A Complex Tool For The Spatial Analysis Of Hiking Trails | Gabriela ...

Trang chủ » Hg77/2003 » A Complex Tool For The Spatial Analysis Of Hiking Trails | Gabriela ...

Có thể bạn quan tâm

Academia.eduAcademia.eduLog InSign Up
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
  • more
    • About
    • Press
    • Papers
    • Terms
    • Privacy
    • Copyright
    • We're Hiring!
    • Help Center
    • less
Digital Elevation Profile: A Complex Tool for the Spatial Analysis of Hiking Trailsinfo

Info

keyboard_arrow_downkeyboard_arrow_upGabriela ManeaGabriela ManeaGabriela ManeadownloadDownload PDFdescriptionSee full PDFvisibility

140

views

Related papers

arrow_back_iosTOPOGRAPHIC profile, elevation & slope analysis USING GISArlyn RuslindadownloadDownload free PDFCartography and visualization in mountain geomorphologyJeff OlsenhollerdownloadDownload free PDFDigital elevation models in geomorphologyBartłomiej SzypuładownloadDownload free PDFHierarchical geomorphological mapping in mountainous areasHarry SeijmonsbergendownloadDownload free PDFDetecting Mountain Peaks and Delineating Their Shapes Using Digital Elevation Models, Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems Using …Tomaž PodobnikardownloadDownload free PDFThe Semiautomated Identification of the Planation Surfaces on the Basis of the Digital Terrain Model. Case Study: The Mehedinti Mountains (Southern Carpathians)Marcel Török-OancedownloadDownload free PDFArticle Detecting Mountain Peaks and Delineating Their Shapes Using Digital Elevation Models, Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems Using Autometric Methodological ProceduresTomaž PodobnikardownloadDownload free PDFThe geotouristic map - between theory and practical use. Case study - the central sector of the Bucegi mountains (Romania)Robert DobredownloadDownload free PDFA topographical approach to survey environmental adaptation assessment on a mountain trail as a pathway to local prosperityAnastasia StergiadoudownloadDownload free PDFQuantifying short-term surface changes on recreational trails: The use of topographic surveys and 'Digital Elevation Models of Differences'(DODs)Marek EwertowskidownloadDownload free PDFIT applications for sharing geoheritage information: the example of the geological and geomorphological trail in the Monviso massif (NW Italy)Pietro MoscadownloadDownload free PDF2013 Loibl & Lehmkuhl - High resolution geomorphological map of a low mountain range near Aachen, GermanyDavid LoibldownloadDownload free PDFApplication of GIS for morphotectonic analysis (on the example of Kremenets Mountains)Olena TomeniukdownloadDownload free PDFTerrain Susceptibility to Geomorphological Processes and their Impact on Tourism Infrastructure in the Sâmbata Valley (Făgăraş Mountains, Romania)Alexandru NedeleadownloadDownload free PDFarrow_forward_iosView more paperskeyboard_arrow_down

Abstract

One of the current attributions of mountain geomorphology is to provide information for tourism purposes, such as the spatial analysis of hiking trails. Therefore, geomorphic tools are indispensable for terrain analyses. Elevation profile is one of the most adequate tools for assessing the morphometric patterns of the hiking trails. In this study we tested several applications in order to manage raw data, create profile graphs and obtain the morphometric parameters of five hiking trails in the Căpățânii Mountains (South Carpathians, Romania). Different data complexity was explored: distance, elevation, cumulative gain or loss, slope etc. Furthermore, a comparative morphometric analysis was performed in order to emphasize the multiple possibilities provided by the elevation profile. Results show that GPS Visualizer, Geocontext and in some manner Google Earth are the most adequate applications that provide high-quality elevation profiles and detailed data, with multiple additional fun...

... Read more

Key takeaways

sparkles

AI generated

  1. Elevation profiles are essential for morphometric analysis and planning hiking trails.
  2. GPS Visualizer and Geocontext offer the most comprehensive applications for elevation profile analysis.
  3. The study analyzes five hiking trails in the Căpățânii Mountains, covering an area of 766.14 km.
  4. Parameter comparisons include distance, elevation, cumulative gain, and slope for route selection.
  5. Digital elevation profiles enhance public access to detailed hiking trail information, aiding in route planning.

