Pearl? Matte? Gloss? Satin? Headache...

• Home
• Forums New posts Today's posts My Posts My Threads Popular Content Most Replied Threads Most Liked Threads Most Viewed Threads Most Liked Posts Forum Rules
• What's new
• Gallery New media New comments
• Resources Latest reviews
• Blogs
• Classifieds
• Member Gear New gear Latest content Latest updates Latest reviews Latest questions
• Groups Public Events
• Support Us !

New Inbox Alerts

• New posts
• Today's posts
• My Posts
• My Threads
• Popular Content Most Replied Threads Most Liked Threads Most Viewed Threads Most Liked Posts
• Forum Rules

Menu Log in Register Install the app Install

• Welcome to Photrio! Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features. Click here to sign up
• × Notice: Site bug fix updates in Loading.... Expect a 1-2hr outage. You can close this notice if you like. Thanks, Sean

• Home
• Forums
• Analog Workflow Forums (100% Analog/Traditional)
• Darkroom
• B&W: Film, Paper, Chemistry

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.You should upgrade or use an alternative browser. Pearl? Matte? Gloss? Satin? Headache...

• A
• Thread starter brianmichel
• Start date Jul 11, 2009

Latest Gallery

Frozen Pool

• Don_ih
• Feb 23, 2026

• 11
• 6
• 113

H Greenhouse Volunteer

• loccdor
• Feb 23, 2026

• 3
• 0
• 79

Recent Classifieds

• For SaleSilver Gelatin book
  • Started by Peter Schrager
  • Today at 7:49 AM
• For SaleFuji GFX 100s with 120/80/63/30mm and 5 batteries
  • Started by reneboehmer
  • Yesterday at 6:20 PM
• For SaleSlide film
  • Started by Peter Schrager
  • Yesterday at 4:23 PM
• For SaleDurst F30 enlarger without Base Board
  • Started by Jon Shiu
  • Yesterday at 3:01 PM
• For Sale[FS] ALPA Rodenstock HR Alpagon 4.0/40mm LB (Copal 0) + HPF Metre Focus Ring: £4,500 / ~$5,600 USD / ~5,200
  • Started by Jack Kenyon
  • Yesterday at 6:43 AM

Forum statistics

Threads 202,412 Messages 2,840,393 Members 101,320 Latest member '3D Printed 6x24 Cam Recent bookmarks 0

brianmichel

Member Allowing Ads Joined Apr 6, 2009 Messages 67 Format Medium Format Alright, I've been looking around for more information on this, but I can't find any definitive examples of what the end difference of these papers are. Yes, yes I realize that a glossy paper will have a shine to it when printed, and a matte paper will produce an image with no shine. But what's the deal with Pearl and Satin? I can't find anything on these, are any of these preferred for printing, I know that I should probably try some of each, but I wanted to baseline what to expect from all of these, let me know if you guys have any experience with these kinds of paper. For the most part I'm looking at Ilford Multigrade RC paper, since it seems pretty prevalent and cheap in order to be economical in my first printing extravaganza. Any information is appreciated, thanks!

keithwms

Member Allowing Ads Joined Oct 14, 2006 Messages 6,220 Location Charlottesvi Format Multi Format So, pearl is supposed to have some deeper back shine, i.e. pearlescence, as opposed to strong reflection. Satin is supposed to have some of the iridescence of the fabric. The issue most people have with straight glossy is that it reflects back very strongly, the image is totally obscured if you don't hold it at some magic angle. So there have been various attempts to get rid of that back shine while keeping as much of the DMax as possible. That's my take on it. You should be able to order a paper sampler and see what works best for you. As for me, I am a fiber matte kinda guy. Don't like gloss shine at all. I can live with pearl and satin and semimatte though. "Only dead fish follow the stream" [APUG Portfolio] [APUG Blog] [Website]

Ian Grant

Subscriber Allowing Ads Joined Aug 2, 2004 Messages 23,414 Location West Midland Format Multi Format Just the opposite Pearl appears less contrasty not such deep blcks, despite the emulsion being identical. The major difference is how the prints reflect light, most manufacturers used to provide dealers/retailers with a swatch to show the differences. Matt can look really nice and natural to some, many prefer Pearl, others Glossy. As Keith says many of us prefer unglazed Glossy fibre based papers they are probably the best of all. Ian My APUG portfolio

pentaxuser

Member Joined May 9, 2005 Messages 20,446 Location Daventry, No Format 35mm Satin is much more matte than its name would suggest vis a vis Pearl. It is said to take handcolouring better because of its "tooth" but I haven't tried it for this yet. I like the surface but compared to Glossy( the student's favourite for courses) and Pearl, it sells an awful lot less. My fear is that it is surface we could lose unless demand is at least maintained. Give it a try with a small pack and then buy bigger if you like it. The best message to Ilford about what it should continue to produce is its sales figures. pentaxuser

