 3/8ths would probably suit him to a tee,although I understand 1/8ths are little used and a bit pedantic, but work nicely if you're undecided between 3.25 and 3.5. Same with a guy like prime Roger Moore, I'm undecided on 6ft1 or 1.25 so 1 1/8th could be perfect. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/May/25James, absolute lowest I buy him at. I’m with Rory. He had to clear 6ft3, the question is by how much exactly? 6ft4 first thing I think is a more than reasonable. Canson said on 14/May/25Rob may have him pegged at his peak. Maybe he was a guy who held around 192 at lunch and dipped to 6’3 3/8” or 1/4” at a low James B 172cm said on 14/May/25I guess 191cm in Escape from Alcatraz Rory said on 13/May/25Can't see why he would have lost anything by Dirty Harry,he was only 41...so unless he'd had some unknown spinal injury unlikely he'd lost anything at all. I've always thought maybe every which way but loose or Escape from Alcatraz...maybe a few mm gone by then in late 70s. Considering his slouch he had to clear 6ft3...if his measured height was 6ft3 he would have mostly looked a 6ft2.25 or 2.5 guy in the 60s and 70s which he didn't, he looked 6ft2.75-3 even with the slouch. As I say young clint actually I think was very similar to Paul Bettany in height,posture and build...Clint probably had slightly better posture than Bettany but not hugely. Jamss B said on 12/May/25Well Clint could have dropped a tiny fraction of height by the time of Dirty Harry Rory said on 12/May/25The problem with Clint was he always tended to have pretty weak posture i think,most of the time he looked like a guy not quite maximising his potential height. Often he could look 190cm as a result,but I think somewhere in that 191-192 zone is likely if you told him to stand up straight for a measurement. Thunderbolt and lightfoot is a prime example, looked 1.5 inches taller than Bridges mostly, but I remember in one scene Clint stood tall for a few seconds and suddenly looked at least 2 inches taller than Bridges..I think under a stadiometer in the 60s/early 70s 6ft3.25-3.5 would have been his result. In a way not too dissimilar to a guy like Paul Bettany, can look sub 6ft3 at times but you just know he's clearing it for an upright measurement. Hong said on 12/May/25I personally think 6ft3 flat is a more accurate height for Clint's peak,but 6ft3.25 would be close enough. Gerald S said on 12/May/25Exactly Rob, which is why many of us believe Clint should be downgraded to 6’3.25” peak. It is likely Clint cleared 6’3”, but he could not have been much over that mark. A 6’3.25” peak listing might also better explain why Eric Fleming was able to edge Clint out from time to time on Rawhide. Hong said on 11/May/25Click Here Here's Clint last year,see how old and frail he looks. Gerald S said on 11/May/25Yes Rob, 6’1” is the figure we can all best agree on for Santoni. All of us see him around that 6’1” range.Editor RobSomewhere around that, 186 with Clint looked fair enough, although in other stuff he's seemed 185... Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/May/256ft1 is the bare minimum I can accept for Santoni. He looks noticeably taller beside Eastwood in Dirty Harry than Hal Holbrook (at least strong 6ft) does in Magnum Force….. Hong said on 10/May/25Click Here Here's that video with Rock Hudson again. Gerald S said on 9/May/25Rob, maybe just give Reni 6’1” for now? That would be a nice compromise between Hong’s, Rory’s, Rampage’s and my estimations. I say, Reni’s name has started quite a conversation here. Gerald S said on 8/May/25Yes, I too am now seeing the logic of 6’1” for Santoni, but I would not go under 6’1”. 