FAQ's

sparkles

AI generated

What is the role of digital elevation profiles in hiking trail analysis?add

The paper reveals that digital elevation profiles provide crucial data for morphometric analyses, influencing route planning for recreation and scientific purposes. They assist in classifying trails into difficulty levels based on parameters such as elevation and slope.

How do different software applications compare in generating elevation profiles?add

The study demonstrates that GPS Visualizer and Geocontext-Profiler offer complex analytical capabilities, integrating multiple parameters for refined trail evaluations. Conversely, ArcMap provides simpler results, but is often sufficient for basic profile requirements.

What specific morphometric parameters are crucial for hiking trail assessment?add

Key parameters include cumulative gain, slope, elevation, and elapsed time, essential for determining the difficulty level of trails. The comparative analysis in the study illustrates how these metrics vary across different trails in the Căpățânii Mountains.

How can elevation profiles enhance mountain tourism education?add

The findings indicate that detailed elevation profiles can inform mountain guides and enhance public understanding of trail difficulties and accessibility. Providing this information contributes to better route planning, promoting quality mountain tourism experiences.

What challenges exist in establishing trail difficulty levels using elevation profiles?add

The paper notes that elevation profiles alone are insufficient for accurate difficulty assessments; complementary geomorphological data—like hill slope stability—are necessary. An example illustrates that a low-slope trail could cross steep terrains, complicating difficulty ratings.

Figures

arrow_back_ios
Table 5. Comparative parameters of the T4 and T5 trails.
Table 5. Comparative parameters of the T4 and T5 trails.
arrow_forward_ioscloseTitleAbstractKey TakeawaysFAQsFiguresIntroductionData, Software and MethodsDataMethodsConclusionsReferences1 of 18format_list_bulletedOutlinebookmark_borderSave shareShare

Download research papers for free!

Join us!arrow_forward

Related papers

New approaches in mountain maps

Dusan PetrovicdownloadDownload free PDF

The Validity of Open-Source Elevations for Different Topographic Map Scales and Geomatics Applications

Gomaa_2 DawoddownloadDownload free PDF

Morphometric analysis and tectonic interpretation of digital terrain data: a case study

Győző JordándownloadDownload free PDF

Geomorphological Characteristics of the Italian Side of Canin Mts (Julian Alps) using Digital Terrain Analysis and Field Observations

László MaridownloadDownload free PDF

A Rational Characterization and Visualization of Topographic Relief Into Mountainous, Semi Mountainous and Plane Terrain

Marinos KavourasdownloadDownload free PDF

Orometry-based terrain analysis and synthesis

Axel ParisdownloadDownload free PDF

References (49)

