Rupert Grint Height - How Tall

Rupert Grint's Height

5ft 7 ½ (171.5 cm)

English actor best known for playing Ron Weasley in the Harry Potter films. He once said he "doesn't" know his height but also mentioned he was "about 5ft 8", and also claimed about "Five Seven". His agency listed him as "Height 5'10"". Photo PR Photos Harry PotterRupert Heights5ft 7 ½ Males

You May Be Interested

Daniel Radcliffe5ft 4 ½ (164 cm) Emma Watson5ft 4 ¾ (164 cm) Bonnie Wright5ft 5 ½ (166 cm) Tom Felton5ft 8 ½ (174 cm)

Add a Comment983 comments

• Your Guess (Optional) 5ft 5 ½5ft 5 ¾5ft 65ft 6 ¼5ft 6 ½5ft 6 ¾5ft 75ft 7 ¼5ft 7 ½5ft 7 ¾5ft 85ft 8 ¼5ft 8 ½5ft 8 ¾5ft 95ft 9 ¼5ft 9 ½

Average Guess (104 Votes)5ft 7.5in (171.4cm)

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4

TheBat said on 27/Sep/255'7.25"-5'7.75" range. avi said on 15/Jun/25Looks like he's 5'7.25 at most Barely 3 inches between him and Radcliffe 5'7-5'7.5 is what I'd consider the last short range height In todays age unfortunately 5'8 is really like the new 5'7 aaronj00 said on 12/Jun/25He gives off a taller vibe than this, like 5'9 - 5'11 range, but is actually not as tall as that. If I met him in person, I think that he would be just tall enough to where I wouldn't think he was short. Emil said on 11/May/25Josh is easily 3 inches taller than Grint if not a tad more. I think he's 5'7.25 at the most Andrea said on 28/Apr/25I don't know if this dates back to 2008 (around the time the video was uploaded), but he claims 5'7 here: Click Here josh b said on 23/Nov/24Click Here My pic with Rupert, similar footwear, hoping to round out the harry potter cast with a few more, Rupert was a decent bloke and seemed to be enjoying himself. 5'7 and a fraction said on 28/May/23He can give the impression of a 5'10er in Harry potter beside Radcliffe and Watson. It's only when you see him round guys like Matthew Lewis that you realize he's not as tall as you think. Sandy Cowell said on 15/Nov/22Well, that’s quite a height to have grown to for a child star! 5ft7.5. Darksol64 said on 10/Nov/22Usually an "About 5'8 " claim means measured a little over 5'7 so just round up by default so you don't short-change yourself. I agree he's likely closer to 5'7 than 5'8 at a low. I just can't see him that near Rob's height. He would be lucky to wake up first thing at Rob's extreme low, and may not even quite get that. ike57 said on 17/Oct/22Rob then what on Earth is happening here? Click Here Cold Water said on 28/Dec/215ft 7 Rachmaninoff61 said on 6/Mar/21Rob when you say Grint is in between average and short range what do you mean exactly? Like there’s a gray area where you’re not short nor average? If so where do you think that threshold hits that makes you about average and then which height is the beginning of short. I’m referencing US/UK really Editor Rob5ft 7 might be towards the lower bounds of average and upper end of he short range in UK. slim 6'1 said on 11/Jan/21Nearer 5’7 than 5’8 GTB173cm said on 8/Jan/21Gotta be just about 5’8 on the dot in the morning then 5’7.25 at night. Eww said on 21/Nov/20People calling him short are hilarious I've never seen Rupert as a short guy he pulls off looking average definitely wouldn't say he's short Julian Cross 188.5cm said on 18/Oct/20Funny that his most famous role, Ron Weasley, was described as tall and gangly in the Harry Potter books! Nik Ashton said on 16/Oct/20He’s my height peeps! Nik Ashton said on 29/Sep/20@ matt789 - You are so right! Realist said on 21/May/20It's funny a lot of guys 5'7.5 to 5'8.5 claim not to know their height. This teenager at my job is about 5'8.5 and 17 but he can still grow to 5'10 so I think knowing you are short can help I was 5'7 at 16! If I hadn't known i was short I would have never tried to grow now I am roughly 5'10 or a little over in shoes. Jam Cherry said on 4/May/20171.5 cm seems spot on JohnMoore-162cm said on 27/Apr/205ft7 1/2" sounds about right , just over 5ft8 out of bed Nik Ashton said on 5/Feb/20@ Joel Masterman - Where do you live? Jkiller said on 4/Feb/205'7 and a half sounds about right. Calcutta said on 31/Jan/20@Rob why the downgrade? 5'7 3/4 was an overestimation? Editor RobGrint looks right between 5ft 7 and 8 Joel Masterman said on 24/Jul/19Rob do you consider Rupert Grint to be quite short I wondering because I'am this guys height and I always get told I'am quite short? Editor RobIn the UK it's under average and maybe in the zone between short range and average. Yang (5 footer 8, 172-173) said on 16/Jul/19Still NOT EVEN 5ft 7 plateau IMO. I would say 5ft 6 range like Jonah Hills. cmillzz said on 22/May/19@Paul Wood yep. I think once a guy hits 173cm, he’s in the average range. Anonim said on 6/Sep/18Weak 5ft 7, closer to 5ft 6 Paul Wood said on 27/May/18A lot of 5ft 6ish men claim 5ft 7, many 5ft 7 men claim 5ft 8in and so it goes on. This is why, in most people's minds, the idea of what is 'short' is actually a taller height than short really is. It's all this rounding up or adding an inch that goes on. I'd say Rupert Grint is 5ft 7.5in tops. Dude 173 cm said on 14/Jan/18@Rob What is the difference for you Rob between Daniel and him? Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 11/Jan/18Guy looks short, he isn’t 5’8” or near at. 170-171 Letorgi said on 4/Jan/18173 cm for Rupert Jason 193cm said on 4/Jan/18Weird. I always thought he was 5'10. Sacred said on 6/Nov/17173 cm for him emma said on 11/Sep/17ron in the harry potter movies looks like ed sheeran isn't? Editor Rob they certainly have a very similar height range and could be brothers! Slothee said on 3/Sep/17He looks like Ed Sheeran, is the same height as Ed Sheeran, and has the exact same claim as Ed Sheeran (about/around 5'8")! What're the odds? Chris said on 13/Aug/17@Jamie A person's width most certainly has an effect on perceived height. I'm a half inch taller then my brother but 2.5 inches wider in the shoulders. EVERYONE assumes he's taller unless we are standing right next to each other. Really, all you have to do is look at different pics of Mark Wahlberg. He looks taller when he's off the juice. jamie said on 18/Jul/17Rob in the movies Rupert doesn't look short by any means he looks a solid 5'9 is it fair to say 5'8 is a decent height for a man. Its weird how mark Wahlberg is 5'8 yet he looks short, but Rupert grint looks average. I guess body shape/build really affects how tall you look. Editor Rob maybe it helped also having Daniel by his side for a lot of his teens...leaves an imprint with people that he was inches taller than Radcliffe. even said on 7/Jul/17172 after waking up World Citizen said on 25/May/17Looks a flat 5 ft 7 with Daniel Radcliffe, but looks the same height with also 5 ft 7.75 listed Ed Sheeran. Arthur said on 7/Mar/17Rob, he looks a bit shorter than Ed Sheeran. They are not the same height. Click Here Click Here Editor Rob I think they are quite close, they'd need a measurement to really see if there was much between them. You can see Grint with the Phelps boys and Felton at a convention Here Ultimate said on 20/Feb/17Rob, 173 cm is impossible for Rupert. I buy 5'7.5, i wouldn't be surprised if he is a fraction over five seven, good chance. Peruvian 1.73m said on 19/Feb/17Hey guys, look those photos of Rupert with 5'4.25 Radcliffe and 5'4.5 Emma Watson: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here 172.4cm guy said on 7/Feb/17See this picture of Rupert and Tom Felton...Click Here. Assuming similar footwear, and compensating for Tom's leaning towards Rupert, it's clear that there is 3cm of a height difference between them. Tom is a confirmed 174cm guy, so Rupert does seem to be more on the 171cm side. Abcd said on 24/Nov/16Rupert Grint with 177cm William Moseley . Click Here P.S: Its a 2006 video when Rupert was 18. GN5ft9in said on 4/Oct/16It's easy to guess Harry Potter cast as Rob had a picture with Tom Felton. Tom is 5ft 9in and Rupert is more than an inch shorter than Tom, so anywhere from 5'7 - 5'8. Mike6'2 said on 29/Aug/16In casting him he was a tall kid and I guess they expected he would surpass the 6' mark. rop said on 26/Jun/16Tom felt on is 5cms taller than Rupert MazZayn said on 18/Apr/16In google said 178 ,rob why are some of the height wrong placed???!?? Editor Rob he's only claimed 5ft 8 so maybe it is outdated information, especially if their algorithm took the height from some sites that had him listed 5ft 10. Maximus said on 4/Apr/16Probably around 5'8" or very close...... themis said on 23/Mar/16tom felton is 179 its taller than helena than danniel and its 8 m shorter than rupert and mathew Rubio said on 14/Feb/16Looks no taller than 5' 6". Rob I think he needs a serious downgrade. Here he is with 5' 5 emma watson. Click Here Emma probably has a 1" advantage and it looks like rupert grint is wearing lifts. Editor Rob I think you could argue 5ft 7 for him, but 5ft 6 seems a bit short Rubio said on 12/Feb/16Grint is 5 ft 6 no more. Rob I think he needs a downgrade. thatmanoverthere said on 3/Feb/16Who is taller? Ed Sheeran or Rupert? KnightX said on 30/Jan/16AHAHA.... Definitely Google haves some kinda of deal with short actors, because Google had posted 1,78 m for Rupert, when he haves just 1,72 m. What is the idea of Google by doing so?! Ally said on 13/Apr/15He doesn't look any taller than he is listed here. 5'7.75" seems right CD said on 5/Apr/15More likely Ed Sheeran is 171 range. Rupert at 172 is fine. He has never looked more than 3 inches taller than Daniel Radcliffe either who is 164 or 165. Keltoi said on 3/Apr/15I actually think he's a proper 173cm, maybe a fraction over. He looked taller than Sheeran by a half inch. If Ed is 172cm, then Grint must be 173cm-ish. I think his posture and choice of footwear can make him look around 170cm at times, but he's taller. I'm 173cm and have been guessed anywhere from 170cm to 178cm depending on the circumstances. LX1 said on 8/Mar/15no it's not, Ria. he's 5'7-ish. not 5'7 neither 5'8 Chilean said on 2/Feb/15he looks shorter than ed sheeran Height182 said on 5/Dec/145'7.75''? Wow, I thought he was like 5'5.5'' or something. This guy must be the shortest looking near 5'8'' guy in HISTORY. kale said on 27/Sep/14he really look not