Faecal Particle Size: Digestive Physiology Meets Herbivore Diversity
Maybe your like
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation- Clipboard
- My Bibliography
- Collections
- Citation manager
Save citation to file
Format: Summary (text) PubMed PMID Abstract (text) CSV Create file CancelEmail citation
Email address has not been verified. Go to My NCBI account settings to confirm your email and then refresh this page. To: Subject: Body: Format: Summary Summary (text) Abstract Abstract (text) MeSH and other data Send email CancelAdd to Collections
- Create a new collection
- Add to an existing collection
Add to My Bibliography
- My Bibliography
Your saved search
Name of saved search: Search terms: Test search terms Would you like email updates of new search results? Saved Search Alert Radio Buttons- Yes
- No
Create a file for external citation management software
Create file CancelYour RSS Feed
Name of RSS Feed: Number of items displayed: 5 10 15 20 50 100 Create RSS Cancel RSS Link CopyFull text links
Elsevier Science
CORE Full text links Actions
CiteCollectionsAdd to Collections- Create a new collection
- Add to an existing collection
Page navigation
- Title & authors
- Abstract
- Publication types
- MeSH terms
- LinkOut - more resources
Abstract
In herbivore ecophysiology, comparative chewing efficiency has only recently received increased attention. This measure is best assessed on un-processed forage-only diets; corresponding comparative datasets are missing. We measured a faecal mean particle size (MPS [mm]) in 14 large herbivore species (body mass (M) range 60–4000 kg; 8 ruminants and 6 hindgut fermenters) fed a consistent grass hay diet, in which intake, digesta mean retention times (MRT [h]) and digestive efficiency (as digestibility of faecal fibre measured by 96 h cumulative in vitro gas production GP96h [ml per 200 mg faecal fibre], and metabolic faecal nitrogen MFN [% organic faecal matter]) had been quantified simultaneously. MPS was generally lower in ruminants than in hindgut fermenters and increased with M in the total dataset, but was nearly constant among closely related taxa (e.g. within ruminants, within equids) irrespective of M. MPS (but not MRT) was significantly correlated to GP96h, whereas MRT (but not MPS) was significantly correlated to MFN, suggesting different effects of these factors on different aspects of digestibility. Combinations of measures including MPS mostly explained digestibility better than other combinations. The phylogenetic signal λ, which was mostly 1 when linking any single measure to digestibility, was estimated 0 in models that linked digestive efficiency to combinations of measures. These results support the intuitive concept that species diversification in large herbivores is tightly related to digestive physiology, and that chewing efficiency as measured by faecal particle size is an integral aspect of this scenario.
PubMed Disclaimer
Publication types
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Actions
- Search in PubMed
- Search in MeSH
- Add to Search
MeSH terms
- Animals Actions
- Search in PubMed
- Search in MeSH
- Add to Search
- Animals, Domestic / physiology Actions
- Search in PubMed
- Search in MeSH
- Add to Search
- Body Weight Actions
- Search in PubMed
- Search in MeSH
- Add to Search
- Digestive System Physiological Phenomena* Actions
- Search in PubMed
- Search in MeSH
- Add to Search
- Feces / chemistry* Actions
- Search in PubMed
- Search in MeSH
- Add to Search
- Herbivory / physiology* Actions
- Search in PubMed
- Search in MeSH
- Add to Search
- Linear Models Actions
- Search in PubMed
- Search in MeSH
- Add to Search
- Particle Size* Actions
- Search in PubMed
- Search in MeSH
- Add to Search
- Regression Analysis Actions
- Search in PubMed
- Search in MeSH
- Add to Search
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
- CORE
- Elsevier Science
Medical
- MedlinePlus Health Information
Elsevier Science
CORE [x] Cite Copy Download .nbib .nbib Format: AMA APA MLA NLM Send To - Clipboard
- Save
- My Bibliography
- Collections
- Citation Manager
NCBI Literature Resources
MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer
The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.
Tag » How Big Are Poop Particles
-
Coronavirus Could Be Carried In Fecal Particles Spread By Toilet ...
-
Effect Of Varying Total Mixed Ration Particle Size On Rumen Digesta ...
-
Flushing Toilets Creates A Cloud Of Potentially Viral Particles
-
The Truth About Breathing Poo Particles In Bathrooms - XO2
-
The Characterization Of Feces And Urine: A Review Of The Literature ...
-
It's Not Just Beards — The Whole World Is Covered In Poop - The Cut
-
Toilet Flushes Create A Vortex Of Airborne Coronavirus Poop Particles
-
Yes, Toilet Spray After You Flush Includes Poop Particles | SELF
-
Poop In The Pool | Healthy Swimming | Healthy Water | CDC
-
Feces - Wikipedia
-
Poop Appearance: What Stool Shape, Size, & Smell Can Tell You
-
Feces | Biology - Britannica
-
Is Your Toothbrush Covered In Poop? Here's How To Thoroughly Clean It
-
It's 2020, So, Naturally, Poop Plumes Are A Problem, Too