Post Hoc Analysis: Use And Dangers In Perspective - PubMed
Maybe your like
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation- Clipboard
- My Bibliography
- Collections
- Citation manager
Save citation to file
Format: Summary (text) PubMed PMID Abstract (text) CSV Create file CancelEmail citation
Email address has not been verified. Go to My NCBI account settings to confirm your email and then refresh this page. To: Subject: Body: Format: Summary Summary (text) Abstract Abstract (text) MeSH and other data Send email CancelAdd to Collections
- Create a new collection
- Add to an existing collection
Add to My Bibliography
- My Bibliography
Your saved search
Name of saved search: Search terms: Test search terms Would you like email updates of new search results? Saved Search Alert Radio Buttons- Yes
- No
Create a file for external citation management software
Create file CancelYour RSS Feed
Name of RSS Feed: Number of items displayed: 5 10 15 20 50 100 Create RSS Cancel RSS Link CopyActions
CiteCollectionsAdd to Collections- Create a new collection
- Add to an existing collection
Page navigation
- Title & authors
- Abstract
- Publication types
- MeSH terms
- LinkOut - more resources
Abstract
DANGERS AND ADVANTAGES OF POST HOC ANALYSIS: Post hoc analysis is of major importance in the generation of hypotheses. However, the hypothesis is created by the analysis and has not been proved by any "experiment'. In some circumstances the conclusion derived from a post hoc analysis is entirely appropriate. For example, it was the only method used by Crick and Watson for determining the structure of DNA. In other circumstances, however, the results will be misleading. NEED FOR CAUTION WITH INTERPRETATION: The results of a post hoc analysis should be viewed with considerable scepticism and, in advance of confirmation by other appropriately designed prospective studies, should not be regarded as definitive proof.
PubMed Disclaimer
Publication types
- Review Actions
- Search in PubMed
- Search in MeSH
- Add to Search
MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance* Actions
- Search in PubMed
- Search in MeSH
- Add to Search
- Case-Control Studies* Actions
- Search in PubMed
- Search in MeSH
- Add to Search
- Humans Actions
- Search in PubMed
- Search in MeSH
- Add to Search
- Meta-Analysis as Topic* Actions
- Search in PubMed
- Search in MeSH
- Add to Search
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.
Research Materials
- NCI CPTC Antibody Characterization Program
- Clipboard
- Save
- My Bibliography
- Collections
- Citation Manager
NCBI Literature Resources
MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer
The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.
Tag » What Is Post Hoc Analysis
-
Post Hoc Analysis - Wikipedia
-
What Are Post-hoc Analyses? | Editage Insights
-
What Is The Significance And Use Of Post-hoc Analysis Studies?
-
What Is Post-Hoc Analysis In A Clinical Trial?
-
Using Post Hoc Tests With ANOVA - Statistics By Jim
-
Post Hoc Analysis: Process And Types Of Tests - Mind The Graph
-
11.8: Post Hoc Tests - Statistics LibreTexts
-
Post Hoc Analysis - SAGE Research Methods
-
One-way ANOVA Test에서 Post Hoc Analysis를 해야 한다는데 무슨 말 ...
-
Post-hoc Tests
-
논문에서 Post-hoc이란? - 네이버 블로그
-
Implementing Post-Hoc Analysis In Your Research Findings - Impactio
-
Post Hoc Test - APA Dictionary Of Psychology