A Prospective Evaluation Of Bass, Bionator And Twin Block ... - PubMed

Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. Skip to main page content

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation Search: Search Advanced Clipboard Save Email Send to

• Clipboard
• My Bibliography
• Collections
• Citation manager

Display options Display options Format Abstract PubMed PMID

Save citation to file

Format: Summary (text) PubMed PMID Abstract (text) CSV Create file Cancel

Email citation

Email address has not been verified. Go to My NCBI account settings to confirm your email and then refresh this page. To: Subject: Body: Format: Summary Summary (text) Abstract Abstract (text) MeSH and other data Send email Cancel

Add to Collections

• Create a new collection
• Add to an existing collection

Name your collection: Name must be less than 100 characters Choose a collection: Unable to load your collection due to an error Please try again Add Cancel

Add to My Bibliography

• My Bibliography

Unable to load your delegates due to an error Please try again Add Cancel

Your saved search

Name of saved search: Search terms: Test search terms Would you like email updates of new search results? Saved Search Alert Radio Buttons

• Yes
• No

Email: (change) Frequency: Monthly Weekly Daily Which day? The first Sunday The first Monday The first Tuesday The first Wednesday The first Thursday The first Friday The first Saturday The first day The first weekday Which day? Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Report format: Summary Summary (text) Abstract Abstract (text) PubMed Send at most: 1 item 5 items 10 items 20 items 50 items 100 items 200 items Send even when there aren't any new results Optional text in email: Save Cancel

Create a file for external citation management software

Create file Cancel

Your RSS Feed

Name of RSS Feed: Number of items displayed: 5 10 15 20 50 100 Create RSS Cancel RSS Link Copy

Full text links

Silverchair Information Systems Full text links

Actions

CiteCollectionsAdd to Collections

• Create a new collection
• Add to an existing collection

Name your collection: Name must be less than 100 characters Choose a collection: Unable to load your collection due to an errorPlease try again Add Cancel PermalinkPermalinkCopyDisplay options Display options Format AbstractPubMedPMID

Page navigation

• Title & authors
• Abstract
• Publication types
• MeSH terms
• LinkOut - more resources

Title & authors Abstract Publication types MeSH terms LinkOut - more resources Full text links CiteDisplay options Display options Format AbstractPubMedPMID

Abstract

A prospective clinical study with a random allocation of 47 adolescent patients to three different functional appliance groups was established and compared with an untreated control group over a 9-month period. Treatment was undertaken with either a Bionator, Twin Block, or Bass appliance. Pre- and post-treatment cephalograms were used to quantify the skeletal and dentoalveolar changes produced by the appliances and compared with those observed in the control group as a result of growth. Both the Bionator and Twin Block appliances demonstrated a statistically significant increase in mandibular length (3.9 +/- 2.7 mm; 3.7 +/- 2.1 mm, respectively) compared with the control group (P < 0.05), with an anterior movement of pogonion and point B. Highly statistically significant increases (P < 0.01) were seen in lower face heights for all the appliance groups compared with the control group. The Twin Block group showed the least forward movement of point A due to a change in the inclination of the maxillary plane. The Bionator and Twin Block groups showed statistically significant reductions in the inclination of the upper incisors to the maxillary plane (P < 0.05). The Bass group showed minimal change in the inclination of the lower labial segment to the mandibular plane. The Bionator group demonstrated the greatest proclination of the lower labial segment (4.0 +/- 3.6 degrees). Clinically important changes were measured in all the appliance groups when compared with the control group. Differences were also identified between the functional appliance groups. The Twin Block appliance and, to a lesser extent, the Bionator appeared the most effective in producing sagittal and vertical changes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

• Clinical Trial Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Comparative Study Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Randomized Controlled Trial Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search

MeSH terms

• Activator Appliances* Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Adolescent Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Analysis of Variance Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Case-Control Studies Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Cephalometry Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Child Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Chin / pathology Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Evaluation Studies as Topic Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Female Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Humans Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Lip / pathology Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Male Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Malocclusion, Angle Class II / pathology Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Malocclusion, Angle Class II / physiopathology Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Malocclusion, Angle Class II / therapy* Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Mandible / pathology Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Maxilla / pathology Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Maxillofacial Development Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Orthodontic Appliance Design Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Prospective Studies Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Reproducibility of Results Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Retrognathia / pathology Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Retrognathia / physiopathology Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Retrognathia / therapy Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search
• Vertical Dimension Actions
  • Search in PubMed
  • Search in MeSH
  • Add to Search

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • Silverchair Information Systems

• Medical

  • ClinicalTrials.gov

Full text links [x] Silverchair Information Systems [x] Cite Copy Download .nbib .nbib Format: AMA APA MLA NLM Send To

• Clipboard
• Email
• Save
• My Bibliography
• Collections
• Citation Manager

[x]

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.