Petition Of Right | Principles, Example, & History - Britannica

Ask the Chatbot Games & Quizzes History & Society Science & Tech Biographies Animals & Nature Geography & Travel Arts & Culture ProCon Money Videos petition of right Introduction References & Edit History Related Topics Videos Contents Lifestyles & Social Issues Human Rights petition of right English law Ask the Chatbot a Question More Actions Print Cite verifiedCite While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions. Select Citation Style MLA APA Chicago Manual of Style Copy Citation Share Share Share to social media Facebook X URL https://www.britannica.com/topic/petition-of-right-English-law Feedback External Websites Feedback Corrections? Updates? Omissions? Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login). Feedback Type Select a type (Required) Factual Correction Spelling/Grammar Correction Link Correction Additional Information Other Your Feedback Submit Feedback Thank you for your feedback

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

External Websites

• Online Library of Liberty - 1628: Petition of Right

Ask the Chatbot a Question Written and fact-checked by Britannica Editors Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree.... Britannica Editors History Table of Contents Table of Contents Ask the Chatbot

petition of right, legal petition asserting a right against the English crown, the most notable example being the Petition of Right of 1628, which Parliament sent to Charles I complaining of a series of breaches of law. The term also referred to the procedure (abolished in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.

At common law the crown, or the sovereign in his official capacity, could not be sued in the king’s courts. Since the king was, historically, the supreme lord of those courts, administering justice in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their jurisdiction. Hence it became a practice, whenever a subject’s real or personal property had come into the possession of the king or his servants without legal right, for the subject to petition the king in council for its restoration. The king then might or might not, at his discretion, refer the suppliant’s petition to one of his courts, usually to the old Court of Exchequer, with a writ directing the judges to do what was just (fiat justitia). In the late 19th century the tasks of deciding whether there was cause for action and of issuing the fiat justitia were left, respectively, to the attorney general and the home secretary.

Key People: Sir John Eliot (Show more) Related Topics: United Kingdom (Show more) See all related content

Although judgment was given in the ordinary manner, the execution of the judgment presented certain difficulties because the courts could not decree execution against the crown and its servants. By the end of the 19th century, judgments in favour of the suppliant were certified by the court to the treasury with the stipulation that they be satisfied out of public funds. In 1947 a new pattern for remedies against the crown was established, doing away with the petition of right.

The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica This article was most recently revised and updated by Adam Zeidan.