Cyclone Lessons. - BEST FIGHTER FOR CANADA

Có thể bạn quan tâm

Cyclone lessons.

January 12, 2014

Not yet, but soon, hopefully.

Tempest. Storm. Whirlwind. CYCLONE. It would seem that Canada's newest helicopter was aptly named, not for the downwash of its propeller, but for the type of controversy it would cause. By now, many of you have heard that the CH-148 Cyclone is pretty much a "done deal". Despite a brief period of threatening to take their business elsewhere, the Canadian government announced that they would be going ahead with the troubled Cyclone purchase. This was done as a late Friday afternoon "info dump", a practice that indicates that they want the announcement to attract the least amount of attention. Despite this, criticism has been ramping up, questioning the choices made and the money spent in what former Defence Minister Peter MacKay called "the worst procurement in the history of Canada". Those who don't learn from history are destined to repeat it, so let's look at some of the lessons (hopefully) learned from the long and painful process of replacing Canada's CH-124 Sea King helicopters.

BUY OFF THE RACK.

By far the greatest delay in the Cyclone program has been caused by development delays. The Cyclone itself is a "militarized" version of Sikorsky's S-92 Cougar. Sikorsky pitched the S-92's civilian roots as a way to sell the Cyclone as being a "proven" platform.

Sikorsky S-92 Cougar, basis for the CH-148 Cyclone.

It takes more prepare a product for military service than few coats of medium grey paint and some decals, however. Military hardware needs to meet much more demanding requirements and needs to operated in some inhospitable environments. Specialized equipment needs to be added such as weapons, surveillance gear, and communication equipment. In the Cyclone's case a special copper wire mesh needs to be applied throughout to help protect the helicopter's sensitive electronic systems from high levels of electromagnetic radiation produced by military grade radars. Adding all this extra gear means more weight. For the Cyclone, that extra weight made it sluggish enough that it needed upgraded engines. With all these modifications, the Cyclone is, for all intents and purposes, almost an entirely different aircraft from the S-92 Cougar. While ordering an almost entirely new design allows the DND to outfit their new helicopter to exactly their specifications, the end result is far more expensive and takes a lot longer than buying something "off the rack". The irony here is that when the original EH101 was cancelled by PM Jean Chretien for being a "Cadillac", but what greater luxury is there above having a custom tailored suit?

Commonality... Shommonality...

CH-149 Cormorant stopping for a large double-double.

Canada currently operates a fleet of 14 CH-149 Cormorant SAR (search and rescue) helicopters. Those helicopters are currently operated out of British Columbia, Nova Scotia, and Newfoundland. CH-148 is intended to reach a fleet of 28. These 28 Cyclones will replace Sea Kings currently stationed in British Columbia and Newfoundland, not too far away from where Cormorants are operating. It should be noted that the CH-149 Cormorant is a decontented version of the EH-101 originally intended to replace the Sea King. It should also be noted that, during its brief look into Cyclone alternatives, the modern variant of the EH-101, the AW-101, was considered. It should also be noted that one of the duties the Cyclone will be tasked with is Search and Rescue.

The UK's Royal Navy just went ahead and replaced their Sea Kings with the EH101 Merlin.

So... While a mixed fighter fleet would be considered cost prohibitive, a mixed helicopter fleet is okay, even though those helicopters are of similar design, function, and even based close together. Huh? Canada also took a rather roundabout route in procuring its fleet of CH-47F Chinooks. After selling it's previous fleet to the Netherlands, DND realized they were desperately needed for Afghanistan. Those new Chinooks arrived after Canadian operations ended there however, as they were waiting for extra, Canada specific features to be added, like larger fuel tanks and an upgraded electrical system. One of the missions tasked to the new CH-47F? Disaster relief, a mission also shared with the CH-124 Sea King and CH-149 Cormorant. Oof.

Politics and procurement don't mix.

