Top Most 19+ Why Pitbulls Illegal In Denver
-
1.Denver Overturns Pit Bull Ban After More Than 30 Years
The ordinance banning ownership of pit bulls was enacted in 1989 after a number of people had been attacked.
View more » -
2.How To Get A Permit For Your Pit Bull In Denver
Owners should get in touch with Denver Animal Protection to set up a breed-restricted assessment.
View more » -
3.Pit Bull Bans Nearly A Thing Of The Past In Colorado
Lone Tree close is close to lifting its pit bull ban, which would leave Louisville as the only Colorado city left with breed-specific restrictions.
View more » -
4.Denver Pit Bull Ban Lifted - Should You Go? | GoPetFriendly
The pit bull ban was lifted, but visiting Denver with your pittie still isn't easy. Read on to decide if it's more trouble than it's worth.
View more » -
5.Animal Ordinances & Legislation
Read an overview of city ordinances related to the care and keeping of pets in Denver, including breed-specific legislation.
View more » -
6.Denver Votes To Allow Restricted Breeds In The City With A Permit
Denver Animal Protection (DAP), a division of the Denver Department of Public Health & Environment, announces that Denver residents voted November 3, 2020, to repeal the restricted breed ban that has been in place in the City and County of Denver. Under Denver’s Ordinance Sec. 8-67, pit bull breeds (American Pit Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier, or Staffordshire Bull Terrier) are prohibited unless they have been issued a provisional Breed-Restricted Permit.
View more » -
7.Gumdrop Is 1st Pit Bull Adopted In Denver Since Repeal Of 30-year Ban
The pittie, now renamed Odin, offers hope to pit bull lovers near and far.
View more » -
8.Pit Bull Bites In Denver Outnumber Those Of Any Other Breed
Denver Animal Protection identified 117 pit bull bites in 2021.
View more » -
9.Denver Votes To Repeal Pit Bull Ban
The contentious ordinance will be replaced with a new licensing system for bully breeds aimed at encouraging responsible pet ownership.
View more » -
10.Dog Breed Ordinances By City (Metro Denver Area)
This handout contains a list of cities in the metro Denver area that ban particular dog breeds. Please contact the city websites for more infomation.
View more » -
11.Here's How Denver Licensing For Pit Bull Breeds Would Roll Out Starting Jan. 1
Denver voters showed an overwhelming support to pass Measure 2J, which lifts the city's ban on specific dog breeds including pit bulls, American pit bull terriers, American Staffordshire terriers or
View more » -
12.Pit Bull Ban Lifted In Denver Starting Jan. 2, Registration Will Be Required
The City and County of Denver has lifted its ban on pit bulls. It is, however, required for pit bull owners to purchase a $35 permit first.
View more » -
13.Surprise, Surprise. Denver's Pit Bull Ban Has Always Been Controversial.
We dug into the archives to find how time can really be a flat circle in this town.
View more » -
14.Are Pit Bulls Allowed In Colorado?
Colorado is one of many states with strict laws banning pit bulls. To learn more about cities that ban certain breeds, visit our post.
View more » -
15.Denver Mayor Vetoes Pit Bull Ordinance, Pit Bulls Remain Banned In Denver
Denver's mayor decided to keep the pit bull ban in place for his city.
View more » -
16.Colorado | Animal Legal & Historical Center
-
17.How Denver's Pit Bull Ban Led To A Woman's Nightmare
The vague language of the statute led to problems.
View more » -
18.Denver Animal Shelter Offering Pit Bull Evaluations So Owners Can Get Required Permit: 'Make Your Relationship Legal'
The Denver Animal Shelter performed evaluations of pit bulls Thursday and will see more dogs next Thursday, to help residents make sure their best friend is legal in the city.
