Bill C-59 And CSIS's “New” Powers To Disrupt Terrorist Threats

1. Home /
2. Archives /
3. Vol 57, No 1 /
4. Forum: Bill C-59, An Act Respecting National Security Matters

Bill C-59 and CSIS’s “New” Powers to Disrupt Terrorist Threats: Holding the Charter-Limiting Regime to (Constitutional) Account

Authors

• Michael Nesbitt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/alr2575

Abstract

In 2017, the Liberal government released Bill C-59, which was its update to the national security legislation that was introduced by the previous government via Bill C-51. Bill C-59’s goal was to address the criticisms of its predecessor, including the new “kinetic” powers granted to the Canadian Security and Intelligence Service (CSIS) to actively disrupt threats to the security of Canada. While Bill C-59 made some improvements to ensure that CSIS’s new powers are exercised in accordance with the Charter, there are still deficiencies to be addressed. This article reviews the changes brought in with Bill C-59, examines how those amendments may not avoid constitutional challenge, and outlines what a section 1 Oakes justification may look like. Ultimately, to address the Charter implications of the new legislation, further changes are required, including the use of court-appointed special advocates to ensure an adversarial system and further oversight of CSIS’s new, disruptive authority.

Downloads

• PDF

Published

2019-10-02

Issue

Vol 57, No 1

Section

Forum: Bill C-59, An Act Respecting National Security Matters

License

For Editions following and including Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License

For Editions prior to Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.

Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:

1. Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
2. Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
3. Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
4. Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.

To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

• Michael Nesbitt, Dana Hagg, An Empirical Study of Terrorism Prosecutions in Canada: Elucidating the Elements of the Offences , Alberta Law Review: Vol 57, No 3
• Michael Nesbitt, Leah West, Forum Introduction: Bill C-59, An Act Respecting National Security Matters: What it Does and Why it Matters , Alberta Law Review: Vol 57, No 1

about

Welcome to the Alberta Law Review

The Alberta Law Review (ALR) is a student-run publication whose primary purpose is to enhance discourse on Canadian legal issues. Founded in 1955, the ALR is published by the Alberta Law Review Society, an organization consisting of law students at the University of Alberta and the University of Calgary. Built upon the hard work of student editors at both law faculties, the ALR is published every quarter and has roughly 1,000 pages per volume.

donate

Newsletter Signup

Click HERE if you would like to sign up for the ALR Newsletter.

LinkedIn block

Information

• For Readers
• For Authors
• For Librarians

Alberta Law Review | ISSN: 1925-8356Editors: Lauren Stavert & Eli ZiffContact | Privacy Policy