There's plenty of blame to go around when it comes to the bungled Sea King replacement. Ordered by a Progressive Conservative government, the EH101 was actually a pretty obvious choice. Purposely designed as a direct replacement for the Sea King, the EH101 was the only helicopter left standing after the Sikorsky S-70 Sea Hawk was deemed too small and the Aérospatiale Super Puma was aged past its prime. The EH101 order came during a time of deficits and high unemployment, however, so its selection was dubbed wasteful by then opposition Liberal leader, Jean Chretien. Famously, Chretien described the EH101 as a "Cadillac". This, despite the EH101's distinct lack of leather seats, wood trim, and available landau top. Despite a promise to reduce the order, the Liberal Party of Canada soundly trounced the PCs in the next election. It should be noted, however, that the EH101 was far from the biggest scandal of that particular election cycle, or that government. Upon winning the 1993 election, Jean Chretien and his party quickly cancelled the EH101 purchase. This ended up costing the Canadian taxpayers $478.3 million in cancellation fees, followed up by another $71.5 million spent on extending the life of the Sea Kings. To put this in perspective, that $550 million would have paid for 1/8th of the EH101 order. And then... Nothing. The Sea King was left to soldier on until it approached its 50-year anniversary with the Canadian Armed Forces. No interim helicopter. No competition to find a cheaper, more basic model. No reevaluation. Despite the best efforts of the crews working on it, the Sea King became increasingly more labour intensive to put in the air, requiring 30 hours of maintenance for each hour up in the air.

"If the Sea King stays in the air for longer than 8 hours... Call your doctor."

It wasn't until after Jean Chretien took his "long walk in the snow" that new Liberal leader and Prime Minister Paul Martin made the Sea King replacement a priority. While the EH101 (now AW101) was still under consideration, the requirements seemed to have been written intentionally to disqualify it. In 2004, the Sikorsky H-92 SuperHawk was selected to be the basis for the next Maritime Helicopter. This, despite the fact that the H-92 had yet to be selected by any other military force. Now, almost 10 years later, the Canadian Armed Forces are still waiting. It is inevitable that large scale military purchases become politicized. After all, a governing party spending billions of taxpayers' money is always a big deal. Taxpayers demand value for their tax dollar, after all. The possibility that that 30% or more of their paycheck is being deducted to help pay for something frivolous, extravagant, or just plain stupid. Big ticket military purchases almost never come as a surprise, however. Vehicles and equipment have finite lifetimes. Some of it becomes obsolete as technology advances. Some of it becomes ineffective thanks to new tactics. Some of it just wears out after decades of hard use. While ground crew technicians can often work miracles getting old aircraft to fly again, sooner or later there comes a time when parts are no longer available and the cost of repairs is greater than the costs associated with procuring new equipment. No matter how new and shiny those new helicopters, tanks, jets, or rifles might be, sooner or later, they're going to wear out and need to be replaced. While billions of dollars being spent might seem like political fodder for an opposition party, there's a good chance their criticism could backfire when and if they take office and assume responsibility for the same procurement program they criticized.

Sir Sam Hughes, Minister of Militia and Defense during WWI, equipped solders with a prone-to-jam Ross Rifle, the MacAdam Shield Shovel, (pictured) and the infamous "Sir Sam Shoes", which were combat boots constructed out of cardboard (yes, you read that right).

Simple solutions?

What can be done to avoid a future Cyclone debacle?

When possible, avoid purchasing an unproven design. While it's tempting to be at the forefront of technology, doing so costs money and developmental delays are the norm. Canada doesn't have the military budget, nor the will, to be at the bleeding edge of military technology.
Avoid the need to "Canadianize" a design. Military contractors can't be expected to deliver a product on time and on budget if we're constantly changing the requirements. Yes, Canada does have some rather challenging operating environments, but few of these environments (cold weather, large land mass, etc) are truly unique enough to warrant custom built aircraft.
Splitting a fleet of similar mission aircraft into two separate platforms is okay if its politically justified, so surely splitting a fleet for more pressing reasons (cost, flexibility, risk mitigation) should be completely acceptable, if not openly encouraged.
Have a contingency plan. Procurements rarely go as planned, so why not give ourselves recourse if things don't go as planned? Have a "first runner up" selected in case the selected winner is unable to meet expectations of pricing, deliveries, or specifications. Preferably, this "runner up" would be a proven design already in production and in service.
Try to leave politics out of it. While a little political intervention is to be expected, the Canadian Armed Forces shouldn't be equipped on the whims of those more concerned on poll numbers. At most, the Canadian government should act as a simple oversight to ensure that military procurement follows a defined set of rules set up to ensure Canadians get the best value for their dollar and that our soldier's get the equipment they need.
Plan early. The day after a new aircraft is delivered, consideration on its replacement should start. This include reevaluating that aircraft's role, to ensure that requirements are based on what that aircraft will actually do, not just simply copy-and-pasted from the previous models' spec sheet. Some platforms may see their role expanded, others might see their role diminish or even slip away.
Watch (but don't necessarily copy) what everyone else is doing. If no one else is selecting a platform, that could be clear sign to stay away. Conversely, successful platforms are usually successful for a reason, costs often being one of them.