AlanC

Member Allowing Ads Joined Feb 23, 2004 Messages 348 Location North Yorksh In the Ilford Multigrade RC range satin is the least glossy and has the least depth of black. Pearl has more sheen, and deeper blacks -quite good blacks in my opinion. If I was forced to only print on RC this would be the surface I would choose, as I much prefer it to glossy. Ilford do this surface in Warmtone RC as well, also very nice, with a warmer base than Warmtone fibre. Alan Clark OP OP

brianmichel

Member Allowing Ads Joined Apr 6, 2009 Messages 67 Format Medium Format So in ascending order of gloss for the Ilford range it goes; satin, pearl, glossy. Once again I think playing with all of these would be beneficial since I don't print much. Thanks for the help!

Edwardv

Member Allowing Ads Joined Jan 26, 2005 Messages 396 Format Medium Format I prefer RC glossy for my displayed work because it has better contrast. I find Pearl and Satin lack contrast; the only good thing about these papers is finger prints aren't left on the print as it would on glossy. So for clients I give them Pearl/Satin and increase the contrast more. Nonetheless, I prefer fiber paper for my personal work

Ian Grant

Subscriber Allowing Ads Joined Aug 2, 2004 Messages 23,414 Location West Midland Format Multi Format In RC Pearl is a great finish, paper's expensive so make a choice. Satin's interesting but the surface marks easily it's not good for constant handling and general use. As for Gloss versus Pearl well look at colour snapshots the surfaces are much the same, I like both and am ambiguous, if I'm printing to scan then glossy. Ian My APUG portfolio

AlanC

Member Allowing Ads Joined Feb 23, 2004 Messages 348 Location North Yorksh Brian, For the Ilford Multigrade 4 RC range, yes. The fibre range has matt and glossy. Small 25 sheet packs are available. The best thing is to buy a pack of satin , one of pearl and one of glossy, then print the same negative on all three. You will soon discover which you like best. alan Clark OP OP

brianmichel

Member Allowing Ads Joined Apr 6, 2009 Messages 67 Format Medium Format Alan, I think that's what I'm going to do, now that I have a better understanding of what to expect. I'll pick up a 25 pack of each and give it a whirl!

AlanC

Member Allowing Ads Joined Feb 23, 2004 Messages 348 Location North Yorksh Eadwardy says that Pearl and Satin lack contrast. I find that Ilford Pearl has more contrast than Ilford Satin. The difference is very noticable. Satin doesn't really have a black, but the Pearl does. Alan Clark

Monophoto

Member Allowing Ads Joined Aug 27, 2004 Messages 1,689 Location Saratoga Spr Format Multi Format

brianmichel said: So in ascending order of gloss for the Ilford range it goes; satin, pearl, glossy. Once again I think playing with all of these would be beneficial since I don't print much. Thanks for the help! Click to expand...

In the 'good old days', photographers working with 'glossy' fiber based paper had choices in the way they could dry prints. One option was to squeegee the wet print onto a waxed, polished metal plate (called a 'ferrotype plate'). This would produce a mirror-like finish on the print that was the ultimate in glossy. Alternatively, they could dry the prints face down on fiberglass screens, or in blotter books, for a more subdued gloss. Ferrotyped prints were commonly used for commercial (reproduction) applications, while the air-dried version was more common for artistic and display applications. When RC papers were introduced, manufacturers knew that the new technology would take away the choice that photographers had for the surface finish of dried prints, so they opted to provide choices of surfaces that emulated the options that were available with fiber based paper. RC glossy paper produces results that are similar to ferrotyping, while the Ilford "pearl" surface emulated air-dried glossy fiber-based paper. Kodak had a similar product like but used letter designations - F was 'glossy', while "E" approximated the effect of air-dried fiber-based glossy paper. Matte paper is just that - very flat. The most common use for matte paper is for situations where monochrome prints were to be hand colored, although occasionally you will see a matte photograph on display. "Satin" is Ilford's term for a surface that is part-way between true matte and their "pearl' surface - Kodak had a similar surface that they designated as "N" and sometimes described as "soft gloss". Louie

lightwisps

Subscriber Allowing Ads Joined Jan 27, 2005 Messages 383 Location Almonte, Ont Format 35mm My paper of choice is Ilford MG fibre glossy. That gives me the opportunity of drying it in my Arkay either face up or face down. In other words face up is glossy and face down is a semi-matte. Either way, you are free to do whatever toning you chose. Don Negatives are forever. Memory sticks till the end of the week.

