Dominance (ecology) - Wikipedia

Measure of species' ecological influence For other uses, see Dominance. "Dominant species" redirects here. For other uses, see Dominant Species.

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: "Dominance" ecology – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (June 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Ecological dominance is the degree to which one or several species have a major influence controlling the other species in their ecological community (because of their large size, population, productivity, or related factors)[1] or make up more of the biomass. Both the composition and abundance of species within an ecosystem can be affected by the dominant species present.[2]

In most of the world's ecosystems, biologists have repeatedly observed a rank-abundance curve in which ecosystems comprise a handful of incredibly abundant species, but more numerous, rarer species that are few in number.[3][4][5][6] Danish botanist Christen C. Raunkiær described this phenomenon as his "law of frequency" in 1918, in which he recognized that in communities with a single species accounting for most of the biomass, species diversity was often lower.[7]

Understandably, biologists expect to see more profound effects from those species greater in number.[8] First formalized as the mass ratio hypothesis in a 1998 paper by English ecologist J. Philip Grime, ecologically dominant species are predicted to have overwhelming effects on ecosystem function and ecological processes due to their relatively high biomass and ubiquity.[9]

Most ecological communities are defined by their dominant species.[10][2]

• In many examples of wet woodland in western Europe, the dominant tree is alder (Alnus glutinosa).[11]
• In tallgrass prairies of Northeastern Kansas, the dominant grass is (Andropogon gerardii).[12][13][14][15]
• In temperate bogs, the dominant vegetation is usually species of Sphagnum moss.[16]
• Tidal swamps in the tropics are usually dominated by species of mangrove (Rhizophoraceae).[17][18]
• Some Arctic sea floor communities are dominated by brittle stars.[19]
• Exposed rocky shorelines are dominated by sessile organisms such as barnacles and limpets.[20]
• The turtle ant (Cephalotes pusillus), is thought to dominant arboreal ant communities in the Brazilian savannah.[21]

There are currently several different metrics for assessing species dominance in natural ecosystems, including the importance value index,[22] competitive index,[23] community importance index,[24] and dominance index.[2]

See also

[edit]

• National Vegetation Classification, a system for classifying British plant communities by their dominant species
• Monodominance

References

[edit]