If the Cyclone debacle truly is "the worst procurement in the history of Canada", (some would argue not) than perhaps its failure could have the positive effect of changing how Canadian military purchases are handled in the future. Did Canada learn from the Cyclone purchase? Will it effect the decision to replace the CF-18? Hopefully. AW-101 budgets CH-124 CH-148 CH-149 Cormorant Cougar Cyclone EH101 helicopters politics S-92 Sea King

Comments

Doug AllenJanuary 13, 2014 at 2:49 PM
1. I agree, however other than the cyclone when is the last time a developmental program was truly started2. I agree MOTS purchases should be pursued. If it is good enough for our allies it should work for us. I believe the CH-47F were all post contract extras added without proper oversight. This should be illegal3.minimizing platforms should be a goal, particularly with our small forces and their demonstrated management deficiencies. 4. I'm not sure how a contingency plan would work or if it would be needed if the first 2 points were followed5. I'm not sure I agree. At present there is no accountability within DND or the CF's. Who made the decisions? Has anybody been fired? If the minister just purchased platforms through sole source deals at least the public would know who was accountable.6. Unfortunately DND/CF seems to plan forever. Has anyone costed the individual programs to see how many personnel and how much money has been wasted on the Cyclone/FWSAR/JSS/CCV over the yearsIn addition to point three the CF's are going to have 4 helicopters in service for total numbers of 156 (100 CH-146,13 CH-149, 15 CH-147,28 CH-148) actually less with no plan for attrition. Ideally Comorant and Cyclone would be merged into one platform as originally intended, this could still happen in either direction. The reality is 85% of CF's helicopter roles could be done by 75 CH-146 and 75 CH-149. The Chinooks are here to stay now and that is not a bad thing just another small, orphan platform to maintain.
ReplyDeleteReplies
Doug AllenJanuary 15, 2014 at 10:36 PM
Doug, an argument for what I'm not surehttp://blogs.ottawacitizen.com/2014/01/15/questions-are-being-raised-why-it-is-taking-dnd-and-the-government-so-long-to-buy-military-trucks/$10 million a year to keep SMP project open? Extrapolate that for all the projects open, for projects of greater complexity, and for average procurement time period of 15 years. Ouch
ReplyDeleteReplies

Add commentLoad more...

THE REAL REASON THE GRIPEN LOST...

April 01, 2022

For those of you wondering how Saab lost the FFCP competition, new information has come to light... According inside sources, the initial scoring of the two fighters was incredibly close. The F-35 did indeed win the "Capability" category (worth up to 60%) while the Gripen E ended up being ahead on both price (worth 20%) and industrial offsets (worth the remaining 20%). According to my source April Furst, who is currently serving an internship in the House of Commons. The ultimate decision was made rather hastily while the final scores were being tallied up. "Due to COVID restrictions and renovations, the FFCP committee were forced to convene in a remote office located in the basement of the Parliament building. You could tell it wasn't used very often. Lots of cobwebs, and the whole place smelled musty and moldy. "The committee members were doing their thing, going down each individual line of the respective offers. It was actual... Read more

Fighter Jet Fight Club: Gripen NG vs. Super Hornet!

