Fujifilm XC 35mm F2 Vs XF 35mm F2 Sample Gallery (DPReview TV)
Có thể bạn quan tâm
Now reading: Fujifilm XC 35mm F2 vs XF 35mm F2 sample gallery (DPReview TV) 42 comments Fujifilm XC 35mm F2 vs XF 35mm F2 sample gallery (DPReview TV) Comments (42) Published Jan 25, 2020 | dpreview staff | Share | Tweet |
In their latest video, Chris and Jordan from DPReview TV compared Fujifilm's inexpensive XC 35mm F2 lens with the more durable XF 35mm F2 R WR that costs twice as much.
In this gallery above you'll see some of the comparison photos they took with each lens, with the XC version coming first.
View sample gallery
Watch DPReview TV's Fujifilm 35mm F2 lens comparison video
Tags: sample-gallery, dprtv, fujifilmGear in this story
Gear in this story
Fujifilm XC 35mm F2 - Discuss in the forums
- See full product details
- View sample images
Fujifilm XF 35mm F2 R WR - Discuss in the forums
- See full product details
- View sample images
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
Fujifilm XC 35mm F2
| black | $199.00 | Shop now |
| Black | $399.00 | Shop now |
| Silver | See price on Amazon.com | |
Comments
All (43)Most popular (3)Editors' picks (0)DPR staff (0)Oldest firstJ0s3phKimpressive lens for 200-250 eur.
Like0Dec 17, 2021permalinkLazlo55This is how one can understand the differences between lenses : absolute like for like shots. Well done.
Like1Jan 26, 2020permalinkNewbie4LifeZero pictures with the kit lens?
Given the core market of this lens (first timers with their first prime) it's amazing so much of the dpreview coverage "misses the mark" with no info answering the basic question:
Is it better than the kit?
Like1Jan 26, 2020permalinkMiddleman316What? The "mark" in this write-up is clearly how it compares to the XF equivalent.
The side by sides of the exact same image answer that question comprehensively.
I'm actually kind of astonished at this complaint.
Like13Jan 26, 2020permalinkRevenantI guess he means that the XC and XF versions are basically the same lens, optically speaking, only targeted at different users (entry-level and budget-minded people vs. enthusiasts).
So, given that few people would be choosing between the two versions, and they're optically the same anyway, it would make more sense to compare the XC with a lens aimed at the same users. This is how I interpreted the OP.
Like2Jan 26, 2020permalink
1971_M5 Looks REALLY good.
Like2Jan 25, 2020permalink
fPrime A direct H2H lens comparison gallery? Color me impressed, Chris and Jordan.
DPR take note. This is how ALL lens review galleries should be shot (against a comparator lens). Gallery images shot in isolation with a single review lens are much less useful.
Like29Jan 25, 2020*permalinkLazlo55Absolutely, this is the only way to understand lens quality, same shot, minutes apart, with different lenses, so the lens character can shine.
Like3Jan 26, 2020permalink
MyReality No. A blind test is the best. Knowing what each lens is and the lens price can cause picture choice bias. Even if you did not know the price and what each lens was and you were looking at the same number of photos from each lens, you might end up choosing the best photos just be guessing, because you have a 50% chance.
Like3Jan 27, 2020permalinkpaolo-uluguruThe magician! that is in Fujifilm camera/optics. These guys simply are the masters of the craft. What a lens, what a gem!!!
Like1Jan 25, 2020permalinkretr01976I agree. You have to own one to truly understand what a gem it is. It easily beat some of my best most coveted FF glass and L gems. It’s pixel sharp, contrast and color are “cinematic”, bokeh is beautiful, focusing is rocket fast and completely silent, it’s metal and the entire package is tiny.
Like1Jan 25, 2020permalinkmischa72Which one? This is a comparisan, so which one is the gem? Would like to know, as for me it would be the choice between a brand new XC and a used XF ;-)
Like1Jan 13, 2021permalink
Hugo808 Is it just me or is the cheaper one a bit better?
