Commodities & Minerals Enterprise V. CVG Ferrominera (I) - Jus Mundi

FR

• FR
• EN

"" Vous cherchez cette expression. NOT Le terme suivant ne devrait pas apparaître dans le document. AND Les deux termes doivent être dans le document. OR L'un des deux termes doit être dans le document. NEAR/X Les deux termes doivent être séparés de moins de X mots. Utilisez NEAR seul pour X = 30 mots. Recherche exacte Excluez les variations grammaticales des termes de votre recherche. Consultez Jus AI new Améliorez vos recherches et votre productivité avec l'IA SUGGESTED TITLES LEGAL CONCEPTS Produits

Recherche juridique & Productivité

Jus AI

Recherche et productivité assistées par l'IA.

Search

Base de données sur le droit international et l'arbitrage.

Wiki Notes

Notes pratiques sur les concepts clés de l’ISDS.

Publications

ICC DRL

ICC Dispute Resolution Library.

Find out how to get access

JURIS

Commentaires en arbitrage commercial international.

Find out how to get access

OUP

Ouvrages phares d’Oxford University.

Find out how to get access

BRILL

Les principaux ouvrages de DIP et de RDIE.

Find out how to get access

Arbitration insights

Recherche de Profil

Profils enrichis de nos données et analytiques.

Cette fonction n’est pas incluse dans votre abonnement. Cliquez pour savoir comment y accéder

Conflict Checker

Révéler les relations entre parties.

Cette fonction n’est pas incluse dans votre abonnement. Cliquez pour savoir comment y accéder

Solutions

• Intelligence Juridique
• Jus AI

Couverture

Practice Areas

• L’Arbitrage Commercial
• L’Arbitrage d’Investissement
• Arbitrage Sportif
• Droit du Commerce International
• DIP et Droit de la Mer
• Arbitrage Maritime

Partenariats

• ICC
• AAA-ICDR
• IBA
• Become a Partner

Bibliothèques

• ICC DRL
• JURIS
• OUP
• BRILL
• IBA
• ICSID
• AAA-ICDR

Clients Sécurité À propos

• Qui sommes-nous?
• Our Mission
• Carrières
• Blog Daily Jus
• Newsletter

FR - Changer de langue

• FR
• EN

Produits

Recherche juridique & Productivité

Jus AI

Recherche et productivité assistées par l'IA.

Search

Base de données sur le droit international et l'arbitrage.

Wiki Notes

Notes pratiques sur les concepts clés de l’ISDS.

Publications

ICC DRL

ICC Dispute Resolution Library.

Find out how to get access

JURIS

Commentaires en arbitrage commercial international.

Find out how to get access

OUP

Ouvrages phares d’Oxford University.

Find out how to get access

BRILL

Les principaux ouvrages de DIP et de RDIE.

Find out how to get access

Arbitration insights

Recherche de Profil

Profils enrichis de nos données et analytiques.

Cette fonction n’est pas incluse dans votre abonnement. Cliquez pour savoir comment y accéder

Conflict Checker

Révéler les relations entre parties.

Cette fonction n’est pas incluse dans votre abonnement. Cliquez pour savoir comment y accéder

Solutions

• Intelligence Juridique
• Jus AI

Couverture

Practice Areas

• L’Arbitrage Commercial
• L’Arbitrage d’Investissement
• Arbitrage Sportif
• Droit du Commerce International
• DIP et Droit de la Mer
• Arbitrage Maritime

Partenariats

• ICC
• AAA-ICDR
• IBA
• Become a Partner

Bibliothèques

• ICC DRL
• JURIS
• OUP
• BRILL
• IBA
• ICSID
• AAA-ICDR

Clients Sécurité À propos

• Qui sommes-nous?
• Our Mission
• Carrières
• Blog Daily Jus
• Newsletter

FR - Changer de langue

• FR
• EN

Connexion Réserver une démo Connexion Réserver une démo Produits

Jus Mundi

Jus AI

Search

Wiki Notes

ICC DRL

JURIS

OUP

BRILL

Jus Connect

Recherche de Profil

Conflict Checker

Solutions

• Intelligence Juridique
• Jus AI

Couverture

Practice Areas

• L’Arbitrage Commercial
• L’Arbitrage d’Investissement
• Arbitrage Sportif
• Droit du Commerce International
• DIP et Droit de la Mer
• Arbitrage Maritime

Partenariats

• ICC
• AAA-ICDR
• IBA
• Become a Partner

Bibliothèques

• ICC DRL
• JURIS
• OUP
• BRILL
• IBA
• ICSID
• AAA-ICDR

À propos

• Qui sommes-nous?
• Our Mission
• Carrières
• Blog Daily Jus
• Newsletter

FR - Changer de langue

• FR
• EN

• Résultats de la recherche
• Affaire

9842
• Ask Jus AI about the case New New Jus AI Interact with this case using Jus AI
• Suivre cette Affaire
• Sauvegarder
• Copier la référence