August 01, 2014

I will be honest... I have been dreading this installment of Fighter Jet Fight Club. I tend to root for the underdog in any competition, but what happens when underdogs have to compete against each other? Both of these aircraft have a 0-2 record for FJFC, yet both are clearly crowd favorites in the comment section. Our contestants today are two of the biggest value propositions in the fighter world today. Both are "modernized" versions of aircraft that have been flying since the 80s. Neither make promises of being the most dominant force in the skies, but they do promise a "90%" solution at "50%" of the cost. Most importantly, both aircraft are "tried and true" designs that have provided years of faithful service. Despite this, they are often overlooked in favor of newer, flashier aircraft like the F-35 Lightning II. Which aircraft will see redemption here today? Just remember the rules . Air-to-Ground: Infiltration/Pe... Read more

Fighter Jet Fight Club: F-35 vs. Gripen

September 26, 2014

Funny how things go full circle. When I started gripen4canada.blogspot.ca a few years ago, I was convinced that the Gripen NG (now Gripen E/F) would be a much more suitable replacement for Canada's aging CF-18s. Much has changed since then, and I have attempted to broaden my scope to look at other fighter aircraft in order to find the "best fighter for Canada". Anyone following the Joint Strike Fighter's saga over the years knows that it is a troubled program. Despite assertions of progress from both Lockheed Martin and the Pentagon, there is no escaping the fact that the F-35 is still nowhere near the fighter it is supposed to be. When I devised "Fighter Jet Fight Club" I decided that I would need to compensate for the F-35's issues, otherwise I would be shot down as clearly biased against it. In order to do this, I added two rules: All equipment will work "as advertised". No buggy software, etc. Cost is not considered. ... Read more

Doug Allen Visit profile

Labels

5th gen
6th Generation
737 MAX
A-10
A-12
A-4
AETD
AIM-9X
air show
Airbus

airlines
airshow atlantic
ALCM
American only
AMRAAM
Anarchy in the UK
Anne Murray
April 1st
arctic
Argus
ASH
astronaut
ASW
AT-6
ATD-X
Aurora
Australia
AV-8
Avro Arrow
AW-101
AWACS
B-1
B-2
B-52
Back to Basics
BAE
Bat Country
Bear
Berlin-class
bias
Bill Sweetman
Billie Flynn
Bluenose
Boeing
Boeing vs. Bombardier
Bombardier
bomber
bouchard
Boxing analogies gone wild
Bradley
Brazil
budgets
budgets.
Buffalo
C-130
C-17
C-2
C-27
C-27J
C-295
C-Series
C295
Canadian Rangers
CANSEC
Canuck
CAS
CC-115
CC-150
CF-100
CF-100 Canuck F-86 Sabre Scorpion Starfire F-94 F-89
CF-101
CF-101 Voodoo Arrow Avro Arrow Hindsight 2020
CF-104
CF-104 Starfighter F-105 Thunderchief Mirage Hindsight 2020
CF-116
CF-116 CF-5 Freedom Fighter F-4 A-5 Phantom Skyhawk Hindsight 2020
CF-18
CF-18 F-16 F-15 F-14 F/A-18 Tomcat Eagle Viper Fighting Falcon Hornet Hindsight 2020
Cf-18 Gripen JAS 39
CF-35
CF-5
CH-124
CH-148
CH-149
CH-47
China
Chinook
clustertrump
Cobra
cockpit
competition
Cormorant
coronavirus
correction
Cougar
coup
CP-140
CPFH
Crimea
cruise missiles
Cyclone
Dassault
death spiral
defence policy review
Denmark
dogfight
DOT&E
drones
EA-18
Eagle
Egypt
EH101
election 2015
Embraer
emerging threats
engines
EOTS
Eric Palmer
Eurofighter
experts
F-100
F-101
F-102
F-105
F-117
F-14
F-15
F-15EX
F-15SE
F-15X
F-16
F-16V
F-16XL
F-18E/F
F-20
F-22
F-35
F-35 AIM-9 Sidewinder Nitpick
F-35 Fat Amy Firefox
F-35 Gripen
F-35 Omnishambles
F-35 Politics COVID Bias
F-35C
F-35D
F-36 Kingsnake F-16XL
F-4
F-5
F-86
F-86 MiG-15 Tunnan J29 CL-13
F/A-18
F/A-XX
F135
facepalm
fiery death
Fighter Jet Fight Club
fire
first flight
FJFC
Flanker
FOL
foreign fighters
Freedom Fighter
frikkin laser beams
fuel
future tech
FWSAR
GAO
Germany
Global 6000
Global Hawk
GlobalEye
Globemaster
go big or go home
goodbye
Greenwood
Gripen
Gripen F-35 Bayraktar XQ-58 Valkyrie Switchblade
Gripen E
grounded
Growler
hacking
Harry DeWolf
Harvard II
Hawk
helicopters
Hercules
Hindsight 2020
Hindsight 2020 CF-101 CF-18 CL-13 F-86 CF-100 CF-101 Voodoo Sabre Hornet Starfighter CF-104 Canuck CF-5 CF-116 Freedom Fighter
History
Hornet
hybrid
I'm back!
IAF
IMP
India
interim fighter
IRST
Israel
Italy
J-10
J-20
J-31
Japan
jobs
Joint Strike Missile
JSF
JSM
KAI
KC-10
KC-390
KC-46
KEPD 350
KFX
lasers
Lavi
Libya
life finds a way...
Lightning II
Lockheed
Lockheed Martin
LOL
Loren Thompson
M-346
Meteor
Middle-east
MiG-21
MiG-25
MiG-29
MiG-31
military industrial complex
Mirage
missiles
Mistral
mixed fleet
MMRCA
Mythbuster
Mythbuster Mondays
myths
NASA
NATF
Netherlands
NGB
Northrop Grumman
Norway
NSPS
Offsets
Oh crap!
omnishambles
operating costs
opinion
Osprey
Ottawa Road Trip
PAK FA
passive radar
patrols
Pentagon Wars
Pierre Sprey
POGO
politics
Predator
Project Pluto
Q400
QOTW
Queenston-class
question of the week
questionnaire
RAAF
RAF
Rafale
RAND
rant
Raptor
Raptor Salad
ratatatat
RCAF
reality check
Reaper
reset
RFP
Rhino
Richard Shimooka
runways
Russia
S-92
S. Korea
Saab
Saab Draken
Saab/Boeing
safety
Santa
SAR
Scorpion
SDB-II
Sea King
secretariat
sequestration
Shakespear? Really?
shenanigans
ShinShin
shipbuilding
Silent Eagle
single-engine
Snowbirds
something
something dark side.
South Africa
Space Shuttle
Spain
Spartan
Spoilers!
stand by
Star Wars
Starfighter
stealth
Stealth snowmobile
Storm Shadow
Su-22
Su-27
Su-57
Su-75 Checkmate
Super Arrow
Super Hornet
Super Hornets
Super Tucano
Supply-class
Switzerland
Swordfish
T-100
T-38
T-50
T-X
Tankers
Taurus
Tempest
Tesla
Texan II
the finale!
The Five Fighters
the stupid... it burns
thrift shop
Tornado
trade war
training
trump
trumpsterfire
Tu-160
Tu-95
Turkey
Typhoon
UAV
UCAV
UCLASS
Ugh
Ukraine
USAF
USMC
USN
V-22
Vampire
Victoria-class
video
Voodoo
VOTE!
Warthog
weapons
welsh
What if?
whoa
Why can't we just be friends?
wild speculation
Winslow Wheeler
WTF?
X-47B
X-Wing
YF-17
zombie shuffle

