GTX 770 Vs R9 290 - Tom's Hardware Forum

Search

Everywhere Threads This forum This thread Search titles only Note By: Search Advanced search… Everywhere Threads This forum This thread Search titles only By: Search Advanced… Log in Register What's new

Search

Everywhere Threads This forum This thread Search titles only Note By: Search Advanced search… Everywhere Threads This forum This thread Search titles only By: Search Advanced… Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar Menu Install the app Install How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

• Home
• Featured
• Forums New posts Search forums
• What's new Featured content New posts Latest activity

• Best of CES 2026: Innovating amidst the RAM and storage apocalypse!

GTX 770 vs R9 290

• Thread starter Thread starter junilerick
• Start date Start date Aug 24, 2014

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar

• Home
• Forums
• Hardware
• Graphics Cards

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

Nvidia GTX 770 or AMD R9 290?

• Nvidia GTX 770

  Votes: 5 29.4%

• AMD R9 290

  Votes: 10 58.8%

• Get some sushi

  Votes: 2 11.8%

• Total voters 17

• 1
• 2

Next 1 of 2

Go to page

Go Next Last J

junilerick

Reputable

Aug 18, 2014 7 0 4,510 Hey guys, I'm in the process of building my first entertainment/light gaming PC. While I would mostly be using it for general multitasking (web surfing with 20 tabs open, listening to music, watching TV shows), I would also like to be have the option to play the latest games reasonably well and last me a good 3 to 5 years with minimal upgrades. This is my build so far: **CPU** | [Intel Core i5-4690K 3.5GHz Quad-Core Processor](http://pcpartpicker.com/part/intel-cpu-bx80646i54690k) | $199.99 @ Micro Center **Motherboard** | [ASRock Z97 EXTREME4 ATX LGA1150 Motherboard](http://pcpartpicker.com/part/asrock-motherboard-z97extreme4) | $85.00 **Memory** | [G.Skill Ripjaws X Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3-1600 Memory](http://pcpartpicker.com/part/gskill-memory-f312800cl9d8gbxl) | $79.98 @ OutletPC **Storage** | [Samsung 840 EVO 120GB 2.5" Solid State Drive](http://pcpartpicker.com/part/samsung-internal-hard-drive-mz7te120bw) | $86.86 @ Amazon **Storage** | [Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive](http://pcpartpicker.com/part/western-digital-internal-hard-drive-wd10ezex) | $56.99 @ Micro Center **Video Card** | [MSI Radeon R9 270 2GB TWIN FROZR Video Card](http://pcpartpicker.com/part/msi-video-card-r9270gaming2g) | $129.00 **Case** | [Phanteks Enthoo Pro ATX Full Tower Case](http://pcpartpicker.com/part/phanteks-case-phes614pbk) | $99.99 @ Newegg **Power Supply** | [EVGA 600B 600W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply](http://pcpartpicker.com/part/evga-power-supply-100b10600kr) | $59.99 @ Amazon What I'm considering now is buying a slightly more high-end graphics card. I've narrowed down my choices to AMD's R9 290 or Nvidia's GTX 770. These cards are quite a bit more expensive so I'm hoping to check for deals periodically and get a better bargain. Anyhow, my main dilemma is while the R9 290 seems to perform better while at a cheaper price point, judging from the reviews on Newegg and Amazon (the 770 has all 5 stars, the R9 290 has all 4 stars), the 770, and Nvidia graphics cards in general, seem to much more reliable, quiet, cool, and have better support (especially EVGA). My questions are: 1) Should I just stick with the R9 270 and save the rest for a couple rounds of sushi? 2) Is the lower price and higher performance really worth it? Anybody with personal experience dealing with these two graphics cards or just AMD vs Nvidia in general? 3) If when I adjust Window's appearance settings to 1920 x 1080 and it says "OUT OF RANGE" does it mean that resolution is not supported by my current monitor or graphics card? 4) Do any of the components have better price/performance options?

morgilroka

Honorable

Jul 16, 2012 975 0 11,360 http://gpuboss.com/gpus/Radeon-R9-290-vs-GeForce-GTX-770 ... GTX 770 is the winner here... Although they are very similar in performance. At this point it's about brand preference and pricing. I personally am switching back to Nvidia when it's time for an upgrade because i found their support more helpful and there is more options eg. PhysX etc. "Out of range" is most likely referring to your monitor limiting lower, 1440x900? Check your Monitor specs and that will answer the question for you. Edit: If you have a few extra dollars to throw around, i would recommend swapping out that PSU for this: http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817151095 Overall better unit, comes with a 7 year warranty compared to EVGA's 3. Also very quite operation. P

