AMD FX-8150 Review - Bit

Có thể bạn quan tâm

Dark Theme Light Theme bit-tech

Home
Tech
Modding
Gaming
Forum

All
News
Reviews
Features
Previews
Guides
Blogs
Competitions
Press Releases

All
Audio
Cases
Cooling
CPUs
Graphics
Laptops
Memory
Mobile
Monitors
Motherboards
Networking
PCs
Peripherals
PSUs
Software
Storage

AMD FX-8150 Review

Written by Clive Webster

October 12, 2011 | 05:03

Tags: #bulldozer #comparative #cpu #fx #overclock #overclocking #performance #processor #socket-am3

Companies: #amd #intel

1 - AMD FX-8150 Review 2 - AMD Bulldozer - What’s a Module, what's a Core? 3 - AMD Bulldozer - More Performance Per Core 4 - AMD Bulldozer Front-end and Memory 5 - AMD FX-8150 Test Setup 6 - AMD FX-8150 Cinebench and WPrime Performance 7 - AMD FX-8150 Image Editing and Video Encoding 8 - AMD FX-8150 Multi-tasking and Overall Performance 9 - AMD FX-8150 Gaming Performance 10 - AMD FX-8150 Power Consumption 11 - AMD FX-8150 Stock-speed Performance 12 - AMD FX-8150 Overclocking and Performance 13 - AMD FX-8150 Conclusion Next

AMD FX-8150 Review

Manufacturer: AMD UK price (as reviewed): £205 inc VAT US price (as reviewed): $245 (ex tax) MSRP

The wait is finally over

There’s been plenty of confusion surrounding Bulldozer since we first heard about the new CPU microarchitecture back in July 2007 – we were told it was a modular CPU design that would incorporate a GPU. And that there would be only two flavours of Fusion processor – one based around Bulldozer for high-performance CPUs and another Bobcat design for low-power systems. Most of that has turned out to be true, though there’s no graphics unit in a Bulldozer CPU and we have the Llano processor design to bridge the gap between Bobcat and Bulldozer. More confusing was whether Bulldozer was ever meant for home use. In a briefing in August 2010 we were told explicitly that, ‘[Bulldozer] delivers 33 per cent more cores and an estimated 50 per cent increase in throughput in the same power envelope as Magny-Cours’, AMD’s current top-end Opteron design. There was also talk that Bulldozer processors should drop into G34 motherboards with a BIOS update, and that a new Llano processor was intended for desktop use. Soon after, Bulldozer was confirmed as a desktop as well as server and workstation CPU design; after a delay of several months, it’s finally on sale. Now that we have a Bulldozer CPU to test (plus the attendant reviewers’ guides, interviews and all the rest), we can clear away all the myths and rumours that have surrounded it. The FX-8150 is the first processor we’ve seen that’s based on the Bulldozer CPU architecture, and it’s the daddy of the new lineup with a nominal frequency of 3.6GHz (boosting up to 4.2GHz). The FX-8150 is joined by three other FX-branded processors at launch, with another three models due to arrive at some point after today. Here’s a table to summarise the models we know about, before we go on and talk about them some more.

AMD FX-series processors
Name	Nominal Frequency	Turbo Core Frequency	Max Turbo Frequency	TDP	Cores	Level 2 cache	Level 3 cache	Northbridge Frequency	SRP
FX-8150*	3.6GHz	3.9GHz	4.2GHz	125W	8	8MB	8MB	2.2GHz	$245
FX-8120*	3.1GHz	3.4GHz	4GHz	95W and 125W	8	8MB	8MB	2.2GHz	$205
FX-8100	2.8GHz	3.1GHz	3.7GHz	95W	8	8MB	8MB	2GHz	Unknown
FX-6100*	3.3GHz	3.6GHz	3.9GHz	95W	6	6MB	8MB	2GHz	$165
FX-4170	4.2GHz	None	4.3GHz	125W	4	4MB	8MB	2.2GHz	Unknown
FX-B4150	3.8GHz	3.9GHz	4GHz	95W	4	4MB	8MB	2.2GHz	Unknown
FX-4100*	3.6GHz	3.7GHz	3.8GHz	95W	4	4MB	8MB	2GHz	$115
*Launch models

Before delving into the specs, it’s worth noting that all FX processors are fully unlocked, meaning that there’s no need for the Black Edition branding we’ve become used to. None of the FX range has an integrated graphics unit, which in understandable on one hand, as AMD has already released two new processor designs this year with integrated graphics, while the much larger Intel has only given us one. To deliver three radically new APUs in one year would be astonishing. Even more so when you look into the Bulldozer CPU design, as there’s plenty of radical new design work that has gone into it. As with the A-series and and E-series APUs, there’s no branding other than the letter – AMD has been planning to kill as many of its brand names as possible (including ATI) for a while, and the company has done just that with this launch. As far as real brands go, AMD now only has Vision, Radeon, FirePro and Opteron. AMD is calling the FX-8150 the world’s first eight-core desktop processor, though to some controversy – we discuss what’s in a core? later, but will stick to an overview of the CPU design here. Bulldozer CPUs are comprised of Modules, each of which has two execution units and some shared resources, such as the Fetch, Decode, floating point unit and 2MB of Level 2 cache. These Modules can then be bolted together to form 4-, 6- or 8-core CPUs – Bulldozer is a very modular design, just as Intel CPUs have been modular in their construction for a while now too (since the Nehalem-based Core i7-900 series in November 2008). A Module isn’t just made of a pair of stripped down K10 execution cores squabbling over some shared units, though, Bulldozer is a completely new design (and design philosophy) from AMD. As such, this article is rather long.

AMD FX-8150 Specifications

Frequency 3.7GHz
Turbo Frequency up to 4.2GHz
Core Bulldozer
Manufacturing process 32nm
Number of cores eight physical
Memory controller Dual-channel DDR3
Cache 8 x 16KB L1 data, 4 x 64KB L1 instruction, 4 x 2MB L2, 4 x 2MB L3
Packaging Socket AM3+
Thermal Design Power (TDP 125W
Features SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, 256-bit AVX, AESNI, PCLMULQDQ, AMD64, Cool’n’Quiet 3.0, AMD-V, MMX, FMA4, XOP

Want to comment? Please log in.

Discuss this in the forums