Report Abuse

Từ khóa » Ch-149 Vs Ch-148

Cyclone Lessons. - BEST FIGHTER FOR CANADA

Cyclone lessons.

BUY OFF THE RACK.

Commonality... Shommonality...

Politics and procurement don't mix.

Simple solutions?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE REAL REASON THE GRIPEN LOST...

Fighter Jet Fight Club: Gripen NG vs. Super Hornet!

Fighter Jet Fight Club: F-35 vs. Gripen

Archive

Labels

Report Abuse

Canada's CH-148 Cyclones: 4th Time Lucky? - Defense Industry Daily

Sikorsky CH-148 Cyclone - Wikipedia

AgustaWestland CH-149 Cormorant - Wikipedia

Routine Inspections Discover Cracks On Almost All The Canadian ...

Sikorsky CH-148 Cyclone Helicopter - Lockheed Martin

[PDF] The CH-148 Cyclone Heads Out To Sea - Lockheed Martin

RCAF Analyzes Options For Cormorant Upgrade - Vertical Magazine

Leonardo CH-149 Cormorant - Military Factory

The Maritime Solution - Helicopters Magazine

Sikorsky CH-148 Cyclone - Military Wiki - Fandom

Sikorsky CH-148 Thread - Secret Projects Forum

Sikorsky CH-148 Cyclone - Academic Dictionaries And Encyclopedias

Does Anyone Know Why The RCAF Currently Operates Both CH-148 ...

Liên Hệ