Fermat's Last Theorem | Definition, Example, & Facts | Britannica
Maybe your like
Numbers and Mathematics Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.
External Websites- Boston University Arts and Sciences - Department of Mathematics and Statistics - An Overview of the Proof of Fermat�s Last Theorem
- Nature - Fermat's last theorem earns Andrew Wiles the Abel Prize
- Whitman College - Applications of Number Theory to FermatÂ’s Last Theorem (PDF)
- University of Babylon - Fermat�s Theorem (PDF)
- Digital Commons at Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School - Fermat's Last Theorem for Rational Exponents (PDF)
- American Mathematical Society - The Proof of Fermats Last Theorem by R. Taylor and A. Wiles (PDF)
- Wolfram MathWorld - Fermat's Last Theorem
- National Science Foundation - 350 Years Later, Fermat's Last Theorem Finally Proved
- MIT Mathematics - Fermat�s Last Theorem
- University of Waterloo - Fermat's Last Theorem
- University of Cambridge - Faculty of Mathematics - Features: Faculty Insights - Fermat's Last Theorem - from history to new mathematics
Fermat’s last theorem, the statement that there are no natural numbers (1, 2, 3,…) x, y, and z such that xn + yn = zn, in which n is a natural number greater than 2. For example, if n = 3, Fermat’s last theorem states that no natural numbers x, y, and z exist such that x3 + y 3 = z3 (i.e., the sum of two cubes is not a cube). In 1637 the French mathematician Pierre de Fermat wrote in his copy of the Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria (c. 250 ce), “It is impossible for a cube to be a sum of two cubes, a fourth power to be a sum of two fourth powers, or in general for any number that is a power greater than the second to be the sum of two like powers. I have discovered a truly remarkable proof [of this theorem], but this margin is too small to contain it.” For centuries mathematicians were baffled by this statement, for no one could prove or disprove Fermat’s last theorem. Proofs for many specific values of n were devised, however. For example, Fermat himself did a proof of another theorem that effectively solved the case for n = 4, and by 1993, with the help of computers, it was confirmed for all prime numbers n < 4,000,000. By that time, mathematicians had discovered that proving a special case of a result from algebraic geometry and number theory known as the Shimura-Taniyama-Weil conjecture would be equivalent to proving Fermat’s last theorem. The English mathematician Andrew Wiles (who had been interested in the theorem since the age of 10) presented a proof of the Shimura-Taniyama-Weil conjecture in 1993. An error was found in this proof, however, but, with help from his former student Richard Taylor, Wiles finally devised a proof of Fermat’s last theorem, which was published in 1995 in the journal Annals of Mathematics. That centuries had passed without a proof had led many mathematicians to suspect that Fermat was mistaken in thinking he actually had a proof.
The Editors of Encyclopaedia BritannicaThis article was most recently revised and updated by Erik Gregersen.Tag » Alistair's Last Theorem 0=1
-
"PROVE" 0 = 1 Using Integral Calculus - Where Is The Mistake?
-
Fermat's Last Theorem - Wikipedia
-
Proof That 1 = 0 Using A Common Logical Fallacy - Nathan Marz
-
One Equals Zero! – Math Fun Facts
-
Professor Who Solved Fermat's Last Theorem Wins Math's Abel Prize
-
What Is The Last Theorem? | Simon Singh
-
350 Years Later, Fermat's Last Theorem Finally Proved - Gov.ta
-
Help Debunk A Proof That Zero Equals One (no Division)?
-
Modern Family Botches Not One, But Two Graduation Storylines
-
[PDF] Mathematical Reasoning & Proofs - Alistair Savage
-
Proof That One Equals Zero (Using Algebra) - David Pleacher