Comparison Of SPECT/CT V/Q Scan, CTPA & Clinical Probability Of ...

Skip to main content Meeting ReportGeneral Clinical Specialties Track Comparison of SPECT/CT V/Q scan, CTPA & clinical probability of pulmonary embolism. Qian Zhao, Haiyan Yang, Xiaohong Zhu and Rong Wang Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 514; Qian Zhao 1Department of Nuclear Medicine General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University Yinchuan, Ningxia China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Haiyan Yang 2Ningxia Medical University Yinchuan, Ningxia China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaohong Zhu 2Ningxia Medical University Yinchuan, Ningxia China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rong Wang 1Department of Nuclear Medicine General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University Yinchuan, Ningxia China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

514

Purpose: Wells’ score is the one of the commonly used clinical probability assessment of pulmonary embolism (PE). SPECT/CT Ventilation-Perfusion (V/Q) scan and CTPA were the two imaging techniques for the diagnosis of PE. This study compared the diagnostic efficacy of SPECT/CT V/Q scan, CTPA and wells’ probability of PE.

Methods: Retrospective study of 288 patients who underwent SPECT-CT/VQ scan and CTPA within the same admission and <72 h apart for evaluation of PE during July 2012 to July 2017. Different modality imaging were reviewed and compared. Results: Of the 288 patients, 86 were diagnosed as PE clinically. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV of SPECT/CT V/Q scan was 75.58%, 92.08%, 87.15%, 80.25% and 89.86%, respectively. That of CTPA was 63.79%, 80.00%, 73.86%, 66.07% and 78.35%, while Wells’ score as 62.79%, 52.24%, 55.40%, 36.00% and 76.64%, respectively. The most common clinical presentations were shortness of breath (SOB) (75.69%), chest pain (33.33%), leg pain or swelling (31.60%), syncope (3.12%) and hemoptysis (2.78%). Conclusion: Compared with CTPA and clinical probability score of PE, SPECT/CT V/Q has the highest sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV for diagnosing PE.

Previous Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 59, Issue supplement 1 May 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts User Name * Password * Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address Email * Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Comparison of SPECT/CT V/Q scan, CTPA & clinical probability of pulmonary embolism. Message Subject (Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site. Your Personal Message Citation Tools Comparison of SPECT/CT V/Q scan, CTPA & clinical probability of pulmonary embolism. Qian Zhao, Haiyan Yang, Xiaohong Zhu, Rong Wang Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 514;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share Comparison of SPECT/CT V/Q scan, CTPA & clinical probability of pulmonary embolism. Qian Zhao, Haiyan Yang, Xiaohong Zhu, Rong Wang Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 514; Share This Article: Copy Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article User Name * Password * Remember my user name & password.

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

General Clinical Specialties Track

  • Quantitative Evaluation of Parathyroid Adenoma and Hyperplasia in Reference to Thyroid using Tc-99m MIBI SPECT/CT
  • A primitive study for clinical application of 18F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide PET/CT in combination with 18F-FDG PET/CT for imaging neuroendocrine neoplasms
  • Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detection of disease burden and response assessment in patients with myeloid sarcoma
Show more General Clinical Specialties Track

Outcomes/Infectious Disease/Pulmonary II

  • Collagen-Targeted PET Imaging in Pulmonary Fibrosis: Initial Human Experience
  • CT guided Technetium-99m Macroaggregated albumin injection for lung nodule localization prior to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A single institutional experience
  • 3D-Quantitated lung perfusion 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT: Impact on intended management in comparison to planar (2D) lung perfusion scan in lung cancer patients
Show more Outcomes/Infectious Disease/Pulmonary II

Similar Articles

Từ khóa » Vq Scan Vs Ct Pe