1. ^ "OECD Glossary of Statistical Terms - Ecological dominance Definition".
2. ^ a b c Avolio, Meghan L.; Forrestel, Elisabeth J.; Chang, Cynthia C.; La Pierre, Kimberly J.; Burghardt, Karin T.; Smith, Melinda D. (13 March 2019). "Demystifying dominant species". New Phytologist. 223 (3): 1106–1126. Bibcode:2019NewPh.223.1106A. doi:10.1111/nph.15789. ISSN 0028-646X. PMID 30868589.
3. ^ Whittaker, R. H. (1965-01-15). "Dominance and Diversity in Land Plant Communities". Science. 147 (3655): 250–260. Bibcode:1965Sci...147..250W. doi:10.1126/science.147.3655.250. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 17788203.
4. ^ Alroy, John (2015-09-04). "The shape of terrestrial abundance distributions". Science Advances. 1 (8) e1500082. Bibcode:2015SciA....1E0082A. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500082. ISSN 2375-2548. PMC 4643760. PMID 26601249.
5. ^ Darwin, Charles (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or, The preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray, Albemarle Street. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.82303.
6. ^ Gleason, H. A. (1 October 1929). "The Significance of Raunkiaer's Law of Frequency". Ecology. 10 (4): 406–408. Bibcode:1929Ecol...10..406G. doi:10.2307/1931149. ISSN 0012-9658. JSTOR 1931149.
7. ^ Kenoyer, Leslie A. (1 July 1927). "A Study of Raunkaier's Law of Frequence". Ecology. 8 (3): 341–349. Bibcode:1927Ecol....8..341K. doi:10.2307/1929336. ISSN 0012-9658. JSTOR 1929336.
8. ^ Gaston, Kevin J. (1 May 2011). "Common Ecology". BioScience. 61 (5): 354–362. Bibcode:2011BiSci..61..354G. doi:10.1525/bio.2011.61.5.4. ISSN 1525-3244.
9. ^ Grime, J. P. (5 January 2002). "Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects". Journal of Ecology. 86 (6): 902–910. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00306.x. ISSN 0022-0477.
10. ^ Braun, E. Lucy (1 April 1947). "Development of the Deciduous Forests of Eastern North America". Ecological Monographs. 17 (2): 211–219. Bibcode:1947EcoM...17..211B. doi:10.2307/1943265. ISSN 0012-9615. JSTOR 1943265.
11. ^ Prieditis, Normunds (1997-03-01). "Alnus glutinosa – dominated wetland forests of the Baltic Region: community structure, syntaxonomy and conservation". Plant Ecology. 129 (1): 49–94. Bibcode:1997PlEco.129...49P. doi:10.1023/A:1009759701364. ISSN 1573-5052.
12. ^ Smith, Melinda D.; Knapp, Alan K. (8 May 2003). "Dominant species maintain ecosystem function with non-random species loss". Ecology Letters. 6 (6): 509–517. Bibcode:2003EcolL...6..509S. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00454.x. ISSN 1461-023X.
13. ^ Silletti, Andrea M; Knapp, Alan K; Blair, John M (2004-04-01). "Competition and coexistence in grassland codominants: responses to neighbour removal and resource availability". Canadian Journal of Botany. 82 (4): 450–460. Bibcode:2004CaJB...82..450S. doi:10.1139/b04-016. ISSN 0008-4026.
14. ^ Chang, Cynthia C.; Smith, Melinda D. (2011-10-21). "Invasion of an intact plant community: the role of population versus community level diversity". Oecologia. 168 (4): 1091–1102. doi:10.1007/s00442-011-2157-z. ISSN 0029-8549. PMID 22015570.
15. ^ Hoover, D. L.; Knapp, A. K.; Smith, M. D. (2014-05-23). "Contrasting sensitivities of two dominant C4 grasses to heat waves and drought". Plant Ecology. 215 (7): 721–731. Bibcode:2014PlEco.215..721H. doi:10.1007/s11258-014-0345-8. ISSN 1385-0237.
16. ^ Krachler, Regina; Krachler, Rudolf F.; Wallner, Gabriele; Steier, Peter; El Abiead, Yasin; Wiesinger, Hubert; Jirsa, Franz; Keppler, Bernhard K. (2016-06-15). "Sphagnum-dominated bog systems are highly effective yet variable sources of bio-available iron to marine waters". Science of the Total Environment. 556: 53–62. Bibcode:2016ScTEn.556...53K. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.012. ISSN 0048-9697. PMID 26971209.
17. ^ Brocklehurst, P (1996). Mangrove survey of Darwin Harbour, Northern Territory (N.T.): CCNT/NFI project 1994-95. Dept. of Lands Planning and Environment. ISBN 0-7245-2766-4. OCLC 40791904.
18. ^ Ismail; Sulistiono; Hariyadi, S; Madduppa, H (2021-04-01). "Diversity, density, and Importance Value Index of mangroves in the Segara Anakan lagoon and its surrounding area, Cilacap Regency, Indonesia". IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 744 (1) 012034. Bibcode:2021E&ES..744a2034I. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/744/1/012034. ISSN 1755-1307.
19. ^ Piepenburg, D.; Schmid, M. K. (1996-07-01). "Brittle star fauna (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) of the arctic northwestern Barents sea: composition, abundance, biomass and spatial distribution". Polar Biology. 16 (6): 383–392. Bibcode:1996PoBio..16..383P. doi:10.1007/BF02390420. ISSN 1432-2056.
20. ^ Worm, B.; Karez, R. (2002), "Competition, Coexistence and Diversity on Rocky Shores", Competition and Coexistence, vol. 161, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 133–163, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-56166-5_6, ISBN 978-3-642-62800-9, retrieved 2023-04-27{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)
21. ^ Camarota, Flávio; Vasconcelos, Heraldo L.; Marquis, Robert J.; Powell, Scott (2020-10-01). "Revisiting ecological dominance in arboreal ants: how dominant usage of nesting resources shapes community assembly". Oecologia. 194 (1): 151–163. Bibcode:2020Oecol.194..151C. doi:10.1007/s00442-020-04748-z. ISSN 1432-1939. PMID 32909091.
22. ^ Curtis, J. T.; McIntosh, R. P. (1 July 1951). "An Upland Forest Continuum in the Prairie-Forest Border Region of Wisconsin". Ecology. 32 (3): 476–496. Bibcode:1951Ecol...32..476C. doi:10.2307/1931725. ISSN 0012-9658. JSTOR 1931725.
23. ^ GRIME, J. P. (30 March 1973). "Competitive Exclusion in Herbaceous Vegetation". Nature. 242 (5396): 344–347. Bibcode:1973Natur.242..344G. doi:10.1038/242344a0. ISSN 0028-0836.
24. ^ Power, Mary E.; Tilman, David; Estes, James A.; Menge, Bruce A.; Bond, William J.; Mills, L. Scott; Daily, Gretchen; Castilla, Juan Carlos; Lubchenco, Jane; Paine, Robert T. (1 September 1996). "Challenges in the Quest for Keystones". BioScience. 46 (8): 609–620. Bibcode:1996BiSci..46..609P. doi:10.2307/1312990. ISSN 0006-3568. JSTOR 1312990.