Like2Jan 25, 2020permalink
Sezano this particular copy seems to be.
it's entertaining though when people obsess about corner sharpness, moire, fringing, and all else, because they totally should in this forum.
Like0Jan 25, 2020permalinkHugo808 "this particular copy seems to be"
And that's the story with Fuji, I've sent back more of their lenses than I can count and I'm still not happy with my 55-200mm. I never had any cause for complaint with other companies. But the good ones are truly superb.
Like0Jan 26, 2020permalinkRevenantThis is really an issue with most lens comparisons based on only one sample of each lens: are the differences we see between the lenses bigger than the differences caused by sample variation?
Like0Jan 26, 2020permalinkborissimo86Yes, the cheaper one appears to be sharper.
Like1Jan 26, 2020permalinkAoi UsagiLooks like a winner.
Like2Jan 25, 2020permalinkAlex Rathmannvery sharp
Like1Jan 25, 2020permalink
J A C S So far, you avoided direct comparisons. Is that a new trend?
Like2Jan 25, 2020permalinkbadiIt is a head to head comparison of 2 lenses claiming/having similar optical formulas so it was kind of necessary here if they wanted the article out this way. I like direct comparisons, so i hope we'll see as many as possible...
Like0Jan 27, 2020permalink108that's a good gallery . Anyone with this combo should be happy .
Like1Jan 25, 2020permalinkpanther fanDid you do some flare tests? Are the coatings the same?
Like1Jan 25, 2020permalinkAoi UsagiThere was some flare from the street light images, but nothing definitive. I wish they would take a photo of both the lenses side by side, so we could see the color reflection of the coatings. Of course, there might not be a visible difference.
Like0Jan 25, 2020*permalink
Chris Niccolls I didn't see any difference in the coatings at all. All the mounting bezels and flocking inside the lens look identical too. I'm pretty sure they simply used the same factory assembly and mounted it in aplastic shroud instead.
Like7Jan 25, 2020permalink
marc petzold Yes, it looks exactly the same - about that nightshot with street lamp - into one picture the flare is to the bottom, into the other, to the side. It looks anyway exactly the same, from the lens rendering.
I do hope, that Fujifilm would release the XC 23mm F2 Lens, as said before. 35mm is the perfect focal length for repotage, street, landscape, etc...everything into between. My X-E1 would see much more usage with this lens, the Zoom is not so my thing.
Good Light.
Like3Jan 25, 2020permalinkAoi Usagi@Chris Niccolls. Thanks for clarifying.
Like0Jan 25, 2020permalinkmarc petzold Panther, you're the Freak of the Week, on DPR seriously. In almost every News Thread, you do post Pro-Sony, and against all odds, all the other brands - this is confirmed.
I explained only something about Distortion to you. Have Fun, but you're spreading incorrect, self-generated Rumors. Nothing against the 16-55 2.8 G,i've said only as example, that without digital correction, this Lens does have a) much distortion (according to 1300 bucks price) and 2) that it doesn't resolve that much at the edges - that's all.
Yes, all APS-C Lenses from 16mm do suffer from distortions, you didn't get the message (again!) that there's a difference between a 400-500 bucks vs. a 1300 bucks Lens - that isn't "hate", that is a matter of fact, nothing else. Nothing against Sony here.
Good Light.
Like0Jan 26, 2020permalinkpanther fan@marc petzoldSo confused that you are replying to the wrong comment?
Like1Jan 26, 2020permalinkggcI have the XF version, good lens, sharp side to side even at f2, but really mediocre corners even at F8. I prefer the 27mm F2.8 anyway.
Like0Jan 25, 2020permalinkpanther fanFuji uses digital distortion correction in this lens quite heavily. This means the corners are sharper wide open than they could be otherwise. But they don't improve much when stopping down. As distortion stays the same at F8.