Commodities & Minerals Enterprise v. CVG Ferrominera (I) Commodities & Minerals Enterprise Ltd. v. CVG Ferrominera Orinoco, C.A. (I) Nature de la procédure : Internationale Type d'affaire : Arbitrage commercial Industries: Maritime Shipping Trade Wholesale Trade Mining Metal ores Date d'introduction : 9 févr. 2016 Statut de l'affaire : Achevée Pays d'origine de l'investisseur : Îles Vierges britanniques Pays d'origine du défendeur: Venezuela Institution: Arbitrage ad hoc (Arbitrage ad hoc) Rules of arbitration: Règlement d'arbitrage maritime SMA 2013 Siège de l’arbitrage : New York City Loi applicable : États-Unis

Documents de l'affaire

• Partial Final Award Granting Fees and Expenses to Claimant for the Cost of the Hearing on October 26, 2016 No. 4293 - 12 nov. 2016
• Partial Final Award Granting in Part and Denying in Part (1) Claimant´s Motions for Partial Security and (2) Respondent´s Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction - 5 janv. 2017
• Partial Final Award Concerning Respondent CVG Ferrominera Orinoco, C.A.'s Motion to Overrule Claimant Commodities & Minerals Enterprise Ltd.'s Objections to First Request for Production of Documents - 3 mars 2017
• Dissenting Opinion of A.J. Siciliano
• Partial Final Award No. 4309 - 10 mars 2017
• Order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Granting Defendant’s Motion to Quash Service - 4 avr. 2017
• Partial Final Award Regarding Respondent CVG Ferrominera Orinoco, C.A.'s Application for Review and Set Aside of the Partial Final Award on Security Dated January 5, 2017 No. 4328 - 2 nov. 2017
• Order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Granting Petition to Confirm and Denying Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award - 18 juil. 2018
• Statement of Reasons For and Forming Part of Final Awards - 20 déc. 2018
• Final Award - 20 déc. 2018
• Final Award concerning Claimant's Motion to Correct the Final Award of December 20, 2018 - 11 févr. 2019
• Opinion and Order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York - 18 sept. 2019
• Judgment of the United States Court for the Southern District of Florida - 23 sept. 2020
• Amended Opinion & Order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York - 10 déc. 2020
• Order of the United States Court for the Southern District of Florida - 8 juil. 2021
• Order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida - 2 déc. 2021
• Final Judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida - 10 déc. 2021
• Judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit - 3 oct. 2022
• Order of the United States Supreme Court Denying Petition for a Writ of Certiorari - 21 févr. 2023
• Opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit - 8 août 2024

Voir tous les autres documents

• Joint Memorandum in Support of Claimant's Applications for Partial Final Award for Security - 1 juil. 2016
• C.V.G. Ferrominera Orinoco, C.A.’s Demand for Stay and Defenses Under Reservation and Protest - 22 juil. 2016
• C.V.G. Ferrominera Orinoco, C.A.’s Response in Opposition to Claimant’s Joint Application for a Partial Final Award for Security - 17 août 2016
• Report of Professor Carlos Enrique Mouriño Vaquero - 10 oct. 2016
• Petition to Confirm and Enforce International Arbitration Award - 17 janv. 2017
• Respondent’s Motion to Quash Petitioner’s Insufficient Service and Incorporated Memorandum of Law - 6 févr. 2017
• CVG Ferrominera Orinoco, C.A.’s Response in Opposition to Commodities & Minerals Enterprise Ltd.’s Petition to Confirm and Enforce International Arbitration Partial Final Award on Security - 5 avr. 2017
• Declaration of Dr. Alfredo De Jesús O. - 5 avr. 2017
• CVG Ferrominera Orinoco, C.A.’s Motion to Vacate Partial Final Award on Security or to Remand - 5 avr. 2017
• Affidavit of Bruce G. Paulsen in support of Petition to Confirm Arbitration Awards - 19 déc. 2019
• Petition to Confirm, Recognize, and Enforce Final Arbitration Award and for Entry of Judgment - 19 déc. 2019
• Respondent’s Motion to Vacate Order Granting Petition to Confirm, Recognize, and Enforce Final Arbitration Award and for Entry of Judgment and Incorporated Memorandum of Law - 30 sept. 2020
• Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion to Vacate Order Granting Petition to Confirm, Recognize, and Enforce Final Arbitration Award and for Entry of Judgment and Incorporated Memorandum of Law - 14 oct. 2020
• First Amended Petition (Complaint) To Confirm, Recognize, and Enforce Final Arbitration Award and for Entry of Judgment - 19 juil. 2021
• Respondent’s Response in Opposition to First Amended Petition to Confirm, Recognize, and Enforce Final Arbitration Award and for Entry of Judgment and Incorporated Memorandum of Law - 27 sept. 2021
• Notice of Appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit - 30 déc. 2021
• Petition for a Writ of Certiorari - 29 déc. 2022

Mis à jour le: 3 nov. 2022 Générer un résumé via une IA

Accrochez-vous, Jus AI est en train de faire sa magie...

annuler

Cela pourrait prendre un moment.

