A Proper Affalterbach Hot Rod - Mercedes-AMG C63 S Vs Rivals - Evo

Skip to ContentSkip to FooterFind a car reviewMakeMake
  • Abarth
  • Acura
  • Alfa Romeo
  • Alpina
  • Alpine
  • Ariel
  • Aston Martin
  • Audi
  • BAC
  • Bentley
  • BMW
  • Bugatti
  • BYD
  • Cadillac
  • Caparo
  • Caterham
  • Chevrolet
  • Chrysler
  • Citroen
  • Corvette
  • Cupra
  • Dacia
  • Dodge
  • Donkervoort
  • DS
  • Elemental
  • Ferrari
  • Fiat
  • Fisker
  • Ford
  • Genesis
  • Ginetta
  • GMA
  • Hennessey
  • Honda
  • Hyundai
  • Infiniti
  • Jaguar
  • Jeep
  • Kia
  • Koenigsegg
  • KTM
  • Lamborghini
  • Lancia
  • Land Rover
  • Lexus
  • Lotus
  • Lucid
  • Maserati
  • Mazda
  • McLaren
  • McMurtry
  • Mercedes
  • MG
  • MINI
  • Mitsubishi
  • Morgan
  • Nissan
  • Pagani
  • Peugeot
  • Piech
  • Pininfarina
  • Polestar
  • Porsche
  • Praga
  • Radical
  • Renault
  • Rimac
  • Rolls-Royce
  • Saab
  • SEAT
  • Singer
  • Skoda
  • Smart
  • Subaru
  • Suzuki
  • Tesla
  • Toyota
  • TVR
  • Vauxhall
  • Volkswagen
  • Volvo
  • Zenos
ModelModelSkip advertAdvertisementIn-depth reviews
  • Home
  • Mercedes
  • C-Class
  • C63
  • Mercedes-AMG C63 (W205, 2015 - 2023) review – a proper Affalterbach hot rod
Mercedes-AMG C63 (W205, 2015 - 2023) – rivals

We put the W205 C63 up against the Audi RS5 and BMW M4 Comp Pack

by: Henry Catchpole20 Feb 2025
  • 1Mercedes-AMG C63 (W205, 2015 - 2023) review – a proper Affalterbach hot rod
  • 2Performance and 0-60 time
  • 3Engine and gearbox
  • 4Ride and handling
  • 5MPG and running costs
  • 6Interior and tech
  • 7Design
  • 8Mercedes-AMG C63 S v rivals - currently reading
Mercedes AMG C63 W20521Evo ratingRRPfrom £60,460
  • Fast and sounds great
  • Ride is firm and engine isn't as characterful as the W204 C63's

The Mercedes-AMG C63 S went head-to-head with the Audi RS5 and BMW M4 Competition Pack in a Supertest in evo 240. Read the online version of that Supertest here and subscribe to evo for all the evo Supertests in full.

Here's what we thought of the Mercedes-AMG C63 S against its rivals...

Advertisement - Article continues below

In the company of BMW’s M4 and Audi’s new RS5 that both use blown 3.0-litre six-cylinder engines  Mercedes-AMG’s C63 S bruiser seems a little old hat with its V8, but that power plant is certainly the most aurally stimulating of the trio. It produces the most power but is comfortably the heaviest and with an interior that’s showing its age and a £7500 price premium it might struggle against the M4 and RS5.

The AMG is undoubtedly rapid but its suspension struggles to keep the power harnessed and it can serve up heart-in-the-mouth oversteer moments if you turn the traction control off.

> Mercedes-AMG C63 S E Performance 2024 review – Affalterbach's BMW M3 rival misses the mark

Weights, dimensions and performance data 

With more power than both the M4 and the RS5 one might have expected the AMG to be the quickest in a straight line but despite the fruity V8 bellowing its approval the Merc’s 1847kg weight (50kg heavier than the RS5 and 200kg more than the M4) counts against it and it’s only a tenth quicker to 60mph than the M4 and 0.7sec behind the RS5. The AMG’s hard to get off the line cleanly too, like the M4 it scrabbles for traction.

Advertisement - Article continues belowSkip advertAdvertisementAdvertisement - Article continues below

More reviews

In-depth reviews
  • Mercedes-AMG C63 (W205, 2015 - 2023) review – a proper Affalterbach hot rod
  • Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG (W204, 2008-2014): review, specs and buying guide
  • Mercedes C-class review – BMW 3-series rival strikes back
Reviews
  • Used Mercedes-AMG C63 coupe (W205, 2015 - 2023) review: the final V8 C-class
  • Mercedes-AMG C63 S E Performance 2024 review – Affalterbach's BMW M3 rival misses the mark
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class C300d Estate 2022 review
  • Mercedes-AMG C43 2022 review – can AMG really rival the M340i with just four cylinders?