6’1.25” still stands as another possibility. Hong said on 8/May/25@Rory good pic,I could agree 6ft1 for Santoni but I still think Clint was more a flat 6ft3 at peak. Rory said on 8/May/25Click Here Santoni with 5ft10 listed Jose Ferrer. Reni looks 6ft1 there,but has a camera angle advantage so I'd put him at 6ft0.75, which is the kind of height I'd settle on for Santoni I think. Rory said on 8/May/25No you've not listened Hong. Its obvious to me in the Dirty Harry film Clint isn't standing at his best in that corridor scene with Santoni..so forget just a 1.5 inch or even 2 inch difference..Clint had way more height in the can than you saw in that scene so in a sense that scene is irrelevant. Clint looked 1.75 inches taller than Santoni in that scene with hands in pockets,practically looking at the ground and stood in a very casual way...what does that tell me ? Tells me if he stood upright and properly the real difference,is likely 2.5 inches...somewhere around that. Certainly above 2 inches...so why would he be only "6ft2 max" if Santoni was somewhere in 6ft0.5-0.75 zone ? Sometimes in life and with height you have to read between the lines, look at nuances. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/May/25Reni Santoni I would be another great add to the site. Vintage character actor who showed up in a lot of things over the years. No less than 6ft1 for him (sorry Rory) with 6ft1½ on the table as well. I see roughly 2in between him and Eastwood in Dirty Harry. Rob, maybe 186cm is fair shout?Editor RobHe did hold up fairly well with Clint, but can't remember him from other stuff. Hong said on 7/May/25My guess is Clint Eastwood height at the time of Dirty Harry 6ft3 inches tall,Reni Santoni 6ft1.5 inches tall,height difference 1.5 inches in Clint Eastwood's favour.If Santoni is proven to be 6ft.5 or 6ft.75 then I have to put Clint at 6ft2.5 or 6ft2.75 in that movie because posture or not too me there was know more than an inch and a half between them.And if Clint was under 6ft3 peak big deal Hollywood has been known to inflate the heights of their action heros over the years,Arnold and the Rock for example. Hong said on 7/May/25The angle with Penn is misleading and not accurate enough for a comparison,Kennedy is on higher ground and Santoni is slightly further from the camera.Clint was in a couple of movies with Kennedy and the height difference was little or nothing.In Dirty Harry Santoni in some scenes was very close in height to Clint Santoni at 6ft.05 would leave Clint at max 6ft2 in comparison.Also Stallone is not a good guy to compare anybody to as he is a well known lift wearer and was very fond of cuban heels back in the day.AIn the pics I posted below with Lee Majors 5ft11, Arthur Hill 6ft3 and Betty Thomas 6ft1 ,I would confidently out Santoni in the 6ft1.5 range similar to James Coburn in comparison to Clint. Gerald S said on 7/May/25Rob, might we give Reni 186cm? That could be a fair figure. Rory said on 7/May/25Click Here Rory said on 7/May/25Click Here Look at Santoni there third in from the right next to legit 6ft4 George Kennedy, now I know he's on slightly lower ground there and at a disadvantage,but still is that a guy who really strikes you as being near 6ft2 proportionally ? Or here with 5ft8 Sean Penn who is slouching...really 6ft1.5 range ? I'm not convinced Click Here Rory said on 7/May/25I've not seen Reni Santoni in many things..guns of the magnificent seven,Cobra and Dirty Harry but I'd be astonished if he was 6ft2, didn't look anywhere near that imo. I remember him only having about 2 inches on Stallone,who even assuming Sly was wearing lifts, still leaves Santoni at 6ft1 maximum. There's pics of Santoni with Sean Penn too from a film and he looks barely more than 4 inches taller. I actually think there's a good chance of 6ft0.5 Santoni or 6ft0.75 if we're being optimistic and a slouching 6ft3.25 Clint in Dirty Harry. Gerald S said on 7/May/25Rob, in watching below can we agree Reni was at worst a strong 6’1”? Click Here It is unusual to find a scene where Clint’s posture is more upright than his co-star’s! Reni would have cleared 6’1”, but again 6’2” is pushing it.Editor RobYeah he likely was somewhere in 6ft 1 range, I can see the 6ft 1.5 argument if we say Clint cleared 6ft 3 and was near 3.5. Hong said on 7/May/25Click Here Clint and 6ft1.5 listed James Coburn. Gerald S said on 6/May/25Rob, is Reni Santoni eligible for a page on Celebheights? He is becoming a popular topic of conversation on here. Over 6’1” for sure but I’m not buying 6’2”. 