For me, that is a good compromise, however. I think the corners are quite decent and having them already decently sharp wide open with such a small lens is a nice benefit
Like2Jan 25, 2020permalinkmarc petzold That post doesn't make sense - complaining about digital distortion correction inside a sub 200 USD Lens, useless. I could argue, even the 18.5/2.8 Lens for instance with the Leica T does have distortion correction, any lens nowadays, via Lens Profile (almost), wheter via LR, PS, C1, etc. or invisible inside the Lens Profile added via RAW.
FYI, the Sony G 16-50/2.8 for 1300 bucks looks bad in distortion terms, without correcting, for such a high price - so what?
Good Light.
Like1Jan 25, 2020permalinkpanther fan@marc petzold
Again you misread my post. Distortion correction is the answer to why it doesn't sharpen up much when stopping down.
In general for same sized lenses. Lenses with physical distortion correction - less sharp corners wide open, sharpen up when you stop downLenses with digital distortion correction - allow for sharper corners wide open, but limit the improvement you can have stopped down because of the slight degradation by the digital correction stays
Again I am not against this compromise, as said in my original post"For me, that is a good compromise, however"
It is just an explanation to ggc why the corners don't sharpen up like on "classic" lenses
PS: Why do you always bring up the Sony 16-55? Yes it has high distortion, so does the Fuji 16-55? Both chose the same compromise because it is a good compromise
Like4Jan 25, 2020*permalink
Henrik Helmers @panther correcting distortion in software does not improve corners with one aperture and degrade corners with another. Furthermore the areas stretched or compressed will depend on the type of distortion corrected.
Like1Jan 25, 2020permalinkDay Hiker@Henrik: Panther did not say correcting distortion improves the corners at some apertures and degrades it at others. I implore you to read more closely. Panther indicated that when correcting for distortion wide open, you will see less dramatic corner improvement when you stop down due to the fact that much of the possible correction is already done wide open.
My guess is that if raw images can be captured with this lens @ multiple apertures and no distortion correction added, that we might see a traditional corner sharpness improvement as the apertures decrease.
Like3Jan 25, 2020permalinkggcit's isn't related to digital correction.
At f2 corners are ugly, and they do sharpen up, at F11 they are acceptable. Too late for me.
At f5 (full open) the 16-50mm is much better in the corners than this 35.
Like0Jan 25, 2020permalinkmarc petzold Eno, digital lens correction correlates not for being lossless - it comes at a price, that's also the reason, for instance the "fine" 16-55 2.8 G Sony Lens, that it'll never reach 24 MP into the corners, that's exactly my Point here, nothing more, nothing less - therefore that Zoom as example for digital correction via built-in Lens Profile.
Further, FYI, i do prefer manual "classic" lenses, because they don't rely on digital corrections, hence at that time, there wasn't "digital" being onto the Screen. It's nowadays way easier for Lens Creators/Designers, to take a average Lens, and make it "good" with digital corrections - way cheaper, than to add more (high quality, costly) Lens Elements itself, to deal with distortion(s), LoCA, or other-wise an much more sophisticated Lens Design from the Pike up, which would being more costly (R&D) to develop.
Hope you understand that topic better now.
Good Evening.
Like2Jan 25, 2020*permalinkHenrik Helmers @panther wrote "[Distortion correction] means the corners are sharper wide open than they could be otherwise. But they don't improve much when stopping down [to F8]."
What @panther probably meant was that the distortion correction *makes the corners worse* when shooting wide open, and prevents the lens from improving when stopping down.
And of course the corners will improve when stopping down, every lens I have ever owned does.
Like0Jan 26, 2020permalinkpanther fanBefore everybody guesses here what I meant. And marc petzold spews is anti Sony hate, although all modern 16-xxx APS-C zooms go for the same compromise, let me clarify what I meant.
IF YOU KEEP THE SIZE AND WEIGHT OF A LENS THE SAME (no extra elements)You are faced with the following problem:You can design corners that are sharp, but have distortion orYou can design corners that are softer but are distortion-free
While digital distortion correction costs some sharpness, the corners with distortion correction still end up sharper after correction wide open.
