BMW X6 2012 Vs BMW X5 2010 | Compare Cars Auto ABC

Trang chủ » Bmw X5 Vs X6 2010 » BMW X6 2012 Vs BMW X5 2010 | Compare Cars Auto ABC

Có thể bạn quan tâm

Logo LatviešuEnglishEspañol Car reviews Car technical data Find your car The most reliable used cars Timing chain or belt? Compare cars Real fuel consumption Service and maintenance Car costs Car mileage calculator Fuel prices BMW X6 2012 vs BMW X5 2010

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

BMW X6 2012 - 2014 - choose version - BMW X6 xDrive30d | 258 HP | Diesel | Automatic | 4x4 BMW X6 M | 555 HP | Petrol | Automatic | 4x4 BMW X6 M50d | 381 HP | Diesel | Automatic | 4x4 BMW X6 xDrive35i | 306 HP | Petrol | Automatic | 4x4 BMW X6 xDrive40d | 306 HP | Diesel | Automatic | 4x4 BMW X6 xDrive50i | 450 HP | Petrol | Automatic | 4x4 BMW X6 M50d | 381 HP | Diesel | Automatic BMW X6 50i | 408 HP | Petrol | Automatic | 4x4 BMW X6 30d | 245 HP | Diesel | Automatic | 4x4 BMW X5 2010 - 2013 - choose version - BMW X5 xDrive30d | 245 HP | Diesel | Automatic | 4x4 BMW X5 xDrive35i | 306 HP | Petrol | Automatic | 4x4 BMW X5 xDrive40d | 306 HP | Diesel | Automatic | 4x4 BMW X5 xDrive50i | 408 HP | Petrol | Automatic | 4x4 BMW X5 M50d | 381 HP | Diesel | Automatic | 4x4
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW X6 is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW X5 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW X6 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 3.0 - 4.43.0 - 4.4

Performance

Power: 245 - 555 HP245 - 408 HP
Torque: 400 - 740 NM400 - 740 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.7 - 7.5 seconds5.4 - 7.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.0 - 13.97.4 - 12.5
BMW X6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW X5. On average, BMW X6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 212 mm (8.3 inches)222 mm (8.7 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.88 m4.86 m
Width: 1.98 m1.95 m
Height: 1.70 m1.78 m
BMW X6 is larger, but lower.BMW X6 is 3 cm longer than the BMW X5, 4 cm wider, while the height of BMW X6 is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 580 litres620 litres
Trunk max capacity:with rear seats folded down 1450 litres1750 litres
BMW X5 has more luggage space.Despite its longer length, BMW X6 has 40 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. This could mean that the BMW X6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 (by 300 litres).
Turning diameter: 12.8 meters12.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`763~ 2`799
Safety: no datano data
Quality: average average
Average price (€): 17 40014 000
Pros and Cons: BMW X6 has
  • also available in 2WD
 BMW X5 has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail
Car reviews Car technical data The most reliable used cars Timing chain or belt? Real fuel consumption Car mileage calculator Car costs Fuel prices Car videos Terms of service, privacy policy Follow us on Facebook! Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv We are using cookies to personalise content and ads. Got it

Từ khóa » Bmw X5 Vs X6 2010