BMW X5 M Specs, 0-60, Quarter Mile, Lap Times

fastestlaps

• Vehicles
• Tracks
• More
  • Home
  • Compare cars
  • Vehicles
  • Tracks
  • Tyres
  • Add laptime / drive
  • Lists
  • Polls
  • Drives
• 

• 
• Sign in

BMW X5 M specs

Price in US	$86,225 - $96,045
Car type	SUV/truck
Curb weight	2399-2417 kg (5289-5329 lbs)
Introduced	2009
Origin country	Germany
Gas mileage	16.8 l/100 km (14 mpg US / 17 mpg UK)
Views	64.6k
Submitted by	rxbkrs

Lap times Best Filters Non-dry laps Stock Modified

Track	Time
Camden Airport (post 10/2010)	1:29.53
Kakucs Ring	0:48.91
Killarney	1:28.00
Kyalami (new)	2:02.80
Motortrend Figure-8	0:25.40
Sachsenring	1:43.72
Top Gear Track	1:28.20 w
Virginia International Raceway Grand East Course (pre 01/2014)	3:11.10
Wakefield Park	1:11.40

Performance

0 - 50 kph	1.7 s
0 - 100 kph	4.5 s
0 - 130 kph	7.0 s
0 - 180 kph	12.9 s
0 - 200 kph	16.4 s
0 - 250 kph	30.4 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph	11.9 s
0 - 60 mph	4.0 s
0 - 100 mph	9.9 s
Est. 1/8 mile	8.9 s @ 95.1 mph
1/4 mile	12.5 s @ 111.8 mph
Top speed	250 kph (155 mph)
Est. max acceleration	0.69 g (7 m/s²)
Lateral acceleration	0.90 g (9 m/s²)
70 mph - 0	49 m (162 ft)

Powertrain specs

Engine type	Twin-turbo V8
Displacement	4.4 l (269 ci)
Power	555 ps (547 bhp / 408 kw)
Torque	680 Nm (502 lb-ft)
Power / liter	126 ps (124 hp)
Power / weight	231 ps (227 bhp) / t
Torque / weight	283 Nm (209 lb-ft) / t
Efficiency	33 PS per l/100 km
Transmission	6 speed automatic
Layout	front engine, all wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

X5 M competition

BMW X5 M vs BMW X6 M

BMW M3 vs BMW X5 M

BMW X5 M vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo

BMW X5 M vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo S

More BMW cars 1120

2009 BMW X6 M 555 ps, 2250 kg

2008 BMW X6 xDrive50i 408 ps, 2190 kg

2010 BMW X3 xDrive 35i 306 ps, 1805 kg

2007 BMW X5 4.8i E70 355 ps, 2420 kg

wallenieswiftie 2m ago

This SUV had no sedan equivalent. Fair enough, the E60 M5 had no SUV equivalent. They have completely different powertrains. It was E39 M5 x E53 X5 xDrive46is/xDrive48is, then F10 M5 x F15 X5 M, and then F90 M5 x F95 X5 M. (The SUV platform is always newer than its sedan counterpart.) G90 M5 will likely still have an SUV equivalent (G95 X5 M?).

Reply 59

Kimo 3y ago

Have a 9 yo x5m bought 4 years ago for $35k 40k miles. Brandie new inside and out. Simple mods it runs 700+hp and 700+torque. 0 to 60 in around 3 sec. This car is by far one of the biggest value autos you can buy. Sorry haters, but the s63 engine and 4x4 drivetrain is still in the fastest bmws today. Amazing technology.

Reply 1.1k 12 replies

Jeff M. 5y ago

If you owned a Hellcat then you’d know the Hellcat is only 2 tenths of a second faster 0-60 than an M5 and four tenths of a second faster in the 1/4. Remember the power difference between the two. We aren’t comparing apples to apples here. But I know of a Porsche 911 Turbo S that runs 8.7 in the 1/4. That’s 4 seconds faster than the Hellcat. There are a lot of faster cars out there than the Hellcat. Just sayin.....

Reply 2.5k 12 replies

Demon 5y ago

Not a hater, I’ve own M5 and the 3 series, but to get some yahoo next to my Hellcat and think he has something that will stand up to it, is so ridiculous! The Hellcat is 2 seconds faster from 0-60mph, over 50mph top speed and cost a fraction of the price. Learn your place in the SUV, not muscle in any aspect.

Reply 2.1k 1

NOM3RCY 6y ago

Too many haters in these comments: I owned one of these for a few years and took it on the track and had it ice racing. They are very capable and rewarding vehicles to drive, and extremely comfortable and luxurious as a daily driver, especially with our MN winters.

Reply 2.1k

OnceUponNever 13y ago

If I was in that thing going round a corner i would be truly scared. Seriously, really, scared.

Reply 2.1k

benzsl 14y ago

0-250kph:30,4

Reference:Autobild sportscars 6/2012

Reply 1.8k

Ash 14y ago

Just bought a Monte Carlo blue x5m I own a r8 and 2011 7 series. But this car outperforms everything I own. MileAge is 5.5km/litre which is not bad for a suv that beats the 360 Modena. I think this vehicle deserves more Appreciation nd it's much cheaper than cayenne turbo. Its really fun...