But if you stop down and thereby reduce many of the lens aberrations like spherical aberration, chromatic aberration, etc... corners tend to get sharper. The corners with physical correction now catch up a lot, due to a reduction in all the flaws they had before.
Like0Jan 26, 2020permalinkpanther fanThe distorted corners also catch up, but because you were able to reduce many aberrations already wide open the gain isn't so high. Also because you still face the problem of degradation by digital correction you end up with slightly softer corners even if you were able to correct everything else 100%That's why in many cases lenses with optical distortion correction catch up or exceed lenses with digital correction once stopped down.
Since wide-open performance is of high priority and lenses in APS-C and M43 are often designed with a specific size limit in mind, many designs in those systems rely on digital distortion correction
Like0Jan 26, 2020permalinkKarrolyI have noticed several times with my gear that there is a significant difference in the quality of the lens distortion correction between in-camera correction and correction in PP, especially with entry-level and mid-range cameras. Fost speed reason, the in-camera correction is "quick and dirty". I don't know about high-end cameras...
Like0Jan 26, 2020*permalinkggcSo... without images is an empty discussion. here for one week the samples, at every aperture, NOT CORRECTED against distortion.
here is a wetransfer link: https://we.tl/t-nAb0aQvi9i
if you don't trust in it, just scan it with virustotal.
Corners are nearly good at F11. Central and side sharpness is excellent starting from F2.
Like0Jan 27, 2020permalinkpanther fan@ggcI am not exactly sure for or against what you try to argue with those samples. But showing them without lens correction, of course, makes them look worse.
Most of the "soft corner" isn't in the frame after you apply lens corrections, so there is obviously no need for it to be sharp. Many manufacturers even allow near-full black vignetting there because they won't show up in the final picture.
That said yes a little bit more corner sharpness would be nice. I am not sure if all samples of the 35mm behave this way. The RAW conversion also looks kinda weird
Like0Jan 27, 2020*permalinkYou may also like
 |  |  |  |
| Canon EOS R6 Mark II Sample Gallery (DPReview TV) Jan 22, 2023 | Sony FE 20-70mm F4 G Sample Gallery Jan 18, 2023 | DPReview TV: Fujifilm 35mm XC vs XF. Same performance for half the price? Jan 25, 2020 | Fujifilm announces affordable XC 35mm F2 prime lens Jan 23, 2020 |
More about gear in this article
158DPReview TV: F1.4 or F2.0? Which are the best Fujifilm primes?videoJun 26, 2021The guys at DPReview TV always go above and beyond to produce their videos. This video comparison of Fujifilm's F1.4 and F2 primes show just how dedicated they are, with Chris powering through the pain after suffering a nasty injury.
86Fujifilm X-A3 sample gallerysample galleryJun 20, 2017Fujifilm's X-A3 is the company's only offering to use a new 24MP sensor without their trademark X-Trans color filter array. We've had it out and about with a variety of lenses to see how it compares.
