Case C-525/16 (MEO) — Serviços De Comunicações E Multimédia SA

 Back Forward

• Save & file
• View original
• Forward
• Print
• Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
• Follow Please login to follow content.
• Like
• Instruct

add to folder:

• My saved (default)
• Read later

Folders shared with you

• 

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Find out more about Lexology or get in touch by visiting our About page.

Register Price Discrimination and Competition Law - Case C-525/16 (MEO) — Serviços de Comunicações e Multimédia S.A. Camilleri Preziosi Malta April 23 2018

In essence this ruling answers a question of interpretation concerning point (c) of the second paragraph of Article 102 TFEU according to which, ‘applying dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions with other trading parties, thereby placing them at a competitive disadvantage’, may constitute an abuse of a dominant position. Therefore, according to the letter of this Article, the prohibition only applies if it places a firm at the receiving end at ‘at a competitive disadvantage’.

On 19 April 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) clarified, firstly: not every disadvantage affecting operators who were charged more, compared with the tariffs applied to their competitors for an equivalent service, means that competition is distorted. Secondly, ‘competitive disadvantage’ cannot be assumed, this determination has to be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account all relevant circumstances in order to conclude that the behaviour of the dominant firm has had an effect on costs, profits or any other relevant interest of one or more of the partners.

It also articulated that it is not necessary to take into account the seriousness of a possible ‘competitive disadvantage’; fixing an appreciability (de minimis) threshold for the purposes of determining whether there is an abuse of a dominant position is not justified.

Case cited: Case C-525/16, Meo – Serviços de Comunicações e Multimédia ECLI:EU:C:2018:270

Camilleri Preziosi - Ron Galea Cavallazzi and Lisa Abela  Back Forward

• Save & file
• View original
• Forward
• Print
• Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
• Follow Please login to follow content.
• Like
• Instruct

add to folder:

• My saved (default)
• Read later

Folders shared with you

• 

Filed under

• Malta
• Competition & Antitrust
• Litigation
• Camilleri Preziosi

Organisations

• CJEU

Laws

• Article 102 TFEU

Popular articles from this firm

1. Oil & Gas in Malta *

2. Tax controversy in Malta *

3. At a glance: tax law enforcement in Malta *

4. A general introduction to immigration law and policy in Malta *

5. Environment and climate change in Malta *

Interested in contributing? Get closer to winning business faster with Lexology's complete suite of dynamic products designed to help you unlock new opportunities with our highly engaged audience of legal professionals looking for answers. Learn more

Professional development

• Navigating the Key Stages of Antitrust Investigations in the UK & Europe - Learn Live

  MBL Seminars | 1.5 CPD hours Online 15 April 2026

• Navigating Parental Liability - Mastering Compliance in Competition Law - Learn Live

  MBL Seminars | 3 CPD hours Online 14 May 2026

• Collective Actions & Competition Law - Learn Live

  MBL Seminars | 1.5 CPD hours Online 15 September 2026

View all

Related practical resources PRO

• How-to guide How-to guide: How to identify and prioritise competition law risk in your organisation (EU)
• Checklist Checklist: Competition law compliance (EU)
• Checklist Checklist: Conducting a competition compliance audit (EU)

View all

Related research hubs

Malta

Litigation

Competition & Antitrust