6’1.5” seems the right listing.Editor RobNot sure on him yet. James B 172cm said on 6/May/25Rob he did look 6'3.5 tops I thought in Dirty Harry Hong said on 6/May/25Click Here Clint and Kyle now,as you can see Clint is no a lot shorter than Kyle. Hong said on 6/May/25Click Here Clint and his son Kyle in 1993, Clint aged 63,Kyle 25.At that stage Clint was still close to peak,Kyle is listed on IMDb as 6ft1.5 which looks reasonably accurate,as you can see Clint was taller at that stage of his life. Hong said on 5/May/25Click Here The woman in the pics with Reni Santoni is actress Betty Thomas,she is listed as 6ft1 everywhere on line,if that is her actual height I think we can say that Santoni was indeed over 6ft1 in height. Canson said on 5/May/25@Editor Rob: I have relatives in their 80s who have lost 1/2-1”. 1” max. 4 seems extreme and I’m talking people prob 6’2-6’3 range. My dad is in his 70s and he has lost less than an inch himself and he was a strong 6’4 peakEditor RobMy own Father can barely stand over 5ft 6, but it's obvious with some people how they lose height. I think with dowager's hump (kyphosis), compressed discs, osteoporosis and knee/hip issues, for some it all adds up. You do well if you only lose an inch by age 80. Would be worth taking note of their lifestyle (diet, any form of exercise). I'd be delighted to only lose an inch by that age! Hong said on 3/May/25Click Here Clint and 6ft3.5 Chevy Chase in 1987,Clint still looks around 6ft3 there. Tkazi said on 2/May/25Rob is 4-5” height loss normal?Editor RobFor a taller man of Clint's age, 4 inches is what you might expect would be common. My own Father is younger than Clint and because of upper back curvature and permanently bent knees, he isn't really over 5ft 6 range these days, so near 4 inches lost in 30 years. Rory said on 2/May/25I think Clint probably had 2.5 inches on Santoni. The difference looked less than that in Dirty Harry,more like 2 inches tops, but Clints posture in their scenes was very loose,I think purposefully showing that Harry wasn't a buttoned up establishment type. I've got Clint at 6ft3.25 or 3.5 peak so my best guess would be a weaker style 6ft1 for Santoni..don't see 6ft1.5 from the few films I've seen him in,didn't look that tall. Hong said on 2/May/25Click Here Here's Santoni with 5ft11 listed Lee Majors. Hong said on 2/May/25Click Here On the Subject of Santoni's height,here's a pic of Santoni with 6ft3 listed Arthur Hill,as you can see Hill has edge's him a bit,too me Santoni is looking in the 6ft2 range I comparison.If anybody has any doubts about Hill's height just Google him with 6ft2 Peter Fonda and you will see he's a genuine 6ft3 guy.So judging by how Tall Santoni looks next to a 6ft3 guy I'd say there's a similar difference between him and Clint and him and Arthur Hill.But it kinda gives people more of an example how tall Santoni actually was. Hong said on 1/May/25Click Here pics of peak Clint with Reni Santoni, I've searched for Santoni's height on line, mostly he's listed as 6ft tall but IMBD has him at 6ft1.5.In dirty Harry Clint was looking slightly taller than Santoni,if Santoni was 6ft1.5 that would put by comparison Clint at around 6ft2.5 to 6ft3 max.I am of the belief that Clint's height was slightly exaggerated in his youth and was more 6ft2.75 that's 190cm in his youth and in boot's could pull off 6ft4 easily.If not 6ft2.75 max 6ft3 which for his generation was a pretty impressive height. Gerald S said on 30/Apr/25Rob, can you add his DIRTY HARRY co-star, Reni Santoni? 6’1.5” adds up; Clint has 2 inches max on Reni below who is noticeably slouching. Click Here Zuber said on 29/Apr/25Guys on the comments shocked by his height loss don't realize how old 95 is...Like Duhon said '' most 94 year olds measure 6' below ground''. Cold Water said on 8/Dec/24Now:180.3 cm Peak:191.3 cm Bobbyh3342 said on 7/Dec/246'2 prime barefoot , people seem to forget how tall a real 6'2 barefoot guy is,,, Rock Hudson was measured at 6'3.5 in the navy yet everyone wants him to be 6'5 , maybe its the Hollywood effect? Rory said on 7/Dec/24In the pictures of Clint with Momoa there is a clue that these two guys would once have been pretty close in height being Clints legs..their leg/waist lengths look pretty similar. Clint now has the legs