62014CA0547 - EN - EUR-Lex - European Union
EUR-Lex Access to European Union law This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
You are here- EUROPA
- EUR-Lex home
- EUR-Lex - 62014CA0547 - EN
- Help
EU law
- Treaties
- Treaties currently in force
- Founding Treaties
- Accession Treaties
- Other treaties and protocols
- Chronological overview
- Legal acts
- Consolidated texts
- International agreements
- Preparatory documents
- EFTA documents
- Lawmaking procedures
- Summaries of EU legislation
- Browse by EU institutions
- European Parliament
- European Council
- Council of the European Union
- European Commission
- Court of Justice of the European Union
- European Central Bank
- European Court of Auditors
- European Economic and Social Committee
- European Committee of the Regions
- Browse by EuroVoc
EU case-law
- Case-law
- Reports of cases
- Directory of case-law
Official Journal
- Access to the Official Journal
- Official Journal L series daily view
- Official Journal C series daily view
- Browse the Official Journal
- Legally binding printed editions
- Special edition
National law and case-law
- National transposition
- National case-law
- JURE case-law
Information
- Themes in focus
- EUR-Lex developments
- Statistics
- ELI register
- What is ELI
- ELI background
- Why implement ELI
- Countries implementing ELI
- Testimonials
- Implementing ELI
- Glossary
- EU budget online
Document 62014CA0547
- Help
- Text
- Document information
- Case file
- Permanent link
- Download notice
- Save to My items
- Create an email alert
- Create an RSS alert
Case C-547/14: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 May 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) — United Kingdom) — The Queen, on the application of: Philip Morris Brands SARL, Philip Morris Ltd, British American Tobacco UK Ltd v The Secretary of State for Health (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Directive 2014/40/EU — Articles 7, 18 and 24(2) and (3) — Articles 8(3), 9(3), 10(1)(a), (c) and (g), 13 and 14 — Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products — Validity — Legal basis — Article 114 TFEU — Principle of proportionality — Principle of subsidiarity — Fundamental rights of the European Union — Freedom of expression — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 11)
Case C-547/14: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 May 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) — United Kingdom) — The Queen, on the application of: Philip Morris Brands SARL, Philip Morris Ltd, British American Tobacco UK Ltd v The Secretary of State for Health (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Directive 2014/40/EU — Articles 7, 18 and 24(2) and (3) — Articles 8(3), 9(3), 10(1)(a), (c) and (g), 13 and 14 — Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products — Validity — Legal basis — Article 114 TFEU — Principle of proportionality — Principle of subsidiarity — Fundamental rights of the European Union — Freedom of expression — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 11)
Case C-547/14: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 May 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) — United Kingdom) — The Queen, on the application of: Philip Morris Brands SARL, Philip Morris Ltd, British American Tobacco UK Ltd v The Secretary of State for Health (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Directive 2014/40/EU — Articles 7, 18 and 24(2) and (3) — Articles 8(3), 9(3), 10(1)(a), (c) and (g), 13 and 14 — Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products — Validity — Legal basis — Article 114 TFEU — Principle of proportionality — Principle of subsidiarity — Fundamental rights of the European Union — Freedom of expression — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 11)
OJ C 243, 4.7.2016, pp. 12–13 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Expand all Collapse allLanguages, formats and link to OJ
Language- BG
- ES
- CS
- DA
- DE
- ET
- EL
- EN
- FR
- GA
- HR
- IT
- LV
- LT
- HU
- MT
- NL
- PL
- PT
- RO
- SK
- SL
- FI
- SV
- BG
- ES
- CS
- DA
- DE
- ET
- EL
- EN
- FR
- GA
- HR
- IT
- LV
- LT
- HU
- MT
- NL
- PL
- PT
- RO
- SK
- SL
- FI
- SV
- BG
- ES
- CS
- DA
- DE
- ET
- EL
- EN
- FR
- GA
- HR
- IT
- LV
- LT
- HU
- MT
- NL
- PL
- PT
- RO
- SK
- SL
- FI
- SV
- BG
- ES
- CS
- DA
- DE
- ET
- EL
- EN