more than 172cm mate said on 5/Jul/14i reckon he is about 5'6" (168 cms) Realist said on 30/Apr/14Rob he has grown some bit since Order of Phoenix i think. He looks taller in Half Blood Prince. He and Felton are almost exact. Felton: 174 Grint: 173 Lurker said on 20/Apr/14I was stood next to him a couple of days ago, I'm 6'0 in my Doc Martens so I would think 5'8 is a reasonable guess. abhay said on 20/Apr/14i think he is 5'8 flat170cms avi said on 27/Mar/14closer to 5'7 flat than 5'8 Realist said on 8/Feb/14Rob i think he is 5'7 flat 170 cms. Forrest95 said on 18/Jan/14He's so similar to Ed Sheeran, both looked same height in the music video lego house near the end although might be his posture Peter said on 2/Dec/13171 cm tom cruise 172 with long nek Wip said on 14/Sep/13when i met him in a supermarket about a year ago he was wearing those pumps with very little soles and seemed slightly taller than me. I would guess I had about 0.5 inch footwear more and have measured myself using Robs method at 5'8.1. Seemed more 5'8.5ish to me. Willow said on 25/Aug/13I've seen Rupert in person and I must say he's surely more than 197,5 high... I swear! Byron T. said on 4/Apr/13Looks about the same height as Ed Sheeran in the ''Lego House'' music video. Under 5'8'' as listed. Jay said on 14/Mar/13Felton: 174 (confirmed by Rob) Grint: 170-172 Watson: 161 (seen her in person; much shorter than expected) Radcliffe: 164 Wright: 167 Rheneas said on 23/Feb/13For me: Felton 175 Wright 165 Radcliffe 166 Watson 168 Grint 173 Oldman 178 Rickman 185 Gambon 180-183 Thewlis 189-191 Original said on 24/Dec/12Felton: 174 cm Rupert: 172 cm Daniel: 165 cm Emma: 164 cm srinu said on 1/Oct/12ah.... His height is about 5.8fit his look tollor then dnil & emma(my friend) Keltoi said on 5/Sep/12He looked very similar in height to Ed Sheeran who's 5'7" ish. Having said that though, I don't think a half inch would be very noticeable to most, and certainly not to me; so there's a possibility he could be just under 5'8". matt789 said on 25/Aug/125 ft 8 i wouldnt say is realley short for a guy i mean i'm 5 ft 10 1/2 and i've never been called short and thats only 2.5 inches taller then 5 fot 8 Maximus Meridius said on 24/Aug/12Rob is there a chance he is 5ft 8in. Primo said on 18/Aug/12Think this guy is more like 5ft6 then 5ft7.75 but is my opinion hpfinatic said on 15/Aug/12Rupert is 5'8". That's really short for a guy. He seems tall because of how short Daniel is. He's only 5'5". Ethan Johnston said on 23/Jan/12Rupe 5'7'' Radcliffe 5'6'' Jonas said on 3/Jan/12How can you call Grint 5'10? Rupert is around 5'8... Ria, you have no clue... Daniel Radcliffe 5'8? Have you completely lost the plot? Radcliffe is 5'5. Godred said on 27/Dec/11Ria & Kashfia - You have absolutely no idea how to do this. Felton - 5`9. Grint - 5`8 max. Radcliffe - 5`5. Thierro said on 27/Dec/11Rupert: 174 cm Daniel: 165 cm Emma: 164 cm Bonnie: 169 cm These are my opinions. fricanman said on 27/Dec/11Check these photos from Daily Mail at Harry Potter wrap. Rupert taller than Daniel, Daniel taller and Emma (except when she wears heels) Tom Felton taller than all three in cast photo. We know Tom is 5'8"-9" range from Rob's picture - the rest is common sense! Interesting height comparisons over the years - looks to me like Daniel may have grown the most since the films began. Click Here Ria said on 17/Dec/11Ryan, 5'8" is not at all tall for a man. 5'8" is in fact short for a man. Daniel Radcliffe is SHORT because he is only 5'8" in his bare feet. Rupert Grint and Tom Felton are 5'10" in their bare feet. Ryan said on 17/Dec/11You are an idiot, if thats what you think, kashfia. Check out Rob next to tom felton (174cm). tom felton is about 3-4 inches taller than radcliffe. You obviously want that kid to be tall, but lets face the facts, he's SHORT. Kashfia said on 13/Dec/11Daniel Radcliffe is definitely NOT 5'5" or shorter in his bare feet. Daniel Radcliffe is only 5'8" in his bare feet. Rupert Grint is 5'10" or 5'11" in his bare feet. My dad is 6'5" in his bare feet and Daniel Radcliffe looked 9 inches shorter than him. Kashfia said on 10/Dec/11How could Rupert Grint be only 5'8" or 5'9" if his younger brother, James is at least 6'1"? medha said on 29/Nov/11i think deniel's height is just same as me. David said on 25/Nov/11He never looks taller than 5'8 to me. Daniel is more like 5'4.5, I think. sylinher said on 26/Sep/11the funny thing about this guy it's that his character...ron weasly... is pretty tall in the books of harry potter..that has to be the reason of why he looks taller in the movies.. iam surprised about his real height...he looked at leats 5'11...mad world jim said on 4/Sep/11sep, 6 11 hey I am 5'9 inches, my familys height is about 5'5 average yet my gramps was 6'0 I wonder if I will recieve some of that height as well. oh i almost forgot, rupert is 5'9 Jay said on 2/Sep/11This listing is quite spot on - the main three of HP are not tall people at all - all three are under 5'8" (Emma doesn't even reach 5'8" in massive heels... I don't think it's plausible to make them any bigger). I'd