  • Allen, T. R., 2008. Digital Terrain Visualization and Virtual Globes for Teaching Geomorphology. Journal of Geography, 106(6), 253-266. doi: 10.1080/00221340701863766.
  • Ardelean, M., 2010. Munții Piule-Iorgovanu. Studiu de geomorfologie. Teză de doctorat. Universitatea "Babeș-Bolyai", Cluj-Napoca.
  • Avouac, J. P., Dobremez, J. F., Bourjot, L., 1996. Palaeoclimatic interpretation of a topographic profile across middle Holocene regressive shorelines of Longmu Co (Western Tibet). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 120 (1-2), 93-104. doi: 10.1016/0031-0182(96)88700-1.
  • Badea, L., Buza, M., Sandu, M., Rusenescu, C., 1987. Carpații Meridionali: Munții Parâng-Cindrel. In D. Oancea, V. Velcea (Eds.), Geografia României: Carpații Românești și Depresiunea Transilvaniei (Vol. 3, pp. 285-305). Editura Academiei R.S.R., Bucharest.
  • Badea, L., Niculescu, G., Roată, S., Călin, D., Ploaie, G., 1998. Masivul Vânturarița- Buila. Caracterizare geomorfologică. Buletinul Geografic, 2, 3-36.
  • Baias, S., Blaga, L., Dehoorne, O., Grama, V., Gozner, M., Herman, G., Ilieş, D.C., Ilieş, A., Josan, I., Morar, C., 2010. Băile Felix-Băile 1 Mai-Betfia (judeţul Bihor), Harta geoturistică. Editura Universității din Oradea, Oradea.
  • Bishop, M., Shroder, J. F., 2004. Geographic Information Science and Mountain Geomorphology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York.
  • Bull, W. B., 2007. Tectonic Geomorphology of Mountains: A New Approach to Paleoseismology. Wiley, Malden Oxford Carlton.
  • Burbank, D. W., Anderson, R. S., 2012. Tectonic Geomorphology. Wiley, Oxford Chichester Hoboken.
  • Cartotrekking, 2001. Manuale di Trekking. Retrieved from http://www.cartotrekking.com/files/-E-book.-.ITA-.MANUALE.DI.TREKKING.pdf
  • Castaldini, D., 2008. Maps and Multimedia Tool for the Environmental Tourism in Protected Areas of the Modena Apennines (Northern Italy). GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 1 (1), 13-33.
  • Castaldini, D., Valdati, J., Ilieș, D.C., 2009. Geomorphological and Geotourist Maps of the Upper Tagliole Valley (Modena Apennines, Northern Italy), Carta geomorfologica e geo-turistica dell'alta Valle delle Tagliole (Appennino Modenese, Italia settentrionale) Mem. Descr. Carta Geol. d'It. LXXXVII (pp. 29-38).
  • Chiou, C. R., Tsai, W. L., Leung, Y. F., 2010. A GIS-dynamic segmentation approach to planning travel routes on forest trail networks in Central Taiwan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97, 221-228.
  • Clius, M., Teleucă, A., David, O., Moroșanu, A., 2012. Trail accessibility as a tool for sustainable management of protected areas: Case study Ceahlău National Park, Romania. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 14, 267-278. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2012.03.026.
  • Comănescu, L., Dobre, R., 2012. Harta geoturistică a Munţilor Bucegi (sectorul Babele-Caraiman). Ars Docendi, București.
  • Comănescu, L., Nedelea, A., Dobre, R., 2013. The Geotouristic Map -between theory and practical use. Case study -the central sector of the Bucegi Mountains (Romania). GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 1 (11), 16-22.
  • DNR, 2014. DNR Garmin Extension (Version 5.4). Minnesota, USA: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Retrieved from http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/mis/gis/tools/arcview/extensions/DNRGarmin/DN RGarmin.html.
  • ESRI, 2014. ArcGIS Resources: Creating a profile graph from 3D line features Retrieved Sept. 9, 2014, from http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/ 10.2/index.html#//00q80000006z000000.
  • Evans, I., 2012. Geomorphometry and landform mapping: What is a landform? Geomorphology, 137, 94-106. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.09.029.
  • Garmin, 2010. Map Source (Version 6.16.3). Olathe, KS (USA): Garmin International Ltd. Retrieved from http://www.garmin.com/garmin/cms/lang/en/us/maps/tripplanningsoftware/ mapsource.
  • Giles, P. T., 1998. Geomorphological signatures: classification of aggregated slope unit objects from digital elevation and remote sensing data. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 23 (7), 581-594. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096- 9837(199807)23:7<581::AID-ESP863>3.0.CO;2-S.
  • Google, 2014. Google Earth. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/earth/.
  • Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 77 /2003 privind instituirea unor măsuri pentru prevenirea accidentelor montane şi organizarea activităţii de salvare în munţi, Anexa B. Monitorul Oficial nr. 91/13.02.2003, București.