Reply 1.5k

PandaBoy 15y ago

It's only pointless and a waste of money when you can't afford it.....

If you can then by all means buy this thing and have fun with it!

Reply 1.3k

M=power 15y ago

This car or any car is pointless for people who cant afford it.

hell, a civic is pointless if you cant even afford food.

For everyone else this is another niche market just like any car.

Reply 1.1k

Inline 6 rules 16y ago

The 4.1 s is 0-60 mph NOT 0-100 km/h!

Reply 930

BMWexpert 16y ago

BMW X5M : 0-100 km/h = 4.1 sec http://www.bmwblog.com/2010/02/02/test-drive-2010-bmw-x5-m/

Reply 839

Anonymous 16y ago

I'd be happy with either an X5M or an X6M. Sure it's more power and size than most people need but that's part of the fun :)

Reply 762

jake 16y ago

your missing a point though an all wheel drive suv is going to fare better than a 2 wheel drive sports car in the rain any day. plus this has an extra 200hp on the porsche. put both in the dry and this thing wont look as impressive than you think

Reply 710

E 16y ago

Wet laps are as good as coin tosses.

Reply 643

Anonymous 16y ago

Thats only a 1s difference, and this is an suv!

Reply 615

jake 16y ago

no becuase the GT3 was also in the wet and it beat this thing by one second. Even then I think one second is misleading. They always say on the show had it been dry it would be about four seconds faster. I think the GT3 would pick up more time then the Bimmer. I think the wet proably affected the Gt3 more. i think it made the Bimmer look better than it really is.

Reply 595

Anonymous 16y ago

If this does a 1:28.2 in th wet, at the TGT, could this be at the 996 GT3 level????

Reply 547

jake 16y ago

the quarter mile time is in the 0-300km/h box

Reply 522

audi r8 16y ago

He mean the 1/4 mile ..

Reply 492

Anonymous 16y ago

0-300km/h in 12.5?

Reply 474

Mr sav 16y ago

yeah sure, suggesting buying 2 cars instead of 1? we have 5 month of snow, so buy m3 and then just park it in garage for half a year??? People stop being arogant. For example Top Gear always saying that diesle are best solution. But when its -20 diesle cars wont start ( exp Moscow ) or Us consumers, from your point of view we can also say that big stupid suv like Escalade are pointless, ( they are bad quality, shity of road capability, gas guzzlers ) also its impossible to park car like this in Europe, but for Usa its ok, cause parking is not a problem. I belive that marketing departament in Bmw did good job. Mb have Ml amg, Volkswagen have Cayenne turbo and Q7 v12. So why bmw cant create X5m, especially if it is better that all of above. No after promotion i'm lucky enough to afford this car, and believe me its awesome. I sold my m3 and i dont regret it, cause X5m is much better all-round car for our country.

Reply 446

Anonymous 16y ago

im not so sure but a direct fuel injected 4.0 twin turbo charged inline6 can get a 520hp without so much lag...

this is where is the 570hp news came from... http://www.bimmerfile.com/2009/12/18/the-next-generation-m5-comes-into-focus/

Reply 373

Anonymous 16y ago

I hear 520bhp and 500lb ft!! from a TwinTurbo V8. 570bhp is kinda overkill though, and suv's are really just big or different shaped cars.

Reply 341

Anonymous 16y ago

"Anonymous Its only a waste of money if BMW doesnt sell as many as they thought"

It's a waste of money for the one who buys that sort of car, not for the BMW

Reply 320

Anonymous 16y ago

In my opinion 600 ps would be great for Publicity even if it will hurts fuel consumption with only a bit of extra performance..

Reply 302

Anonymous 16y ago

an extra 25ps for the m5 to 580ps is believable but some sources say that it will have 570hp & more torque.. even thought 570hp is around 580ps...

Reply 280

Anonymous 16y ago

Its only a waste of money if BMW doesnt sell as many as they thought, but, they should have made a CSL, which my sources say there going too!! iz supposedly a even more hardcore than that GTS crap, 500bhp from a 4.5 i hear! but also a hefty pricetag!!

Reply 265

Anonymous 16y ago

Sure people need SUV, but not this pointless X5M. It's a waste of power and money.

Reply 258

Anonymous 16y ago

You people know, sum people actually Need suv's, not everybody needs a car, they could use it because they cant fit in a car, or for there job or whatever.

Reply 252

Timeline

Hoppelmoppel123 9m

added data for BMW 335i Coupe

FastestLaps 13m

Thank you. It went from 0 to 3 very quickly. ...

True. So its not new genre but return of a tiny ...

Corvolet3 26m

R63 already exists

FastestLaps 50m

New genre for cars - super MPV 😀

For the most evil of soccer moms 😜

BeiEllish 57m

Doesn’t the Senna and 765 beat it too? 😏

Crispi74 2h

https://ibb.co/PwXnLg0 "...covered the 12.9 miles circuit in an astonishing 7min 46 secs.." "...and close ...

CMRDNOOB 3h

MPV with 789ps, same powertrain as the 24' 001, some say it can do ...

CMRDNOOB 3h

added Zeekr 009