Five Children's Books You Didn't Know Were Banned | Reading Partners

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, provide social media features, and analyze our traffic. By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

Accept

research-backed

From regular student assessment to contracting for independent studies, Reading Partners systematically collects, analyzes, and uses data to generate knowledge, improve programs, and report on impacts.

Learn more about research-backed term

science of reading

The established and growing research we have about how students learn to read, including systemic phonics education.

Learn more about science of reading term

individualized

A facet of high-dosage tutoring in which a tutor offers personalized attention to their student, resulting in targeted support, and personalized literacy learning.

Learn more about individualized term

high-dosage

The frequency of a learning experience. For example, Reading Partners students receive twice weekly tutoring for maximum growth.

Learn more about high-dosage term

educational equity

Ensuring every student, no matter their race, gender, socioeconomic level, or location has access to the resources and support they need to succeed in school and in life.

Learn more about educational equity term Back to blog Back to blog

It’s Banned Books Week, a time to celebrate the freedom to read! It may come as a surprise that many of your favorite childhood books, from authors such as Dr. Seuss and Maurice Sendak, have been deemed unfit for reading in the US. In fact, each year hundreds of books are challenged or removed from schools and libraries.

Banned books have existed for centuries, but here is a list of five familiar children’s books you probably didn’t know were banned.

The Giving Tree by Shel Silverstein

The Giving Tree was banned from a public library in Colorado in 1988 because it was interpreted as being sexist. Some readers believe that the young boy continually takes from the female tree, without ever giving anything in return. As the boy grows up, he always comes back to the tree when he needs something, taking until the tree has nothing left to give him.

The Lorax by Dr. Seuss

Dr. Seuss’ environmental kid’s book was banned in 1989 in a California school because it was believed to portray logging in a poor light and would turn children against the foresting industry. Members of the logging community were so upset by Dr. Seuss’ book that they sponsored the publication of a book called The Truax in an attempt to show children the need for foresting. The Lorax has also been criticized for its excessive portrayal of consumerism. The Once-ler represents a greedy America who wants the latest and greatest items, regardless of the consequences.

Harriet the Spy by Louise Fitzhugh

Harriet the Spy was challenged in 1983 at a school board meeting in Xenia, Ohio, where some argued the book encouraged children to disrespect their parents by lying, talking back, cursing, and spying on others. The female character of Harriet was also believed to be a bad influence on children because of her abrasiveness and improper behavior.

Where the Wild Things Are by Maurice Sendak

Maurice Sendak’s picture book faced many opponents immediately after its publication in 1963. Readers believed Where the Wild Things Are was psychologically damaging and traumatizing to young children due to Max’s inability to control his emotions and his punishment of being sent to bed without dinner. Psychologists called it “too dark”, and the book was banned largely in the south. It has also been challenged several times for its images of witchcraft and supernatural elements.

James and the Giant Peach by Roald Dahl

James and the Giant Peach has been banned and challenged several times since its publication, namely, for being too scary for its targeted age group. The death of the aunts has been targeted as an exceptionally scary part of the story. It is also believed to promote poor behavior, such as disobedience and, as some references note, communism.

VOLUNTEER

SHARE THIS STORY

• Share via Facebook
• Share via Twitter
• Share via LinkedIn

CATEGORIES

• Early Education

by Hannah Cleveland

AmeriCorps Site Coordinator

CATEGORIES

• Early Education

SHARE THIS STORY

• Share via Facebook
• Share via Twitter
• Share via LinkedIn

Related Stories

See All PostsRead more about The reality of the literacy opportunity gap

January 29, 2025

The reality of the literacy opportunity gap

Read more about Learning to read with dyslexia

January 27, 2025

Learning to read with dyslexia

Read more about What to do for kids who have no interest in reading 

November 18, 2024

What to do for kids who have no interest in reading