50CP+ 2016: Fujifilm gets new X-Pro2 and X70 into photographers' handsFeb 28, 2016Fujifilm didn't announce any new products at CP+ this year, but the show is the first chance that a lot of Japanese enthusiast photographers have had to get their hands on the X-Pro2 and X70, which were unveiled last month. In an effort to get cameras into photographers' hands, Fujifilm is running a rental service at this year's show, where prospective X-series users can hire gear while they're attending the show. Read more
86Behind the scenes at Fujifilm's factory in Sendai, JapanFeb 1, 2016After the official launch of the X-Pro2 recently in Tokyo, Fujifilm invited a select group of press to visit its Taiwa assembly plant in Sendai, to see the camera being put together. As well as the X-Pro2, we were also able to see the assembly lines for the X-T1, X100T and several lenses. So of course, being the nerds that we are, we took a bunch of pictures. Click through to check out our factory tour
60Rain or shine: Fujifilm XF 35mm F2 R WR real-world sample gallerysample galleryNov 30, 2015Fujifilm's XF 35mm F2 strikes an appealing balance between size, cost and durability. It's sealed against moisture and dust, making it a great candidate for use with the weather-resistant X-T1, and at $399 is a fairly affordable 'normal' prime for Fuji's X-system. The Pacific Northwest is just the place to test weather-resistant gear, though thankfully we've had enough unseasonably dry and sunny days to put together a real-world sample gallery with the 35mm F2. Read more
Latest sample galleries
Sony FE 28-70mm F2 GM pre-production sample gallery 
Sony a1 II pre-production sample gallery 
Panasonic S9 Sample Gallery 
Nikon Z50II pre-production sample gallery See more galleries » Latest in-depth reviews
516Sony a1 II initial review: is Sony's flagship camera another game changer?preview5 days agoSony's Alpha 1 II adds pre-capture and improved autofocus to its high-speed, high-res pro mirrorless model.
801Panasonic Lumix DC-S9 in-depth reviewreview1 week agoThe Lumix S9 is Panasonic's newest full-frame mirrorless camera. It allows users to create their own custom looks for out-of-camera colors and is the first full-frame Lumix camera aimed squarely at social media content creators.
627Nikon Z50II initial review: A fun APS-C camera on a budgetpreview3 weeks agoThe Nikon Z50 II adds a color profile button – sound familiar? – 3D tracking, cloud connectivity, and more.
62Gear we love: My decade-long test of the Lowepro Photo Sport 300 photo packaccessory review1 month agoWe don't usually test a product for ten years before reviewing it, but after a decade of using the Lowepro Photo Sport 300 AW II on an almost daily basis, Managing Editor Dale Baskin tells us why he loves this pack.
283Fujifilm X-M5 Initial Review: a camera for the content agepreview1 month agoFujifilm's X-M5 is an entry-level mirrorless APS-C camera with a strong focus on vlogging.
Read more reviews »Latest buying guides
The Best cameras under $1000 in 20242 days agoAround $1000 is increasingly becoming the entry point for modern interchangeable lens cameras. We look at what you can get for your money, and which we think is best.
Best cameras for vlogging in 20241 week agoWhether you’re just sharing clips with friends or you’re launching an online on-camera career, vlogging matters. We looked at cameras with selfie-friendly screens, wide-angle lenses, microphone inputs and great video quality, and selected the best.
7 Best mirrorless cameras in 20242 weeks ago'What's the best mirrorless camera?' We're glad you asked.
The 7 Best cameras for travel in 20244 weeks agoWhat's the best camera for travel? Good travel cameras should be small, versatile, and offer good image quality. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for travel and recommended the best.
The Best cameras under $1500 in 20241 month agoWhat’s the best camera for around $1500? These midrange cameras should have capable autofocus systems, lots of direct controls and the latest sensors offering great image quality. We recommend our favorite options.
Check out more buying guides » Featured Videos
Fuji 35mm F2 XC vs XF: The same performance for half the price?
Which are the best Fujifilm prime lenses: XF F1.4 vs F2 (18mm, 23mm and 35mm)
Panasonic S9 Video Review | DPReview Finished challenges |  |  |
| Little Flower by KL007from Macro (1:1 +) - Flowers (New Shot Only) | Oomph! by darubfrom The Ball and the Player | Ghost bus by Marzio5from Just a Sec [New Shot] |
Announcing the December Editors' Photo Challenge: 'Happy Holidays'The theme for our December Editors' photo challenge is 'Happy Holidays'. Show us what the holiday season looks like through your lens for a chance to be featured in our winners' gallery later this month.
Nov 24, 20240
In case you missed it: we shot an NFL game with Sony's new a1 IIWe got to test the Sony a1 II out in the field – literally.