Once it’s hooked up though the AMG’s V8 really delivers the goods and in the 0-150mph test it equals the lissom M4 Comp Pack for pace.

Lap time and track driving 

As any track regular will tell you the biggest enemy on track is weight so it shouldn’t come as a surprise that the AMG was the slowest around Bedford Autodrome’s West Circuit. In the final analysis the C63 S was 1.6sec slower than the RS5 and 2.2 adrift of the M4.

The AMG’s main issue was putting the power down – with the traction control in its half way setting the system was reining the car in too much, with it off it’s hard to extract the maximum from the car without lurid oversteer rearing its ugly head in the quicker corners. You have to be quick to catch it, too.

Supertest data and specs table

 

Mercedes-AMG C63 S

 

BMW M4 Comp Pack

 

Audi RS5

 

Engine

 

V8, 3982cc, twin-turbo

 

Straight-six, 2979cc, twin-turbo

 

V6, 2894cc, twin-turbo

 

Power

 

503bhp @ 5500-6250rpm

 

444bhp @ 7000rpm

 

444bhp @ 5700-6700rpm

 

Torque

 

516lb ft @ 1750-4500rpm

 

406lb ft @ 1850-5000rpm

 

442 lb ft @ 1900-5000rpm

 

Transmission

 

Seven-speed MCT auto, rear-wheel drive, electronically controlled LSD

 

Seven-speed dual-clutch (option), rear-wheel drive, LSD

 

Eight-speed auto, four-wheel drive, electronically controlled rear LSD

 

Tyres

 

255/40 R19 front, 285/35 R20 rear, Michelin Pilot Super Sport

 

255/35 R19 front, 275/35 R19 rear, Michelin Pilot Super Sport

 

275/30 R20 front, 275/30 R20 rear, Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2

 

Height/width

 

1400mm/1877mm

 

1392mm/1870mm

 

1360mm/1861mm

 

Weight

 

1847kg as tested (1725kg claimed)

 

1645kg as tested (1585kg claimed)

 

1799kg as tested (1655kg claimed)

 

Power-to-weight

 

277bhp/ton using test-car weight (296bhp/ton claimed)

 

274bhp/ton using test-car weight (285bhp/ton claimed)

 

251bhp/ton using test-car weight, (273bhp/ton claimed)

 

0-60mph

 

4.3sec as tested (3.9 to 62 claimed)

 

4.4sec as tested (4.0 to 62 claimed)

 

3.6sec as tested (3.9 to 62 claimed)

 

Top speed

 

155mph (limited)

 

155mph (limited)

 

174mph (optional raised limiter)

 

evo mpg

 

16.5 (average over duration of test)

 

21.2 (average over duration of test)

 

19.6 (average over duration of test)

 

Basic price

 

£70,385

 

£62,080

 

£62,900

 

PCP monthly price

 

£902 (36 months, £8000 deposit, 10,000 miles per annum limit)

 

£861 (36 months, £8000 deposit, 10,000 miles per annum limit)

 

£833 (36 months, £8000 deposit, 10,000 miles per annum limit)

 

Share this on TwitterShare this on FacebookEmailSkip advertAdvertisementGo Back toDesign
In this review
  • 1Mercedes-AMG C63 (W205, 2015 - 2023) review – a proper Affalterbach hot rod
  • 2Performance and 0-60 time
  • 3Engine and gearbox
  • 4Ride and handling
  • 5MPG and running costs
  • 6Interior and tech
  • 7Design
  • 8Mercedes-AMG C63 S v rivals - currently reading
Skip advertAdvertisement

Most Popular

Maserati GT2 Stradale review – can Modena best the Porsche 911 GT3 RS?Maserati GT2 StradaleReviews

Maserati GT2 Stradale review – can Modena best the Porsche 911 GT3 RS?

Maserati’s GT2 Stradale might look like a race track refugee but this supercar is at its best on the road20 Jan 2026The anatomy of a top-class Dakar-winning racer: Dacia SandriderDacia SandriderFeatures

The anatomy of a top-class Dakar-winning racer: Dacia Sandrider

The Dacia Sandrider is a £1million, Prodrive-built Rally-Raid special that now has an outright Dakar Rally win under its belt. We dissect it19 Jan 2026Caterham Project V is delayed, but a running prototype is finally hereCaterham Project V News

Caterham Project V is delayed, but a running prototype is finally here

Caterham’s new age electric coupe is now officially behind schedule, but the first running prototype has now been unveiled at the Tokyo Auto Salon13 Jan 2026Skip to HeaderSkip to Content

Từ khóa » C63 Vs C43 0-60