of a 6ft4 guy and the spine of someone of about 5ft5. For me with Clint I think it comes down to either 6ft3.25 or 3.5 peak. 5ft10 today wouldn't surprise me,but the poster was right in that anything more than 6ft underground at 94 is a bonus. Canson said on 7/Dec/24@Hong: that’s interesting. A lot of people don’t lose that much. But he’s alive like Duhon said. He’s def lost at least 4” in height. He was not far (within an inch of Momoa). I’d say peak height was at minimum 6’3 flat. He was 190.5 up to 192 at most reachjtm said on 5/Dec/24crazy how short he looks with Momoa even if we assume Momoa is really 6'4 Scotto said on 4/Dec/24No less than 6-3 peak. In the Dirty Harry film he’s legit minimum of 6-3. Lost loads of height but that’s to be expected. Duhon said on 3/Dec/24@Hogn well, most most 94 year olds measure 6' below ground, so he's not doing too shabby. Hong said on 2/Dec/24Click Here Look how small Clint looks here, it's hard to believe he was even close in height to Mamoa at any stage. Gerald S said on 29/Nov/246’3.25” peak; same as Eric Fleming. reachjtm said on 26/Nov/24Heston 6'2 and Eastwood 6'3.5 peak seems about right to me. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Nov/24Less than 6ft3 is unlikely for Clint but for some reason I sense that a guy like Sterling Hayden would eviscerate his claim to 6ft4 if they were to appear together (No scenes of them in The Wild West which they were both in).....unless of course Sterling really was 6ft5 and rounded down which as we know was a common thing for very tall actors to do. 181cmguy said on 25/Nov/24@Arch Stanton, yeah I find I am a lot more patient towards elderly people now than I was a few years back. Living with and caring for my grandmother (who is in her 90s and has dementia) has helped me to become more considerate of others, though there is still room for improvement! Arch Stanton said on 24/Nov/24It is sad 181cm, but I think it's amazing that Clint and Van Dyke are still with us and Clint still active. He is still said to be very sharp, though has lost more weight and height in recent years. Clint has been finding it increasingly difficult in Hollywood recently due to his conservative views, I'm sure he's disgusted with the way things have gone. You can't cancel a guy like Clint Eastwood though! Arch Stanton said on 24/Nov/24Clint said there was only one guy taller than him in school at 6 ft 5, not that he was that himself.. Arch Stanton said on 24/Nov/24There is a video from around 1972 at an awards ceremony where Clint looks a good inch taller than Heston. Some people see him at 6 ft 3 but 6'2.5" to me seems spot on. Hong said on 22/Nov/24Click Here Here's an example of a prime Clint looking tall with Heston and Wayne,two talk men,Clint slightly edging 6ft2.5 listed Heston. Editor RobHe looks taller than Charlton. Henrik said on 22/Nov/24So Clint made a six-five claim at one point, huh? He was always tall in his movies, but I don't think that I ever would have taken him to be that tall. I'd have assumed six-two even before six-five. Editor RobI believe he meant there was a 6ft 5 guy on the team taller than himself. 181cmguy said on 22/Nov/24I can't help but feel a bit saddened, having grown up seeing these guys when they were young (even though some were already getting on when I was watching their earlier films), to now seeing them all frail and hunched over. I saw a recent clip of Dick Van Dyke (who is almost 99) and hearing him say he's just praying that he makes it when asked what his birthday plans were was quite sad ;-; Hong said on 20/Nov/24Click Here Here's Clint with Fleming,in this pic Clint is looking taller all be it he's in flat footwear and Fleming is barefoot,but still agreed they both looked very similar in rawhide, I'd give a strong 6ft3 range for both guys at peak. Hong said on 20/Nov/24Click Here Clint with Toni Collette, he's looking a couple of inches taller max,I know he's not standing upright but he's definitely looking 5ft10 range these days. Hong said on 20/Nov/24Click Here Another pic of Clint and Hoult,Clint looking frail and around 5ft10 range. Hong said on 20/Nov/24Click Here Clint with Hoult, Clint's peak is actually taller than Hoult. Gerald S said on 18/Nov/24Rob, can you add his RAWHIDE co-star, Eric Fleming? 