say 5'7.5", but this is pretty good. amitesh said on 20/Aug/11yeah thats for sure that rupert grint is surely between 5'8-5'9 and no more taller than that. dementor alice said on 19/Aug/11I am looking at the recent DH2 New York opening photos where they are all standing next to Alan Rickman. Rickman is known to be 6'1. Keep in mind Watson is wearing heels maybe platforms but looks about 5'8 in the photo compared to Rickman. You can get a better idea how tall the male cast members are. Felton and Grint both look to be about 5'10. Lewis looks pretty close to the same height as Rickman, so 6ft or 6'1. Radcliffe 5'6, 5'7 tops. Hope that helps. Henkka said on 10/Aug/11@Jay: You're right, but that's the risk of being young and famous: fan claims are usually exaggerations, and you can't really know anything for certain unless you've met them or have something to help gauging them. In the case of Rupert or Tom I think it's pretty clear that 5'7.5" for the first and 5'8.5" for the later is pretty much spot on. I haven't met Emma, but I agree she looks 5'3 tops (though I heard her claim 5'5", not as much as 5'6"). But I met Daniel once and he didn't look 5'4" flat to me. It might have been because of his footwear, I don't know, but at that moment he looked 5'5" flat to me (but I agree, he might be below that, sometimes he looks shorter). I've also met Matt Lewis and Evanna Lynch, and can confirm that the 5'11.5" and 5' listings, respectively, are pretty much correct. paul said on 7/Aug/11with 5'8.5 listed Tom Felton Click Here DMan said on 7/Aug/11"well, at 16 you are pretty much done growing" Having just turned 19 and witnessed for myself, i can tell you that this isn't true. I know a number of people who have grown quite a number of inches since 16. I think for the MAJORITY of people, this is the case, but there is a significant yet smaller number of people where this is just not true at all. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- True. Alot of people have major spurts after the age of 16. I remember a friend of my was around 5'7-5'8 around his 16th birthday and a year later he was an easy 6'0-6'0.5, and the year after that he hit 6'1. As for Grint, I always thought he looked taller in the Potter films, maybe his slim build or the fact he's around shorter actors/actresses? Click Here That's a fairly recent photo, not the best of angles but gets dwarfed by the Phelp twins, 5'8 MAX. Jay said on 7/Aug/11Agree with Henkka, there is a lot of exaggeration out there. Particularly with the young cast of HP - I've never heard/seen Rupert state his height but Emma and Dan both add several inches (Emma is less than 5'3" but claims 5'6", Dan has a less ludicrous claim - he says he is 5'5" while he is actually 5'4"). A lot of it is strange fan speculation too - people *still* insist Tom Felton is 6'1", when he is 5'8" or slightly less. Rupert is about half an inch shorter than he is, so 5'7.5" is accurate. This listing is pretty accurate SunKing said on 28/Jul/11He's between 5'7.5" - 5'8". I'm slightly above 5'7.5" at night myself and he looks my height. Henkka said on 27/Jul/11@Jed: Well, it happens a lot. Tom Felton is listed in some places at 6'1, when he's around 5'8.5. Or Josh Herdman, who is listed at 6'4 when he's 5'10.5. Some people like to exagerate a lot and have pretty bad sight, that's it. I'm positive Rupert is between this listing and 5'8, but no more. Felton's got a good inch on him, and he's slightly below 5'9. Martin said on 27/Jul/11he looks about 5'8-5'8.5" to me Jed said on 26/Jul/11He can't be 5'7.75 if he's being called 5'11 in places. 8cm isn't going to be seen if it's not there. jake said on 20/Jul/11He might be 5ft8.5 Drizzle said on 20/Jul/11This makes me think that I'm perfect for him! I'm quite short, but he's not so short nor so tall. Well, I'm ready for our wedding Rup! Honor said on 17/Jul/11I saw Rupert at the Deathly Hallows Part II premier, he explicitly told me he was 6 ft however I believe him to be lying as I am 6 ft and he appeared shorter than me. 5\'8.56784 said on 14/Jul/11He's 5'7, tho he usually wears boots, so he miay appear 5'8. Benj said on 11/Jul/11Noticed the guardian article -which claims him to be 5'11 at a somewhat arbitrary point in the article. Surley taller than 5'8 then Prague, CZ said on 4/Jul/11These are so ****ing short. God dammit, I thought he was at least 6 feet tall. Compared to him, I am very tall person. I'm 6 feet 1 inches (186 cm) tall. Reed said on 3/Jul/11dan radcliffe is 5'5" so 5'7 5'8 seems about right for rupert Therese said on 3/Jul/11Just read The Guardian article that came out today. The interviewer at one point refers to Rupert as 5'11. Truthfully I don't think he's that tall, but this guy was walking around with him so, who knows? The article: Click Here Red said on 13/May/11If Daniel Radcliffe is really 5 ft 5 as listed, then I think Rupert is closer to 5.8.5"-5.9". maria said on 8/May/11what? i was think rupert 180 cm and he was 172 cm rafa said on 28/Apr/11He has a VERY BAD posture. He should improve his posture; look at Tom Cruise or Brad Pitt; they have A STRAIGHT POSTURE. Tori said on 23/Apr/11Wow, in the movies he looked a little taller than that. But I dont care because im only 5'3". He's my favorite, partly cuz of his hight. ;* David said on 12/Apr/11Lol, always noticeably shorter than 5'4 Emma Watson is heels... How can anyone think he's 5'9 or even 5'10? Even 5'8 seems like a stretch. 