Editorial: Repeal California's Ban On State-funded Travel To Some States
Maybe your like
- News
- Home Page
- California
- Election 2024
- Housing & Homelessness
- Politics
- Science & Medicine
- World & Nation
- Business
- Artificial Intelligence
- Autos
- Jobs, Labor & Workplace
- Real Estate
- Technology and the Internet
- California
- California Politics
- Earthquakes
- Education
- Housing & Homelessness
- L.A. Influential
- L.A. Politics
- Mental Health
- Climate & Environment
- Climate Change
- Water & Drought
- Entertainment & Arts
- Arts
- Books
- Stand-Up Comedy
- Hollywood Inc.
- The Envelope (Awards)
- Movies
- Music
- Television
- Things to Do
- De Los
- En Español
- Food
- 101 Best Restaurants in L.A.
- Recipes
- Image
- Art & Culture
- Conversations
- Drip Index: Event Guides
- Fashion
- Shopping Guides
- Styling Myself
- Lifestyle
- Health & Wellness
- Home Design
- L.A. Affairs
- Plants
- Travel & Experiences
- Weekend
- Things to Do in L.A.
- Obituaries
- Voices
- Editorials
- Letters to the Editor
- Contributors
- Short Docs
- Sports
- Angels
- Angel City FC
- Chargers
- Clippers
- Dodgers
- Ducks
- Galaxy
- High School Sports
- Kings
- Lakers
- 2026 Milan-Cortina Olympics
- USC
- UCLA
- Rams
- Sparks
- World & Nation
- Immigration & the Border
- Israel-Hamas
- Mexico & the Americas
- Ukraine
- Times Everywhere
- 404 by L.A. Times
- LA Times Today
- Newsletters
- Photography
- Podcasts
- Short Docs
- TikTok
- Threads
- Video
- YouTube
- X (Twitter)
- For Subscribers
- eNewspaper
- All Sections
- _________________
- LA Times Studios
- Business
- • AI & Tech
- • Automotive
- • Banking & Finance
- • Commercial Real Estate
- • Entertainment
- • Goods & Retail
- • Healthcare & Science
- • Law
- • Sports
- Deals & Coupons
- Decor & Design
- Dentists
- Doctors & Scientists
- Fitness
- Hot Property
- Live & Well
- Orange County
- Pets
- The Hub: Rebuilding LA
- Travel
- Veterinarians
- Weddings & Celebrations
- Newsletters
- Live Stream
- Events
- Screening Series
- Crossword
- Games
- L.A. Times Store
- Subscriptions
- Manage Subscription
- EZPAY
- Delivery Issue
- eNewspaper
- Students & Educators
- Subscribe
- Subscriber Terms
- Gift Subscription Terms
- About Us
- About Us
- Archives
- Company News
- eNewspaper
- For the Record
- Got a Tip?
- L.A. Times Careers
- L.A. Times Store
- LA Times Studios Capabilities
- News App: Apple IOS
- News App: Google Play
- Newsroom Directory
- Public Affairs
- Rights, Clearance & Permissions
- Short Docs
- Advertising
- Classifieds
- Find/Post Jobs
- Hot Property Sections
- Local Ads Marketplace
- L.A. Times Digital Agency
- Media Kit: Why the L.A. Times?
- People on the Move
- Place an Ad
- Place an Open House
- Sotheby’s International Realty
- Special Supplements
- Healthy Living
- Higher Education
- Philanthropy
- Politics
- Trump Administration
- California Politics
- L.A. Politics
- View All
Demonstrators in Austin, Texas, gather at the state Capitol to speak against transgender-related legislation bills being considered in the Texas Senate and Texas House in May 2021. (Eric Gay / Associated Press) - 52
- Share via Close extra sharing options
- X
- Threads
- Copy Link URL Copied!
Gov. Gavin Newsom spent the week of July Fourth vacationing with his family in Montana, where his wife’s parents own a ranch. This should be an entirely unremarkable fact.
But it generated news last week because Montana is on the long list of states to which California has banned state government-funded travel in protest against anti-LGBTQ state laws. Of course, Newsom was on a personal vacation, not government business, so the trip was not paid for by the state. But that didn’t stop critics from calling Newsom a hypocrite because he typically travels with a security detail whose expenses are paid with state funds.