6ft 3 minimum- good chance of a fraction over 6’3” actually. In Rawhide (Click Here, Fleming seemingly edged out Eastwood more times than not, but Fleming’s posture was often superior. I’d therefore suggest putting both men at 6’3.25” peak; inseparable in height. Editor RobThey could be within 1/4 inch of each other. Mark Simmons said on 1/Oct/24Looking at Clint Eastwoods recent photos I see on Facebook in particular pics I see of him stood next to his son Kyle and other guys over 6ft tall I would say Clint Eastwood currently stands at approximately 5ft 9 inches tall. I have read years ago Clint Eastwood states his height loss over the years is due to back problems. I would say in his prime he's around 6ft 2 to 6ft 3 Epik said on 24/Sep/24Wow 5ft 11 now! Rob, is 4.5 inches of height loss a greater amount than the average in his age group? Conparing someone like Donald Sutherland, his height loss was 2.5 inches, both around the same age. Editor RobIt's more than average, but for men who are over 6ft 3, it might not be that much more than typical. Gaevin said on 23/Sep/24Rob, do you think he still has a chance of solid 5ft 11, or do you think he may have dipped under today? Editor RobIt can be harder to tell with some elderly people, whether they have an extra bit of height in reserve. Arch Stanton said on 27/Apr/24Yeah he's looking nearer 5 ft 10 with his posture now, but maybe can still scrape 5'11 for a measurement. When you see him with 6 ft 4 guys now it's hard to imagine he was ever even near that height. James B 172cm said on 22/Apr/245ft11 now rob? Editor RobSeeing recent photos, hard to pinpoint exactly but it's more than likely he isn't over it now. Hong said on 2/Dec/23Click Here Then you see Clint Eastwood with George Kennedy and you think "is Leo 6ft4?"It's probably very confusing for your average person with no particular interest in the heights of celebrities. Hong said on 2/Dec/23Click Here Imagine if you just presumed Clint was 6ft4 and Leo was 6ft because you saw their heights on a standard article that doesn't take into account height loss in old age etc,this pic would be a bit confusing because both guys look the same height. Leone_Fan said on 30/Nov/23Thanks for the clip of the Eiger Sanction. Although its usually considered one of Eastwood's lesser movies I absolutely love it. The social attitudes on display would be considered outdated by many I guess but its a movie and shouldn't be take too seriously. Eastwood's character is a Professor of Art History who also happens to be a world class mountaineer and government agency hitman which is completely nuts of itself. So really it's not meant to be anything other than a piece of entertainment. With that clip/trailer below we see Gregory Walcott and George Kennedy alongside Clint Eastwood. I think both of this pair are a little taller than Clint more genuine 6'4'' type guys. Although there is a fairly well known photo of Clint and George standing next to each other in climbing gear and they look the exact same height. This photo appears in the background of the movie. There is also a German actor seen who looks taller than both Clint and George Kennedy in that scene together. So it was a movie with a lot of tall guys. Hong said on 29/Nov/23Click Here Clint and solid 6ft2 Morgan Freeman, looking pretty similar in 92. James B 172cm said on 27/Nov/23I’d say in the early 90s he was no less than 6’2 1/2 Hong said on 27/Nov/23Leone_fan I think it's mainly down to Aspel being more 5ft8 range and Clint is closer to the camera.I would not say Clint wore lifts,he IMO he was around 6ft3 range peak not 6ft4 and by the 90s dropped a bit of height and was more 6ft2.5 range early 90s, and down to a flat 6ft2 by the end of the 90s, sometimes times looking 6ft1.5 due to slouchy posture. Hong said on 27/Nov/23Click Here This is the actor in that pic Parker. Henrik said on 27/Nov/23Clint and 6ft 4 George Kennedy: Click Here Clint and 6ft 1.5 Jeff Bridges: Click Here Leone_Fan said on 27/Nov/23Looking again at the video of Clint on the