5'7.5 is about right. And yes, he's done growing. He's 22. He already looked his current height back in 2007... Most guys are done growing by the age of 18. Of course, there are late bloomers who can grow past that age, but Rupert is definitely not one. Neither are most people. Jack said on 9/Apr/11I'd say this site has it right. Rupert is max 5'7.75", maybe a tiny bit shorter. Unless he's had a strange growth spurt since the last premiere, he's finished at under 5'8". As for Daniel and Emma, they are both in the region of 5'2" to 5'4", and given that photographic evidence is ridiculously inconsistent (angles, footwear advantages in Emma's case, hair height etc ad nauseum) it's impossible to say which is taller, but Rupert is obviously the tallest of the trio. Anon said on 7/Apr/11They must have been slouching big time then because any pictures I've seen with the three of them, Rupert has looked a good 7-8 inches smaller. His head tends to come up to around the beginning of their noses. Therese said on 4/Apr/11Just watched an extended DVD clip of Rupert and the Phelps brothers. If they're 6'3 as some sites report and they have a good 5 or 6 inches on Rupert, I think saying Rupert is around 5'9 isn't too far off. Aaron said on 2/Apr/11Sorry, but 5'10" or anything near that is just an impossibility for this guy. Aside from the fact that he usually wears tall heels, there's no way Grint is even 5'9" unless Watson is wearing 6 inch heels in this pic. He's grown a little over the past 4 years, but by no more than half an inch. Click Here Anonymous said on 13/Feb/11Well he looks a good inch shorter than Tom Felton (174cm) in most photos and he wasn't much taller than Matt Lucas (169cm) in Come Fly With Me, so I'd say he's somewhere between 170cm and 173cm, but no more. I'd be more inclined to think that he's 171cm-ish than 173cm though. the truth said on 12/Feb/11Average height of a caucasian guy below 50 years old is 5-10.5 in the US Paula said on 22/Jan/11ele ní£o tem so isso, em 2006 fez um filme chamado Lií§íµes de Vida(Driving Lessons)e ele perto da atriz Laura Linney que tem 5'10" ficava quase do mesmo tamanho, imagina agora que se passaram 4 anos. maximus meridius said on 7/Jan/11he is 22 now i don't think he will grow anymore besides 5ft 8in is not short because it's not many inches below average height some boys carry on growing until there 22 that's only the lucky ones most boys are done growing by 17 18 that's only the early bloomers it's not uncommon for boys to carry on growing until there 22 some boys carry on growing until they are 23 24 25 26 and 27 which is very rare some boys just happen to be late bloomers. michael said on 3/Jan/115-8 seems dead on if Radcliffe is 5-5, because in general he looks about 3 inches taller than him. Anonymous said on 30/Dec/10People don't realize how tall a legit 5'9 or 5'10 is. This guy is not 5'10. Not 2 inches only away from 6'!! I agree you can look shorter or taller but there are scenes where there is only 3 inch difference between him and Radcliffe. He is 5'8. He isn't taller than Felton and Rob has a pic with him and he is barely over 5'8 himself. Rob you've got it within a half inch.He isnt taller than 5'8. d wade said on 24/Dec/105,7 maximum a 5,9 doesnt look so short. Andy said on 23/Dec/10good 4 inches on harry 5'9''minimum Click Here Julia said on 6/Dec/10I met him in London last week, and I'm 5"9.5 and he had a good half inch / inch on me. TheTruth said on 2/Dec/10I have an actual book that says Rupert Grint is 5'10" and it doesn't matter how tall he "looks" because people can look 5'8" if they're 5'6", etc. But I know that he is 5'10" and this book was published like 3 years ago and I don't think that he would shrink in 3 years. If you want to see the book, it's called: Boys We Love. I don't know anything about it. So, stop saying he's 5'7"-5'9" because that is obviously not true right now. d wade said on 29/Nov/10radcliffe and emma watson are both 5,4 not 5,6 and rupert grint is 5,7 not 5,9 a 5,9 doesnt look that small. tweetybirdflii said on 28/Nov/10i think he is 5'9 probably he luks mah tall tho so :-/ lml :]]] maximus meridius said on 27/Nov/10Rupert Grint is defiantly 5ft 8in for sure 5ft 10in is a bit too high for him he is not 5ft 10in Emma Watson is 5ft 5in she is not 5ft 6in 5ft 6in is a bit high for her Daniel Radcliffe is 5ft 6in he is not 5ft 8in that is too high for him maximus meridius said on 27/Nov/10Since he is 5ft 8in he still has short legs a 5ft 9in and a 5ft 10in would have average legs a man of 5ft 11in has long legs tall starts from 5ft 11in he has longer legs that daniel radcliffe but he still has short legs. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Nov/10He must've grown a bit. Not under 5"8, probably 174cm Blah said on 20/Nov/10Acutally, for boys you can grow more until you're mid 20's, that's only if you haven't reached your limit in your DNA. Some boys these days only grow until they're 16 because these days nutrition is easier to get, so they grow quickly but reached their limit faster too. Moke said on 20/Nov/10I also think 5'8 might be the better guess. The guy very often wears converse and has the posture of an old man. What do you think he has on Bonnie Wright here: Click Here I've no clue what her footwear gives.... Close said on 19/Nov/10Well I saw the new harry potter film: Deathly Hallows, and I gotta say, Rupert had a lot of height on Daniel. He had at least 3 1/2 inches on Daniel. You need to upgrade him. Hes a 5'8, maybe 5'8.5. Anonymous said on 19/Nov/10well look at this pic... Assume Emma has 3" heels, she's taller than Dan and he's wearing shoes as well... And Rupert is about her height with heels... Click Here(PEOPLE.com:+Top+Headlines) Justme said on 13/Nov/10Well Shoes and Hair can add a little height, so can't blame people for thinking he is a little bit taller then his true height. Anonymous said on 12/Nov/10"well, at 16 you are pretty much done growing" Having just turned 19 and witnessed for myself, i can tell you that this isn't true. I know a number of people who have grown quite a number of inches since 16. I think for the MAJORITY of people, this is the case, but there is a significant yet smaller number of people where this is just not true at all. Rikashiku said on 7/Nov/10My brother was 6'2" at 12 and 6'4" at 22. He grew to 6'5" when he turned 26. Men keep growing into 21 on average, girls grow until 16 today. It used to be 18. jasper said on 4/Nov/10great says on 23/Jul/10 i also don´t get why people are always putting this guys grow till 21 thing up.thats the very last date, up until which you can realise catch up growth if you are seriously ill. most men stop from 16 to 17 maybe 18.so there is no major height gain after 16 /17 . that´s simply some drivel of some doctor. the old folks had it right on. one doc used to tell me: "well, at 16 you are pretty much done growing"-------------------------------------------thats not true i was about 5'9 when i was 16 and grow to be 6'2 by 18(havnt grown since 20 now) daigo said on 31/Oct/10WOW.... cant believe this...im 171cm and he's 172. and i thought dan was 170 so in my mind i always thought of him (rupert) as a 178-179... Rampage(\\-_-_-/)Clover said on 27/Oct/105"8(173cm) by now surely? umad80 said on 7/Jul/09C'mon now... after seeing the HBP photocall, can you honestly keep a straight face and say 5'7.75"? Look! Click Here - and that's one of many photos. I also think Dan is 5'4" or so... no way is he 5'5". Tom and Rupert have over 4" on him. They pretty much all had the same footwear. Anonymous said on 6/Jul/09This guys height is hard to pin down. He is most most likely percieved to be taller than he really is, due to his acting partners rather miserable height. I'm gonna go with my gut on this, and say he is exactly my height - 5'8.5 umad80 said on 5/Jul/09Okay, more proof that Rupert is over 5'8". If Rove is 5'7.5" (though claims 5'8") and Rupert probably has a little more shoe, then he's definitely at least a half inch taller than Rove, probably a bit more... Click Here - go about 1:20 into the video. They never stand perfectly next to each other, but Rupert seems to have pretty much an inch on the man. Like I said, probably better shoe because of the Ron shoes (they look like construction boots - giving around an inch?) so the difference in shoe is probably around a half inch. Rupert's shoes: Click Here - Seriously, Rupert is a solid 5'8" I'd think... arguably taller than that, but definitely NOT shorter than 5'8". umad80 said on 4/Jul/09Hmm. Well, if nothing else, Rupert deserves to be upgraded to at least 5'8". LOL The latest interview, "'I once read I was going to be an oompa loompa in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory,' he half smiles noting the dig at his 5ft 8in height." Second column, around the last paragraph: Click Here Really, I think he's 5'8.5" like Tom Felton, but 5'8" seems reasonable enough considering he tends to have a solid 3" on Dan and Emma. Anonymous said on 3/Jul/09From a recent interview with FHM:"... he half smiles, noting the dig at his 5ft 8in height."Click Here umad80 said on 25/Jun/09So let me get this straight... Tom is closer to the camera, better shoes, and 5'8.5" and Rupert is still this height with only maybe being not even a whole inch shorter in the picture? Rupert is pretty much the same height as Tom. People who have met him have said that he's pretty much around 5'9" maybe not exact, but close enough... Anonymous said on 24/Jun/09Actually, I think he's really 172 cm. He's slightly shorter than Tom Felton and Tom was proved to be 5'8-5'9. umad80 said on 19/Jun/09Rupert is NOT 5'6" or 5'6.5" now THAT is crazy. In OotP he was pretty much the same height as Tom. Click Here and Click Here And these were Tom's shoes: Click Here and of course Rupert was wearing