 | The Official Forum > Football | Snap Infraction | | | User Name | Remember Me? | | Password | |
| Register | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
| Community Links |
| Social Groups |
| Pictures & Albums |
| Members List |
| Search Forums |
| Show Threads Show Posts |
| Tag Search |
| Advanced Search |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1 (permalink) Sun Oct 19, 2008, 09:23pm |
TViglione Official Forum Member | Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 1 | |
Snap Infraction During a High School Football game the opposing teams center snapped the ball earlier than anticipated by his teammates because he was the only player to move on the snap. The ball touched the QB's hands and then fell to the ground. The ball was recovered by a defensive lineman. In my book, that is considered a fumble and the ball should have gone to the defense, however, the ref called a five yard penalty due to a "snap infraction" and the offense maintained the ball. Which is the correct call? |
#2 (permalink) Mon Oct 20, 2008, 04:44am |
JugglingReferee Fav theme: Roundball Rock | Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Near Dog River (sorta) Posts: 8,558 | |
Canadian Ruling Quote: Originally Posted by TViglione During a High School Football game the opposing teams center snapped the ball earlier than anticipated by his teammates because he was the only player to move on the snap. The ball touched the QB's hands and then fell to the ground. The ball was recovered by a defensive lineman. In my book, that is considered a fumble and the ball should have gone to the defense, however, the ref called a five yard penalty due to a "snap infraction" and the offense maintained the ball. Which is the correct call? | CANADIAN RULING: Assuming that the Ready For Play whistle had in fact been blown in, it is a fumble and first down for the team currently on defense - team B. __________________ Pope Francis |
#3 (permalink) Mon Oct 20, 2008, 07:01am |
waltjp Official Forum Member | Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Randolph, NJ Posts: 1,936 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by TViglione During a High School Football game the opposing teams center snapped the ball earlier than anticipated by his teammates because he was the only player to move on the snap. The ball touched the QB's hands and then fell to the ground. The ball was recovered by a defensive lineman. In my book, that is considered a fumble and the ball should have gone to the defense, however, the ref called a five yard penalty due to a "snap infraction" and the offense maintained the ball. Which is the correct call? | Nothing you have said would lead me to believe this was an illegal snap. __________________ I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is more cowbell! |
#4 (permalink) Mon Oct 20, 2008, 07:32am |
Forksref Official Forum Member | Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: N.D. Posts: 1,829 | |
The only infraction was that B got the short end of the stick. No foul here. Just a snapper who didn't know the count and B suffers. |
#5 (permalink) Mon Oct 20, 2008, 08:19am |
FTVMartin Official Forum Member | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: MI Posts: 175 | |
There was nothing illegal about the snap. It was just early. That's a fumble. |
#6 (permalink) Mon Oct 20, 2008, 08:37am |
Ed Hickland Official Forum Member | Join Date: Aug 1999 Posts: 1,130 | |
NFHS 2-39 SNAP Art. 1...A snap is the legal act of passing or handing the ball backwards from its position on the ground. Art. 2...The snap begins when the snapper first moves the ball legally other than adjustment. In a snap, the movement must be quick and continuous backward motion of the ball during which the ball immediately leaves the hand(s) of the snapper and touches a back or the ground before it touches an A lineman. Art. 3...The snap ends when the ball touches the ground or any player. Where was this not a snap? It is possible it was ruled a snap infraction if the snapper did not make a continuous movement. You had to be there! __________________ Ed Hickland, MBA, CCP [email protected] |
#7 (permalink) Mon Oct 20, 2008, 09:08am |
wwcfoa43 Official Forum Member | Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 183 | |
Perhaps the official was thinking NFL rules. Prior to the 2008 season in the NFL, a snap that hit the ground prior to touching the QB was a 5 yard illegal procedure penalty. Of course, even this does not match the OP because the poster said the QB touched it which would have been a fumble even in the NFL pre-2008. |
#8 (permalink) Mon Oct 20, 2008, 11:51am |
mikesears Official Forum Member | Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Bloomington, IL Posts: 1,319 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by TViglione During a High School Football game the opposing teams center snapped the ball earlier than anticipated by his teammates because he was the only player to move on the snap. The ball touched the QB's hands and then fell to the ground. The ball was recovered by a defensive lineman. In my book, that is considered a fumble and the ball should have gone to the defense, however, the ref called a five yard penalty due to a "snap infraction" and the offense maintained the ball. Which is the correct call? | Not having the benefit of seeing the play, I have a couple of questions. Did the snapper double pump? Did the snapper let go of the ball immediately? Was there something else that could have caused the ball to remain dead? A snap must meet several requirements to be legal and if it doesn't, the ball remains dead. __________________ Mike Sears |
#9 (permalink) Mon Oct 20, 2008, 12:53pm |
LeRoy Official Forum Member | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: North Posts: 69 | |
Fumble --- B's Ball |
#10 (permalink) Mon Oct 20, 2008, 04:37pm |
LDUB Official Forum Member | Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 1,643 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by TViglione The ball touched the QB's hands and then fell to the ground. The ball was recovered by a defensive lineman. In my book, that is considered a fumble | In the rule book, that is considered a muff |
| Bookmarks |
-
Digg -
del.icio.us -
StumbleUpon -
Google
|
« Previous Thread | Next Thread
» | Thread Tools |
Show Printable Version |
Email this Page |
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode |
Switch to Hybrid Mode |
Switch to Threaded Mode |
| Rate This Thread |
Excellent Good Average Bad Terrible |
Posting Rules | | You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OnTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules | |
Similar Threads |
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Snap infraction question | bcl1127 | Football | 8 | Wed Oct 08, 2008 09:30pm |
| legal or snap infraction?? | MJT | Football | 5 | Tue Oct 23, 2007 09:03am |
| Judgment calls on pre-snap and at-the-snap fouls??? | ChickenOfNC | Football | 18 | Tue Jan 09, 2007 01:44pm |
| Snap Infraction or not? | ljudge | Football | 2 | Wed Aug 17, 2005 11:35am |
| snap infraction | DanSummers | Football | 6 | Mon Nov 11, 2002 08:03pm |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is
05:40am.
| The Official Forum - Archive - Top |
| LinkBack |
LinkBack URL |
About LinkBacks |
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1