Nov 23, 202413video
Accessory Roundup: outdoor camera bags, beautiful card readers, and moreThis week we're looking at some new card readers, outdoor bags, a microphone setup, and more.
Nov 23, 202411
The Best cameras under $1000 in 2024Around $1000 is increasingly becoming the entry point for modern interchangeable lens cameras. We look at what you can get for your money, and which we think is best.
Nov 22, 2024
Sony FE 28-70mm F2 sample galleryWe took portraits, beachside landscapes, and more using Sony's new fast zoom lens.
Nov 21, 202443sample gallery
Landscape Photographer of the Year winners reveal a beautiful EarthThe 11th annual International Landscape Photographer of the Year competition has announced the winners of its 2024 awards, showcasing stunning imagery from around the world.
Nov 21, 202443
The APS-C lens landscape has changedThere used to be very few APS-C lenses for Canon RF and Nikon Z-mount. That's changed over the past two years.
Nov 20, 2024198
Sony a1 II pre-production sample galleryWe tested a pre-production a1 II out by shooting cats, portraits, and the New York Jets.
Nov 20, 202444sample gallery
Sony a1 II initial review: is Sony's flagship camera another game changer?Sony's Alpha 1 II adds pre-capture and improved autofocus to its high-speed, high-res pro mirrorless model.
Nov 19, 2024516preview
Sony's new 28-70mm F2 GM is a zoom for dark placesSony's latest GM zoom lens has a constant F2 aperture, a full stop brighter than the standard 24-70 F2.8.
Nov 19, 2024215lens news
Sony Alpha 1 II press conference, LIVE reportWe're at Sony's 'Creative Space' event in New York, which happens to coincide with when the company said it would announce the Alpha 1 II. We'll be reporting from the event as it happens.
Nov 19, 202439camera news
Sigma expands Canon RF-mount lens lineup with four new APS-C primesThe company 16mm F1.4 DC DN, the 23mm F1.4 DC DN, the 30mm F1.4 DC DN and the 56m F1.4 DC DN.
Nov 19, 202459lens news
25 years of DPReview: The rise and fall of the compact cameraAs DPReview celebrates its 25th anniversary, we're revisiting the history of digital photography from the past quarter century. In this article, former DPReview editor and DCResource.com founder Jeff Keller looks back at the compact camera roller coaster.
Nov 18, 202417725th anniversary
Winners of the November DPReview Editors' Photo challengeOur November theme was 'Fog', and your entries rolled in thick and fast. We were astounded by over 500 photo submissions, many of which demonstrated exceptional quality and creativity.
Nov 17, 202435
Accessory Roundup: cards, card readers, and moreThis week we're looking at a solid Nikon sale, camera and computer storage, and more.
Nov 16, 202411
DPReview.com lens database expanded to include Viltrox AF lensesWe've added sixteen Viltrox autofocus lenses to our database, to give a broader insight into the lenses available for mirrorless systems.
Nov 15, 202450lens news
Help DPReview explore subscription options: Share your feedbackTake a quick survey and help shape how we approach subscription options to better serve the DPReview community.
Nov 15, 2024187
Meike's new 85mm is an autofocus F1.8 lens for Sony, Nikon and L-mount for $340Meike's latest lens is an 85mm F1.8 autofocus lens that is a lot like its other 85mm F1.8 lens... with some key differences.
Nov 15, 202431lens news
On this day 1998: release of the camera that started it allOur anniversary year must be approaching its end, as it's now 26 years since the release of the first camera we ever reviewed.
Nov 14, 20245325th anniversary
Best cameras for vlogging in 2024Whether you’re just sharing clips with friends or you’re launching an online on-camera career, vlogging matters. We looked at cameras with selfie-friendly screens, wide-angle lenses, microphone inputs and great video quality, and selected the best.
Nov 13, 2024
Fujifilm's putting the GFX100 II's massive sensor into its first cinema cameraFujifilm's GFX Eterna camera puts its 102MP medium format into a cinema camera body.
