Water Has Calories - Organic Chemistry - Science Forums

Jump to content Science Forums
  • Sign In
  1. Home
  2. Sciences
  3. Chemistry
  4. Organic Chemistry
  5. Water has calories
  • All Activity
Mrflapjack Lepton

Mrflapjack

New Members
  • 1 posts
  • 0 Badges
  • 0 Reputation
Mrflapjack Lepton

Mrflapjack New Members

February 27, 20187 yr

February 27, 20187 yr

Does water have calories? My friend thinks so because joules can be converted to calories and water has energy (joules). I disagree because saying such is akin to saying "a line has meters" rather than "a line has length" which is improper, therefore so is "water has calories." Who is right here, and why?

dimreepr SuperNerd

dimreepr

Senior Members
  • 15k posts
  • 0 Badges
  • 1.2k Reputation
  • Location: Stonehouse, Gloucestershire.
dimreepr SuperNerd

dimreepr Senior Members

February 27, 20187 yr

February 27, 20187 yr

Water has no 'chemical' energy and therefore no calories without input. 

Sensei Genius

Sensei

Senior Members
  • 8.2k posts
  • 0 Badges
  • 1.3k Reputation
Sensei Genius

Sensei Senior Members

February 27, 20187 yr

February 27, 20187 yr

Calories that can be used by human body, depends on difference between temperature of drink and temperature of your body.

4.1855 J/K*g * mass_of_water * ( temperature_of_water - 36.6 ) = energy that you can gain because of drinking just water.

But typical e.g. hot tea has no more than 40-50 C, so put inputs in equation, and you have 4.1855 * 250 g * (50-36.6) = 14 kJ of energy.

 

4 minutes ago, dimreepr said:

Water has no 'chemical' energy and therefore no calories without input. 

1 calorie = energy needed to increase temperature of 1 gram of water by 1 degree. From definition of calorie.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calorie

 

Edited February 27, 20187 yr by Sensei

dimreepr SuperNerd

dimreepr

Senior Members
  • 15k posts
  • 0 Badges
  • 1.2k Reputation
  • Location: Stonehouse, Gloucestershire.
dimreepr SuperNerd

dimreepr Senior Members

February 27, 20187 yr

February 27, 20187 yr
2 minutes ago, Sensei said:

1 calorie = energy needed to increase temperature of 1 gram of water by 1 degree. From definition of calorie.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calorie

 

3

And how does water do that?

John Cuthber SuperNerd

John Cuthber

Resident Experts
  • 18.4k posts
  • 0 Badges
  • 4.1k Reputation
  • Location: England
  • Chemistry Expert
John Cuthber SuperNerd

John Cuthber Resident Experts

February 27, 20187 yr

February 27, 20187 yr
3 hours ago, dimreepr said:

And how does water do that?

It doesn't.

 

pavelcherepan Protist

pavelcherepan

Senior Members
  • 874 posts
  • 0 Badges
  • 148 Reputation
pavelcherepan Protist

pavelcherepan Senior Members

February 28, 20187 yr

February 28, 20187 yr
7 hours ago, Sensei said:

4.1855 J/K*g * mass_of_water * ( temperature_of_water - 36.6 ) = energy that you can gain because of drinking just water.

But typical e.g. hot tea has no more than 40-50 C, so put inputs in equation, and you have 4.1855 * 250 g * (50-36.6) = 14 kJ of energy.

I assume the original post was referring to "food energy", something that we get through cellular respiration and water in on itself does not have any calorific value.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_energy

swansont SuperNerd

swansont

Moderators
  • 56.4k posts
  • 0 Badges
  • 9.2k Reputation
  • Location: Upstate NY
  • Evil Liar (or so I'm told)
swansont SuperNerd

swansont Moderators

February 28, 20187 yr

February 28, 20187 yr
19 hours ago, Mrflapjack said:

Does water have calories? My friend thinks so because joules can be converted to calories and water has energy (joules). I disagree because saying such is akin to saying "a line has meters" rather than "a line has length" which is improper, therefore so is "water has calories." Who is right here, and why?

The caloric (food) value assumes combustion. You can literally burn foods to determine this.

You can't burn water.

StringJunky SuperNerd

StringJunky

Senior Members
  • 13.7k posts
  • 0 Badges
  • 3.2k Reputation
  • Location: UK
StringJunky SuperNerd

StringJunky Senior Members

February 28, 20187 yr

February 28, 20187 yr
3 hours ago, swansont said:

The caloric (food) value assumes combustion. You can literally burn foods to determine this.

You can't burn water.

In the formation of water the calorific value of hydrogen has been spent, hasn't it?

swansont SuperNerd

swansont

Moderators
  • 56.4k posts
  • 0 Badges
  • 9.2k Reputation
  • Location: Upstate NY
  • Evil Liar (or so I'm told)
swansont SuperNerd

swansont Moderators

February 28, 20187 yr

February 28, 20187 yr
7 minutes ago, StringJunky said:

In the formation of water the calorific value of hydrogen has been spent, hasn't it?