This is a silly attack, but Democrats have themselves to blame. The Democratic-controlled Legislature exposed California leaders to such needless gotchas by passing the well-intentioned but foolish law in 2016 that prohibits state-funded travel to states that have laws discriminating against people based on gender identity or sexual orientation. It was signed by then-Gov. Jerry Brown.
AdvertisementLawmakers argued at the time that the boycott would send a strong message “that we do not tolerate discrimination in our state and beyond our borders.” But it hasn’t done that at all. Instead, it’s created a raft of bureaucratic work-arounds inside state government and thwarted some academic research — without achieving demonstrable economic impact on the offending states. And it’s clearly not discouraging red states from passing discriminatory laws, since the list of prohibited states has grown from four when the boycott began to 22 today.
Editorial: California’s latest boycott is well-meaning but ill-conceived and ineffective
Boycotts are having a moment.
Jan. 17, 2017One reason California’s ban is ineffective is that it’s riddled with loopholes. State-funded travel is allowed to banned states to protect health or safety, so there’s no prohibition on Newsom traveling with his California Highway Patrol detail. Travel is allowed if state officials need to enforce a California law, perform an audit, engage in litigation or comply with requests from the federal government. It’s allowed to complete job-required training and to participate in meetings necessary to obtain grant funding. In other words, it’s permitted in a lot of situations that state employees routinely encounter.
The ban does not apply to how California politicians spend their campaign funds, another loophole that blunts its economic impact and makes Democrats look like hypocrites. Several Democratic lawmakers who voted for the bill in 2016 used campaign money in the following years to travel to conferences in states subject to the boycott, including Texas, Alabama and Tennessee. Another used campaign money to travel to Kentucky to learn about that state’s bail system, even though it’s also on the list of banned states. And though Newsom didn’t travel to Florida — another prohibited state — he recently pumped $100,000 into its economy by airing ads there poking Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis. These examples don’t violate the law, but they show how meaningless it is in achieving what boycotts are supposed to do — make offensive entities feel a financial pinch.
AdvertisementNor has the travel ban stopped the economic activity generated by college sports. Athletes from California’s public universities still participate in games across the nation, they just use private dollars instead of taxpayer money to fund trips to prohibited states.
Meanwhile, the ban has prevented many scholars at California’s public universities from participating in legitimate academic pursuits. It’s been so problematic that the American Historians Assn. wrote a letter to California lawmakers last year asking for a change to the law. Ironically, the historians point out in their letter, the law that’s meant to promote LGBTQ rights has actually limited the ability for scholars “to conduct research, deliver presentations, or participate in conferences and workshops that would also support social change on LGBTQ or other equity issues in some of the very places where that work is most needed.”
Editorial: Stop the full-on legislative assault on transgender people
As if banning trans female athletes on women’s teams weren’t bad enough, many states seek to interfere with their ability to find medical treatments.
March 30, 2021In one instance, a history professor at San Francisco State was initially prevented from traveling to North Carolina to review archival records in libraries there, research he was pursing for a project on the historical context for that state’s anti-transgender bathroom law. Eventually he was able to get an exemption by showing the trip would be paid for by a private endowment, not with state funds.
“This solved the immediate problem for me, but not the larger problem for other scholars,” professor Marc Stein wrote in a blog post last year. “Almost everyone else in the University of California and California State University systems … has effectively lost public funding for research in the states covered by the boycott.”
As the 50 states grow increasingly politically divided, California has an important role to play in demonstrating the benefits of inclusive, progressive policies. California’s commitment to equal rights for LGBTQ people and to providing access to abortion and contraception are especially vital now, as a right-wing Supreme Court dismantles Americans’ hard-fought freedom. Welcoming people from other states who seek healthcare that’s banned where they live is a substantive and meaningful way for California to demonstrate its values.
But the travel ban is a loopy, unworkable attempt to show the nation what we stand for without really showing much at all. It puts symbolism above pragmatism, weakening well-founded criticism of discriminatory laws. Advocates still believe it’s an important tool in a suite of responses to unjust attacks on LGBTQ people in red states. So California Democrats will have a hard time admitting that this policy has been ineffective and would likely face resistance if they introduced legislation to repeal it. But that’s what they should do. Not because the governor vacationed in Montana, but because principles not matched by substance aren’t really principles at all.
