How DNA Evidence Can Be Falsified | MIT Technology Review

Skip to Content

An Israeli company, called Nucleix, has shown that it’s possible to fake DNA evidence at a crime scene, a possibility that has been cited as a concern for those who make their genome sequence public. Nucleix, based in Tel Aviv, has also developed a test that can distinguish between real and fake DNA evidence, i.e. DNA that has been shed from a person, and synthesized DNA that has replicated from a small DNA sample or generated anew from an individual’s genome sequence.

According to a report in The New York Times,

The scientists fabricated blood and saliva samples containing DNA from a person other than the donor of the blood and saliva. They also showed that if they had access to a DNA profile in a database, they could construct a sample of DNA to match that profile without obtaining any tissue from that person.

… The authors of the paper took blood from a woman and centrifuged it to remove the white cells, which contain DNA. To the remaining red cells they added DNA that had been amplified from a man’s hair.

Since red cells do not contain DNA, all of the genetic material in the blood sample was from the man. The authors sent it to a leading American forensics laboratory, which analyzed it as if it were a normal sample of a man’s blood.

The new test can distinguish between real and fake DNA evidence by anaylzing patterns of DNA methylation, a chemical modification that alters the shape of DNA molecules. According to a press release from the company,

…in vivo-generated DNA contains loci that are completely and consistently methylated and other loci that are unmethylated, differing from in vitro-synthesized DNA, which is completely unmethylated. Nucleix’s novel proprietary assay can identify and differentiate between real and all potential types of fake DNA through methylation analysis of a set of genomic loci. Results of the company’s research demonstrated both the current risk in sample integrity and the success of Nucleix’s new approach to DNA source verification.

• Popular

  1. A “QuitGPT” campaign is urging people to cancel their ChatGPT subscriptionsMichelle Kim
  2. Moltbook was peak AI theaterWill Douglas Heaven
  3. Yann LeCun’s new venture is a contrarian bet against large language models  Caiwei Chen
  4. Meet the Vitalists: the hardcore longevity enthusiasts who believe death is “wrong”Jessica Hamzelou

Keep Reading

Most Popular

A “QuitGPT” campaign is urging people to cancel their ChatGPT subscriptions

Backlash against ICE is fueling a broader movement against AI companies’ ties to President Trump.

By

• Michelle Kimarchive page

Moltbook was peak AI theater

The viral social network for bots reveals more about our own current mania for AI as it does about the future of agents.

By

• Will Douglas Heavenarchive page

Yann LeCun’s new venture is a contrarian bet against large language models  

In an exclusive interview, the AI pioneer shares his plans for his new Paris-based company, AMI Labs.

By

• Caiwei Chenarchive page

Meet the Vitalists: the hardcore longevity enthusiasts who believe death is “wrong”

They argue we need a revolution—and more and more influential scientists, funders, and politicians are taking them seriously.

By

• Jessica Hamzelouarchive page

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates fromMIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Enter your emailPrivacy Policy

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at [email protected] with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.