Aspel show I am still surprised how tall he looks. He does look 6'4'' here and as someone said he never usually looks this tall. When he stands next to genuine 6'4'' or thereabout guys like Harve Presnell or Ed Mcmahon from the Johnny Carson Show Clint usually looks shorter. It seems unlikley but I wonder if there was any possibility Clint was wearing lifts in his footwear. I don't think so but I'm shocked how tall he looks here. Although he was standing nearer the camera than Aspel. From the 1990s onwards he looked 6'2''at best I think. Parker said on 27/Sep/23@Hong 'I googled the actress he's with in the pic I posted and she's listed as 5ft6 inches' You have posted far better evidence than this showing Clint is over 6'3. I wouldn't trust any site other than this one on height listings I mean here's that same actress with 6'3 listed Michael Rennie Click Here Not a great pic I admit, but I wouldn't have guessed her at 5'6 if they are on level ground Hong said on 27/Sep/23I agree Leone_Fan morning height of 6ft4 for Clint's peak is possible,but he was closer to 6ft3 most of the day.Also on the subject of Presnell if you watch the David Frost show interview with Clint, Ali and Presnell you can clearly see Presnell is the taller of the two. Leone_Fan said on 26/Sep/23In Paint Your Wagon Clint was noticeably taller than Lee Marvin but looked slightly shorter than Harve Presnell. Although with the latter there perhaps weren't any really good scenes to compare. The strange thing was that Marvin seemed to stack up better against Presnell than against Eastwood. I think Clint was probably no shorter than 6'3'' but maybe a weak 6'4'' morning height at best. Hong said on 24/Sep/23Click Here It's an interesting if not bizarre role for Clint,his dancing in particular was very bad and amateurish,but away from that and back to the subject of height,I googled the actress he's with in the pic I posted and she's listed as 5ft6 inches,if you add an extra 3 for heels,Clint is not looking much over 6ft in comparison,which is a bit strange,and as you said he's certainly not looking anywhere near 6ft4, that's why I think 6ft3 peak is more than generous for his height. Arch Stanton said on 21/Sep/23Eastwood fans may not have seen him in Le Streghe in such an offbeat role. I think it was shot in Italy in 65 in between filming or after filming the Dollars films. It's in Italian, I watched it yesterday and understood a fair bit of it. Click Here Clint comes in at 1hr 23 and certainly in an offbeat role. He certainly looks different with his hair slicked like that (like it was in Pink Cadillac). Doesn't look like a 6 ft 4 guy in it. Hong said on 9/Sep/23Click Here Rory here's a pic from that same show you can get a good look at all the footwear on show,btw 6ft3.25 for Clint's peak could be more like it but 6ft3.5 seems a little bit of a stretch. Rory said on 8/Sep/23Hong, I'm not sure on Parkers shoes though. You've assumed they're only 1 inch, but I'm doubtful about that because to me they look like quite bulky shoes. Ignoring footwear I'd say there looked 2.5 inches between Parker and Eastwood. I've got Eastwood at 6ft3.25 prime btw. Arch Stanton said on 8/Sep/23I mean Clint was even in a film with Richard Kiel and stood next to him on a slope LOL! Hong said on 8/Sep/23Ok Rory let's look at it this way,so Clint was 6ft3.5 + 1.25 to 1.5 inch boot heels puts Clint pretty close to 6ft5,now in comparison we have Parker 6ft5.5 and for arguments sake 1 inch heel?that would leave him at 6f6.5 that's around 1.5 inches difference.Also both guys have poor posture,Clint tends to slouch and Parker tends to stoop,so taken that into account I still see more than 1.5 inches height difference more like 2.5 leaving Clint looking no more than 6ft3 flat. Rory said on 7/Sep/23Hong,you've posted that many times before lol,I'm saying he looks taller than ebsen there for me when he stands well but 6ft3 flat compared to Fess Parker I'd say,not quite 3 inches. Does he have footwear advantage on Fess ? I wouldn't swear by that,those shoes Fess have on look pretty unconventional and chunky. I'd agree though on that particular show,he looked 6ft3 flat. Hong