Proofy

Admirable

Aug 19, 2014 1,661 0 6,460 gpuboss is very bias and leans tower nvidia... R9 290 destroys GTX770 in everything but PhysX.. If you will be using two monitors or playing on resolution that is higher than 1920x1080 definitelly go for R9 290 (recommend SAPPHIRE VAPOR-X R9 290 4GB GDDR5 TRI-X OC) Agree with PSU change, seasonic is the best E

enamak

Honorable

Jan 24, 2014 392 0 10,860 Its true, r9 290 beats GTX 770 by 10-20%, tho 770 its better in some games. IMO you should get gtx 770 2gb, or 4gb if you are going to have multimonitor or planing to sli later. Nvidia has better cards overall and much better drivers. If you are going with any resolution higher than 1080P then yes, get the r9 290. I already had AMD and NVIDIA, had to Rma 2 amd cards (but it was asus problem, and it was r9 280x, so dont worry about that r9 290). Still, i feel i have a much more stable card with nvidia But if you compare r9 290x to gtx 770, then r9 290x hands down.

morgilroka

Honorable

Jul 16, 2012 975 0 11,360 PhysX is worth the 770 alone, in my opinion. J

junilerick

Reputable

Aug 18, 2014 7 0 4,510 I've been researching monitors and I didn't realize how much it affects what graphics card you get - I'll probably be getting something between 22" to 24" at 1920 x 1080. And while I would like the R9 290 performance, I really don't want want to have put up with its infamous noise and heat - anyone have personal experience with this? How much would it cost in additional cooling to bring it down to acceptable levels? And how long did it take to fix all the driver issues and such? E

enamak

Honorable

Jan 24, 2014 392 0 10,860 Physx its not that good. Get the GTX 770 2GB if you get that 1080P monitor, you wont regret it

T3PShooter

Reputable

Jun 28, 2014 232 0 4,860 If you're comparing these cards on just raw performance and horsepower alone the GTX 770 will never beat a Gigabyte R9 290 WF http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00HS84DFU. No way, no how... If you're only gaming on a single 1080p monitor at 60Hz then an EVGA GTX 770 SC w/ ACX http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00CZIQXBA will be plenty. If anyone tells you that the GTX 770 is a faster or more powerful card than the R9 290 they don't have a clue what they're talking about. Someone mentioned GPUBoss not being a reliable source and they are absolutely correct. It's a lazy website that just compares numbers on the back of the box and not actual benchmarks.

Samsamproducts

Honorable

Jan 8, 2014 252 0 10,960 I agree, the r9 290 is significantly better in all games. As for heat and noise, those are only problems with the reference coolers. If you get one with an aftermarket cooler you will be set! E

enamak

Honorable

Jan 24, 2014 392 0 10,860 Gtx 770 is a better card overall for 1080p with stable drivers, and it beats r9 290 in SOME games. So for 1080p i would go gtx 770 2gb, stable, solid, quiet and cool card P

Proofy

Admirable

Aug 19, 2014 1,661 0 6,460 Like I said, if you won't be using resolution higher than 1920x1080 get gtx770 because it will perform like r9 290 (in battlefield 4 it has 10-20fps less but I think that you can live with that 😀) Also GTX770 will probably "live longer" than R9 290 because it has better cooling and quality. Yes, monitor affect graphic card, after all they display the image on the monitor don't they ? E

enamak

Honorable

Jan 24, 2014 392 0 10,860 What this guy said above. 1080p = single gtx 770 1440p+ = r9 290, tho at 4k a single 290 wont do much

T3PShooter

Reputable

Jun 28, 2014 232 0 4,860 enamak : What this guy said above. 1080p = single gtx 770 1440p+ = r9 290, tho at 4k a single 290 wont do much I will only agree with this if you add 1080p at 60Hz. If you want to game at over 60Hz the 770 isn't the right choice. I game at 1080p at 144Hz with a GTX 780Ti and this is the only way to get consistent 100+ frames per second. E

enamak

Honorable

Jan 24, 2014 392 0 10,860 Even a r9 290 couldnt mantain 120 or 144 fps in most games at 1080p. And you can get asus monitor with g-sync, wich is better if you cant have 120fds at 120hz or 144fps at 144hz

dearupol

Honorable

Jun 30, 2012 42 0 10,540 r9 290 is far far better than 770 ..................compare the gtx 770 with r9 280x vaporx edition .....there is no chance in hell 770 is better than r9 290.... E

enamak

Honorable

Jan 24, 2014 392 0 10,860 R9 290 is not far better than gtx 770, its only 15-20% better and im some cases 770 wins. Gtx 770 outperforms any 280x anytime, its a much better card overall with better drivers