chucks! C'mon Rob, doesn't Rupert deserve an upgrade? These are pretty good indications that he's 5'8" or maybe a tad taller. Anonymous said on 19/Jun/09Tom felton is only 5'8.5'', this guy cant be any taller than 5'6'' or 5'6.5'' at the max.. u guys got to wake up there is no way near he is 5'9'' that would make him taller than Tom! lol Sydney said on 24/May/09well looks like we gotta wait for the new movie, but in the posters Rupert looks 5"9 yoyo said on 21/May/09if you notice rupert in harry potter & the order of the phoenix is not much taller than dan & emma .but at hand ,foot & wand ceremony when they are barefoot rupert is looking very much taller than daniel & emma.watch the video at 9:27Click Here umad80 said on 19/May/09'please' I think it's funny you chose that video (also something that took place like 3 years ago) considering that Stephen Fry says they have a combined height of 11 feet 9 inches which means that they were probably measured with their shoes on. Moseley has dress shoes on giving him over an 1" extra so for argument's sake he's about 5'10.75" barefoot and with shoes he'd be 6' (assuming they're giving him 1.25" extra in height). Rupert had on chucks which probably gave him a half inch extra in height so barefoot would be 5'8.5" and with shoes 5'9" this would equal out to the 11'9" combined height. Otherwise Moseley would be over 5'11" for the current height to work. jade said on 19/May/09i think he's 5'8.5? yep. yoyo's ryt. he has grown few cms this year Please said on 15/May/09Click Herewilliam moseley towers over him. Anonymous said on 11/May/09He's probably 1.74 m. But no way he's 5'10. 5'9 at most. yoyo said on 6/May/09i dont think that Rupert is below 5'8".no doubt his height is 5'8.75".i think he has grown by a few cms this year hey. said on 5/May/09Stephanie -- Emma's taller than Dan...this much is clear in the newly released set photos. Stephanie said on 2/May/09I'd say Rupert is between 5' 8" and 5' 10". It's hard to tell because he slouches a lot and I'm not sure if Dan and Emma are telling the truth (they both claim 5' 6"). hey. said on 28/Apr/09Lol, and we still remain at 5'7.75".....;) umad80 said on 14/Mar/09I want to point out something that a lot of people don't always notice. Dan tries to stand tall and push down the people he stands next to. I've watched the video, and any video where you can see up close to when they start posing for pictures like this, Dan does this. Rupert isn't even standing at his best, and Dan who is standing better than Rupert, gives a clear 4" difference. But hell, if Dan and Emma are only 5'4.5" then Rupert is 5'8.5" because, as I said, there is a definite 4" difference here. Anonymous said on 12/Mar/09ok, he must be at least 5'8 since he was much taller than Dan and Emma during the ceremony. But again, Dan and Emma are not quite 5'5, I think. Probably 5'4.5. umad80 said on 9/Mar/09If Rupert gives the impression of 5'6", then Dan and Emma give the impression of 5'2"ish. Click Here - proof right here that Rupert is well over 5'8". If you believe Dan and Emma are 5'5" and nothing under. (Of course, to not say a solid 5'9" is to say that the photo isn't the best.) Anonymous said on 8/Mar/09Shortest looking 5'9 guy I've ever seen. He really can give a 5'6 impression sometimes. But considering his usual posture and his footwear, maybe he's really 5'9. umad80 said on 3/Mar/09Robbie Sheehan is being estimated around 6'1" and Rupert seems around 4"-5" shorter. In all honesty, Rupert is probably around an inch taller than what he's listed as here. He's not a solid 5'9", though I think anything below 5'8.5" is out of the question. Nik said on 28/Feb/09I will admit he does look quite short sometimes. but thats usually compared to tall people. I'd say he's 5-8 because he can look shorter but when he does its usually his posture that does it. umad80 said on 15/Feb/09To be fair, Robbie Sheehan is like 6'0" or 6'1" (it is unclear yet; he could be taller) and I'm not sure how tall Kim Nixon is, but she had heels. Rupert was leaning into the two of them. I guess that has a lot to do with it because I noticed in videos he looked an inch or two taller than he appeared in pictures. It's pretty much estimated that Rupert is between 5'8" and 5'9". Nothing more, nothing less. Anonymous said on 12/Feb/09I also noticed that he was short next to his co-stars. He always looks quite short, actually. I can't believe he's 5'9 or something. I've never seen a 5'9 guy look as short as Rupert. He must be about 5'7.5. And he usually looks 5'6-5'7. 