C-715/17 – Official Blog Of UNIO

Skip to content

5443243347_f20715f9cb_o

by Alessandra Silveira, Editor

The Opinion of the Advocate-General Eleanor Sharpston in the joined cases C-715/17, C‑718/17 and C‑719/17 (delivered on 31 October 2019) concluded by recalling an old story from the Jewish tradition that deserves wider circulation – particularly in times of COVID-19 pandemic. A group of men are travelling together in a boat. Suddenly, one of them takes out an auger and starts to bore a hole in the hull beneath himself. His companions remonstrate with him. ‘Why are you doing that?’ they cry. ‘What are you complaining about?’ says he. ‘Am I not drilling the hole under my own seat?’ ‘Yes,’ they reply, ‘but the water will come in and flood the boat for all of us’ (paragraph 255).

The story is recalled by the Advocate-General regarding the principle of solidarity provided in Article 80 TFEU: “The policies of the Union set out in this Chapter [‘Policies on border checks, asylum and immigration’] and their implementation shall be governed by the principle of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility, including its financial implications, between the Member States. Wherever necessary, Union acts adopted pursuant to this Chapter shall contain appropriate measures to give effect to this principle”.

On this principle – which requires all Member States – the Advocate-General stated that “respecting the ‘rules of the club’ and playing one’s proper part in solidarity with fellow Europeans cannot be based on a penny-pinching cost-benefit analysis along the lines (familiar, alas, from Brexiteer rhetoric) of ‘what precisely does the EU cost me per week and what exactly do I personally get out of it?’ Such self-centredness is a betrayal of the founding fathers’ vision for a peaceful and prosperous continent. It is the antithesis of being a loyal Member State and being worthy, as an individual, of shared European citizenship. If the European project is to prosper and go forward, we must all do better than that” (paragraph 254 of the Opinion). Continue reading “We are all in the same boat! On the legal principle of solidarity and its legal implications in the recent CJEU case law”

Search for: Search This blog is an invitation to think and debate Europe. You are welcome to join us in this interesting journey! Follow the Official Blog of UNIO

Enter your email address to follow our blog and to think&debate Europe with us.

Email Address:

Follow

Social
  • View Centro-de-Estudos-em-Direito-da-União-EuropeiaCentre-of-Studies-in-EU-Law-245612225455625’s profile on Facebook
  • View uniocedu’s profile on Twitter
  • View unioblog’s profile on Pinterest
Categories
  • Case notes
  • Comments
  • Editorials
  • Essays
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Summaries of judgments
  • Uncategorized
ThemesAI article 50 artificial intelligence Brazil brexit case law CFREU citizenship CJEU classical competition Competition Law COVID-19 covid19 data protection Democracy digital digital economy digital single market e-justice ecj effective judicial protection elections environment environmental law EU EU law european arrest warrant European citizenship european commission european elections European integration European parliament Freedom of religion Fundamental Rights gc GDPR general court Green Deal health hungary Internal Market internet interop interoperability judgments judicial independence judicial power liability migration personal data poland populism Portugal post-brexit primacy primacy of EU Law privacy public health Romania rule of law rule of law regulation russia social policy social rights social security Spain state aid UK Ukraine UNIO - eu law journal Union based on the rule of law war withdrawal withdrawal agreementArchives
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
2015 The Official Blog of UNIO-EU Law Journal. All content is propriety of The Official Blog of UNIO-EU Law Journal, unless otherwise noted. Please do not reproduce or use any texts, photos or other content without permission.
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Official Blog of UNIO
    • Join 302 other subscribers Sign me up
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Official Blog of UNIO
    • Customize
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
Loading Comments... Write a Comment... Email (Required) Name (Required) Website

Từ khóa » C-715/17