62016CA0116 - EN - EUR-Lex - European Union
EUR-Lex Access to European Union law This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
You are here- EUROPA
- EUR-Lex home
- EUR-Lex - 62016CA0116 - EN
- Help
EU law
- Treaties
- Treaties currently in force
- Founding Treaties
- Accession Treaties
- Other treaties and protocols
- Chronological overview
- Legal acts
- Consolidated texts
- International agreements
- Preparatory documents
- EFTA documents
- Lawmaking procedures
- Summaries of EU legislation
- Browse by EU institutions
- European Parliament
- European Council
- Council of the European Union
- European Commission
- Court of Justice of the European Union
- European Central Bank
- European Court of Auditors
- European Economic and Social Committee
- European Committee of the Regions
- Browse by EuroVoc
EU case-law
- Case-law
- Reports of cases
- Directory of case-law
Official Journal
- Access to the Official Journal
- Official Journal L series daily view
- Official Journal C series daily view
- Browse the Official Journal
- Legally binding printed editions
- Special edition
National law and case-law
- National transposition
- National case-law
- JURE case-law
Information
- Themes in focus
- EUR-Lex developments
- Statistics
- ELI register
- What is ELI?
- ELI background
- Why implement ELI?
- Countries implementing ELI
- Testimonials
- How to implement ELI
- Glossary
- EU budget online
Document 62016CA0116
- Help
- Text
- Document information
- Case file
- Permanent link
- Download notice
- Save to My items
- Create an email alert
- Create an RSS alert
Joined Cases C-116/16 and C-117/16: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 February 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret — Denmark) — Skatteministeriet v T Danmark (C-116/16), Y Denmark Aps (C-117/16) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States — Directive 90/435/EEC — Exemption of the profits distributed by companies of a Member State to companies of other Member States — Beneficial owner of the distributed profits — Abuse of rights — Company established in a Member State and paying to an associated company established in another Member State dividends all or almost all of which are then transferred outside the European Union — Subsidiary subject to an obligation to withhold tax on the profits at source)
Joined Cases C-116/16 and C-117/16: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 February 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret — Denmark) — Skatteministeriet v T Danmark (C-116/16), Y Denmark Aps (C-117/16) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States — Directive 90/435/EEC — Exemption of the profits distributed by companies of a Member State to companies of other Member States — Beneficial owner of the distributed profits — Abuse of rights — Company established in a Member State and paying to an associated company established in another Member State dividends all or almost all of which are then transferred outside the European Union — Subsidiary subject to an obligation to withhold tax on the profits at source)
Joined Cases C-116/16 and C-117/16: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 February 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret — Denmark) — Skatteministeriet v T Danmark (C-116/16), Y Denmark Aps (C-117/16) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States — Directive 90/435/EEC — Exemption of the profits distributed by companies of a Member State to companies of other Member States — Beneficial owner of the distributed profits — Abuse of rights — Company established in a Member State and paying to an associated company established in another Member State dividends all or almost all of which are then transferred outside the European Union — Subsidiary subject to an obligation to withhold tax on the profits at source)
OJ C 139, 15.4.2019, pp. 7–8 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Expand all Collapse allLanguages, formats and link to OJ
Language- BG
- ES
- CS
- DA
- DE
- ET
- EL
- EN
- FR
- GA
- HR
- IT
- LV
- LT
- HU
- MT
- NL
- PL
- PT
- RO
- SK
- SL
- FI
- SV
- BG
- ES
- CS
- DA
- DE
- ET
- EL
- EN
- FR
- GA
- HR
- IT
- LV
- LT
- HU
- MT
- NL
- PL
- PT
- RO
- SK
- SL
- FI
- SV
- BG
- ES
- CS
- DA
- DE
- ET
- EL
- EN
- FR
- GA
- HR
- IT
- LV
- LT
- HU
- MT
- NL
- PL
- PT
- RO
- SK
- SL
- FI
- SV
- BG
- ES
- CS
- DA
- DE
- ET
- EL
- EN
- FR
- GA
- HR
- IT
- LV
- LT
- HU
- MT
- NL
- PL
- PT
- RO
- SK
- SL
- FI
- SV
Multilingual display
