The Supreme Court's Awful Hobby Lobby Decision Just Spawned A ...

Maybe your like

News
- Home Page
- California
- Election 2024
- Housing & Homelessness
- Politics
- Science & Medicine
- World & Nation
Business
- Artificial Intelligence
- Autos
- Jobs, Labor & Workplace
- Real Estate
- Technology and the Internet
California
- California Politics
- Earthquakes
- Education
- Housing & Homelessness
- L.A. Influential
- L.A. Politics
- Mental Health
Climate & Environment
- Climate Change
- Water & Drought
Entertainment & Arts
- Arts
- Books
- Stand-Up Comedy
- Hollywood Inc.
- The Envelope (Awards)
- Movies
- Music
- Television
- Things to Do
De Los
En Español
Food
- 101 Best Restaurants in L.A.
- Recipes
Image
- Art & Culture
- Conversations
- Drip Index: Event Guides
- Fashion
- Shopping Guides
- Styling Myself
Lifestyle
- Health & Wellness
- Home Design
- L.A. Affairs
- Plants
- Travel & Experiences
- Weekend
- Things to Do in L.A.
Obituaries
Voices
- Editorials
- Letters to the Editor
- Contributors
- Short Docs
Sports
- Angels
- Angel City FC
- Chargers
- Clippers
- Dodgers
- Ducks
- Galaxy
- High School Sports
- Kings
- Lakers
- 2026 Milan-Cortina Olympics
- USC
- UCLA
- Rams
- Sparks
World & Nation
- Immigration & the Border
- Israel-Hamas
- Mexico & the Americas
- Ukraine
Times Everywhere
- 404 by L.A. Times
- Facebook
- Instagram
- LA Times Today
- Newsletters
- Photography
- Podcasts
- Short Docs
- TikTok
- Threads
- Video
- YouTube
- X (Twitter)
For Subscribers
eNewspaper
All Sections
_________________
LA Times Studios
- Business
- • AI & Tech
- • Automotive
- • Banking & Finance
- • Commercial Real Estate
- • Entertainment
- • Goods & Retail
- • Innovators Unplugged
- • Healthcare & Science
- • Law
- • Sports
- Deals & Coupons
- Decor & Design
- Dentists
- Doctors & Scientists
- Fitness
- Hot Property
- Live & Well
- Orange County
- Pets
- The Hub: Rebuilding LA
- Travel
- Veterinarians
- Weddings & Celebrations
- Newsletters
Live Stream
Events
- Screening Series
Crossword
Games
L.A. Times Store
Subscriptions
- Manage Subscription
- EZPAY
- Delivery Issue
- eNewspaper
- Students & Educators
- Subscribe
- Subscriber Terms
- Gift Subscription Terms
About Us
- About Us
- Archives
- Company News
- eNewspaper
- For the Record
- Got a Tip?
- L.A. Times Careers
- L.A. Times Store
- LA Times Studios Capabilities
- News App: Apple IOS
- News App: Google Play
- Newsroom Directory
- Public Affairs
- Rights, Clearance & Permissions
- Short Docs
Advertising
- Classifieds
- Find/Post Jobs
- Hot Property Sections
- Local Ads Marketplace
- L.A. Times Digital Agency
- Media Kit: Why the L.A. Times?
- People on the Move
- Place an Ad
- Place an Open House
- Sotheby’s International Realty
Special Supplements
- Healthy Living
- Higher Education
- Philanthropy

Politics
Trump Administration
California Politics
L.A. Politics
View All

Don't Miss Your morning catch-up: Trump’s team is losing...to the L.A. Public Defender, Trump rejects science and more big stories Advertisement Politics Column: The Supreme Court’s awful Hobby Lobby decision just spawned a very ugly stepchild Los Angeles Times columnist Michael Hiltzik

Los Angeles Times columnist Michael Hiltzik

By Michael HiltzikBusiness Columnist Follow Aug. 19, 2016 11:35 AM PT

Share via Close extra sharing options
- Email
- Facebook
- X
- LinkedIn
- Threads
- Reddit
- WhatsApp
- Copy Link URL Copied!
- Print

“The court, I fear, has ventured into a minefield.”