More to Read
-
Deadly ICE shooting in Minnesota, affordability stir up California gubernatorial forums
Jan. 11, 2026 -
Voices Chabria: Newsom offers a sunny view of California to combat Trump’s darkness
Jan. 8, 2026 -
For Subscribers California rolls out sweeping new laws for 2026, from cellphone limits in schools to a ban on cat declawing
Jan. 1, 2026
Get thought-provoking perspectives with our weekly newsletter.
By continuing, you agree to our Terms of Service and our Privacy Policy.
Enter email address Agree & Continue The Times Editorial BoardFollow Us
- X
The Los Angeles Times’ editorial board determines the positions of The Times as an institution. It operates separately from the newsroom. You can read more about the board’s mission at About The Times Editorial Board.
More From the Los Angeles Times
-
Voices Editorial: To understand homelessness, listen to homeless people. Here’s what I learned
March 30, 2025 -
Voices Editorial: Stop finding ways to kill the Venice Dell homeless housing project and get it built instead
March 23, 2025 -
Voices
Editorial: For California towns with a bear problem, using dogs to hunt is no solution
March 9, 2025 -
Voices Editorial: Keeping at-risk residents from losing their housing will be a key to solving homelessness
March 2, 2025
Podcasts
-
Through Her Doc ‘All The Walls Came Down,’ Filmmaker Ondi Timoner Aims To ‘Save’ Altadena, And Her Community – And Herself – Heal
Taped Jan 8, 2026, a year after the Eaton Fire, this episode features Ondi Timoner. After losing her home, she began documenting the displacement and financial struggles of her neighbors, joining My Tribe Rise to help Altadena rebuild and recover.
-
Crimes of the Times: “The Trials of Frank Carson” Update
Attorney Frank Carson defended the accused for decades. Framed for murder and later acquitted, a star witness admitted he lied. Stanislaus County paid $22.5M to settle his estate’s lawsuit.
-
Boiling Point: Smoglandia Pt 6: FUTURE ELECTRIC, FUTURE TROUBLE
Hear from the winner of the 1968 Caltech vs MIT electric car race. But it’s not all fresh air: smog devastates communities of color, and the Trump administration may pull the plug on California’s ability to clear its own air.
Subscribers are Reading
-
Healthcare experts warn ‘people will die’ unless state steps up amid federal cuts
-
L.A.’s buzziest coffee shop is in a gorgeous Angelino Heights home. Is this the start of a bigger trend?
-
She’s challenging Bass from the left. Could she become L.A.’s Mamdani?
-
Will Supervisor Lindsey Horvath enter the mayor’s race? She’s got a week to decide
-
Letters to Sports: Dodgers’ decision to visit White House fires up usual debate
Latest Opinion Voices
- Voices
Letters to the Editor: The world cannot ignore famine in war-torn Sudan any longer
Feb. 7, 2026 - Voices
Letters to the Editor: A cautionary tale of the dangers of self-certification in construction
Feb. 7, 2026 - Voices
Granderson: Trump keeps reminding us why people support him. It’s the racism
Feb. 6, 2026 - Voices
Contributor: Our era really is like the Civil War in one key way
Feb. 6, 2026 - Voices
Letters to the Editor: Do we really think ‘millions’ are going to want to visit L.A. for the Olympics?
Feb. 6, 2026
Tag » What Is State Funded Travel
-
Prohibition On State-Funded And State-Sponsored Travel To States ...
-
AB 1887 Travel Prohibition To Certain States Using State Funding ...
-
Frequently Asked Questions Regarding AB 1887 Requirements
-
AB 1887 State-Funded Travel Restrictions
-
AB 1887 State-funded Travel Restrictions For Four More Additional U.S. ...
-
Banned States (Assembly Bill 1887)
-
Why California Bans State-Funded Travel To Nearly Half Of States
-
PROHIBITION ON STATE-FUNDED AND STATE-SPONSORED ...
-
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) - AB 1887 | State Of California
-
Law AB 1887 Prohibits State Funding Of Travel To Certain States
-
Travel Ban - Assembly Bill No. 1887 - CSUSM
-
California Bans State-funded Travel To Nearly Half Of US
-
California Adds 5 More To Their State-funded Travel Ban, Citing Anti ...
-
Restricted Travel Law AB 1887 | Business & Financial Services