I would imagine so.

Sensei Genius

Sensei

Senior Members
  • 8.2k posts
  • 0 Badges
  • 1.3k Reputation
Sensei Genius

Sensei Senior Members

March 1, 20187 yr

March 1, 20187 yr

While burning

On 28.02.2018 at 12:30 PM, swansont said:

The caloric (food) value assumes combustion. You can literally burn foods to determine this.

You can't burn water.

Water and carbon dioxide gases are results of burning material to check its caloric (food) value. But energy released during this reaction is in e.g. kinetic energy of newly created molecules. Liquid water particles at 100 C has higher e.g. kinetic energy than water at 20 C, or 36.6 C. During collision with "colder" molecule, kinetic energy is partially or fully transferred to it (elastic/inelastic scattering)

Edited March 1, 20187 yr by Sensei

swansont SuperNerd

swansont

Moderators
  • 56.4k posts
  • 0 Badges
  • 9.2k Reputation
  • Location: Upstate NY
  • Evil Liar (or so I'm told)
swansont SuperNerd

swansont Moderators

March 1, 20187 yr

March 1, 20187 yr
2 hours ago, Sensei said:

While burning

Water and carbon dioxide gases are results of burning material to check its caloric (food) value. But energy released during this reaction is in e.g. kinetic energy of newly created molecules. Liquid water particles at 100 C has higher e.g. kinetic energy than water at 20 C, or 36.6 C. During collision with "colder" molecule, kinetic energy is partially or fully transferred to it (elastic/inelastic scattering)

Which is irrelevant to the discussion. The food calorie content is based on the combustion of the material, which is why water is said to have no calories. It can't undergo a combustion reaction. It is a product of such a reaction.

Will your body burn calories heating up water (or better yet, ice)? Possibly. But that's a separate discussion.

Sensei Genius

Sensei

Senior Members
  • 8.2k posts
  • 0 Badges
  • 1.3k Reputation
Sensei Genius

Sensei Senior Members

March 1, 20187 yr

March 1, 20187 yr

 

5 minutes ago, swansont said:

Which is irrelevant to the discussion. The food calorie content is based on the combustion of the material, which is why water is said to have no calories.

OP nowhere said he is interested in just "food calorie". He said about "calorie". We're in science part of forum, so I am interpreting it as "calorie = (historical) unit of energy".

 

dimreepr SuperNerd

dimreepr

Senior Members
  • 15k posts
  • 0 Badges
  • 1.2k Reputation
  • Location: Stonehouse, Gloucestershire.
dimreepr SuperNerd

dimreepr Senior Members

March 1, 20187 yr

March 1, 20187 yr
2 minutes ago, Sensei said:

 

OP nowhere said he is interested in just "food calorie". He said about "calorie". We're in science part of forum, so I am interpreting it as "calorie = (historical) unit of energy".

 

But water has no energy, whatever the unit, without input.

swansont SuperNerd

swansont

Moderators
  • 56.4k posts
  • 0 Badges
  • 9.2k Reputation
  • Location: Upstate NY
  • Evil Liar (or so I'm told)
swansont SuperNerd

swansont Moderators

March 1, 20187 yr

March 1, 20187 yr
5 minutes ago, Sensei said:

OP nowhere said he is interested in just "food calorie". He said about "calorie". We're in science part of forum, so I am interpreting it as "calorie = (historical) unit of energy".

"Does X have calories?" (or "how many calories does X have?") is a pretty clear indication that we are talking about food. Because when we talk about energy content we say energy, not calories. And even if not, it would be the inherent energy content, on a chemical level.

Sensei Genius

Sensei

Senior Members
  • 8.2k posts
  • 0 Badges
  • 1.3k Reputation
Sensei Genius

Sensei Senior Members

March 1, 20187 yr

March 1, 20187 yr
7 minutes ago, dimreepr said:

But water has no energy, whatever the unit, without input.

You omitted essential parameter. Temperature of water.

If you eat ice cream, or ice, it has <0 C, human body has to spend energy to unfreeze it and increase to ambient temperature of body.

If you drink 50 C hot tea. That energy in hot drink does not disappear. Remains in your body, increasing temperature of your body.

 

Does water has food calorie? No it doesn't have food calorie.

Does hot water has energy? Yet it does. 4.1855 [J/K*g] * mass_of_water [g] * ( T_of_water - T_of_your_body ) [K]

dimreepr SuperNerd

dimreepr

Senior Members
  • 15k posts
  • 0 Badges
  • 1.2k Reputation
  • Location: Stonehouse, Gloucestershire.
dimreepr SuperNerd

dimreepr Senior Members

March 1, 20187 yr

March 1, 20187 yr
1 minute ago, Sensei said:

You omitted essential parameter. Temperature of water.

1

No, I didn't "without input" i.e. the sun (heat).

J.C.MacSwell Genius

J.C.MacSwell

Senior Members
  • 6.3k posts
  • 0 Badges
  • 727 Reputation
  • Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
  • Organism
J.C.MacSwell Genius

J.C.MacSwell Senior Members

March 1, 20187 yr

March 1, 20187 yr

A food calorie is actually a kilocalorie of energy. Otherwise I would simply have a nice cold beer and lose weight.

