- DeviceList
- Smartphones
- CPUs
- Video Cards
- Search
Home / CPU / Intel Celeron J4115 vs Intel Pentium G4560Intel Celeron J4115 vs Intel Pentium G4560 Video Specifications
- General information
- Benchmarks
- Technologies and extensions
- RAM parameters
- Virtualization technologies
- Graphics specifications
Games
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
Intel Celeron J4115 28% DeviceList score vs
Intel Pentium G4560 7% DeviceList score We compared the characteristics of Intel Celeron J4115 and Intel Pentium G4560 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2024 year.Intel Celeron J4115 benefits
Number of cores |
4 2 (100%) better vs 2 |
Power Consumption (TDP) |
10 Wt -41 Wt (-80.4%) better vs 51 Wt |
Intel Pentium G4560 benefits Winner in comparison
Maximum frequency |
3.5 GGz 1 GGz (40%) better vs 2.5 GGz |
Passmark |
3591 775 (27.5%) better vs 2816 |
Video Video reviews Intel Celeron J4115
Video reviews Intel Pentium G4560 Intel Pentium G4560 Review: Cannibalizing the i3
Comparison of all specifications
Intel Celeron J4115 | Intel Pentium G4560 |
General information |
Type |
Для ноутбуков | Десктопный |
Architecture codename |
Gemini Lake Refresh | Kaby Lake |
Number of coresA large number of cores improves performance in multithreaded applications. At the moment, increasing the number of processor cores is one of the priorities for increasing performance. |
4 2 (100%) better | 2 |
Number of threadsMore threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
4 | 4 |
Base frequency |
no data | 3.5 GGz |
Maximum frequencyProcessors with high clock speeds perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance. |
2.5 GGz | 3.5 GGz 1 GGz (40%) better |
Manufacturing process technology |
14 nm | 14 nm |
64 bit support |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration |
no data | 1 |
Socket |
FCBGA1090 | FCLGA1151 |
Series |
Intel Gemini Lake | no data |
Start price |
no data | 108 USD |
Price-quality ratioThe sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The higher the%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
no data | 67.7 % |
Maximum core temperature |
no data | 100 °C |
vPro |
TXTIntel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware protection against malware. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM. |
PCI Express revision |
no data | 3.0 |
PCI-Express line count |
no data | 16 |
Secure Key |
MPX |
no data | + |
Identity Protection |
no data | + |
SGX |
no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
OS Guard |
no data | + |
Quick Sync |
no data | + |
L1 CacheMore threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
no data | 64 Кб (на ядро) |
L2 Cache |
4 Мб | 256 Кб (на ядро) |
L3 Cache |
no data | 3 Мб (всего) |
Maximum Case Temperature (tcase) |
no data | 65 °C |
Power Consumption (TDP)The calculated heat output shows the average heat output in operation under load, the larger the value - the more the requirements for cooling and energy consumption increase. |
10 Wt -41 Wt (-80.4%) better | 51 Wt |
EDB |
no data | + |
video memory size |
no data | 64 Гб |
Clear Video |
no data | + |
InTru 3D |
no data | + |
4K resolution support |
no data | + |
Benchmarks |
Passmark |
2816 | 3591 775 (27.5%) better |
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core |
2087 | no data |
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core |
7426 | no data |
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core |
71 | no data |
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core |
263 | no data |
WinRAR 4.0 |
1203 | no data |
x264 encoding pass 1 |
76 | no data |
x264 encoding pass 2 |
18 | no data |
TrueCrypt AES |
2 | no data |
3DMark06 CPU |
3683 | no data |
3DMark Fire Strike Physics |
no data | 5710 |
Technologies and extensions |
Advanced instructions |
no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
Turbo Boost |
no data | - |
Hyper-ThreadingMore threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
Idle States |
Thermal Monitoring |
AES-NIMore threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
+ | + |
AVXThe presence of AVX commands improves performance in floating-point operations and in processor-demanding applications. |
RAM parameters |
Supported memory types |
no data | DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600 |
Maximum memory sizeThe maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor. |
no data | 64 Gb |
Max memory channels |
no data | 2 |
EEC memory supportEEC memory is specially designed for systems with high requirements for data processing reliability. This type of memory automatically recognizes errors that occur. Typically used on server computers. |
Virtualization technologies |
VT-dIntel's virtualization technology allows devices on the PCI bus to be forwarded to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools. |
VT-x |
EPT |
Graphics specifications |
Integrated graphicsThe presence of a video core allows you to use a computer without using a video card. |
+ | + |
maximum frequency of the graphics core |
no data | 1.05 ГГц |
Maximum number of monitors |
no data | 3 |
Clear Video HD |
Maximum resolution via HDMI 1.4 |
no data | 4096x2304@24Hz |
Maximum resolution via eDP |
no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
Maximum resolution via DisplayPort |
no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
DirectX |
no data | 12 |
OpenGL |
no data | 4.4 |
Games
We have selected for you 3 videos with performance tests Intel Celeron J4115, Intel Pentium G4560 in games: Cyberpunk 2077, Fortnite, Red Dead Redemption 2.
Cyberpunk 2077
Fortnite
Red Dead Redemption 2
vs Intel Atom C3558 vs Intel Celeron J4115
vs Intel Celeron J4115 vs Intel Core i5-7300U
vs Intel Core m3-7Y30 vs Intel Pentium G4560
vs Intel Pentium G4400 vs Intel Pentium G4560
vs Intel Pentium G4560 vs Intel Core i7-7700
vs Intel Pentium G4560 vs Intel Core i7-6820HQ
vs Intel Pentium G4560 vs Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2
vs Intel Pentium G4560 vs Intel Core i5-7400 Popular comparisons
vs Intel Core i9-12900K vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs Intel Core i9-12900K vs AMD Ryzen 3 3100
vs Intel Core i9-12900K vs Intel Core i5-8257U
vs Intel Core i9-12900K vs Intel Core i7-10700F
vs AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE vs Intel Celeron J4115
vs Intel Celeron J4115 vs AMD EPYC 7351P
vs Intel Celeron J4115 vs Intel Core i9-7960X
vs Intel Celeron J4115 vs Intel Atom C3955
vs Intel Celeron J4115 vs Intel Xeon Silver 4208
vs Intel Pentium G4560 vs Intel Core i3-9320
vs Intel Pentium G4560 vs AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
vs Intel Pentium G4560 vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs Intel Core i3-6100H vs Intel Pentium G4560
vs Intel Pentium G4560 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6136
- About us
- Contacts
- Privacy policy
- User agreement
- Русский
- English
- Português
- Türk
- Deutsch
- Français
- Italiano
- Español
- Polski