FX 6300 Vs Xeon E5-2620 V4 | Bm.

Front Forum Museum Video Social About En español Search | Compare

| CPUs Intel Alder Lake [2021] Intel Rocket Lake [2021] Intel Tremont [2020] Intel Tiger Lake [2020] AMD Zen 3 [2020] Intel Ice Lake [2019] Intel Comet Lake [2019] AMD Zen 2 [2019] Intel Cascade Lake [2019] AMD Zen+ [2018] Intel Whiskey Lake [2018] Intel Goldmont Plus [2017] AMD Zen [2017] Intel Coffee Lake [2017] Intel Kaby Lake [2016] Intel Goldmont [2016] Intel Skylake [2015] Intel Airmont [2015] AMD Excavator [2015] Intel Broadwell [2014] AMD Steamroller [2014] AMD Puma [2014] Intel Silvermont [2014] AMD Bulldozer [2014] Intel Haswell [2013] AMD Jaguar [2013] Intel Ivy Bridge [2012] AMD Piledriver [2012] AMD Bobcat [2011] Intel Saltwell [2011] Intel Sandy Bridge [2011] Intel Westmere [2010] Intel Nehalem [2008] Intel Bonnell [2008] AMD K10 [2007] Intel Core [2006] Intel P6 Enhanced Pentium M [2006] AMD K8 [2003] Intel NetBurst [2000] | Motherboards Faltan sockets [Intel] LGA 1700 [Intel] LGA 1200 [Intel] LGA 1156 [Intel] BGA 1090 [Intel] LGA 2066 [AMD] TR4 [Intel] AM4 [Intel] LGA 1151 [Intel] LGA 2011-v3 [AMD] FM2+ [Intel] BGA 1170 [Intel] LGA 1150 [Intel] LGA 1366 [Intel] LGA 1155 [Intel] LGA 1175 [AMD] AM3+ [Intel] BGA 559 [Intel] LGA 775 | Computers Intel Rocket Lake [2021] Intel Tremont [2020] Intel Tiger Lake [2020] AMD Zen 3 [2020] Intel Ice Lake [2019] Intel Comet Lake [2019] AMD Zen 2 [2019] Intel Cascade Lake [2019] AMD Zen+ [2018] Intel Whiskey Lake [2018] Intel Goldmont Plus [2017] AMD Zen [2017] Intel Coffee Lake [2017] Intel Kaby Lake [2016] Intel Goldmont [2016] Intel Skylake [2015] Intel Airmont [2015] AMD Excavator [2015] Intel Broadwell [2014] AMD Puma [2014] Intel Silvermont [2014] Intel Haswell [2013] AMD Jaguar [2013] Intel Ivy Bridge [2012] AMD Piledriver [2012] AMD Bobcat [2011] Intel Sandy Bridge [2011] Intel Westmere [2010] Intel Nehalem [2008] AMD K10 [2007] Intel Core [2006] AMD K8 [2003] Intel NetBurst [2000] | RAM Faltan tipos DDR5 LPDDR5 DDR4 LPDDR4 DDR3 LPDDR3 DDR2 Other Unknown | Rankings Performance/W Individual tests Performance/MHz | Download FX 6300 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4 Description The 6300 is based on Piledriver architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 66.4 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 147.8 k points.Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 2.2 times faster than the 6300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below. Specs 6300 E5-2620 v4 CPUID 600f20 406f1 Core Vishera Broadwell-EP Architecture Piledriver Broadwell Base frecuency 3.5 GHz 2.1 GHz Boost frecuency 3.8 GHz 3 GHz Socket Socket AM3+ Socket 2011-3 Cores/Threads 6/6 8/16 TDP 95 W 85 W Cache L1 (d+i) kB 8x32+8x32 kB Cache L2 3x2048 kB 8x256 kB Cache L3 8192 kB 20480 kB Date October 2012 March 2016 Mean monothread perf. 23.14k points 29.39k points Mean multithread perf. 66.43k points 237.83k points AVX optimized benchmark The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011. Monothread 6300 E5-2620 v4 Test#1 (Integers) 7.71k 6.04k (x0.78) Test#2 (FP) 7.41k 10.18k (x1.37) Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) 2.81k 2.74k (x0.98) Test#1 (Memory) 5.2k 2.41k (x0.46) TOTAL 23.14k 21.37k (x0.92) Multithread 6300 E5-2620 v4 Test#1 (Integers) 25.2k 47.51k (x1.89) Test#2 (FP) 25.83k 75.12k (x2.91) Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) 11.47k 19.72k (x1.72) Test#1 (Memory) 3.92k 5.45k (x1.39) TOTAL 66.43k 147.8k (x2.23) Performance/W 6300 E5-2620 v4 Test#1 (Integers) 265 points/W 559 points/W Test#2 (FP) 272 points/W 884 points/W Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) 121 points/W 232 points/W Test#1 (Memory) 41 points/W 64 points/W TOTAL 699 points/W 1739 points/W Performance/GHz 6300 E5-2620 v4 Test#1 (Integers) 2030 points/GHz 2013 points/GHz Test#2 (FP) 1951 points/GHz 3393 points/GHz Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) 741 points/GHz 915 points/GHz Test#1 (Memory) 1367 points/GHz 802 points/GHz TOTAL 6088 points/GHz 7123 points/GHz Monothread performance graph Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

Multithread performance graph Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time. If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4