External links

[edit]

• Dominant Species in a Diverse Ecosystem

v t e Ecology: Modelling ecosystems: Trophic components
General	Abiotic component Abiotic stress Behaviour Biogeochemical cycle Biomass Biotic component Biotic stress Carrying capacity Competition Ecosystem Ecosystem ecology Ecosystem model Green world hypothesis Keystone species List of feeding behaviours Metabolic theory of ecology Productivity Resource Restoration
Producers	Autotrophs Chemosynthesis Chemotrophs Foundation species Kinetotrophs Mixotrophs Myco-heterotrophy Mycotroph Organotrophs Photoheterotrophs Photosynthesis Photosynthetic efficiency Phototrophs Primary nutritional groups Primary production
Consumers	Apex predator Bacterivore Carnivores Chemoorganotroph Foraging Generalist and specialist species Intraguild predation Herbivores Heterotroph Heterotrophic nutrition Insectivore Mesopredators Mesopredator release hypothesis Omnivores Optimal foraging theory Planktivore Predation Prey switching
Decomposers	Chemoorganoheterotrophy Decomposition Detritivores Detritus
Microorganisms	Archaea Bacteriophage Lithoautotroph Lithotrophy Marine Microbial cooperation Microbial ecology Microbial food web Microbial intelligence Microbial loop Mycoloop Microbial mat Microbial metabolism Phage ecology
Food webs	Biomagnification Ecological efficiency Ecological pyramid Energy flow Food chain Trophic level
Example webs	Lakes Rivers Soil Tritrophic interactions in plant defense Marine food webs cold seeps hydrothermal vents intertidal kelp forests North Pacific Gyre San Francisco Estuary tide pool
Processes	Ascendency Bioaccumulation Cascade effect Climax community Competitive exclusion principle Consumer–resource interactions Copiotrophs Dominance Ecological network Ecological succession Energy quality Energy systems language f-ratio Feed conversion ratio Feeding frenzy Mesotrophic soil Nutrient cycle Oligotroph Paradox of the plankton Trophic cascade Trophic mutualism Trophic state index
Defense,counter	Animal coloration Anti-predator adaptations Camouflage Deimatic behaviour Herbivore adaptations to plant defense Mimicry Plant defense against herbivory Predator avoidance in schooling fish

v t e Ecology: Modelling ecosystems: Other components
Populationecology	Abundance Allee effect Consumer-resource model Depensation Ecological yield Effective population size Intraspecific competition Logistic function Malthusian growth model Maximum sustainable yield Overpopulation Overexploitation Population cycle Population dynamics Population modeling Population size Predator–prey (Lotka–Volterra) equations Recruitment Small population size Stability Resilience Resistance Random generalized Lotka–Volterra model
Species	Biodiversity Density-dependent inhibition Ecological effects of biodiversity Ecological extinction Endemic species Flagship species Gradient analysis Indicator species Introduced species Invasive species / Native species Latitudinal gradients in species diversity Minimum viable population Neutral theory Occupancy–abundance relationship Population viability analysis Priority effect Rapoport's rule Relative abundance distribution Relative species abundance Species diversity Species homogeneity Species richness Species distribution Species–area curve Umbrella species
Speciesinteraction	Antibiosis Biological interaction Commensalism Community ecology Ecological facilitation Interspecific competition Mutualism Parasitism Storage effect Symbiosis
Spatialecology	Biogeography Cross-boundary subsidy Ecocline Ecotone Ecotype Disturbance Edge effects Foster's rule Habitat fragmentation Ideal free distribution Intermediate disturbance hypothesis Insular biogeography Land change modeling Landscape ecology Landscape epidemiology Landscape limnology Metapopulation Patch dynamics r/K selection theory Resource selection function Source–sink dynamics
Niche	Ecological trap Ecosystem engineer Environmental niche modelling Guild Habitat Marine Semiaquatic Terrestrial Limiting similarity Niche apportionment models Niche construction Niche differentiation Ontogenetic niche shift
Othernetworks	Assembly rules Bateman's principle Bioluminescence Ecological collapse Ecological debt Ecological deficit Ecological energetics Ecological indicator Ecological threshold Ecosystem diversity Emergence Extinction debt Kleiber's law Liebig's law of the minimum Marginal value theorem Thorson's rule Xerosere
Other	Allometry Alternative stable state Balance of nature Biological data visualization Ecological economics Ecological footprint Ecological forecasting Ecological humanities Ecological stoichiometry Ecopath Ecosystem based fisheries Endolith Evolutionary ecology Functional ecology Industrial ecology Macroecology Microecosystem Natural environment Regime shift Sexecology Systems ecology Urban ecology Theoretical ecology
Outline of ecology