- FR
- GA
- HR
- IT
- LV
- LT
- HU
- MT
- NL
- PL
- PT
- RO
- SK
- SL
- FI
- SV
Multilingual display
Language 1 English (en) Bulgarian (bg) Spanish (es) Czech (cs) Danish (da) German (de) Estonian (et) Greek (el) English (en) French (fr) Croatian (hr) Italian (it) Latvian (lv) Lithuanian (lt) Hungarian (hu) Maltese (mt) Dutch (nl) Polish (pl) Portuguese (pt) Romanian (ro) Slovak (sk) Slovenian (sl) Finnish (fi) Swedish (sv) Language 2 Please choose Bulgarian (bg) Spanish (es) Czech (cs) Danish (da) German (de) Estonian (et) Greek (el) English (en) French (fr) Croatian (hr) Italian (it) Latvian (lv) Lithuanian (lt) Hungarian (hu) Maltese (mt) Dutch (nl) Polish (pl) Portuguese (pt) Romanian (ro) Slovak (sk) Slovenian (sl) Finnish (fi) Swedish (sv) Language 3 Please choose Bulgarian (bg) Spanish (es) Czech (cs) Danish (da) German (de) Estonian (et) Greek (el) English (en) French (fr) Croatian (hr) Italian (it) Latvian (lv) Lithuanian (lt) Hungarian (hu) Maltese (mt) Dutch (nl) Polish (pl) Portuguese (pt) Romanian (ro) Slovak (sk) Slovenian (sl) Finnish (fi) Swedish (sv) DisplayText
| 4.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/12 |
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 May 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) — United Kingdom) — The Queen, on the application of: Philip Morris Brands SARL, Philip Morris Ltd, British American Tobacco UK Ltd v The Secretary of State for Health
(Case C-547/14) (1)
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Directive 2014/40/EU - Articles 7, 18 and 24(2) and (3) - Articles 8(3), 9(3), 10(1)(a), (c) and (g), 13 and 14 - Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products - Validity - Legal basis - Article 114 TFEU - Principle of proportionality - Principle of subsidiarity - Fundamental rights of the European Union - Freedom of expression - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 11))
(2016/C 243/11)
Language of the case: English
Referring court
High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court)
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: The Queen, on the application of: Philip Morris Brands SARL, Philip Morris Ltd, British American Tobacco UK Ltd
Defendant: The Secretary of State for Health
Interested parties and interveners: Imperial Tobacco Ltd, JT International SA, Gallaher Ltd, Tann UK Ltd, Tannpapier GmbH, V. Mane Fils, Deutsche Benkert GmbH & Co. KG, Benkert UK Ltd, Joh. Wilh. von Eicken GmbH
Operative part of the judgment
| 1. | Article 24(2) of Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products and repealing Directive 2001/37/EC must be interpreted as permitting Member States to maintain or introduce further requirements in relation to aspects of the packaging of tobacco products which are not harmonised by that directive. |
| 2. | Article 13(1) of Directive 2014/40 must be interpreted as prohibiting the display, on the labelling of unit packets and on the outside packaging, as well as on the tobacco product itself, of any information covered by that provision, even if the information concerned is factually accurate. |
| 3. | Consideration of the questions referred for a preliminary ruling by the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) has disclosed no factor of such a kind as to affect the validity of Articles 7, 18 and 24(2) and (3) of Directive 2014/40 or that of the provisions of Chapter II of Title II of that directive. |
(1) OJ C 56, 16.2.2015.
TopTừ khóa » C-547/14
-
C-547/14 – Philip Morris Brands SARL And Others - CURIA
-
Case C-547/14 Philip Morris V. Secretary Of State For Health (4 May ...
-
The Tobacco Products Directive Is Declared Valid By The Court Of ...
-
Philip Morris Brands SARL And Others V The Secretary Of State For ...
-
R (on The Application Of) Philip Morris Brands SARL Et Al. V ...
-
[PDF] GLOBAL LESSONS FOR TOBACCO C - QUT Law Review
-
Court Of Justice Confirms Validity Of The New Tobacco Products ...
-
The Ban On Tobacco For Oral Use Upheld By The Court Of Justice
-
Tabacco | Global Health & Human Rights Database
-
Philip Morris V Secretary Of State For Health (C-547/14) - ORBi Lu
-
Philip Morris Brands SARL And Ors, Imperial Tobacco Limited ...
-
C-547/14 Philip Morris Brands Ao | Expertisecentrum Europees Recht
-
[PDF] Internal Market As An Excuse: The Case Of EU Anti-Tobacco ...
-
TPD: Legal Challenges - TobaccoTactics