Edward K H Ng | The London School Of Economics
Skip to main content 
Edward K H NgThe London School of Economics, Law, Graduate StudentThe University of Hong Kong, Law, AlumnusaddFollowdoneFollowing
Could Competition Law Bar the Enforcement of Anti-Competitive Arbitral AwardsThis article explores two possible pathways where arbitral awards may be refused enforcement, nam... more This article explores two possible pathways where arbitral awards may be refused enforcement, namely non-arbitrability and public policy. First, given that Hong Kong competition law contains a number of peculiarities that depart from the general international norm, there could be an argument that competition law issues may not be arbitrable. Second, courts are likely to find that Hong Kong competition law does relate to its local public policy. However, allegations of violation of competition law may not automatically mean that courts will intervene to refuse enforcement. There is strong argument that courts will only refuse enforcement where there are 'serious' violations.Download 
Revisiting International Tort Actions in Hong KongRevisiting International Tort Actions in Hong Kong, 2019Hong Kong courts currently use the double actionability rule to determine whether a party has an ... more Hong Kong courts currently use the double actionability rule to determine whether a party has an international tort claim-the double actionability rule is lagging behind many common law jurisdictions. The purpose of this article is to argue why the double actionability rule must be abolished. The article then explores the three approaches in international tort actions, namely (a) the 'proper law' of tort; (b) lex loci deliciti commissi; and (c) the 'most favourable law' approach. All three approaches to international torts have their shortcomings, and there is no fast solution in solving choice of law issues in international torts. However, it is suggested that Hong Kong should adopt the 'most favourable law' approach, as all of the drawbacks with this approach have been attended to in this article.Download Could Competition Law Bar the Enforcement of Anti-Competitive Arbitral AwardsThis article explores two possible pathways where arbitral awards may be refused enforcement, nam... more This article explores two possible pathways where arbitral awards may be refused enforcement, namely non-arbitrability and public policy. First, given that Hong Kong competition law contains a number of peculiarities that depart from the general international norm, there could be an argument that competition law issues may not be arbitrable. Second, courts are likely to find that Hong Kong competition law does relate to its local public policy. However, allegations of violation of competition law may not automatically mean that courts will intervene to refuse enforcement. There is strong argument that courts will only refuse enforcement where there are 'serious' violations.Download Revisiting International Tort Actions in Hong KongRevisiting International Tort Actions in Hong Kong, 2019Hong Kong courts currently use the double actionability rule to determine whether a party has an ... more Hong Kong courts currently use the double actionability rule to determine whether a party has an international tort claim-the double actionability rule is lagging behind many common law jurisdictions. The purpose of this article is to argue why the double actionability rule must be abolished. The article then explores the three approaches in international tort actions, namely (a) the 'proper law' of tort; (b) lex loci deliciti commissi; and (c) the 'most favourable law' approach. All three approaches to international torts have their shortcomings, and there is no fast solution in solving choice of law issues in international torts. However, it is suggested that Hong Kong should adopt the 'most favourable law' approach, as all of the drawbacks with this approach have been attended to in this article.Download Close
Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
- Log In
- Sign Up
- Log In
- Sign Up
- more
- About
- Press
- Blog
- Papers
- Terms
- Privacy
- Copyright
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
Edward K H NgThe London School of Economics, Law, Graduate StudentThe University of Hong Kong, Law, AlumnusaddFollowdoneFollowingFollowers
51
Following
48
Public Views
Barrister (HK), Attorney (NYS)LLB (HKU), LLM (LSE), PCLL (HKU), CEDR Accredited Mediator, MCIArb, AHKIArblessUploads
Papers by Edward K H Ng