Language 1 English (en) Bulgarian (bg) Spanish (es) Czech (cs) Danish (da) German (de) Estonian (et) Greek (el) English (en) French (fr) Croatian (hr) Italian (it) Latvian (lv) Lithuanian (lt) Hungarian (hu) Maltese (mt) Dutch (nl) Polish (pl) Portuguese (pt) Romanian (ro) Slovak (sk) Slovenian (sl) Finnish (fi) Swedish (sv) Language 2 Please choose Bulgarian (bg) Spanish (es) Czech (cs) Danish (da) German (de) Estonian (et) Greek (el) English (en) French (fr) Croatian (hr) Italian (it) Latvian (lv) Lithuanian (lt) Hungarian (hu) Maltese (mt) Dutch (nl) Polish (pl) Portuguese (pt) Romanian (ro) Slovak (sk) Slovenian (sl) Finnish (fi) Swedish (sv) Language 3 Please choose Bulgarian (bg) Spanish (es) Czech (cs) Danish (da) German (de) Estonian (et) Greek (el) English (en) French (fr) Croatian (hr) Italian (it) Latvian (lv) Lithuanian (lt) Hungarian (hu) Maltese (mt) Dutch (nl) Polish (pl) Portuguese (pt) Romanian (ro) Slovak (sk) Slovenian (sl) Finnish (fi) Swedish (sv) DisplayText
| 15.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/7 |
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 February 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret — Denmark) — Skatteministeriet v T Danmark (C-116/16), Y Denmark Aps (C-117/16)
(Joined Cases C-116/16 and C-117/16) (1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States - Directive 90/435/EEC - Exemption of the profits distributed by companies of a Member State to companies of other Member States - Beneficial owner of the distributed profits - Abuse of rights - Company established in a Member State and paying to an associated company established in another Member State dividends all or almost all of which are then transferred outside the European Union - Subsidiary subject to an obligation to withhold tax on the profits at source)
(2019/C 139/04)
Language of the case: Danish
Referring court
Østre Landsret
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Skatteministeriet
Defendants: T Danmark (C-116/16), Y Denmark Aps (C-117/16)
Operative part of the judgment
| 1. | Cases C-116/16 and C-117/16 are joined for the purposes of the judgment. |
| 2. | The general principle of EU law that EU law cannot be relied on for abusive or fraudulent ends must be interpreted as meaning that, where there is a fraudulent or abusive practice, the national authorities and courts are to refuse a taxpayer the exemption from withholding tax on profits distributed by a subsidiary to its parent company, provided for in Article 5 of Council Directive 90/435/EEC of 23 July 1990 on the common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States, as amended by Council Directive 2003/123/EC of 22 December 2003, even if there are no domestic or agreement-based provisions providing for such a refusal. |
| 3. | Proof of an abusive practice requires, first, a combination of objective circumstances in which, despite formal observance of the conditions laid down by the EU rules, the purpose of those rules has not been achieved and, second, a subjective element consisting in the intention to obtain an advantage from the EU rules by artificially creating the conditions laid down for obtaining it. The presence of a certain number of indications may demonstrate that there is an abuse of rights, in so far as those indications are objective and consistent. Such indications can include, in particular, the existence of conduit companies which are without economic justification and the purely formal nature of the structure of the group of companies, the financial arrangements and the loans. |
| 4. | In order to refuse to accord a company the status of beneficial owner of dividends, or to establish the existence of an abuse of rights, a national authority is not required to identify the entity or entities which it regards as being the beneficial owner(s) of those dividends. |
| 5. | In a situation where the system, laid down by Directive 90/435, as amended by Directive 2003/123, of exemption from withholding tax on dividends paid by a company resident in a Member State to a company resident in another Member State is not applicable because there is found to be fraud or abuse, within the meaning of Article 1(2) of that directive, application of the freedoms enshrined in the FEU Treaty cannot be relied on in order to call into question the legislation of the first Member State governing the taxation of those dividends. |
(1) OJ C 270, 25.7.2016.
TopTừ khóa » C-116/16
-
C-116/16 - CURIA - List Of Results
-
EU Issues Judgments In Danish Cases On Beneficial Ownership - PwC
-
CJEU Decision In Danish BO Cases - KPMG International
-
Danish High Court Issues Rulings On Beneficial Ownership | EY - Global
-
Denmark Vs T And Y Denmark, February ... - Transfer Pricing Case
-
Increased Focus On The Concept Of "Beneficial Ownership" - Fieldfisher
-
Denmark Vs T And Y Denmark, February 2019 ... - TP Guidelines
-
The CJEU Judgments In The Danish Beneficial Ownership Cases ...
-
Withholding Taxes, Abuse And EU Directives
-
CJEU Interprets Concept Of Beneficial Ownership In EU Directives
-
EU Court Decides On Abuse In Danish Interest Tax Cases - Dentons
-
The Danish Cases On Beneficial Ownership And Abuse Of Rights
-
Three Observations On The Danish Beneficial Ownership Cases