Nov 12, 202488camera news
Sony teases launch of flagship a1 Mark II on Sony Alpha Universe websiteSony has teased its newest high-performance camera, the a1 Mark II, promising that it will be announced at a live event next Tuesday, November 19.
Nov 12, 2024204
Panasonic Lumix DC-S9 in-depth reviewThe Lumix S9 is Panasonic's newest full-frame mirrorless camera. It allows users to create their own custom looks for out-of-camera colors and is the first full-frame Lumix camera aimed squarely at social media content creators.
Nov 12, 2024801review
Nikon Z50II vs Zfc: does tech beat style?Nikon's Z50II brings a lot more processing power to the company's otherwise quite similar cameras. Are the added capabilities enough to outshine the Zfc's good looks?
Nov 11, 2024136
Full-frame fisheye: 7Artisans announces 10mm F2.8 II fisheye lens7Artisans' new full-frame fisheye lens is compatible with Canon RF, Nikon Z, Sony E, and L-mount cameras.
Nov 11, 202428lens news
Nikon Z50II pre-production sample gallery – old sensor, new tricksWe got to spend a day shooting a pre-production sample of the Z50II around Seattle. Here are the results.
Nov 10, 202481sample gallery
Accessory Roundup: new packs, new goggles, and some fashionable lightsThis week, we're taking at some lighting accessories from Harlowe, a new drone accessory from DJI, updated Lowepro packs, and more.
Nov 9, 20244
7 Best mirrorless cameras in 2024'What's the best mirrorless camera?' We're glad you asked.
Nov 8, 2024
Review recap: What we put to the test in 2024 (so far)We're coming up on the end of the year, so here's a recap of the reviews and testing we've done in 2024!
Nov 7, 202446
Hasselblad XCD 75mm F3.4 P: A compact short portrait lens for medium formatThe XCD 3,4/75P delivers a 59mm equivalent field of view on Hasselblad's medium format digital cameras.
Nov 7, 202441Tips or suggestions? Contact us!More articles » www.dpreview.com Follow us Mobile site About- About us
- Gear Patrol
- Work for us
- Advertise with us
- FAQ
- Feedback / Contact us
- Privacy
- Legal
- Licensing and Accolades
- News
- Camera reviews
- Lens reviews
- Printer reviews
- Buying guides
- Sample images
- Videos
- Editorial enquiries
- Cameras
- Lenses
- Camera search
- Camera comparison
- Lens search
- Product timeline
- Browse all products
- Community Guidelines
- Forums
- Challenges
- Galleries
- My Profile
- My Settings
- My GearList
Từ khóa » Fuji Xf 35mm F2 Và Xf 35mm F2
-
Fujifilm XF 35mm F2 Vs Fujifilm XC 35mm F2 | Alik Griffin
-
Fuji XF 35mm F/1.4 Vs. XF 35mm F/2 WR
-
Ống Kính Fujinon 35mm F/1.4 Vs 35mm F/2: Nếu Chỉ được Chọn Một
-
Fuji 35mm F2 XC Vs XF: The Same Performance For Half The Price?
-
Fujifilm XF 35mm F2 R WR - TK Foto
-
So Sánh Fujifilm XF 35mm F/1.4 R Vs 35mm F/2 WR - Giang Duy Đạt
-
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR Review | 5050 Travelog
-
REVIEW: Fuji XF 35mm F1.4 R (Still Worth Buying In 2022?)
-
FUJIFILM XF 35MM F2 R WR LENS BLACK - Alan Photo
-
Fujifilm XF 35mm F2 R WR | Giá Và Dịch Vụ Tốt Nhất Tại Mayanh24h
-
Fuji 35mm F/2 WR Review - Ken Rockwell
-
Affordable "fujifilm Xf 35mm F2" For Sale | Photography - Carousell
-
Fujifilm XC 35mm F2 Vs Fujifilm XF 35mm F2 R WR - Camera Decision