Résumé généré pour le document sélectionné

Disclaimer: This feature is still in beta (under testing) and is provided “As Is” and “As Available” without warranties of any kind, either express or implied. You are ultimately responsible for any action taken on the basis of any provided information.

Vous êtes pressé(e) ? Nous avons tout prévu !

Notifiez-moi par e-mail

Vous recevrez un e-mail dès que ce sera prêt.

Copié dans le presse-papiers Copier ×

Merci pour votre vote!

Aidez-nous à mieux comprendre votre avis en choisissant parmi les options suivantes.

Résumé non pertinent/utile Contient des informations incorrectes Contient des erreurs de grammaire Autre ×

Nous aimerions en savoir plus!

0/200

Envoyer ×

Commentaires reçus

Retourner au document

Avocats, autres représentants, expert(s), secrétaire du tribunal

• en

Judgment of the United States Court for the Southern District of Florida

[1]. WHEREAS, on December 19, 2019, Petitioner Commodities & Minerals Enterprise Ltd. ("Petitioner" or "CME") petitioned the Court for an Order pursuant to Chapter 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"), 9 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq., and Article III of the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, June 10, 1958, 330 U.N.T.S. 38 (the "New York Convention") confirming, recognizing, and enforcing an international arbitration award (the "Award")1 in favor of Petitioner and against CVG Ferrominera Orinoco, C.A. ("FMO" or "Respondent") by a panel of three arbitrators (the "Panel") in an arbitration administered by the Society of Maritime Arbitrators ("SMA"), sitting in New York, New York, pursuant to the rules of the SMA (the "SMA Rules"), with respect to CME's claim for FMO's breach of the Transfer System Management Contract dated August 7, 2010 (the "TSMC"); The "Award" refers to the Final Award dated December 20, 2018, together with Appendices A and B (the "Final Award"), as corrected by the Final Award Concerning Claimant’s Motion to Correct the Final Award of December 20, 2018, dated February 11, 2019 (the "Corrected Award"). [2]. WHEREAS, on December 20, 2018, the Panel duly executed the Final Award, and on February 11, 2019, the Panel duly executed the Corrected Award, awarding CME $187,863,578.44, plus post-award interest at a rate of 5.50% per annum from December 20, 2018 until the Award is fully paid or confirmed and made a judgment of the Court; [3]. WHEREAS, for the reasons discussed in the Award, the Panel concluded that the TSMC was a valid and binding contract which FMO failed to perform, and, therefore breached, and that CME should be awarded damages as set forth therein; [4]. WHEREAS, on December 19, 2019, CME filed its Petition (ECF No. 1), which was accompanied by a Notice of Motion to Confirm Final Arbitration Award and for Entry of Judgment (ECF No. 4), a Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Confirm Final Arbitration Award and for Entry of Judgment (ECF No. 6), and an Affidavit in Support of Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award with accompanying exhibits (ECF No. 7); [5]. WHEREAS, the parties agreed to arbitrate pursuant to Clause 41 of the TSMC, which provides, in relevant part:

The Parties hereby expressly declare their Contract to submit to binding arbitration any and all controversies arising from, or in any way related to, this Contract and/or the execution and/or interpretation thereof, including, but not limited to, the validity and/or enforceability of this clause; and consequently further expressly waive their right to submit any such controversies to the jurisdiction of the Courts of any State/Country, including expressly, but not limited to, the jurisdiction of the Venezuelan Courts, as allowed by the Venezuelan Commercial Arbitration Act and any other applicable Venezuelan laws.... Arbitration shall be conducted in Miami, Florida, in accordance with the Rules of the Society of Maritime Arbitrators then in force, in the English language. The arbitration shall be exclusive and mandatory.

TSMC 41 (ECF No. 7-5);

[6]. WHEREAS, the aforementioned Clause 41 also provides that SMA Rules are to apply; [7]. WHEREAS, Section 35 of the SMA Rules states in relevant part:

Wherever parties have agreed to arbitration under these Rules, they shall be deemed to have consented to service of any papers, notices or process necessary to initiate or continue an arbitration under these Rules or a court action to confirm judgment on the Award issued. Such documents may be served:

a. By mail addressed to such party or counsel at their last known address; or

b. By personal service.