That’s how Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg concluded her dissent to the 2014 Hobby Lobby decision. That’s the case in which the court ruled that businesses have a right to their own religious beliefs, and could use them to flout otherwise generally applicable federal laws — in this particular, the Affordable Care Act’s mandate that businesses provide contraceptive coverage as part of their employees’ health insurance.

The minefield Ginsburg warned about has now detonated. On Thursday, U.S. District Judge Sean F. Cox of Detroit ruled that a local funeral home was well within its rights to fire a transgender employee because its owner had a religious belief that gender transition violated biblical teachings.

If religious motivation exempted businesses from anti-discrimination laws, our government would be powerless to enforce those laws.

— ACLU brief in EEOC vs. Harris

Cox’s ruling puts the lie to Justice Samuel Alito’s denial, in his majority opinion in Hobby Lobby, that the ruling would provide a shield for a wide range of discriminatory practices by allowing them to masquerade as religious scruples. “Our decision today provides no such shield,” Alito wrote.

Ginsburg, who was on the short end of a 5-4 decision, knew better. She said there could be “little doubt” that religious claims would proliferate, because the court’s expansion of religious freedom to corporations “invites for-profit entities to seek religion-based exemptions from regulations they deem offensive to their faith.” She asked, “where is the stopping point?… Suppose an employer’s sincerely held religious belief is offended by health coverage of vaccines, or paying the minimum wage … or according women equal pay for substantially similar work?”

She further cited court precedents holding that “accommodations to religious beliefs or observances … must not significantly impinge on the interests of third parties.”

As it happens, the case before Cox involves all those points. At issue was the firing of Aimee Stephens by R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes, which she had joined as a funeral director and embalmer under the name Anthony Stephens in 2007. In July 2013, she informed her employer that she would transition to her female identity starting in 2013, living and working as a woman for a year before undergoing sex-reassignment surgery. Within two weeks, she was fired. A year later, the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued the funeral homes on her behalf.

At first, the case resembled an ordinary sex-discrimination matter. The employer’s defense was that it had a written dress code distinguishing between men’s and women’s working garb, and Stephens had refused to wear men’s clothing. Soon, the funeral homes added a religious dimension, citing the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the same statute underlying the Hobby Lobby case. That legislation was designed to give people a pass on generally applicable laws if they could show that the burdens imposed on their beliefs outweighed the public’s interest.

The funeral homes’ owner, Thomas Rost, is a devout Christian who, according to court filings, “sincerely believes” that the “Bible teaches that a person’s sex … is an immutable God-given gift and that it is wrong for a person to deny his or her God-given sex.”

Rost believes “that the Bible teaches that God creates people male or female” and that he would be “violating God’s commands if [he] were to permit one of the funeral directors to deny their sex. … He would be directly involved in supporting the idea that sex is a changeable social construct rather than an immutable God-given gift.”

The problems Ginsburg identified are obvious from this narrative. First, there’s no way of determining if Rost’s beliefs are genuine or even religious, and plenty of grounds to determine that they’re presumptuous. Cox’s ruling doesn’t indicate what passages of the Bible were the basis of Rost’s conclusion about its teachings, if any. His assertions that sex is “immutable” and that Stephens was taking advantage of a “changeable social construct” are contradicted by medical science. And the accommodation Cox is granting plainly impinges on the interest of a third party — Stephens, who has lost her job.

The ACLU, in a friend-of-the-court brief in the Stephens case, underscored the concerns that Ginsburg raised in Hobby Lobby. The implications of a ruling in the funeral homes’ favor would be “staggering,” it declared. “People hold sincere religious beliefs about a wide variety of things, including racial and religious segregation and the role of women in society. … If religious motivation exempted businesses from anti-discrimination laws, our government would be powerless to enforce those laws.”

Among other things, “business owners could refuse service to people of color, on the ground that their religious beliefs forbid racial integration. Employers could refuse to hire women or pay them less than men, because their religious beliefs require women to remain at home. And educational institutions receiving federal benefits could impose religiously motivated racial segregation policies on their students. All civil rights laws would be vulnerable to such claims where the discrimination was motivated by religion.”

Hobby Lobby, Ginsburg warned, was “a decision of startling breadth.” How broad is just now becoming clear.