Anon Ymous

Member Allowing Ads Joined Feb 7, 2008 Messages 3,682 Location Greece Format 35mm

AlanC said: Eadwardy says that Pearl and Satin lack contrast. I find that Ilford Pearl has more contrast than Ilford Satin. The difference is very noticable. Satin doesn't really have a black, but the Pearl does. Alan Clark Click to expand...

I agree 100%. Sometimes I also have the impression that satin has bit less sharpness, but that could be because of the reduced contrast. My choice is pearl. It does have a good black, it's not too shiny to become annoying and you won't see any fingerprints on it, something very important for me. Let's just say that pearl is a good compromise between glossy and satin (matte really).

Ian Grant

Subscriber Allowing Ads Joined Aug 2, 2004 Messages 23,414 Location West Midland Format Multi Format As I said before the Satin is a very deep lustrous finish it looks amazing, but in truth has a low Dmax.The black of Satin looks amazing until you compare it to Pearl or Glossy. On this AlanC and I would agree as we compared prints. (We don't disagree onn other issues either). Ian My APUG portfolio

AlanC

Member Allowing Ads Joined Feb 23, 2004 Messages 348 Location North Yorksh Ian, You know I always agree with you! The satin also looks like it has deep blacks until you dip a print half in water. Then the wet half looks really good in contrast and D max, and the dry half is revealed to be poor in blacks and lower in contrast as a result. Alan Clark

keithwms

Member Allowing Ads Joined Oct 14, 2006 Messages 6,220 Location Charlottesvi Format Multi Format Matte fiber has the lowest DMax of all and ... looks and feels the best to me "Only dead fish follow the stream" [APUG Portfolio] [APUG Blog] [Website]

MattKing

Moderator

Moderator Joined Apr 24, 2005 Messages 55,639 Location Delta, BC Canada Format Medium Format

Ian Grant said: Matt can look really nice and natural to some ... Ian Click to expand...

Gee, thanks Ian . I really like the pearl surface in RC - it is similar to the N surface that Kodak used to offer. When I used to use FB paper (a very long time ago) there were always some phtos that looked really good on a matte surface Ektalure. Matt Matt Photography is a complex and fluid medium, and its many factors are not applied in simple sequence. Rather, the process may be likened to the art of the juggler in keeping many balls in the air at one time! Ansel Adams, from the introduction to The Negative - The New Ansel Adams Photography Series / Book 2

John Bragg

Member Allowing Ads Joined Nov 29, 2005 Messages 1,039 Location Cornwall, UK Format 35mm Pearl has a reasonable D max and provides a more creamy rendition of highlights. The whites are not as stark and high tones are better separated. My choice over the other finishes.... My Tumblr. https://www.tumblr.com/blog/johnbragg1

wogster

Member Allowing Ads Joined Nov 10, 2008 Messages 1,272 Location Bruce Penins Format 35mm

brianmichel said: Alright, I've been looking around for more information on this, but I can't find any definitive examples of what the end difference of these papers are. Yes, yes I realize that a glossy paper will have a shine to it when printed, and a matte paper will produce an image with no shine. But what's the deal with Pearl and Satin? I can't find anything on these, are any of these preferred for printing, I know that I should probably try some of each, but I wanted to baseline what to expect from all of these, let me know if you guys have any experience with these kinds of paper. For the most part I'm looking at Ilford Multigrade RC paper, since it seems pretty prevalent and cheap in order to be economical in my first printing extravaganza. Any information is appreciated, thanks! Click to expand...

Glossy is a shiny paper, matte is flat, it's just like paint, Pearl is somewhere between the 2, trying to give the advantages of both. I find that Glossy has the best contrast, but can be easily marred by fingerprints, matte has a lower contrast but is not affected by fingerprints, Pearl is kinda in between, has better contrast the matte and better resistance to finger prints then matte. Satin can mean two things, some satin papers have like a cloth layer, under the emulsion, so they have a rough surface, other satin papers are more like pearl papers. Never liked the rough surface satin papers. I always liked pearl for general purpose printing, using glossy and matte when needed for some reason. With multiple grade papers, best is to buy a small package of each and try them to see what you like best. Paul Schmidt See my Blog at http://clickandspin.blogspot.com The greatest advance in photography in the last 100 years is not digital, it's odourless stop bath....

Vilk

Member Allowing Ads Joined Jan 15, 2008 Messages 515 Location hegeso.com Format 35mm and the best part? well, it's not like you have to choose one and forget the other forever lately, it's been a coin flip between satin and pearl for me. i don't fret about contrast and dmax too much--i like the feel of photograph-as-an-object these two surfaces give You must log in or register to reply here. Share: Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link

Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:

Top Bottom