See ECF No. 14-2;

[8]. WHEREAS, on March 30, 2020, CME filed an Affidavit of Service of Bruce G. Paulsen stating that CME had served the Petition and its accompanying papers on counsel for FMO and FMO itself "at their last known address[es]," in accordance with SMA Rule 35 (ECF No. 14); [9]. WHEREAS, on April 29, 2020, the Court issued an order (the "OTSC") directing CME to why service of process was sufficient (ECF No. 15); [10]. WHEREAS, on May 1, 2020, CME filed its Response to the OTSC, which set forth the reasons why service of process was sufficient (ECF No. 16); [11]. WHEREAS, the Award satisfies the FAA and the New York Convention, and no defenses to confirmation apply; and [12]. WHEREAS, FMO has not opposed the Petition despite sufficient service and is in default; [13]. NOW, THEREFORE, upon reading the papers submitted in support of the application, including the Notice of Motion, the Petition, the Memorandum of Law, the Affidavit of Support and accompanying exhibits, the Award, the Affidavit of Service of Bruce G. Paulsen dated March 30, 2020, and CME’s Response to the OTSC, all with proof of due service thereof, all prior proceedings had herein, and upon receiving no opposition from Respondent, it is hereby [14]. ORDERED that the Award is confirmed in its entirety; and [15]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that service of the Petition and all accompanying papers on FMO was properly effected pursuant to the FAA, the New York Convention, and the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1608(b)(1); and [16]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that CME is entitled to judgment in the amount of $187,863,578.44, plus post-award interest at a rate of 5.50% per annum from December 20, 2018 through the date of this Order and shall have execution therefor; and [17]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that CME is entitled to post-judgment interest at the federal statutory rate specified in 28 U.S.C. § 1961 and shall have execution therefor; and [18]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that CME is entitled to the costs of this proceeding, pursuant to Rule 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall have execution therefor. [19]. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 23rd day of September, 2020. Jus AI

Here are some suggestions to get you started

• When did the case start?
• Provide a list of the legal concepts discussed in the case
• Summarise the case in five sentences
• What are the events that gave rise to the dispute?

Consultez Jus AI Citations postérieures de ce document dans sa totalité : par. Citations postérieures de cet extrait : 0 Suivre cette Affaire New Sauvegarder Copier la référence Cliquez sur le texte pour sélectionner un élément Cliquez ailleurs pour désélectionner un élément Jus AI

Here are some suggestions to get you started

• When did the case start?
• Provide a list of the legal concepts discussed in the case
• Summarise the case in five sentences
• What are the events that gave rise to the dispute?

Consultez Jus AI Ouvrez le PDF dans un nouvel onglet ×

Demandez le PDF

L'accès aux PDF de ce document est réservé sur demande aux clients de l'offre Jus Mundi - Legal Practice. La version HTML de ce document reste entièrement disponible sur notre site web.

Annuler Demandez le PDF × Email professionnel Connexion Pas de compte ? Demandez un essai gratuit. ×

This Wiki Note has not been submitted yet. We continuously identify new themes to add to the existing Wiki Notes as well as Contributors to author new Notes. Become a Contributor, submit your candidacy to author this Wiki Note.

Become a Contributor The writing of this Wiki Note is in progress. × ×

Oups ! Vous avez atteint la limite maximale d'alertes (10 max. pour les arbitres).

Supprimez une de vos alertes pour en créer une nouvelle

×

Oups ! Vous avez atteint la limite maximale d'alertes (10 max. pour les affaires).

Supprimez une de vos alertes pour en créer une nouvelle

Sélectionner un mot clé : 1 /

Cette fonctionnalité requiert un abonnement

Accédez à la source d'information la plus complète et la plus fiable en arbitrage

DEMANDEZ UN ESSAI GRATUIT

Déjà enregistré ? Se connecter

×

Retour d'information

Merci de décrire ici votre retour (donnée, contenu, information manquante, autre) Annuler Envoyer La référence a été copiée. ×

Sauvegarder dans :

Succès!

An error just occurred, please try again

Créer un nouveau dossier Create ×

Cette fonctionnalité requiert un abonnement

Accédez à la source d'information la plus complète et la plus fiable en arbitrage

Demandez un essai gratuit Déjà enregistré? Se connecter < Back Email professionnel Connexion Pas de compte ? Demandez un essai gratuit. ×

Vous avez besoin d'un accès Premium pour pouvoir utiliser cette fonctionnalitée.

abonnez-vous à l'une de nos offres. ×

Connectez-vous pour accéder à cette fonctionnalité.

Connexion Vous n'avez pas de compte ? Contactez-nous ×

Abonnés AI Premium uniquement

Doublez votre efficacité en matière de recherche, de rédaction, d'analyse et de traduction grâce aux informations fournies par la base de données sur l'arbitrage et le droit international la plus complète au monde avec Jus AI.

En savoir plus Vous avez déjà souscrit à ce plan ? Se connecter