Before Defining Performance Criteria We Must Agree On ... - PubMed
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation- Clipboard
- My Bibliography
- Collections
- Citation manager
Save citation to file
Format: Summary (text) PubMed PMID Abstract (text) CSV Create file CancelEmail citation
Email address has not been verified. Go to My NCBI account settings to confirm your email and then refresh this page. To: Subject: Body: Format: Summary Summary (text) Abstract Abstract (text) MeSH and other data Send email CancelAdd to Collections
- Create a new collection
- Add to an existing collection
Add to My Bibliography
- My Bibliography
Your saved search
Name of saved search: Search terms: Test search terms Would you like email updates of new search results? Saved Search Alert Radio Buttons- Yes
- No
Create a file for external citation management software
Create file CancelYour RSS Feed
Name of RSS Feed: Number of items displayed: 5 10 15 20 50 100 Create RSS Cancel RSS Link CopyFull text links
Actions
CiteCollectionsAdd to Collections- Create a new collection
- Add to an existing collection
Page navigation
- Title & authors
- Abstract
- MeSH terms
- LinkOut - more resources
Abstract
The term "qualitative test" is ambiguous and should not be used for nominal (classification) or ordinal (grading) tests. Characteristics for nominal and ordinal scale test results, such as traceability and uncertainty, remains to be established before general performance criteria can be agreed upon. For ordinal binary test with a quantitative back ground scale an assay could be characterized with the three quantities "C5", "C50", and "C95". The C50-value, or the equivalence point, ought to be declared by the manufacturers of diagnostic products. For the correct understanding and communication of results from ordinal and nominal tests the way of expressing the results also need to be harmonized.
PubMed Disclaimer
MeSH terms
- Clinical Laboratory Techniques / standards* Actions
- Search in PubMed
- Search in MeSH
- Add to Search
- Confidence Intervals Actions
- Search in PubMed
- Search in MeSH
- Add to Search
- Quality Control Actions
- Search in PubMed
- Search in MeSH
- Add to Search
- Risk Actions
- Search in PubMed
- Search in MeSH
- Add to Search
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
- De Gruyter
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.
Medical
- MedlinePlus Health Information
Miscellaneous
- NCI CPTAC Assay Portal
- Clipboard
- Save
- My Bibliography
- Collections
- Citation Manager
NCBI Literature Resources
MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer
The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.
Từ khóa » C5 C50 C95
-
[PDF] Establishing The Performance Characteristics Of In Vitro Diagnostic ...
-
[PDF] Establishing The Performance - Characteristics Of In Vitro Diagnostic
-
True Or False? You Can Validate A Qualitative Method - Westgard
-
Before Defining Performance Criteria We Must Agree On ... - De Gruyter
-
[PDF] Guidance For Industry And Food And Drug Administration Staff ...
-
[PDF] 2014-12-01 1 Performance Criteria For “qualitative Test” Procedures
-
Fetal Growth Velocity Standards From The Fetal Growth Longitudinal ...
-
Table 3 BPD Reference Values For Boys And Girls From 12–40 Weeks
-
Lab Guidelines
-
[PDF] Sample ID C5 C25 C50 C75 C95 Sites (coverage >10x And ... - PLOS
-
Independent Controls Add Value To Qualitative COVID-19 Antibody Tests
-
Application Of CLSI EP12-A2 Document In The Performance ...