said on 7/Sep/23Click Here In this he looks about 3 inches shorter than Fess Parker at times,he also has footwear advantage,and looks similar to the older Buddy Ebsen. Leone_Fan said on 5/Sep/23Yes it's possible that it wasn't Clint who wanted Neeson to look shorter but someone else concerned about his image such as the director or studio executives. Everything will be done to make the star look good and not be overshadowed by a supporting actor. Rory said on 4/Sep/23Not necessarily,it may have even have been asked for by the director for the purposes of the camera shot. I'd personally be surprised if Clint,at that point 190cm tall,kicked up a fuss about Neesons height. It's not like Neeson towered him on flat ground,the difference was like 3 or 4cm max. Let's not forget Clint was a powerful film star, if he'd had a problem acting with tall people then they wouldn't have been in the movie with him, so I think that's nonsense. Hong said on 4/Sep/23Your correct Leone_Fan as you can read in the post I sent on 6th of June,this says too me that Clint was indeed very aware of his height next to his co stars and was fully aware that he was beginning to lose height at that stage of his life. Leone_Fan said on 3/Sep/23In Dead Pool Liam Neeson was made to stand on lower ground than Clint so he didn't look taller. Which was stupid I think. Liam did look taller in some scenes though. Rory said on 3/Sep/23I think young Clint would have easily hit 6ft4 out of bed,probably on a good day 6ft4.25 straight out and then at night down to maybe 6ft3.25. Solid 193 range is out seeing as he was edged by Walcott,Kennedy and Gavin, likewise 189/190 range is out seeing as he was taller than ulrick and Matheson whilst in flat shoes. 191.5 is a good bet for Dollars era Clint. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Sep/23Yeah the full 6ft4 always seemed to be a slight stretch. Early morning would have hit it surely. Flat 6ft3 I think should be off the menu as well for Clint's peak though. In Dead Pool still looked around the 6ft3 mark Arch Stanton said on 1/Sep/23It's one of those quite rare instances where Clint actually looks a genuine solid 6 ft 4. In some scenes in Blood Work I thought Clint actually looked a bit taller than Jeff Daniels, and did look about 6 ft 3. Which is odd as it was 2003 and he started looking more 6 ft 2 range by around 1993! I can believe 6'4" in the morning peak Parker, and that he dropped to mid 6'3" range. I think he looked too lanky to be the 6'2.5-6'3 some people say. Parker said on 1/Sep/23Arch Stanton said on 30/Aug/23 Even if Aspel is under 5'9, Clint physically proportionally looks easily 6 ft 4 in that video to me! 100% agree mate. Minimum solid 6'3 as he looked in Magnum Force. I've upgraded my peak guess to 6'4. He's claimed it, why would you lie at that height. Leone_Fan said on 31/Aug/23Really surprised how tall Eastwood looks in the video with Michael Aspel. Looks like a 6'4'' or 6'3'' guy on that show. Clint was in his mid 50s then so I guess still close to his peak height and looked great overall, still the picture of the handsome movie star. Looking at an older Eastwood from the 2000's onwards its hard to see a 6'4'' guy. At times you question whether he was ever really 6'4'' to begin with, such as when you see him towered by Tim Robbins who some claim is 6'7'' but is probably 6'5''. Clint looks like he was a legitimately tall guy who has lost several inches due to the effects of ageing. On a side note I was a bit concerned that the site was going under due to it not accepting comments for a while. I appreciate it said was due to technical issues but was concerned maybe Rob the site owner had blown his bank balance on running the site or something. No offence Rob. Glad to see it's up and running and going strong. Editor RobDoing conventions was by far the biggest expense of running this site. Arch Stanton said on 30/Aug/23Even if Aspel is under 5'9, Clint physically proportionally looks easily 6 ft 4 in that video to me! Rory said on 30/Aug/23In fairness I think Parkinson is underlisted at 5ft10, he could pull off 10.5 quite a bit I feel and I wouldn't go under 10.25 for