T3PShooter

Reputable

Jun 28, 2014 232 0 4,860 I'm sensing a lot of nVidia fanboyism in here. I'm team whichever fits the situation. I currently own a 780Ti so you know I am unbiased when I say that the R9 290 will ALWAYS beat the 770. Anyone who says otherwise has no factual basis to make their argument on. There is nothing about the GTX 770 that will allow it to perform better than the R9 290. Driver support from AMD is not bad. The only things nVidia offers over AMD that are worth noting are Shadowplay and G-sync and Shadowplay is nearly irrelevant now with Raptr's new GVR and unless you have a G-sync capable monitor it is also irrelevant. J

junilerick

Reputable

Aug 18, 2014 7 0 4,510 I think some of you are missing the point here. It's not ALL about performance, while that is of course very important. Noise, heat, driver support, and longevity (not just performance wise, but also that the card can actually function after months of intense heat and high clock rates) also needs to factored in. I've also studied these comparison graphs extensively, but like I said, it doesn't paint the whole picture. Sure the 290X is capable of incredible performance for 5 minutes, but how long can it keep that up before having to be replaced? Price wise, The power consumption means I'll probably have to get a far more robust PSU, the noise heat means I'll probably have to invest in aftermarket cooling, the relatively poorer driver support means I'll probably have to waste additional time fiddling with it, which is going to be especially painful for someone like me. All this means more time and money which needs to be considered. On that note, has anyone been using a 290 or 290X for a decent amount of time now without significant additional expenses and can recommend it based on the criteria above?

dearupol

Honorable

Jun 30, 2012 42 0 10,540 this isnt true the reference version have this problem not the non ref version......

maxalge

Champion

May 31, 2012 13,371 4 56,960 junilerick : I think some of you are missing the point here. It's not ALL about performance, while that is of course very important. Noise, heat, driver support, and longevity (not just performance wise, but also that the card can actually function after months of intense heat and high clock rates) also needs to factored in. I've also studied these comparison graphs extensively, but like I said, it doesn't paint the whole picture. Sure the 290X is capable of incredible performance for 5 minutes, but how long can it keep that up before having to be replaced? Price wise, The power consumption means I'll probably have to get a far more robust PSU, the noise heat means I'll probably have to invest in aftermarket cooling, the relatively poorer driver support means I'll probably have to waste additional time fiddling with it, which is going to be especially painful for someone like me. All this means more time and money which needs to be considered. On that note, has anyone been using a 290 or 290X for a decent amount of time now without significant additional expenses and can recommend it based on the criteria above? You must have totally missed the fact that r9 290's with aftermarket coolers are made for whatever reason. The 290 plays with the 780. The 770 in no way should come up in relation, performance wise. J

junilerick

Reputable

Aug 18, 2014 7 0 4,510 maxalge : junilerick : I think some of you are missing the point here. It's not ALL about performance, while that is of course very important. Noise, heat, driver support, and longevity (not just performance wise, but also that the card can actually function after months of intense heat and high clock rates) also needs to factored in. I've also studied these comparison graphs extensively, but like I said, it doesn't paint the whole picture. Sure the 290X is capable of incredible performance for 5 minutes, but how long can it keep that up before having to be replaced? Price wise, The power consumption means I'll probably have to get a far more robust PSU, the noise heat means I'll probably have to invest in aftermarket cooling, the relatively poorer driver support means I'll probably have to waste additional time fiddling with it, which is going to be especially painful for someone like me. All this means more time and money which needs to be considered. On that note, has anyone been using a 290 or 290X for a decent amount of time now without significant additional expenses and can recommend it based on the criteria above? You must have totally missed the fact that r9 290's with aftermarket coolers are made for whatever reason. The 290 plays with the 780. The 770 in no way should come up in relation, performance wise. Yea the non reference cards are indeed a little cooler and quieter, but what about support and longevity? Going through the Newegg reviews, it seems there is one constant theme - "OMG dis card is da shiet11!!!! But.. My first card died immediately and I had to pay the shipping cost out of pocket and wait a week to get it a new one. Then there was artifacting, BSOD, system lockups, and black screens so I had to tinker with the BIOS and drivers for hours to finally get it to work. Then.. I had to RMA again a couple months later." or something similar. That's why I think the 770, which has fantastic reviews (especially EVGA), IS comparable to the 290 if you consider other factors than just a 5 min benchmarking session. Anyone here with the R9 290 that could shed some light either way? E

enamak

Honorable

Jan 24, 2014 392 0 10,860 Junilerick thats exactly what i think And im not nVidia fanboy but we all know that nVidia makes the best solid and stable gpus, and my only two amds had problems, haha, and ive had 4 nVidia without problems. I chose gtx 770 over r9 290 without blinking. But if you are going to use multiple cards amd its better cause of the prices, tho you still can have more problems than wheb you sli.