  • Hergarten, S., Robl, J., Stüwe, K., 2014. Extracting topographic swath București profiles across curved geomorphic features. Earth Surf. Dynam., 2, 97-104. doi: 10.5194/esurf-2-97-2014.
  • Hubbard, B., Glasser, N. F., 2005. Field Techniques in Glaciology and Glacial Geomorphology. Wiley, Chichester.
  • Huggett, R., Cheesman, J. (Eds.), 2002. Topography and the Environment. Pearson Education Ltd., Edinburgh Harlow Essex.
  • Ilieş, D. C., Ilieş, A., Herman, G., Baias, Ş., Morar, C., 2011. Geoturist map of the Băile Felix-Băile 1 Mai-Betfia area (Bihor county, Romania). GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 2 (8), 219-226.
  • Kogayon, 2011. Parcul Național Buila-Vânturarița. Ghid turistic. Asociația Kogayon, București.
  • Kwan, M. P., Murray, A. T., O'Kelly, M. E., Tiefelsdorf, E., 2003. Recent advances in accessibility researces: Representation, methodology and applications. Geographical Systems, 5, 129-138.
  • Manifold, 2014. Manifold® Surface Tools. Retrieved 9-09-2014, from http://www.manifold.net/info/surface_tools.shtml.
  • Lupu, M., Popescu, B., Szasz, L., Hann, H., Gheucă, I., Dumitrică, P., Popescu, G., 1978. Geological map 126a -Vânturarița (Olănești) sheet (L-35-97-A), scale 1:50,000.
  • Mihai, M., Șandric, I., 2004. Relief accessibility mapping and analysis in Middle Mountain areas. A case study in the Postăvaru-Piatra Mare-Clăbucetele Predealului Mts. (Curvature Carpathians). Studia Geomorphologica Carpatho-Balcanica, 38, 113-121.
  • Mutihac, V., Stratulat, M. I., Fechet, R. M., 2004. Geologia României. Editura Didactică și Pedagogică, Bucharest.
  • Onaca, A., 2005. Considerations on the main potential morpho-dynamic processes in Căpăţânii Mountians. Analele Universităţii de Vest din Timişoara -Geografie, 15, 31-46.
  • Oncescu, N. 1965. Geologia României. Technical Publishing House, Bucharest.
  • Pawlowicz, L., 2007. Elevation profile in Google Maps. Retrieved from http://freegeographytools.com/2007/elevation-profile-in-google-maps.
  • Pietruszka, K., 2010. Geocontext Profiler. Dabrowa Gornicza, Poland. Retrieved from http://www.geocontext.org/publ/2010/04/profiler/en/.
  • Popescu, N., 1968. Munții Căpățânii și Coziei. Editura C.N.E.F.S., București.
  • Posea, G., 2005. Geomorfologia României: reliefuri, tipuri, geneză, evoluție, regionare (2 ed.). Editura Fundației "România de Mâine", București.
  • Posea, G., Popescu, N., Ielenicz, M., 1974. Relieful României, Editura Științifică. Bucharest.
  • Schneider, A., 2013. GPS Visualizer. Retrieved from http://www.gpsvisualizer.com /profile_input.
  • Smith, M. J., Paron, P., Griffiths, J. S. (Eds.), 2011. Geomorphological Mapping: Methods and Applications (Vol. 15). Elsevier, Oxford Amsterdam.
  • Tîrlă, L., 2012. Bazinul hidrografic Olănești -Studiu de geomorfologie. Editura Universității din București, Bucharest.
  • Tomczyk, A. M., Ewertowski, M., 2013. Quantifying short-term surface changes on recreational trails: The use of topographic surveys and 'digital elevation models of differences' (DODs). Geomorphology, 183, 58-72. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.08.005.
  • TopoGrafix, 2014a. EasyGPS (Version 5.18). TopoGrafix, Stow, MA. Retrieved from http://www.easygps.com.
  • TopoGrafix, 2014b. ExpertGPS (Version 5.2). TopoGrafix, Stow, MA. Retrieved from http://www.expertgps.com/default.asp.
  • Tóth, G., & Dávid, L., 2010. Tourism and accessibility: An integrated approach. Applied Geography, 30, 666-677.
  • Velcea, V., Roșu, A., 1982. Geografia Carpaților și a Subcarpaților Românești. Editura Didactică și Pedagogică, București.
  • Whipple, K., Wobus, C., Crosby, B., Kirby, E., Sheehan, D., 2007. New Tools for Quantitative Geomorphology: Extraction and Interpretation of Stream Profiles from Digital Topographic Data. Paper presented at the GSA Annual Meeting. Boulder, CO.
    • View morearrow_downwardAcademia
    • Explore
    • Papers
    • Topics
    • Features
    • Mentions
    • Analytics
    • PDF Packages
    • Advanced Search
    • Search Alerts
    • Journals
    • Academia.edu Journals
    • My submissions
    • Reviewer Hub
    • Why publish with us
    • Testimonials
    • Company
    • About
    • Careers
    • Press
    • Help Center
    • Terms
    • Privacy
    • Copyright
    • Content Policy
    Academia580 California St., Suite 400San Francisco, CA, 94104© 2026 Academia. All rights reserved

    Từ khóa » Hg77/2003