GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor Graphics card Language ⏷ English French
EN ⏷
FR ☰
- Home page
- ⏵ Processor
- ⏵ Comparison
AMD FX-6300 vs Intel Pentium G2030
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD FX-6300 on one side and the Intel Pentium G2030 on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 6 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.8GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 2 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | AMD FX-6300 | Intel Pentium G2030 |
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop |
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| Microarchitecture | Piledriver | Ivy Bridge |
| Core name | Vishera | Ivy Bridge |
| Family | FX-6000 | Pentium 2000 |
| Part number(s), S-Spec | FD6300WMW6KHK, FD6300WMHKBOX, FX-6300 Black Edition | BX80637G2030, BXC80637G2030, CM8063701450000, QE0G, SR163 |
| Release date | Q4 2012 | Q2 2013 |
| Lithography | 32 nm SOI | 22 nm |
| Transistors | 1,200,000,000 | 634,000,000 |
| Cores | 6 | 2 |
| Threads | 6 | 2 |
| Base frequency | 3.5 GHz | 3.0 GHz |
| Turbo frequency | 3.8 GHz | - |
| High performance cores | 6 Cores 6 Threads @ 3.5 / 3.8 GHz | 2 Cores 2 Threads @ 3.0 GHz |
| Cache memory | 8 MB | 3 MB |
| Max memory capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory types | DDR3-1866 | DDR3 1333/1600 |
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max memory bandwidth | 29.9 GB/s | 21 GB/s |
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| TDP | 95 W | 55 W |
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply  | 600W ATX Power Supply | |
| GPU integrated graphics | None | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) |
| GPU execution units | - | 6 |
| GPU shading units | - | 48 |
| GPU base clock | - | 650 MHz |
| GPU boost clock | - | 1050 MHz |
| GPU FP32 floating point | - | 100.8 GFLOPS |
| Socket | AM3+ | LGA1155 |
| Compatible motherboard | Socket AM3+ Motherboard | Socket LGA 1155 Motherboard |
| Maximum temperature | 70.5°C | 105°C |
| Crypto engine | AES Instructions | - |
| Security | Enhanced Virus Protection | Execute Disable Bit |
| CPU-Z single thread | 223 | 288 |
| CPU-Z multi thread | 1,022 | 571 |
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 96 | 107 |
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 366 | 201 |
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 182 | 238 |
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 837 | 466 |
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 555 | 610 |
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 2,549 | 1,215 |
| PassMark single thread | 1,471 | 1,604 |
| PassMark CPU Mark | 4,124 | 1,693 |
| (Windows)Geekbench 4 single core | 2,518 | 2,613 |
| (Windows)Geekbench 4 multi-core | 8,133 | 4,333 |
| (Windows)Geekbench 5 single core | 655 | 570 |
| (Windows)Geekbench 5 multi-core | 2,333 | 1,014 |
| (Windows)Geekbench 6 single core | 446 | 513 |
| (Windows)Geekbench 6 multi-core | 1,478 | 874 |
| (SGEMM)GFLOPS Performance | 67.2 GFLOPS | 32.5 GFLOPS |
| (Multi-core / watt performance)Performance / watt ratio | 86 pts / W | 79 pts / W |
| Amazon |  | |
| eBay |  | |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. Suggested PSU: We assume that we have an ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.The processor AMD FX-6300 has more cores, the maximum frequency of AMD FX-6300 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Pentium G2030 is less. The Intel Pentium G2030 was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.
| CPU-Z - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score |
| AMD FX-6300 | 223 1,022 |
| Intel Pentium G2030 | 288 571 |
In single core, the difference is -23%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 79%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score |
| AMD FX-6300 | 96 366 |
| Intel Pentium G2030 | 107 201 |
In single core, the difference is -10%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 82%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score |
| AMD FX-6300 | 182 837 |
| Intel Pentium G2030 | 238 466 |
In single core, the difference is -24%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 80%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| Cinebench R23 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score |
| AMD FX-6300 | 555 2,549 |
| Intel Pentium G2030 | 610 1,215 |
In single core, the difference is -9%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 110%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread |
| AMD FX-6300 | 1,471 4,124 |
| Intel Pentium G2030 | 1,604 1,693 |
In single core, the difference is -8%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 144%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity. With Windows:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows |
| AMD FX-6300 | 2,518 8,133 |
| Intel Pentium G2030 | 2,613 4,333 |
In single core, the difference is -4%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 88%.With Linux:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Linux |
| AMD FX-6300 | 2,676 8,944 |
| Intel Pentium G2030 | 2,860 4,358 |
In single core, the difference is -6%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 105%.With Mac OS X:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Mac OS X |
| AMD FX-6300 | 2,266 8,231 |
| Intel Pentium G2030 | 2,736 4,648 |
In single core, the difference is -17%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 77%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software. With Windows:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows |
| AMD FX-6300 | 655 2,333 |
| Intel Pentium G2030 | 570 1,014 |
In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 130%.With Linux:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Linux |
| AMD FX-6300 | 659 2,470 |
| Intel Pentium G2030 | 614 1,086 |
In single core, the difference is 7%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 127%.With macOS:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - macOS |
| AMD FX-6300 | 593 2,250 |
| Intel Pentium G2030 | 582 1,027 |
In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 119%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality. With Windows:
| Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows |
| AMD FX-6300 | 446 1,478 |
| Intel Pentium G2030 | 513 874 |
In single core, the difference is -13%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 69%.With Linux:
| Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Linux |
| AMD FX-6300 | 465 1,458 |
| Intel Pentium G2030 | 538 919 |
In single core, the difference is -14%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 59%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Geekbench 6 is a benchmarking platform that is capable of evaluating the performance of a device across multiple operating systems. The software evaluates processor power, with its ability to support different tasks, such as file compression, browsing; GPU computing capabilities, with image editing, video editing, gaming skills, machine learning workloads.
Equivalence:
AMD FX-6300 Intel EquivalentIntel Pentium G2030 AMD Equivalent GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact
Disclaimer: When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad. Information: We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.
