The Grammys Suck. Stop Caring About Them - Varsity

by Rishi Sharma

Tuesday March 2 2021, 12:00am

• Share on Facebook
• Share on Twitter
• Share via Email
• Share on Pinterest
• Share on LinkedIn
• Share on WhatsApp

The Grammys have recently been in hot water. The Weeknd, one of the most successful artists of 2020, wasn’t nominated for a single 2021 award. This wasn’t just another casual snub, though: The Weeknd alleged that the awards were “corrupt”. He stated that he was asked to perform at the award ceremony, but was also scheduled to perform at the Super Bowl Halftime Show earlier that year. He claimed the Grammys didn’t want him to do both, so when he accepted the Super Bowl invite, they yanked his nominations. Allegations of corruption and conflicts of interest in the voting process have been widespread for years. However, that’s just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to possibly the worst major award ceremony in showbusiness.

A major and long-standing problem is with race. Between 2006 and 2020, the only non-white artists to win the main award, Album of the Year, were Bruno Mars (whose win I will discuss later) and Herbie Hancock (for a cover album of songs by Joni Mitchell, a white artist). This is despite swathes of talented ethnic-minority artists being considered: Beyoncé, Frank Ocean, Drake, Kendrick Lamar and The Weeknd (prior to his 2020 snub) were all nominated without ever winning.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Rolling Stone (@rollingstone)

The Recording Academy, who run the awards, were clearly aware of this: in 2013 they established a new award for ‘Best Urban Contemporary Album’. Before you ask, I don’t know what ‘Urban Contemporary’ music is, either. However, when looking at the nominees for ‘Best Urban Contemporary Album’ over the years, its purpose is clear. Out of the 43 artists nominated for the award since its inception, black artists dominate the category. The question then becomes: why can’t other races also make music that’s ‘urban’ and ‘contemporary’? The Academy didn’t have an answer; prior to the 2021 ceremony, they renamed the award to ‘Best Progressive RnB Album’ (even though there is already an award for ‘Best RnB Album’ – maybe these albums are just ‘regressive’ or ‘conservative’ RnB now?). As if that wasn’t enough, in a moment of unbelievable farce, they simultaneously renamed ‘Best Latin Pop Album’ to ‘Best Latin Pop or Urban Album’. It appears that the (notoriously white) Academy has decided that the ‘urban music’ baton has been passed from black people to Latinx people.

Never forget the Grammys didn’t give me my best new artist award when I had 7 songs simultaneously charting on billboard & bigger first week than any female rapper in the last decade- went on to inspire a generation. They gave it to the white man Bon Iver. #PinkFriday

- Mrs. Petty (@NICKIMINAJ) November 24, 2020

Concerns about diversity are often met with responses mentioning the word ‘meritocracy’. However, the awards fail on that end as well. This is another major problem: the Grammys are consistently wrong. In 2012, there was a huge controversy when Kendrick Lamar’s good kid, m.A.A.d city, the most critically-acclaimed rap album of 2012 by miles, according to review aggregator Metacritic, lost the ‘Best Rap Album’ award to Macklemore and Ryan Lewis’s middling record The Heist. This prompted Macklemore (who was also the only white rapper to be nominated in the category) to apologise privately to Lamar. Lamar won the award in 2018 for his album DAMN, but lost out to Bruno Mars’s 24K Magic in the ‘Album of the Year’ category. Out of the five nominated albums, Mars’s was the worst by a good distance (again, according to Metacritic), but had the most sales due to its title track becoming a hit radio single. The Academy have always stated that they aren’t influenced by records’ commercial success and are only concerned with ‘quality’. Lamar’s album was the first album which wasn’t classical or jazz to win the Pulitzer Prize for music, but lost to an album described by Pitchfork as “really really horny”. This year, Justin Bieber’s album Changes, which was actually the second-worst major album of the year overall according to Metacritic, was nominated for ‘Best Pop Album’. Even the Oscars have never nominated the second-worst movie of the year for anything, ever. The Grammys seem to be on an active crusade to pick the worst albums.

“If the artists don’t care, why should anyone else?”

Recently, some artists have become disillusioned. Tyler, the Creator stated that his 2019 win for ‘Best Rap Album’ felt like a “backhanded compliment” because his record, IGOR, contained “less than 30%” rapping. He also called the ‘Urban Contemporary’ category “a politically correct way of saying the N-word”. Drake, arguably the most popular artist on the planet, didn’t submit his 2018 record More Life to the awards; the year before, his single ‘Hotline Bling’ was nominated in two rap categories despite containing no rapping at all. He said that it could have been “because I’ve rapped in the past or because I’m black”. Frank Ocean, the inaugural winner of ‘Best Urban Contemporary Album’, has also stopped submitting his music to the awards. If the artists don’t care, why should anyone else?

READ MORE

Without Mass Spectacle, What is the Eurovision Song Contest?

I’ve left out a lot in this article. One thing is the bizarre eligibility window – which closes on 1st September to allow the Academy time to evaluate entries – and means that the 2021 ceremony features several albums released in late 2019. For some reason, the Academy haven’t considered the agonisingly simple solution already used by the Emmy awards: just have the ceremony later in the year. That being said, this whole article can be summed up in seven words: the Grammys suck. Stop caring about them.

Support Varsity

Varsity is the independent newspaper for the University of Cambridge, established in its current form in 1947. In order to maintain our editorial independence, our print newspaper and news website receives no funding from the University of Cambridge or its constituent Colleges.

We are therefore almost entirely reliant on advertising for funding and we expect to have a tough few months and years ahead.

In spite of this situation, we are going to look at inventive ways to look at serving our readership with digital content and of course in print too!

Therefore we are asking our readers, if they wish, to make a donation from as little as £1, to help with our running costs. Many thanks, we hope you can help!