T3PShooter

Reputable

Jun 28, 2014 232 0 4,860 I've used both brands and still say R9 290 but it's up to the OP and what you're comfortable buying. Close your eyes, clear your mind, and whichever card comes to mind first just buy it.

CooLWoLF

Distinguished

May 15, 2009 1,059 1 19,615 R9 290, no question. Anyone suggesting a 770 over a 290 is likely just displaying fanboyism.... And when you consider the Mantle API enabled games, the performance margin becomes even bigger. Y

Yous

Reputable

Aug 17, 2014 284 0 4,860 Are you kidding me? 770 compared to an R9 290? No, just no. Yes, Nvidia drivers are more stable, but still, no. You don't compare a GTX 770 to an R9 290 and if you tell someone it's better, you're really just lying to them. That's wrong. Yes, AMD does face issues with heat and such, but if you get a non-reference card such as the Sapphire Tri-X, I doubt you'll be facing heat issues at any time. I know for a fact I have the Sapphire Tri-X R9 290 and it hasn't exceeded 65 degrees under full load while playing BF4 on Ultra settings in a 64 player map. Considering I live in Egypt, and the temperature here is pretty hot, that's very good. Bottom line: There's no comparison between the R9 290 and the GTX 770. Maybe the GTX 780 is better for comparison.

• 1
• 2

Next 1 of 2

Go to page

Go Next Last You must log in or register to reply here. Share: Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link

TRENDING THREADS

• NewsIntel showed up for consumers at the 'Consumer Electronics Show;' AMD didn’t
  • Started by Admin
  • Yesterday at 11:55 AM
  • Replies: 56
  News Comments
• Tom's Hardware Member System Gallery
  • Started by tecmo34
  • Apr 30, 2011
  • Replies: 5K
  Systems
• NewsElon Musk wants to build a dirty fab that you can smoke and eat cheeseburgers in — bets that Tesla will turn the concept of cleanrooms upside down
  • Started by Admin
  • Wednesday at 11:10 AM
  • Replies: 89
  News Comments
• DiscussionWhat's your favourite video game you've been playing?
  • Started by amdfangirl
  • Aug 3, 2014
  • Replies: 4K
  PC Gaming
• NewsPresident Trump, Sec. Lutnick praise Intel after the launch of Panther Lake chips — says investment in company already bringing ‘tens of billions o...
  • Started by Admin
  • Yesterday at 8:00 AM
  • Replies: 29
  News Comments
• NewsAMD claims Panther Lake has 'too much baggage' for handheld PC use — fights back after Intel jabs AMD for using 'ancient silicon' in its Z2 series...
  • Started by Admin
  • Thursday at 1:05 PM
  • Replies: 28
  News Comments
• QuestionLaptop suddenly running extremely slow and is virtually unusable - CPU usage suddeny at a constant 100%. Please help me?
  • Started by zcaul
  • Yesterday at 9:20 PM
  • Replies: 2
  Laptop Tech Support

Latest posts

• QuestionMotherboard red VGA light and no display
  • Latest: Lutfij
  • 8 minutes ago
  Motherboards
• QuestionLow FPS In DayZ With New GPU
  • Latest: thestryker
  • 17 minutes ago
  PC Gaming
• K QuestionIs my CPU throttling me? Or is it motherboard VRM?
  • Latest: Kyloz
  • 33 minutes ago
  CPUs
• QuestionHeadset audio crackling ?
  • Latest: beyondlogic
  • 36 minutes ago
  Systems
• QuestionSystem crash, monitors turn off, PC does not react to anything and have to power cycle
  • Latest: Lutfij
  • Yesterday at 10:55 PM
  Systems
• QuestionLaptop suddenly running extremely slow and is virtually unusable - CPU usage suddeny at a constant 100%. Please help me?
  • Latest: zcaul
  • Yesterday at 10:52 PM
  Laptop Tech Support
• Question2018 PC suddenly won't turn on?
  • Latest: Lutfij
  • Yesterday at 10:41 PM
  Power Supplies

Moderators online

• 
• 
• 
• 

Share this page

Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link COMPANY Space.com is part of Future plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site. © Future Publishing Limited Quay House, The Ambury, Bath BA1 1UA. All rights reserved. England and Wales company registration number 2008885. RESOURCES

• Advertising
• Cookies Policies
• Privacy
• Term & Conditions
• Topics

FOLLOW Facebook Twitter Instagram Top Bottom