View more » -
19.New DU Research Measures Impact Of Denver's Pit Bull Ban | University Of Denver
It’s been 30 years since Denver’s controversial pit bull ban began, and this November, for the first time since it was enacted, voters will have the opportunity to decide the prohibition’s fate. This isn’t the first challenge to the policy, described as breed-specific legislation (BSL). As recently as February 2020, Denver’s City Council voted to repeal the ban, but that decision was swiftly vetoed by Mayor Michael Hancock, who cited public safety and irresponsible pet owners in a letter to council representatives. Since the ban’s adoption in 1989, the question of public safety has, in large part, shaped the conversation over Denver’s BSL, but a new University of Denver study, published in Animal Law Review by the Institute for Human-Animal Connection (IHAC) at the Graduate School of Social Work (GSSW), calls this argument into question. “There are a lot of passionate opinions around the BSL, or the pit bull ban,” says GSSW’s Kevin Morris, American Humane endowed chair and research associate professor. “There’s also a lot of misinformation and assumptions, so we are trying to bring data and objective analyses of those data to the discussion, so that people can make more informed decisions about keeping the legislation or coming up with something that might be more effective.” Conducted in conjunction with DU’s Sturm College of Law, as well as with researchers in economics and business, the research provides comprehensive data regarding the effectiveness and costs of Denver’s pit bull ban. Morris and his team began digging into this topic three years ago, asking such questions as: What have been the economic costs of BSL? How has it impacted animal welfare outcomes? And what is the social impact? Using data from Denver Animal Protection, the agency that enforces the BSL, the study found that the city has spent more than $100 million enforcing the ban, with little measurable impact on public safety. Morris notes that while bites from “pit-bull type dogs” (pit bull isn’t a formal breed) have gone down in the prohibition’s 30 years, so have dog bites overall. Morris says the most “stunning” finding depicts unequal enforcement of the pit bull ban in the city’s most vulnerable areas, particularly in places where, the study explains, “racially diverse communities intersect with predominantly white neighborhoods.” “The enforcement of BSL has taken place primarily in our communities of color in Denver,” Morris says. “And this criminalization of certain pet owners has exacerbated the barriers they already experience to accessing pet support services.” According to DU research associate and project manager for the study, Sloane Hawes, the BSL not only effects Denver, but also its neighbors. “The animal welfare system in Colorado thrives through collaboration,” she says. “Having the BSL in Denver means that any pit bull that comes into the care of Denver Animal Protection must either be euthanized or transferred to another community.” The study refers to this phenomenon as the “bad neighbor effect,” largely because it adds pressure to the state’s sheltering system. To save canine lives and ease Denver’s burden, nearby shelters partner with Denver Animal Protection to take in pit bulls, offering them a chance at adoption. The study comes just as Denver voters are headed to the polls in November to decide whether to replace the ban with a registration system for pit bulls. If passed, the ballot measure would allow pit-bull type dogs in Denver, if the owner allows the city to track health and safety metrics, including vaccinations, microchipping and incidents. If the pet owner violates any of these guidelines, the dog would not longer be permitted in the city. While the study doesn’t endorse or condemn this option, it does identify efforts elsewhere that have reported promising outcomes. “There are communities throughout the U.S. and internationally that have adopted comprehensive, breed-neutral dangerous dog policies and seen improvements in public health and safety outcomes such as decreases in bite cases or adherence to leash laws,” Hawes says. “Better yet, the field of animal welfare is beginning to recognize the need for more proactive support services that can keep pets with their families, like affordable veterinary and behavior care, so that punitive enforcement like BSL isn’t necessary.” Alternative options, Hawes adds, would help Denver inch closer to alignment with IHAC’s humane communities framework, which encourages policymakers to consider a holistic approach to legislation and programs. “The conclusion we draw in the paper is the BSL is detracting from Denver’s perception as a humane community. On a national level, Denver is really a leader in animal sheltering in all ways except for the presence of BSL,” she says. “At the heart of what the humane communities framework proposes is the recognition that the health of humans, animals and the environment are interconnected. The health and resilience of an entire community is compromised when certain populations of people or animals are disproportionately targeted.
View more »