Could Competition Law Bar the Enforcement of Anti-Competitive Arbitral AwardsThis article explores two possible pathways where arbitral awards may be refused enforcement, nam... more This article explores two possible pathways where arbitral awards may be refused enforcement, namely non-arbitrability and public policy. First, given that Hong Kong competition law contains a number of peculiarities that depart from the general international norm, there could be an argument that competition law issues may not be arbitrable. Second, courts are likely to find that Hong Kong competition law does relate to its local public policy. However, allegations of violation of competition law may not automatically mean that courts will intervene to refuse enforcement. There is strong argument that courts will only refuse enforcement where there are 'serious' violations.Download Revisiting International Tort Actions in Hong KongRevisiting International Tort Actions in Hong Kong, 2019Hong Kong courts currently use the double actionability rule to determine whether a party has an ... more Hong Kong courts currently use the double actionability rule to determine whether a party has an international tort claim-the double actionability rule is lagging behind many common law jurisdictions. The purpose of this article is to argue why the double actionability rule must be abolished. The article then explores the three approaches in international tort actions, namely (a) the 'proper law' of tort; (b) lex loci deliciti commissi; and (c) the 'most favourable law' approach. All three approaches to international torts have their shortcomings, and there is no fast solution in solving choice of law issues in international torts. However, it is suggested that Hong Kong should adopt the 'most favourable law' approach, as all of the drawbacks with this approach have been attended to in this article.Download Could Competition Law Bar the Enforcement of Anti-Competitive Arbitral AwardsThis article explores two possible pathways where arbitral awards may be refused enforcement, nam... more This article explores two possible pathways where arbitral awards may be refused enforcement, namely non-arbitrability and public policy. First, given that Hong Kong competition law contains a number of peculiarities that depart from the general international norm, there could be an argument that competition law issues may not be arbitrable. Second, courts are likely to find that Hong Kong competition law does relate to its local public policy. However, allegations of violation of competition law may not automatically mean that courts will intervene to refuse enforcement. There is strong argument that courts will only refuse enforcement where there are 'serious' violations.Download Revisiting International Tort Actions in Hong KongRevisiting International Tort Actions in Hong Kong, 2019Hong Kong courts currently use the double actionability rule to determine whether a party has an ... more Hong Kong courts currently use the double actionability rule to determine whether a party has an international tort claim-the double actionability rule is lagging behind many common law jurisdictions. The purpose of this article is to argue why the double actionability rule must be abolished. The article then explores the three approaches in international tort actions, namely (a) the 'proper law' of tort; (b) lex loci deliciti commissi; and (c) the 'most favourable law' approach. All three approaches to international torts have their shortcomings, and there is no fast solution in solving choice of law issues in international torts. However, it is suggested that Hong Kong should adopt the 'most favourable law' approach, as all of the drawbacks with this approach have been attended to in this article.Download CloseLog In
Log in with FacebookLog in with GoogleorEmailPasswordRemember me on this computeror reset passwordEnter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.
Need an account? Click here to sign up- About
- Press
- Blog
- Papers
- Topics
- Academia.edu Journals
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
- Find new research papers in:
- Physics
- Chemistry
- Biology
- Health Sciences
- Ecology
- Earth Sciences
- Cognitive Science
- Mathematics
- Computer Science
- Terms
- Privacy
- Copyright
- Academia ©2024
Từ khóa » Kh Ng
-
Dr. Kam Hung NG | Department Of Aeronautical And Aviation ... - PolyU
-
About Dr Ng Kheng Hong | KH Ng Surgery
-
KH$NG - YouTube
-
Kam K.H. Ng - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University | LinkedIn
-
KH Ng | Facebook
-
KH NG COLORECTAL & MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY
-
Kam K.H. NG | Department Of Aeronautical And Aviation Engineering
-
Kam K.H. NG | Publons
-
Working At K H NG & CO. Company Profile And Information - JobStreet
-
Key & BPM For Hoa N? Kh?ng M?u By Ho?i L?m | Tunebat
-
Dr Jing Hui Kh'ng | Walker St General Practice
-
How To Get To K. H. NG & Koo In Pulau Pinang By Bus Or Ferry?