(after it goes through my system)

 

So a litre of water at 38 C would net me 1 food calorie equivalent (1 degree above my body temperature)

A litre of water at 0 C would save me 37 calories worth of dieting

But it has no actual food calories as mentioned above.

Edited March 1, 20187 yr by J.C.MacSwell

Janus Primate

Janus

Resident Experts
  • 2.2k posts
  • 0 Badges
  • 1.2k Reputation
  • Atom
Janus Primate

Janus Resident Experts

March 1, 20187 yr

March 1, 20187 yr
2 hours ago, J.C.MacSwell said:

A food calorie is actually a kilocalorie of energy. Otherwise I would simply have a nice cold beer and lose weight.

(after it goes through my system)

 

So a litre of water at 38 C would net me 1 food calorie equivalent (1 degree above my body temperature)

A litre of water at 0 C would save me 37 calories worth of dieting

But it has no actual food calories as mentioned above.

Reminds me of the "Scotch on the Rocks" diet.   It was based on the idea that there were a smaller number of Calories in a scotch on the rocks than the calories your body expends bringing the consumed drink up to body temp.  The trick was in that fact while perfectly true, a Calorie is actually a kilocalorie  and equal to 1000 calories.

Edited March 1, 20187 yr by Janus

swansont SuperNerd

swansont

Moderators
  • 56.4k posts
  • 0 Badges
  • 9.2k Reputation
  • Location: Upstate NY
  • Evil Liar (or so I'm told)
swansont SuperNerd

swansont Moderators

March 2, 20187 yr

March 2, 20187 yr
19 hours ago, Sensei said:

You omitted essential parameter. Temperature of water.

Temperature is not an intrinsic property of water, or any atom or molecule, it is a property of the environment.

14 hours ago, J.C.MacSwell said:

A food calorie is actually a kilocalorie of energy. Otherwise I would simply have a nice cold beer and lose weight.

(after it goes through my system)

 

So a litre of water at 38 C would net me 1 food calorie equivalent (1 degree above my body temperature)

A litre of water at 0 C would save me 37 calories worth of dieting 

Possibly. Your body's temperature varies throughout the day, so it's a bit harder to be sure you would burn an extra 37 calories, or if that would be taken care of with what your body is burning anyway.

 

J.C.MacSwell Genius

J.C.MacSwell

Senior Members
  • 6.3k posts
  • 0 Badges
  • 727 Reputation
  • Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
  • Organism
J.C.MacSwell Genius

J.C.MacSwell Senior Members

March 2, 20187 yr

March 2, 20187 yr
10 hours ago, swansont said:

 

Possibly. Your body's temperature varies throughout the day, so it's a bit harder to be sure you would burn an extra 37 calories, or if that would be taken care of with what your body is burning anyway.

 

Yeah. I think it stands as part of the equation, but there are a lot of interdependencies involved. Best to jog a couple miles before relieving the kidneys...just to get that core temperature up!:D

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  1. Home
  2. Sciences
  3. Chemistry
  4. Organic Chemistry
  5. Water has calories
  • All Activity

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Accept Cookies Reject Cookies
  • Sign In
  • Search
  • Menu
Close panel
  • Existing user? Sign In
Close panel
  • Browse
    • Forums
    • Events
    • Guidelines
    • Staff
    • Online Users
    • Leaderboard
  • Activity
  • Leaderboard
  • Store
  1. Home
  2. Sciences
  3. Chemistry
  4. Organic Chemistry
  5. Water has calories
Close panel Search Where: Everywhere This Forum This Topic Topics Events Products Members Search: Content titles and body Content titles only Date Created: Any date Past 24 hours Past week Past month Past six months Past year Use: All of these words Any of these words Last Updated: Any date Past 24 hours Past week Past month Past six months Past year Search... Search Everywhere This Forum This Topic Topics Events Products Members Find results in Search titles and body Search titles only Date Created Created any time Created past 24 hours Created past week Created past month Created past 6 months Created past year Last Updated Updated any time Updated past 24 hours Updated past week Updated past month Updated past 6 months Updated past year Close

Configure browser push notifications

close Chrome Safari Edge Firefox
Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.
Safari (iOS 16.4+)
  1. Ensure the site is installed via Add to Home Screen.
  2. Open Settings App → Notifications.
  3. Find your app name and adjust your preference.
Safari (macOS)
  1. Go to Safari → Preferences.
  2. Click the Websites tab.
  3. Select Notifications in the sidebar.
  4. Find this website and adjust your preference.
Edge (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.
Edge (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Click Permissions for this site.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.
Firefox (Android)
  1. Go to Settings → Site permissions.
  2. Tap Notifications.
  3. Find this site in the list and adjust your preference.
Firefox (Desktop)
  1. Open Firefox Settings.
  2. Search for Notifications.
  3. Find this site in the list and adjust your preference.

Tag » How Many Calories Is Water