him. Aspel 8.25/8.5 and Parkinson 10.25/10.5 is likely and I think Clint by 1985 was 6ft3 how much he'd lost in height by then is unknowable,but probably less than half inch. Hong said on 30/Aug/23Agreed Rory,I think Aspel was closer to 5ft8 than 9 putting Clint in the strong 6ft3 range. Rory said on 29/Aug/23Click Here You can see Aspel with 6ft1.75 Caine in the first 30 seconds here looking a good 5 inches shorter. Also in the episode with Clint he seemed a bit shorter than 5ft9ish Dennis Waterman so I'd say Aspel was at best 5ft8.5 and possibly as low as 5ft8.25. Clint looked 7-8 inches taller but was slightly nearer to the camera so he probably wasn't much more than 7 inches taller than Aspel in reality. James B 172cm said on 29/Aug/23Arch-Maybe Clint was 6’3.25 in the mid 80s? Hong said on 29/Aug/23Click Here Here's Aspel with 5ft10 listed Michael Parkinson, he's looking a couple of inches shorter,so maybe closer to 5ft 8 would be more like Aspels height at the time? Arch Stanton said on 29/Aug/23Clint oddly looks proportionally like a legit 6 ft 4 in that clip from 1985! and the legs of a guy nearer 6 ft 6. I thought Clint edged out 6'3" Michael Moriarty in Pale Rider James! James B 172cm said on 29/Aug/23Rob assuming Clint was not over 6ft3 in 1985 do you agree that Aspel looks 5ft8 in comparison? Editor RobBetween 5ft 8 and 9 James B 172cm said on 29/Aug/23Maybe Michael Aspel is more 5ft8? Hong said on 28/Aug/23Click Here Here's Clint and Eric,as you can see Eric is barefoot and Clint has shoes on but Clint looks to have the edge even taken that in to account.In general in Rawhide I do think both guys look quite similar in height,but with the often uneven ground level in the outside scenes it's pretty hard to get a good comparison. Hong said on 28/Aug/23Click Here look at this video from the Michael Aspel show in 1985, Aspel is listed as 5ft9 and is completely towerd by Clint, it's one of those occasions in which Clint actually looks 6ft4. Gerald S said on 28/Aug/23Rob, I know it's a toss up, but who do you think might have been a stronger 6'3.5" out of Eric Fleming and Eastwood on Rawhide? Editor RobWould have said Clint might have had the edge. James B 172cm said on 27/Aug/236'3-6'3.5 peak Slamm said on 27/Aug/236-3.5 peak now 5-11.75 Hong said on 7/Jun/23Click Here Here's Paul Newman's military physical results,as you can see his height is listed as 69.25 inches which is 5ft9 and a quarter. Hong said on 7/Jun/23But still Arch 6 inches?I don't think so. Hong said on 6/Jun/23Click Here In this article Liam Neeson mentions how he was deliberately made look shorter than Clint in the dead pool. Hong said on 6/Jun/23Just got Newman's military service documents and posted them to Newman's page, it has Newman's height as 5ft9.25. Arch Stanton said on 3/Jun/23Newman is stood on one leg which can often make you look taller and Clint is clearly dropping height with his legs apart though Hong. His legs are more than slightly far apart. Hong said on 3/Jun/23Click Here I've managed to get a closer still of Clint and Newman in which Newman's legs are straight and Clint in in a pisition where his legs are more together. Hong said on 3/Jun/23Click Here A 60 year old Clint with 6ft5.5 listed Clive Mantel,Clint is looking about 6ft2 in comparison. Hong said on 2/Jun/23Click Here Here's a still of all the pics of Clint and Newman from that photo shoot.

• 1
• 2
• 3
• ...
• 24

Celebrity Heights A-Z A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Random Celebrity Latest Star Heights Jacob Fortune-Lloyd Travis Kelce Odessa A'zion Cooper Flagg Molly-Mae Hague Anthony Andrews Bronny James Gianni Capaldi View More Popular Pages

• Celebs My Height
• Top 50 Celebs
• Guess Heights
• Justin Bieber
• Tom Cruise
• Brad Pitt
• Arnold Schwarzenegger
• Sylvester Stallone
• Sneaker Heights
• Elevator Shoes
• Height Articles
• Categories

CelebHeights.com © Rob Paul 2004-2026. By visiting Celeb Heights you agree to its Terms and Privacy & Cookie Policies.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films. Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media. Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.