Std-discussion: Re: More Than One Final Overrider Of A Virtual Functions.
Maybe your like
std-discussion Search Advanced search From: Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 21:29:52 +0300 On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 21:19, Vladimir Grigoriev <vlad.moscow_at_[hidden]> wrote: > > Well, If to change the declarations the following way > > struct A { virtual void f(); }; > struct B : virtual A { }; > struct C : virtual A { void f(); }; > struct D : B, C { }; // OK: A::f and C::f are the final overriders > // for the B and C subobjects, respectively > > when in this case will the code snippet be ill-formed? No, because now there's only one final overrider, in C. But you're on the right track; this is ill-formed: struct A { virtual void f() {} }; struct B : virtual A { void f() {}}; struct C : virtual A { void f() {} }; struct D : B, C { }; // error: no unique final overrider for 'virtual void A::f()' in 'D' Received on 2021-08-17 13:30:09
Tag » C++ No Unique Final Overrider For
-
Virtual Inheritance: Error: No Unique Final Overrider - Stack Overflow
-
No Unique Final Overrider With Virtual B - C++ Forum
-
Virtual Inheritance Error No Unique Final Overrider - C++ - YouTube
-
Virtual Function Specifier
-
Virtual, Final And Override In C++
-
Dreaded Diamond - C++ - DaniWeb
-
Use C++11 Inheritance Control Keywords To Prevent Inconsistencies ...
-
CXXFinalOverriderMap Class Reference - Clang
-
Programmation Orientée Objet (C++) : [5pt] Héritage Multiple - EPFL
-
Final Specifier (since C++11)
-
"override" Or "final" Should Be Used Instead Of "virtual"
-
Inheritance — What Your Mother Never Told You, C++ FAQ
-
[rtual]
-
1782 – C++ Erroneous Requirement For Final Overrider