FTIR Resolution (cm^-1 To Nm) - Zemax Community

Skip to main content Zemax Community Logo
  • Knowledgebase
  • Community
      • Forum overview
      • Recently active topics
      • Unanswered questions
      • General Discussion
      • User News & Alerts59
      • Licensing and Installation181
      • Got a question?3123
      • People & Pointers215
      • Programming OpticStudio
      • Code Exchange93
      • DLLs76
      • ZOS-API382
      • ZPL212
      • Chinese Forums (中文论坛)
      • 用户新闻和注意事项9
      • 授权与安装9
      • 问题讨论159
      • 用户交流与技术分享60
      • Japanese Forums (日本語フォーラム)
      • ユーザーニュースと注意喚起5
      • ライセンスとインストール2
      • 質問コーナー158
      • ユーザー ラウンジ24
  • Ansys Zemax Support FAQs
  • User Groups
Zemax Community Logo
  • Create topic
  • Login
  • Community
  • General Discussion
  • Got a question?
  • FTIR Resolution (cm^-1 to nm)
designerguy13-photonicsForum|alt.badge.img
  • designerguy13-photonics
  • Visible

HI community!

Actually i was going through the THOR Lab manual for FTIR spectroscopy and got stuck at understanding the  relationship between resolution expressed in wavenumbers (R cm^1-) and in nanometer (R(nm). In the Table-2 (link given below) of that manual, can someone explains the conversion formulae used for calculation ?            

         FTIR document reference

Best answer by Sven.Stöttinger

Hi,

your link does not seem to work properly, it only directs back to this thread. But I might have an idea what your question is leading to.

Generally using wavelength in nm is somewhat impractical if you want to express a Δenergy-value, since the same Δ-wavelength value in nm relates to a different ΔE in dependence if you for example are looking at the same Δnm value at 300 nm or at 800nm. This is why the wavenumber (cm^-1) or eV as Δenergy units are more commonly used in spectroscopy.

Just an example: at 500 nm a Δ50nm difference corresponds to a ΔE of roughly 225 meV or 1818 cm^-1,at 900 nm however the same Δ50nm difference now correpsonds to a ΔE of roughly 72.5 meV or 585 cm^-1. 

Here is a link to a online calculator where you can put in wavelength and wavelength-difference to get the energy value calculated (sorry it is in german, but looking at the units should help :) ):

https://optikexpertisen.de/interaktiv/spektralkonverter

 

Hope this helps,

Sven

 

https://github.com/designerguy13-photonics
  • Physical Optics Propagation
  • Interferometer
designerguy13-photonicsMuthu serpi
  • Like
  • Share
Sven.StöttingerForum|alt.badge.img
  • Sven.Stöttinger
  • Infrared
  • Answer
  • Forum|Forum|3 years ago February 24, 2022

Hi,

your link does not seem to work properly, it only directs back to this thread. But I might have an idea what your question is leading to.

Generally using wavelength in nm is somewhat impractical if you want to express a Δenergy-value, since the same Δ-wavelength value in nm relates to a different ΔE in dependence if you for example are looking at the same Δnm value at 300 nm or at 800nm. This is why the wavenumber (cm^-1) or eV as Δenergy units are more commonly used in spectroscopy.

Just an example: at 500 nm a Δ50nm difference corresponds to a ΔE of roughly 225 meV or 1818 cm^-1,at 900 nm however the same Δ50nm difference now correpsonds to a ΔE of roughly 72.5 meV or 585 cm^-1. 

Here is a link to a online calculator where you can put in wavelength and wavelength-difference to get the energy value calculated (sorry it is in german, but looking at the units should help :) ):

https://optikexpertisen.de/interaktiv/spektralkonverter

 

Hope this helps,

Sven

 

designerguy13-photonics
  • Like
designerguy13-photonicsForum|alt.badge.img
  • designerguy13-photonics
  • Author
  • Visible
  • Forum|Forum|3 years ago February 25, 2022

Thanks @Sven.Stöttinger , it was helpful. Though i had figured this thing, onlyconfusion was regarding resolution in terms of wavenumber (delta_nu_prime) and resolution in terms of wavelength (delta_lambda). 

The following relation along with your explanation well explains this artifact :

delta_lanmbda = (delta_nu_prime / nu_prime) * lambda

So, let’s say for resoluting a wavelength of 200 nm with resolution of 1cm^-1, 

delta_lambda = (200 nm /50000 cm^-1) * 1 cm^-1 = 0.004 nm

https://github.com/designerguy13-photonics
  • Like
Powered by GainsightCommunity Posting GuidelinesCookie settingsAccessibility statement

Sign up

Already have an account? Login

Login to the Zemax Community. Login to the Zemax Community.

Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.

Enter your e-mail address Send Back to overview

Scanning file for viruses.

Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.

OK

This file cannot be downloaded

Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.

OK zemax-en Logo
Zemax Community
  • Manage email notification
  • Private Message Inbox
  • My Subscriptions
  • Posting guidelines
Need more help?
  • Ansys Zemax OpticStudio
  • Knowledgebase
  • Software Downloads
  • Ansys Innovation Courses
  • Open a Case
To Chinese users:

Do not provide any information or data that is restricted by applicable law, including by the People’s Republic of China’s Cybersecurity and Data Security Laws ( e.g., Important Data, National Core Data, etc.).

不要提供任何受适用法律,包括中华人民共和国的网络安全和数据安全法限制的信息或数据(如重要数据、国家核心数据等)。

Privacy policy License Agreements Terms of use Cookie Policy Zemax Account Licensing Policies

Từ khóa » Nm Vs Cm-1