GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor Graphics card Language ⏷ English French
EN ⏷
FR ☰
- Home page
- ⏵ Processor
- ⏵ Comparison
Apple M1 vs Intel Core m3-7Y30
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Apple M1 on one side and the Intel Core m3-7Y30 on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.2GHz. The second is used on the notebook segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
Processor | Apple M1 | Intel Core m3-7Y30 |
Market (main) | Laptop | Notebook |
ISA | ARMv8.5-A (64-bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
Microarchitecture | Firestorm, Icestorm | Kaby Lake |
Core name | Firestorm, Icestorm | Kaby Lake-Y |
Family | M series | Core m3 |
Part number(s), S-Spec | APL1102, T8103 | HE8067702739824, SR2ZY, SR347 |
Release date | Q4 2020 | Q3 2016 |
Lithography | 5 nm FinFET N5 | 14 nm |
Transistors | 33,700,000,000 | - |
Cores | 8 | 2 |
Threads | 8 | 4 |
Base frequency | 2.06 GHz | 1.0 GHz |
Turbo frequency | 3.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
Energy cores | 4x Apple Icestorm @ 2.06 GHz | - |
High performance cores | 4x Apple Firestorm @ 3.2 GHz | 2 Cores 4 Threads @ 1.0 / 2.6 GHz |
Cache memory | 16 MB | 4 MB |
Max memory capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Memory types | LPDDR4X-4266 (2133 MHz) | LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 |
Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Max memory bandwidth | 66.7 GB/s | 29.8 GB/s |
Max PCIe lanes | - | 10 |
TDP | 14 W | 5 W |
GPU integrated graphics | Apple M1 GPU 8-Core | Intel HD Graphics 615 |
GPU cores | 8 | - |
GPU execution units | 128 | 24 |
GPU shading units | 1,024 | 192 |
GPU base clock | 1,278 MHz | 300 MHz |
GPU boost clock | 1,278 MHz | 900 MHz |
GPU FP32 floating point | 2,617 GFLOPS | 403.2 GFLOPS |
Socket | SoC | BGA1515 |
AI accelerator | AI accelerator 16-core | - |
AI computing operations per seconds | 11 TOPS | - |
Crypto engine | - | AES New Instructions, Secure Key |
Security | - | Software Guard Extensions, Memory Protection Extensions, Execute Disable Bit, OS Guard |
Max display resolution | 6016 x 3384@60Hz (Thunderbolt), 3840 x 2160@60Hz (HDMI) | 4096 x 2304@24Hz (HDMI), 3840 x 2160@60Hz (DP), 3840 x 2160@60Hz (eDP) |
Video decoding | H.265, HEVC, VP9 | - |
Video encoding | H.265, HEVC | - |
Connectivity | 2 Thunderbolt, 2 USB-C, 1 HDMI 2.0 | - |
Cinebench R15 single thread | 197 | 104 |
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 1,063 | 242 |
Cinebench R20 single thread | 412 | 198 |
Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 2,104 | 463 |
Cinebench R23 single thread | 1,503 | 463 |
Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 7,794 | 1,083 |
PassMark single thread | 3,703 | 1,402 |
PassMark CPU Mark | 14,204 | 2,544 |
(Mac OS X | Windows)Geekbench 4 single core | 5,792 | 2,957 |
(Mac OS X | Windows)Geekbench 4 multi-core | 23,220 | 5,632 |
(macOS | Windows)Geekbench 5 single core | 1,744 | 561 |
(macOS | Windows)Geekbench 5 multi-core | 7,657 | 1,238 |
(macOS | Windows)Geekbench 6 single core | 2,375 | 842 |
(macOS | Windows)Geekbench 6 multi-core | 8,490 | 1,675 |
(SGEMM)GFLOPS Performance | 203.4 GFLOPS | 98.8 GFLOPS |
(Multi-core / watt performance)Performance / watt ratio | 1,659 pts / W | 1,252 pts / W |
Amazon | | |
eBay | | |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.The processor Apple M1 has more cores, the maximum frequency of Apple M1 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core m3-7Y30 is less. The Apple M1 was designed earlier.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.
Cinebench R15 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score |
Apple M1 | 197 1,063 |
Intel Core m3-7Y30 | 104 242 |
In single core, the difference is 89%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 339%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
Cinebench R20 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score |
Apple M1 | 412 2,104 |
Intel Core m3-7Y30 | 198 463 |
In single core, the difference is 108%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 354%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
Cinebench R23 - Multi-Thread & Single Thread Score |
Apple M1 | 1,503 7,794 |
Intel Core m3-7Y30 | 463 1,083 |
In single core, the difference is 225%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 620%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
PassMark - CPU Mark & single thread |
Apple M1 | 3,703 14,204 |
Intel Core m3-7Y30 | 1,402 2,544 |
In single core, the difference is 164%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 458%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity. With Mac OS X:
Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Mac OS X |
Apple M1 | 5,792 23,220 |
Intel Core m3-7Y30 | 2,857 5,728 |
In single core, the difference is 103%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 305%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.With macOS:
Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - macOS |
Apple M1 | 1,744 7,657 |
Intel Core m3-7Y30 | 611 1,037 |
In single core, the difference is 185%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 638%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Mac OS X & Linux |
Apple M1 | 2,375 8,490 |
Intel Core m3-7Y30 | 823 1,683 |
In single core, the difference is 189%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 404%.Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.Geekbench 6 is a benchmarking platform that is capable of evaluating the performance of a device across multiple operating systems. The software evaluates processor power, with its ability to support different tasks, such as file compression, browsing; GPU computing capabilities, with image editing, video editing, gaming skills, machine learning workloads.
Equivalence:
Apple M1 Intel EquivalentApple M1 AMD EquivalentIntel Core m3-7Y30 AMD Equivalent
See also:
Apple M1 MaxApple M1 Pro 10-CoreApple M1 Pro 8-CoreApple M1 UltraApple M2Apple M2 MaxApple M2 Pro 10-CoreApple M2 Pro 12-CoreApple M2 UltraApple M3Apple M3 Max 14-CoreApple M3 Max 16-CoreApple M3 Pro 11-CoreApple M3 Pro 12-CoreApple M4 10-CoreApple M4 9-CoreApple M4 Max 14-CoreApple M4 Max 16-CoreApple M4 Pro 12-CoreApple M4 Pro 14-CoreIntel Core m3-7Y32 GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact
Disclaimer: When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad. Information: We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.