Supreme Court Ruling On OSHA Vaccine-or-Test Mandate Not ...
Maybe your like
Share this Publication
-
Authors
- Rebecca L. Strauss
- Brett Swearingen
-
Related Practice Areas
- Employment and Labor
- Corporate / Mergers & Acquisitions
Yesterday, December 20, 2021, the Supreme Court of the United States (Supreme Court) requested briefing from the federal government on the multiple challenges against the OSHA 100+ Employee Vaccination and Testing Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS). The rule had been reinstated Friday by a divided three-judge panel of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. The briefs from the government are due Thursday, December 30. This means that a ruling from the Supreme Court on whether the ETS will be stayed pending full review of the merits will likely come in early January. In addition, multiple challengers have also asked the Supreme Court to review the merits of the ETS on an expedited basis. We will likely learn whether the Supreme Court has decided to do so when it rules on the stay.
The OSHA ETS requires workers at companies with 100 or more employees to be vaccinated against Covid-19, or mask in the workplace and undergo weekly testing. Under OSHA’s updated compliance deadlines, the agency will not issue citations for noncompliance before January 10 to employers making reasonable, good faith efforts to comply, and will not issue citations for noncompliance with the ETS’s testing requirements before February 9. Therefore, barring intervention by the Supreme Court, employees will need to receive their final dose of the vaccine by February 9 to avoid the ETS’s masking and testing requirements.
We will be sure to keep you updated of any relevant developments. If you have any questions, please contact your Miller Johnson attorney or one of the authors.
Email DisclaimerPlease be advised that contacting Miller Johnson or one of its attorneys by email does not constitute establishing an attorney-client relationship or otherwise confidential relationship between you and the Firm. Please do not give us any information you regard as confidential until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Any information you give to us before establishing an attorney-client relationship will not be regarded as privileged or confidential. Do you wish to proceed?
Cancel I agree Publication Signup"*" indicates required fields
CompanyThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.To receive firm communications, please select from the list of topics, complete your contact information, and Sign Up below.Untitled*Untitled*Email* Untitled*Untitled*Untitled*Untitled*Untitled*ALAKAZARCACOCTDEFLGAHIIDILINIAKSKYLAMEMDMAMIMNMSMOMTNENVNHNJNMNYNCNDOHOKORPARISCSDTNTXUTVTVAWAWVWIWYUntitled*UntitledAll communicationsBusiness and CorporateEducation LawEmployment and LaborEmployee Benefits and Executive CompensationFamily LawHealth CareHealth Care ReformNonprofit and Tax-Exempt OrganizationsPrivate Client - Estate Planning, Probate, Wills & TrustsReal Estate and ConstructionTaxationUnsubscribeThis field is hidden when viewing the formSelect Service* All communications Business and Corporate Education Law Employment and Labor Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Family Law Health Care Health Care Reform Nonprofit and Tax-Exempt Organizations Private Client - Estate Planning, Probate, Wills & Trusts Real Estate and Construction Taxation UnsubscribeYesterday, December 20, 2021, the Supreme Court of the United States (Supreme Court) requested briefing from the federal government on the multiple challenges against the OSHA 100+ Employee Vaccination and Testing Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS). The rule had been reinstated Friday by a divided three-judge panel of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. The briefs from the government are due Thursday, December 30. This means that a ruling from the Supreme Court on whether the ETS will be stayed pending full review of the merits will likely come in early January. In addition, multiple challengers have also asked the Supreme Court to review the merits of the ETS on an expedited basis. We will likely learn whether the Supreme Court has decided to do so when it rules on the stay.
The OSHA ETS requires workers at companies with 100 or more employees to be vaccinated against Covid-19, or mask in the workplace and undergo weekly testing. Under OSHA’s updated compliance deadlines, the agency will not issue citations for noncompliance before January 10 to employers making reasonable, good faith efforts to comply, and will not issue citations for noncompliance with the ETS’s testing requirements before February 9. Therefore, barring intervention by the Supreme Court, employees will need to receive their final dose of the vaccine by February 9 to avoid the ETS’s masking and testing requirements.
We will be sure to keep you updated of any relevant developments. If you have any questions, please contact your Miller Johnson attorney or one of the authors.
Tag » When Will The Supreme Court Rule On The Osha Mandate
-
What Do The Supreme Court Rulings On Vaccine Directives Mean For ...
-
Supreme Court Stays OSHA Vaccine-Or-Testing Mandate
-
Covid Vaccine Mandate: OSHA Withdraws Rule For Businesses After ...
-
[PDF] 21A244 National Federation Of Independent Business V. OSHA (01 ...
-
The Supreme Court Has Ruled On The OSHA And CMS Vaccine ...
-
COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates At The Supreme Court - Health Affairs
-
OSHA's Vaccine Mandate Struck Down By Supreme Court, Now ...
-
SCOTUS Blocks OSHA's ETS And Allows CMS Mandate To Go Into ...
-
A Look At The Supreme Court Ruling On Vaccination Mandates
-
U.S. Supreme Court Stays OSHA Vaccine Mandate, But Allows ...
-
COVID-19: Supreme Court Halts OSHA's Vaccine Or Test Mandate
-
Supreme Court Stays OSHA “Vaccinate Or Test” Emergency ...
-
Supreme Court To Rule On Biden Vaccine Mandate | HRD America
-
US Supreme Court Decisions Stay OSHA ETS, Uphold CMS Vaccine ...