GeForce GTX 1650 Vs GeForce GTX 980 - HWBench
Có thể bạn quan tâm
share this!
HWBench.com- Compare GPUs
- GPU Benchmarks
- CPU Benchmarks

- Home
- VGA Benchmarks
- GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 980
| GeForce GTX 1650Memory: 4096Mb GDDR5DESKTOPRelease date: 30 Apr 2019 | |
![]() | |
| GeForce GTX 980Memory: 4096Mb GDDR5DESKTOPRelease date: 19 Sep 2014 | |
![]() | |
Summary
Gaming performance index
- GeForce GTX 1650100%
- GeForce GTX 980130%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1650 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
| Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 980 |
| 30% higher gaming performance. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |

HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 980
The GeForce GTX 980 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (12 combinations of games and resolutions).Specifications
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 980 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU Name | TU107 () | vs | GM204 (GM204-400-A1) |
| Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 398 mm² |
| Transistors | unknown | vs | 5,200 million |
| Shaders | 896 | vs | 2048 |
| Compute Units | 14 | vs | 16 |
| Core clock | 1485 MHz | vs | 1127 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | vs | 64 |
| TMUs | 56 | vs | 128 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 980 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 256 bit |
| Memory Speed | 2000 MHz 8000 MHz effective | vs | 1753 MHz 7012 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 4096 Mb | vs | 4096 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 980 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| TDP | 0 watts | vs | 165 watts |
| Release Date | 30 Apr 2019 | vs | 19 Sep 2014 |
Raw Performance comparison
Pixel Rate
- GeForce GTX 165053.28 GP/s
- GeForce GTX 98072.10 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Texel Rate
- GeForce GTX 165093.24 GT/s
- GeForce GTX 980144.30 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Memory bandwidth
- GeForce GTX 1650128.00 GB/s
- GeForce GTX 980224.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Single precision performance
- GeForce GTX 16502984.00 GFLOPs
- GeForce GTX 9804616.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
Game benchmarks
1920x1080 (Full HD)2560x1440 (WQHD)Destiny 2
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
- GeForce GTX 165062
- GeForce GTX 98080
FPS (higher is better)
Far Cry New Dawn
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10x64
- GeForce GTX 165055
- GeForce GTX 98072
FPS (higher is better)
Grand Theft Auto V
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
- GeForce GTX 165077
- GeForce GTX 98088
FPS (higher is better)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
- GeForce GTX 165042
- GeForce GTX 98052
FPS (higher is better)
Strange Brigade
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64
- GeForce GTX 165054
- GeForce GTX 98076
FPS (higher is better)
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
- GeForce GTX 165051
- GeForce GTX 98060
FPS (higher is better)
Destiny 2
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
- GeForce GTX 165042
- GeForce GTX 98059
FPS (higher is better)
Far Cry New Dawn
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10x64
- GeForce GTX 165038
- GeForce GTX 98053
FPS (higher is better)
Grand Theft Auto V
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
- GeForce GTX 165049
- GeForce GTX 98061
FPS (higher is better)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
- GeForce GTX 165027
- GeForce GTX 98034
FPS (higher is better)
Strange Brigade
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64
- GeForce GTX 165039
- GeForce GTX 98054
FPS (higher is better)
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
- GeForce GTX 165035
- GeForce GTX 98048
FPS (higher is better)
Similar comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570 |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
| GeForce GTX 980 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
| GeForce GTX 980 | Radeon RX 580 |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
| Radeon RX 5500 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
| GeForce GTX 1660 | Radeon R9 Nano |
Compare VGAs
vsCompare CPUs
vsTop Comparisons
| Radeon RX 6900 XT | VS | GeForce RTX 3090 |
| Radeon RX 6800 XT | VS | GeForce RTX 3080 |
| Radeon RX 6800 | VS | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
| Radeon RX 6800 | VS | GeForce RTX 3070 |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | VS | GeForce GTX 1060 |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | VS | GeForce GTX 960 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | VS | Intel Core i7-10700K |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | VS | Intel Core i9-10900K |
Từ khóa » Gtx 1650 Vs 980
-
Nvidia GTX 1650 Vs 980 - UserBenchmark
-
GeForce GTX 980 Vs 1650 [in 10 Benchmarks] - Technical City
-
GTX 1650 Vs GTX 980 Điểm Chuẩn Hiệu Suất Trò Chơi (i7-8700K Vs ...
-
GTX 980 Vs. GTX 1650 Super | Stock And Overclock Benchmarks
-
GTX 980 Vs. GTX 1650 Super | How Much Performance ... - YouTube
-
GTX 980 Vs. GTX 1650 | New Games Benchmarks - YouTube
-
GeForce GTX 1650 Vs GeForce GTX 980 GPU Comparison
-
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Vs GeForce GTX 980
-
Asus Dual GeForce GTX 1650 Vs Gigabyte GeForce GTX 980
-
GeForce GTX 980 Ti Vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER - How Many FPS
-
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) - NotebookCheck
-
GeForce GTX 1650 Vs GeForce GTX 980 - Hardware Compare
-
GeForce GTX 1650 Compare GeForce GTX 980 Ti Asus 6GB Edition ...
-
Would A GTX 980 Be A Worthy Update From A GTX 1650? Is It Worth It ...