Keep up to date with Michael Hiltzik. Follow @hiltzikm on Twitter, see his Facebook page, or email [email protected].

Return to Michael Hiltzik’s blog.

Americans split on whether to tip hotel staff

Redstone saga shows that ego and family can make succession a risky business

Podcasts

Through Her Doc ‘All The Walls Came Down,’ Filmmaker Ondi Timoner Aims To ‘Save’ Altadena, And Her Community – And Herself – Heal

Taped Jan 8, 2026, a year after the Eaton Fire, this episode features Ondi Timoner. After losing her home, she began documenting the displacement and financial struggles of her neighbors, joining My Tribe Rise to help Altadena rebuild and recover.
Crimes of the Times: “The Trials of Frank Carson” Update

Attorney Frank Carson defended the accused for decades. Framed for murder and later acquitted, a star witness admitted he lied. Stanislaus County paid $22.5M to settle his estate’s lawsuit.
Boiling Point: Smoglandia Pt 6: FUTURE ELECTRIC, FUTURE TROUBLE

Hear from the winner of the 1968 Caltech vs MIT electric car race. But it’s not all fresh air: smog devastates communities of color, and the Trump administration may pull the plug on California’s ability to clear its own air.

Subscribers are Reading

SoCal man once stole a billionaire’s identity, then he set his sights on surfers, prosecutors say
For Subscribers
Cedars-Sinai didn’t act on four decades of complaints about gynecologist’s sexual abuse, lawsuits allege
For Subscribers
L.A. public defenders are on a win streak as Trump’s Justice Department charges activists
Glendale firefighter read wife’s diary moments before she was killed, family attorney says
Closed for decades, a historic L.A. theater reopens for an ambitious late-night video art experience

Latest Politics

Federal authorities announce an end to the immigration crackdown in Minnesota
Feb. 12, 2026
Voices
Arellano: Trump’s deportations are losing him the ‘Mexican Beverly Hills’
Feb. 12, 2026
California, other states sue over Trump administration’s latest cuts to HIV programs
Feb. 11, 2026
Gov. Gavin Newsom approves $90 million for Planned Parenthood
Feb. 11, 2026
Bondi clashes with Democrats over Epstein, political retribution claims
Feb. 11, 2026

Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement

Tag » Why Is Hobby Lobby Bad

Americans split on whether to tip hotel staff

More to Read

Abcarian: Should therapists be allowed to tell gay kids God wants them to be straight?

Contributor: What trans people need now

California law faces revise as high court allows parents to ‘opt out’ of LGBTQ+ school stories

More From the Los Angeles Times

Contributor: Nation’s challenge after Trump will be to seek justice, not retribution

Trump’s response to spike in ACA prices: Lower premiums, sharply higher out-of pocket costs

Judge blocks Trump administration move to cut $600 million in HIV funding from states

Culver City, a crime haven? Bondi’s jab falls flat with locals

Podcasts

Through Her Doc ‘All The Walls Came Down,’ Filmmaker Ondi Timoner Aims To ‘Save’ Altadena, And Her Community – And Herself – Heal

Crimes of the Times: “The Trials of Frank Carson” Update

Boiling Point: Smoglandia Pt 6: FUTURE ELECTRIC, FUTURE TROUBLE

Most Read in Politics

Claims about Trump in Epstein files are ‘untrue,’ the Justice Department says

Justice Department drafting a list of ‘domestic terrorists’

Subscribers are Reading

SoCal man once stole a billionaire’s identity, then he set his sights on surfers, prosecutors say

Cedars-Sinai didn’t act on four decades of complaints about gynecologist’s sexual abuse, lawsuits allege

L.A. public defenders are on a win streak as Trump’s Justice Department charges activists

Glendale firefighter read wife’s diary moments before she was killed, family attorney says

Closed for decades, a historic L.A. theater reopens for an ambitious late-night video art experience

Latest Politics

Federal authorities announce an end to the immigration crackdown in Minnesota

Arellano: Trump’s deportations are losing him the ‘Mexican Beverly Hills’

California, other states sue over Trump administration’s latest cuts to HIV programs

Gov. Gavin Newsom approves $90 million for Planned Parenthood

Bondi clashes with Democrats over Epstein, political retribution claims

Contact