PhonesLaptopsCPUGPUSoC
Beta Log in
Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Exynos 850 vs Snapdragon 660 – what's better? Exynos 850 vs Snapdragon 660
VS
Exynos 850 Snapdragon 660
We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 850 (with Mali-G52 MP1 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (Adreno 512). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
- Review
- Differences
- Benchmarks
- AnTuTu v10
- GeekBench 6
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Exynos 850
12 Snapdragon 660
17 Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan Exynos 850
4 Snapdragon 660
6 Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption Exynos 850
79 Snapdragon 660
64 NanoReview Score Overall chip score Exynos 850
23 Snapdragon 660
23 Key Differences
Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Samsung Exynos 850
- Has a smaller size transistor (8 versus 14 nm)
- Higher GPU frequency (~55%)
- Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
- Performs 3.5x better in floating-point computations
- Shows better (up to 37%) AnTuTu 10 score – 252K vs 183K
- 10% higher CPU clock speed (2200 vs 2000 MHz)
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks SoC: Exynos 850
vs Snapdragon 660
AnTuTu 10
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios Exynos 850
183771 Snapdragon 660
+37% 252006 | CPU | 60055 | 89180 |
| GPU | 26330 | 36992 |
| Memory | 61383 | 56965 |
| UX | 36004 | 68869 |
| Total score | 183771 | 252006 |
| Samples | [51 tests] | [28 tests] |
Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 6
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Single-Core Score Exynos 850
222 Snapdragon 660
+54% 342 Multi-Core Score Exynos 850
868 Snapdragon 660
+42% 1232 | Asset compression | 53.9 MB/sec | 71.3 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 31.7 pages/sec | 41.6 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 35.9 Mpixels/sec | 51.8 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 8.03 images/sec | 13.6 images/sec |
| HDR | 29.7 Mpixels/sec | 46.2 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 1.53 images/sec | 1.89 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 8.04 images/sec | 10.2 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 1.52 Mpixels/sec | 1.97 Mpixels/sec |
Compute Score (GPU) Exynos 850
+112% 596 Snapdragon 660
281 3DMark
A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal) 3DMark Wild Life Performance Exynos 850
+36% 508 Snapdragon 660
373 | Stability | 97% | 96% |
| Graphics test | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| Score | 508 | 373 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 850 and Snapdragon 660
CPU
| Architecture | 8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 4x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73)4x 1.84 GHz – Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53) |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| L2 cache | - | 2 MB |
| Process | 8 nanometers | 14 nanometers |
| Transistor count | - | 1.75 billion |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 3 W | 5 W |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | Samsung |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G52 MP1 | Adreno 512 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 2nd gen | Adreno 500 |
| GPU frequency | 1001 MHz | 647 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1 | 1 |
| Shading units | 16 | 128 |
| Total shaders | 16 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 48 Gigaflops | 165.6 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.3 | 1.0 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | - | 11 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | No | Hexagon 680 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | - | 13.9 Gb/s |
| Max size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2560 x 1600 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 1K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 1080p at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV | - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
Connectivity
| Modem | - | X12 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 13 | LTE Cat. 13 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 300 Mbps | Up to 600 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | May 2020 | May 2017 |
| Class | Low end | Mid range |
| Model number | S5E3830 | SM6115 |
| Official page | Samsung Exynos 850 official site | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 official site |
Cast your vote
So, which SoC would you choose? Exynos 850
206 (31.5%) Snapdragon 660
448 (68.5%) Vote Total votes:
654 Related Comparisons
1. Samsung Exynos 850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (2)
Compare other chipsets (190+) Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 660 and Exynos 850, or ask any questions 🌐
Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community! Name Message Send Send Comparisons
- Smartphones
- Tablets
- Laptops
- CPU
- Graphics Cards
- SoC
Rankings
- Desktop Processors
- Laptop Processors
- Mobile SoC
- Desktop GPU
- Laptop GPU
EnglishРусский > >