SmartphonesCompare LaptopsCompare CPUGPUSoC Ranking
Beta Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Exynos 850 vs Helio G35 – what's better? Exynos 850 vs Helio G35
VS
Exynos 850 Helio G35
We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 850 (with Mali-G52 MP1 graphics) and MediaTek Helio G35 (PowerVR GE8320). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
- Review
- Differences
- Benchmarks
- AnTuTu v10
- GeekBench 6
- Gaming
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Exynos 850
12 Helio G35
12 Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan Exynos 850
4 Helio G35
4 Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption Exynos 850
79 Helio G35
76 NanoReview Score Overall chip score Exynos 850
23 Helio G35
22 Key Differences
Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Samsung Exynos 850
- Has a smaller size transistor (8 versus 12 nm)
- Higher GPU frequency (~25%)
- Shows better (up to 27%) AnTuTu 10 score – 185K vs 145K
Pros of MediaTek Helio G35
- 15% higher CPU clock speed (2300 vs 2000 MHz)
Promotion
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks SoC: Exynos 850
vs Helio G35
AnTuTu 10
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios Exynos 850
+27% 185374 Helio G35
145990 | CPU | 64990 | 54934 |
| GPU | 26753 | 17881 |
| Memory | 54180 | 40532 |
| UX | 39451 | 32643 |
| Total score | 185374 | 145990 |
| Samples | [33 tests] | [21 tests] |
Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 6
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Single-Core Score Exynos 850
+17% 222 Helio G35
189 Multi-Core Score Exynos 850
+7% 868 Helio G35
810 | Asset compression | 53.9 MB/sec | 63.1 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 31.7 pages/sec | 25.9 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 35.9 Mpixels/sec | 36.1 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 8.03 images/sec | 10.5 images/sec |
| HDR | 29.7 Mpixels/sec | 30 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 1.53 images/sec | 0.87 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 8.04 images/sec | 7.57 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 1.52 Mpixels/sec | 1.65 Mpixels/sec |
Compute Score (GPU) Exynos 850
596 Helio G35
n/a Promotion
3DMark
A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal) 3DMark Wild Life Performance Exynos 850
508 Helio G35
n/a | Stability | 97% | - |
| Graphics test | 3 FPS | - |
| Score | 508 | - |
Gaming
Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games | PUBG Mobile | - | 23 FPS [Low] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | - | 29 FPS [Medium] |
| Shadowgun Legends | - | 30 FPS [Low] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | - | 43 FPS [Low] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | - | 29 FPS [Low] |
| Device | - | Xiaomi Poco C3 720 x 1600 |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 850 and Helio G35
CPU
| Architecture | 8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A534x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process | 8 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 3 W | 2.2 W |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G52 MP1 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 2nd gen | PowerVR Series8XE (Rogue) |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 680 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1 | 4 |
| Shading units | 24 | 8 |
| Total shaders | 24 | 32 |
| FLOPS | 40.8 Gigaflops | 43.5 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 1.2 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | No | No |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | - | 13.9 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2400 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 25MP, 2x 13MP |
| Video capture | 1K at 60FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 1080p at 60FPS | 1080p at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 | - H.264 - H.265 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 13 | LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 300 Mbps | Up to 300 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
Info
| Announced | May 2020 | June 2020 |
| Class | Low end | Low end |
| Model number | S5E3830 | MT6765G |
| Official page | Samsung Exynos 850 official site | MediaTek Helio G35 official site |
Cast your vote
So, which SoC would you choose? Exynos 850
1182 (76.7%) Helio G35
360 (23.3%) Vote Total votes:
1542 Related Comparisons
1. MediaTek Helio G35 vs MediaTek Helio G85
2. MediaTek Helio G35 vs MediaTek Helio G36
3. MediaTek Helio G35 vs Unisoc T606
4. Samsung Exynos 850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
Compare other chipsets (170+) Please give your opinion on the comparison of Helio G35 and Exynos 850, or ask any questions Name Message Send Send Promotion Comparisons
- Smartphones
- Tablets
- Laptops
- CPU
- Graphics Cards
- SoC
Rankings
- Desktop Processors
- Laptop Processors
- Mobile SoC
- Desktop GPU
- Laptop GPU
EnglishРусский > >