FFmpeg H264 & H265 Preset Crf Comparison 2020 (finale) - Write
This comprehensive FFmpeg encoding comparison includes H.264 and H.265 HEVC from the fastest preset ultrafast through to veryslow with CRF values from 20 to 30.
The posts have been split up with this, the finale putting the fasts and slows presets from both H.264 with H265 HEVC together.
H.264 and H.265 preset crf comparison
This post is the finale concluding the previous 7 parts. Part 1, 2, 3 and 4 For H.264 can be found at the links. Part 1 for H265 here, part 2 and part 3.
The server
Intel Xeon E-2246G CPU with 6 cores, 12 threads at 3.60GHz boosted to 4.80GHz with 32GB of ram and SSD disk running Ubuntu 18.04 64 bit.
CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) E-2246G CPU @ 3.60GHz Number of cores : 12 CPU frequency : 4200.984 MHz Total size of Disk : 877.5 GB (25.1 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 32068 MB (365 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 1951 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 1 days, 4 hour 47 min Load average : 0.00, 0.00, 1.19 OS : Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 4.15.0-72-generic ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed(1st run) : 438 MB/s I/O speed(2nd run) : 440 MB/s I/O speed(3rd run) : 440 MB/s Average I/O speed : 439.3 MB/sThe Xeon E-2246G is a very recently released CPU (Q2 2019). FFmpeg version 3.4.6.
The source media
Thanks to jell.yfish.us the source media file for the H.265 testing is this file here. At 4k resolution (3840×2160) 29.97 fps, 30 seconds long, 400Mbps bitrate, 10 bit and a file size of 1.4GB this video file is rich in its data.
Results
If you didn’t already know, you will after reading this. H265 or HEVC is considerably slower than H264. The average of all the H264 encode times in seconds was 144.42 whilst H265 was a much greater 590.65 seconds.
H264 averaged 23.91 encoding fps, whilst H265 averaged an encoding FPS speed of just 5.63. The advantages from H265 come in its filesize averaging just 61,648.88 Kilobytes whilst H264 was 103,183.18 KB.
Average H265 bitrate was 16,813.71 kb/s whilst H264 was 28,145.15 kb/s. furthermore stating that H265 HEVC compress the media much more than h264 that is why it takes longer.
File size in kilobytes

Bitrate kb/s

Encoding FPS

Time taken to finish

File size + seconds

File size + seconds + bitrate

Each preset with averages for H264 and H265:
Average file size
Average bitrate
Average seconds
Average FPS
Average size + seconds
Average size + seconds + bitrate
Precentage difference charts:

Graphs for each crf value
FPS
File size

Seconds

Bitrate

Từ khóa » H264 H265 Crf
-
CRF Guide (Constant Rate Factor In X264, X265 And Libvpx)
-
H.264 Video Encoding Guide - FFmpeg Wiki
-
What Is CRF H264? - High Tech Guide
-
Video Compression Testing: X264 Vs X265 CRF In Handbrake 0.10.5
-
What CRF Or Settings I Should Choose For H265 In Order To Achieve A ...
-
H265 Crf - Non-Emby General Discussion - Emby Community
-
What CRF Or Settings I Should Choose For H265 ... - CopyProgramming
-
CRF Values? - VideoHelp Forum
-
CRF Values - VideoHelp Forum
-
FFMPEG Tutorial: 2-Pass & CRF In X264 & X265 - Gists · GitHub
-
The Relation Between Quality And Bitrate In CRF. | Download Table
-
Encoding Time, Bitrate And Objective Qualities For Videos Encoded ...
-
Is A CRF Of 1 Overkill? - Ffmpeg - Super User
-
Encoding Guide - Remotion