2p@c said on 11/Feb/09In the harry potter boooks ron is supposed to be towering over harry but with 5ft7 rupert, not really i think lol umad80 said on 9/Feb/09Rob, I have a height question for you and it pertains to Rupert... I noticed yesterday at the Berlin Film Festival that pictures, Rupert looked short against his co-stars (I don't know how tall his co-stars are actually.) in pictures. However, when you viewed him in video, he looked taller compared to his female co-star and not the 4.5-5" he looks to the male co-star. Is there a particular reason for this? I thought maybe it's just that Rupert definitely isn't standing straight... he's laid back, and at times gets closer to his co-stars and ends up leaning to one side whereas with the film he's not doing that and you get the truer height. Brian said on 9/Feb/09In no way this guy is taller than 5ft8! He simply doesn`t looks it besides Radcliffe, Pattinson, Emma Watson etc. Jacques said on 31/Jan/095'8 guys like myself never really give an impression of being tall.but rupert does have this.. "almost tall" kinda feeling.i really think it is fair for him to be 5'9.... MAYBE even 5'10 but thats pushing it.upgrade maybe?? Anonymous said on 6/Jan/09he's somewhere around 1,75 cm 5.9 i say umad80 said on 3/Jan/09If you're going by Will Moseley, you have to remember that Will was wearing dress shoes and Rupert was wearing chucks. sofie said on 30/Dec/08In a picture of william moseley and rupert grint standing next to each other rupert is about 2-3 (estimate) inches shorter then william, and william moseley is 5'10. So that would make him about 5'7-8. Anonymous said on 10/Dec/08This is just depressing, 2 years and still no change. aijju said on 10/Dec/08i think rup is 5'8 or 5'8 Nik said on 8/Dec/08I still say he's 5-8. He slouches alot is why he looks a little shorter. Jon said on 2/Dec/08In harry potter, ron weasley is suppose to be quite tall compared to harry and hermione. At 5ft 7.75, its not really very appealing is it? i was expecting him to be at least 5'10 or sumthing. my god.... if i met those three in person id tower over them, and im only 5'11.5! wow! Anonymous said on 30/Nov/08I was appeasing you. umad80 said on 27/Oct/08Seriously, you need to open the picture and make it scroll down to the top of Rupert's head. Rupert is right in the middle of his eyes, making him 4.5" shorter. Then you put in that Rob was wearing a cowboy boot type shoe (look: Click Here), take away that Rupert is slightly closer to the camera, and Rob is leaning down a tad, and you have to wonder. Why isn't Rob taller than this if he's 6'1"? If Rupert is barely 5'8" according to Rob, then Rupert should only come to his nose area with the shoes. You can say what you want, but the picture you gave is the best one, because Rupert is the shortest here. Then there is the pics of him standing next to 5'11" Jason Isaacs: Click Here He looks around 6'. I do believe the hair gives off a terrible illusion and probably because he tends to wear cowboy style boots. Anonymous said on 26/Oct/08Yes, umad, but Rob definitely looks taller than 6'1" compared to the other cast members (i.e., Kristen, Ashely Greene, Nikki, Rupert, etc.). You are simply kidding yourself if you think Rupert looked 5'8" or 5'9" next to Rob, even considering Rob's heel advantage. Rob simply towered over Rupert. Click HereRob's not even standing up properly and Rupert's not even up to his eyes, come on now, eyebrows is 4 inches, so Grint at 5'8" would put Rob at around 6'2". Rob also looked around 6'2" with Ed Westwick and the Phelps twin. Check out his page. Anonymous said on 26/Oct/08haha, now you're just not going to answer me? umad80 said on 25/Oct/08I dunno, never thought of it much. Rob always seemed around 6'1" or perhaps a little shorter than that. (During GoF premiere, pics with Rupert suggested shorter than he claims.) But Kristen is definitely around 5'4" because the one playing Jacob is supposed 5'9" (ought to be interesting to see how they make him to be 6'5" or more in later movies, though he could still grow. I think he's only 16) and she seems definitely around that height in pics together. I don't know about the others. Rupert and Rob seem to be friends, so it'll be interesting to see if Rupert shows up at the premiere in December. Might gauge how tall they both are. Anonymous said on 20/Oct/08Umad (I'm sorry that I didn't know what the name was referring to?), I was not asking you if you have read Twilight in order to make a joke or anything, I absolutely love those books, as I love Harry Potter, and am super excited for the movie! I think it's great that books like HP and Twilight can appeal to everyone, that is what makes them great and unique. I just asked to suggest that we discuss the actors' heights of that film (Rob, Kristen, Ashely, etc.) because more photos and such seem to be coming out about them as the movie will be released in November! How about it? I think that Rob is about 6'1" or 6'2", Kristen 5'3" or 5'4", Ashely 5'4", and Nikki 5'5". You? umad80 said on 20/Oct/08"LOL (as you like to do, which, I don't quite understand, seeing as you are about 30 years old I believe)....if you've not noticed (as you probably haven't, unsurprisingly Rupert is the only HP actor's page you visit), but I haven't really said anything about Emma's or Dan's heights in months, I simply do not care because it is pretty easy to see that Rob is not going to change their heights on here, especially Rupert who he has even said he has evidence that he's no more than this height (he's not even commented on any other HP actors pages, so I think that says summat, doesn't it?)"